Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a classification of visual impairment

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the rehabilitation of people with impaired vision, it is essential to have adequate (preferably quantitative) information about their residual visual functions. Special attention is given to the extra information provided by the results of measurement of the contrast sensitivity, especially in combination with the results of other measurements, such as the visual field, the amount of intraocular straylight and the visual acuity. The value of the contrast sensitivity function as a predictor of the extent of dysfunctioning in the visual activities of everyday life, such as outdoor vision, reading and recognition of faces, will be discussed. As far as this is concerned, a comparison is made between the value of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity as measures of the extent of vision and visual dysfunctioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keemink CJ, van der Wildt GJ, van Deursen JBP. Microprocessor-controlled contrast sensitivity measurements. Med Biol. Eng Comp. 1979; 17: 371–78.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van den Berg TJTP, IJspeert JK. The straylight meter, In: Technical digest on non assessment of the visual system, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: O.S.A., 1991: 256–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Wildt GJ. The impact of the residual visual functions of the user on the requirements for the Low-Vision aids. Proceedings of the workshop ‘The Intelligent House for the Blind’ of the Concerted Action on Technology and Blindness. Maastricht, The Netherlands, 1990: 75–80.

  4. Hagemans KH, van der Wildt GJ. The influence of the stimulus width on the contrast sensitivity function in amblyopia. Invest Ophtalmology Vis Sci, 1979; 18: 842–48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rijsdijk JP, Kroon JN, GJ van der Wildt. Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina. Vision Res. 1980; 20: 235–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. van der Wildt GJ, Waarts RG. The influence of the surround on the contrast sensitivity. In: 2nd International Visual Psychophysics and Nedical Imaging Conference, 2–3 July 1981, Brussels, Belgium. Published by IEEE catalog. No. 81 CH 1776-6, 1982: 59–73.

  7. Bulens C, Meerwaldt JD, van der Wildt GJ, Keemink CJ. Contrast sensitivity in clinical neurology. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1988; 90: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flipse JP, van der Wildt GJ, Maas AJJ, Keemink CJ, Rodenburg M. Visual contrast perception during opassive head oscillation. In: Schmid R, Zambarbieri D eds. Proceedings of Fifth European Conference on eye movements, 1989: 36–38.

  9. Bulens C, Meerwaldt JD, Koudstaal PJ, van der Wildt GJ, Spatial contrast sensitivity in Benign Intracranial Hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51: 1323–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bulens C, Meerwaldt JD, van der Wildt GJ, Keemink, CJ. Contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's Disease. Neurology (NY) 1986; 36: 1121–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Volkers ACW, Hagemans KH, van der Wildt GJ, Schmitz PIM., Spatial contrast sensitivity and the diagnosis of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Wildt, G.J., Kooijman, A.C., Dumbar, G. et al. Towards a classification of visual impairment. Doc Ophthalmol 82, 33–41 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156991

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156991

Key words

Navigation