Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient and quantitative aquatic benthos sampler for use in diverse habitats with variable flow regimes

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A suction sampler designed to minimize sampling error, and quantitatively collect benthic macroinvertebrates from coarse substrata under various flow regimes is described. This sampler uses a 12 V bilge pump (capacity 4400 1 h−1) to suck animals into a collecting net from substrata disturbed by a single operator. Macroinvertebrates were collected more rapidly by this sampler than by a Surber sampler or a Boulton suction sampler. Sources of sampling error are discussed for all three samplers. The electric pump sampler described here is suitable for sampling habitats where depth and velocity vary spatially and with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulton, A. J., 1985. A sampling device that quantitatively collects benthos in flowing or standing waters. Hydrobiologia 127: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. V., M. D. Schram & P. P. Brussock, 1989. A vacuum benthos sampler suitable for diverse habitats. Hydrobiologia 153: 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chutter, F. M., 1972. A reappraisal of Needham and Unsinger's data on the variability of a stream fauna when sampled with a Surber sampler. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C. M. & J. M. Elliott, 1982. A comparative study of three air-lift samplers used for sampling benthic macroinvertebrates in rivers. Freshwat. Biol. 12: 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M. & C. M. Drake, 1981a. A comparative study of seven grabs used for sampling benthic macro-invertebrates in rivers. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M. & C. M. Drake, 1981b. A comparative study of four dredges used for sampling benthic macro-invertebrates in rivers. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M. & P. A. Tullett, 1978. A bibliography of samplers for benthic invertebrates. Occ. Publ. Freshwat. biol. Ass. No. 4, 61 pp.

  • Elliott, J. M. & P. A. Tullett, 1983. A supplement to a bibliography of samplers for benthic invertebrates. Occ. Publ. Freshwat. biol. Ass. No. 20, 27 pp.

  • Growns, I. O., 1990. Efficiency estimates of a stream benthos suction sampler. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 41: 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugsley, C. W. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1983. A modified freezecore technique to quantify the depth distribution of fauna in stony streambeds. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 40: 637–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh, 1982. The use of artificial substrates in the study of freshwater benthic invertebrates. In J. Cairns Jr. (ed.), Artificial Substrates. Ann Arbour, Michigan: 175–235.

  • Southwood, T. R. E., 1978. Ecological Methods. Wiley, New York, 524 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surber, E. W., 1937. Rainbow trout and bottom fauna production in one mile of stream. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 66: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & L. S. Fidell, 1989. Using Multivariate Statistics, 2nd Ed. Harper & Row, N.Y., 746 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D., 1981. Evaluation of a standpipe corer for sampling aquatic interstitial biotopes. Hydrobiologia 83: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, S. An efficient and quantitative aquatic benthos sampler for use in diverse habitats with variable flow regimes. Hydrobiologia 281, 123–128 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006441

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006441

Key words

Navigation