Skip to main content

Benefit Sharing in the Context of Default Risk Cooperation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
LISS2019

Abstract

Contract farming, as a representative model of current agricultural industrialization operation, has the greatest impact on compliance rate caused by market risk. Currently, the agricultural product industry is increasingly susceptible to market price risk, and the paper mainly studies the benefit sharing in the context of default risk cooperation. It analyzes the five modes of non-cooperation and cooperation. The conclusions of the study will help to design effective contracts in connection with the contract farming supply chain featured by “processing enterprises + farmers”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalamkar, S. S. (2012). Inputs and services delivery system under contract farming: A case of broiler farming. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25(2012), 515–521.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hardaker, J. B., Lien, G., Anderson, J. R., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2015). Coping with risk in agriculture: Applied decision analysis. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagaraj, N., Chandrakanth, M. G., Chengappa, P. G., Roopa, H. S., & Chandakavate, P. M. (2008). Contract farming and its implications for input-supply, linkages between markets and farmers in Karnataka. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ragasa, C., Lambrecht, I., & Kufoalor, D. S. (2018). Limitations of contract farming as a pro-poor strategy the case of maize outgrower schemes in Upper West Ghana. Rochester: Social Science Electronic Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodhue, R., & Simon, L. (2016). Agricultural contracts, adverse selection, and multiple inputs. Agricultural & Food Economics, 4(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raynolds, L. T. (2000). Negotiating contract farming in the Dominican Republic. Human Organization, 59(4), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shankar, B., Posri, W., & Srivong, T. (2010). A case study of a contract farming chain involving supermarkets and smallholders in Thailand. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 31(1–2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., Michelson, H. C., Narayanan, S., & Walker, T. F. (2012). Smallholder participation in contract farming: Comparative evidence from five countries. World Development, 40(4), 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Upton, J., & Lentz, E. (2017). Finding default? Understanding the drivers of default on contracts with farmers’ organizations under the World Food Programme Purchase for progress pilot. Agricultural Economics, 48(S1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burer, S., Jones, P. C., & Lowe, T. J. (2008). Coordinating the supply chain in the agricultural seed industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 354–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mertens, A., Meensel, J. V., Willem, L., Lauwers, L., & Buysse, J. (2018). Ensuring continuous feedstock supply in agricultural residue value chains: A complex interplay of five influencing factors. Biomass and Bioenergy, 109, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerchak, Y., & Wang, Y. (2010). Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production & Operations Management, 13(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayne, T., & Rashid, S. (2013). Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics, 44(6), 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarkar, S. (2014). Contract farming and McKinsey’s plan for transforming agriculture into agribusiness in West Bengal. Journal of South Asian Development, 9(3), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ding Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yang, H., Zhang, D., Wang, H. (2020). Benefit Sharing in the Context of Default Risk Cooperation. In: Zhang, J., Dresner, M., Zhang, R., Hua, G., Shang, X. (eds) LISS2019. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5682-1_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics