Abstract
During floods, the flows in the main channel and the floodplain have very different features. Thus, one can optimize the calculation time by using 1-D model for the main channel and 2-D model for the floodplain in which the flow is more complex. One solution to couple a 1-D model and a 2-D model is proposed. The two models are based on explicit finite volume schemes solving shallow water equations. Thus, the exchange terms are fluxes calculated on the edges that limit the 2-D model on the side of the 1-D model. For the 1-D model, these fluxes are lateral inputs, upstream, or downstream boundary conditions depending on the side of the coupling. This coupled model is tested on experiments in compound channels for a uniform flow and for a rapidly varied flow produced by an obstacle set on the floodplain. Numerical results are coherent with measurements. On uniform flow, energy losses due to the turbulence are missing, which provides too low water depths. On rapidly varied flow, the transfer velocity between main channel and floodplain is reduced if during the calculation of the exchange terms, the values of the 2-D variables on both sides of the boundary are not defined properly; moreover, the recirculation length is underestimated if the turbulent viscosity coefficient is not high enough.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., & Zhu, D. (2012). 1D–2D coupled numerical model for shallow-water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(2), 122–132.
Fernandez-Nieto, E. D., Marin, J., & Monnier, J. (2010). Coupling superposed 1D and 2D shallow-water model: Source terms in finite volume schemes. Computers and Fluids, 39, 1070–1082.
Paquier, A. (2012). Rubar 3—RubarBE: Notice d’emploi. Lyon: Irstea.
Nicollet, G., & Uan, M. (1979). Ecoulements permanents à surface libre en lits composés. La Houille Blanche, 1, 21–30.
Van Leer, B. (1979). Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32, 101–136.
Vila, J. P. (1984). Modélisation mathématique et simulation numérique d’écoulements à surface libre. La Houille Blanche, 6(7), 485–489.
Roe, P. L. (1981). Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 43, 357–372.
Paquier, A. (2012). Logiciel Rubar 20: Notice d’emploi. Lyon: Irstea.
Pathirana, A., Tsegaye, S., Gersonius, B., & Vairavamoorthy, K. (2011). A simple 2-D inundation model for incorporating flood damage in urban drainage planning. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 2747–2761.
Peltier, Y. (2011). Modélisation physique des écoulements débordants en présence d’épi placé dans la plaine d’inondation. PhD thesis, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Linde, F. (2011). Représentativité de la modélisation 2D pour les écoulements en lit composé. Master thesis. ENTPE, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paquier, A., Bazin, PH. (2014). Coupling 1-D and 2-D Models for Simulating Floods: Definition of the Exchange Terms. In: Gourbesville, P., Cunge, J., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics. Springer Hydrogeology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-42-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-42-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-41-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-42-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)