Skip to main content

Using Rural Education Research to Rethink Literacies Pedagogies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ruraling Education Research
  • 509 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers how rural education research might inform literacies pedagogies. It begins by describing how researchers have mapped pedagogical approaches for teaching literacies and how there are consequences for using particular pedagogies in narrow ways. It also considers how, in the current competitive context of standardised testing, some education systems have required schools to declare publicly their pedagogical framework. Such moves seem to have resulted in a proliferation of narrow pedagogical approaches that are unlikely to be effective for all students. The chapter argues that rural education research—with its detailed and nuanced understandings about rural place and space—offers evidence to help open up particular pedagogical approaches to scrutiny and to demonstrate the importance of knowledge about place in selecting pedagogies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2019). NAP: National Assessment Program [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/.

  • Baca, D. (2012). Rural literacies, postindustrial countrysides: Resolana, Entre Seco y Verde, and the shadow of the atomic age. In K. Donehower, C. Hogg, & E. E. Schell (Eds.), Reclaiming the rural: Essays on literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy (pp. 75–89). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomaeus, P. (2019). Literacy learning for students in rural communities. In R. Henderson (Ed.), Teaching literacies: Pedagogies and diversity (2nd ed., pp. 332–361). Docklands, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, L. (1983). Lessons from a child: On the teaching and learning of writing. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambourne, B. (1992). A naturalistic approach: The contexts of literacy. In A. Watson & A. Badenhop (Eds.), Prevention of reading failure (pp. 61–71). Sydney, NSW: Ashton Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (1990). The changing face of literacy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world (pp. 1–25). Hawthorn, VIC: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2012). A tale of two teachers: Learning to teach over time. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(3), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2012.707501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (2006). Pedagogy as work: Educating the next generation of literacy teachers. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_9.

  • Comber, B., & Cormack, P. (1995). Analysing early literacy teaching practices. In B. Comber & P. Cormack (Eds.), Cornerstones module 4: Frameworks for critical analysis of teaching (pp. 20–38). Adelaide, SA: Department of Education and Children’s Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621042000257225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (Eds.). (2005). Turn-around pedagogies: Literacy interventions for at-risk students. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, H., & Nixon, H. (2009). Teachers’ work and pedagogy in an era of accountability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300903037069.

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (Kindle ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, M., Fraser, S., Reaburn, R., Smith, H., Roberts, J., & Fielding-Wells, J. (2017). Building a new generation: Community expectations on raising aspirations in rural Tasmania. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(3), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, P., & Comber, B. (2013). High-stakes literacy tests and local effects in a rural school. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36(2), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donehower, K., Hogg, C., & Schell, E. E. (2012a). Introduction: Reclaiming the rural. In K. Donehower, C. Hogg, & E. E. Schell (Eds.), Reclaiming the rural: Essays on literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy (pp. 1–13). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donehower, K., Hogg, C., & Schell, E. E. (2012b). Preface. In K. Donehower, C. Hogg, & E. E. Schell (Eds.), Reclaiming the rural: Essays on literacy, rhetoric, and pedagogy (pp. xi–xvi). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Marling, C. (2007). Return of the deficit. Journal of Educational Controversy, 2(1). Retrieved from https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=jec.

  • Education Queensland. (2000). A guide to Productive Pedagogies. Brisbane, QLD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, N. (2007). What do effective teachers of literacy do? Subject knowledge and pedagogical choices for literacy. Literacy, 41(3), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., & Gilbert, P. (1999). Research into language and literacy. In J. Keeves & K. Marjoribanks (Eds.), Australian education: Review of research 1965–1998 (pp. 145–169). Melbourne, VIC: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., Ludwig, C., & Gunn, S. (1995). Everyday literacy practices in and out of schools in low socio-economic urban classrooms. Brisbane, QLD: Centre for Literacy Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. B., Lee, S. W., Tollefson, N., Pass, L., & Massengill, D. (2005). Balanced literacy in an urban district school. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(5), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1986). What’s whole in whole language? Richmond Hill, ON, Canada: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorur, R. (2016). The performative politics of NAPLAN and MySchool. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 30–43). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1981). Patterns of child control of the writing process. In R. D. Walshe (Ed.), Donald Graves in Australia: “Children want to write …” (pp. 17–28). Rozelle, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., & Corbett, M. (Eds.) (2013a). Rethinking rural literacies: Transnational perspectives. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., & Corbett, M. (Eds.) (2013b). Rural education and literacies: An introduction. In B. Green & M. Corbett (Eds.), Rethinking rural literacies: Transnational perspectives (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., & Reid, J.-A. (2014). Social cartography and rural education: Researching space(s) and place(s). In S. White & M. Corbett (Eds.), Doing educational research in rural settings: Methodological issues, international perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 26–40). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. (2009). Place, survivance and white remembrance: A decolonizing challenge to rural education in mobile modernity. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(10). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.609.1156&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2010). Making room for the local. In D. A. Gruenewald & G. A. Smith (Eds.), Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity (pp. xiii–xxiii). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther, J., Halsey, J., & Osborne, S. (2015). From paradise to beyond: Geographical constructs and how they shape education in the bush. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 25(3), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 1(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2008). A boy behaving badly: Investigating teachers’ assumptions about gender, behaviour, mobility and literacy learning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(1), 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2009). Itinerant farm workers’ children in Australia: Learning from the experiences of one family. In P. A. Danaher, M. Kenny, & J. Remy Leder (Eds.), Traveller, nomadic and migrant education (pp. 47–58). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2015). Two conversations at once: Making sense of classroom observations. English in Australia, 50(3), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2020). Knowing teaching through researching and reflecting on practice. In A. Woods & B. Exley (Eds.), Literacies in early childhood: Foundations for equity and quality (pp. 329–342). Docklands, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., & Woods, A. (2019). Re-focusing the lens beyond deficit: Making diversity and difference in schools visible. In R. Henderson (Ed.), Teaching literacies: Pedagogies and diversity (2nd ed., pp. 231–248). Docklands, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydon, R., Hibbert, K., & Iannacci, L. (2004). Strategies to support balanced literacy approaches in pre- and inservice teacher education. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(4), 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dally-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed., e-book). Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & The Learning by Design Project Group. (2005). Learning by design. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Schools Innovation Commission & Common Ground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfdahl, A., & Folke-Fichtelius, M. (2015). Preschool’s new suit: Care in terms of learning and knowledge. Early Years, 35(3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2014.995600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1991). Literacies as social practices. English Education, 23(3), 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). Making literacy policy and practice with a difference. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2014, May). On explicit and direct instruction. In ALEA Hot Topic. Adelaide, SA: Australian Literacy Educators’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997a). Critical literacy and the question of normativity: An introduction. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 1–18). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997b). Shaping the social practices of reading. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 185–225). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, B., Danaher, P. A., & Danaher, G. (2003). Situating and interrogating contemporary Australian rural education research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(3), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. M., & Walker, L. (1987). Three views of language and their influence on instruction in reading and writing. Educational Theory, 37(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Education and Training. (n.d.). Foundation paper: Age-appropriate pedagogies for the early years of schooling. Brisbane, QLD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government. (2016). Age appropriate pedagogies program: Progress report 2016. Brisbane, QLD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government. (2019). Every student succeeding: State schools strategy 2019–2023. Brisbane, QLD: Author. Retrieved from https://education.qld.gov.au/curriculums/Documents/state-schools-strategy.pdf.

  • Rasinski, T., & Padak, N. (2004). Beyond consensus—Beyond balance: Toward a comprehensive literacy curriculum. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J.-A. (2017). Rural education practice and policy in marginalised communities: Teaching and learning on the edge. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(1), 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J.-A., Green, B., Cooper, M., Hastings, W., Lock, G., & White, S. (2010). Regenerating rural social space: Teacher education for rural-regional sustainability. Australian Journal of Education, 54(3), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2014). Researching from the standpoint of the rural. In S. White & M. Corbett (Eds.), Doing educational research in rural settings: Methodological issues, international perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 135–147). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2017). A curriculum for whom? Rereading “Implementing the Australian Curriculum in rural, regional, remote and distance-education schools” from a rural standpoint. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P., & Green, B. (2013). Researching rural places: On social justice and rural education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 765–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. (1983). Essays into literacy. Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2005). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Miller, P. D. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2016). Local experiences, global similarities: Teacher perceptions of the impacts of national testing. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools: An Australian assessment (pp. 57–71). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2000). “Like schools”, educational “disadvantage” and “thisness”. Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Reid, J.-A. (2008). Placing teachers? Sustaining rural schooling through place-consciousness in teacher education. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23(7). Retrieved from http://www.ruralteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/placing-teachers.pdf.

  • Woods, A. (2019). Socially just literacy education: What could reform look like in schools? In R. Henderson (Ed.), Teaching literacies: Pedagogies and diversity (2nd ed., pp. 211–230). Docklands, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Henderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Henderson, R. (2021). Using Rural Education Research to Rethink Literacies Pedagogies. In: Roberts, P., Fuqua, M. (eds) Ruraling Education Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0131-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0131-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0130-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0131-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics