Abstract
Based on the influence of members’ roles and their relationship strengths on the adaptability of an innovation ecosystem, this paper extends the basic NK model by introducing weight parameter and relationship strength parameter. According to the extended model, three evolutionary characteristics are obtained. Firstly, for an innovation ecosystem, compared with the traditional view of “strengthening the weakness”, “strengthening the strengths” will achieve a higher efficiency for its adaptability enhancement. Secondly, a suitable relationship strength but not a highest one will help to enhance its adaptability. Finally, a global vision will help to achieve the optimal evolution path. Moreover, on the basis of the evolutionary characteristics, we put forward three strategies to improve the system adaptability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Gawer, M.A. Cusumano, Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31(3), 417–433 (2014)
A. Ginsberg, M. Horwitch, S. Mahapatra et al., Ecosystem strategies for complex technological innovation: the case of smart grid development, in Technology Management for Global Economic Growth (IEEE, 2010), pp. 1–8
O. Dedehayir, S.J. Mäkinen, J.R. Ortt, Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: a literature review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2016)
E. Autio, L.D.W. Thomas, Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (2014), pp. 204–228
A. Gawer, Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7), 1239–1249 (2014)
Y. Chen, F.J. Xie, Bionics study on innovation ecosystems’ evolution path of photovoltaic industry based on Lotka-Voterra model. Res. Develop. Manage. 24(3), 74–84 (2012) (In Chinese)
K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, M.G. Russell et al., Insights for orchestrating innovation ecosystems: the case of EIT ICT Labs and data-driven network visualizations. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 66(2/3), 243 (2014)
R.J. Rabelo, P.A. Bernus, Holistic model of building innovation ecosystems, in Ifac Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (2015), pp. 2250–2257
B. Sun, X.F. Xu, H.T. Yao, Research on the evolution of innovation ecosystems based on the MLP framework. Stud. Sci. Sci. 34(8), 1244–1254 (2016). (In Chinese)
Y. Yao, H. Zhou, The dynamic equilibrium and simulation of mobile internet platform innovation ecosystem: a symbiotic evolution model. Kybernetes 45(9), 1406–1420 (2016)
D. Xu, Research on the innovation complexity of business model (Economic Management Press, 2005) (In Chinese)
S.A. Kauffman, The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution (New York & Oxford University Press, 1993)
J. Luo, Network structure and evolvability of innovation ecosystems. Acad. Manage. Ann. Meet. Proc. 2014(1), 11518–11518 (2014)
K. Mohannak, J. Matthews, O. Dedehayir et al., The birth and development of innovation ecosystems: a literature review. Radiat. Meas. 44(5), 571–575 (2009)
B.H. Hou, H. Liu, Analysis on NK model of enterprise network adaptability. China Industr. Econ. 4, 94–104 (2009). (In Chinese)
J. Holland, Emergence: from chaos to order (Century Publishing Group, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2006) (In Chinese)
R. Adner, Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4), 98–107; 148 (2006)
S. Wright, The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics (1932), pp. 356–366
S.A. Kauffman, Adaptation on rugged fintess landscapes, in Lectures in the Science of Complexity, ed. by D. Stein (Addison-Wesley, Longman, 1989), pp. 527–618
E. Autio, L.D.W. Thomas, Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management (The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, 2014), pp. 204–228
E. Almirall, R. Casadesus-Masanell, Open versus Closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35(1), 27–47 (2010)
M. Iansiti, R. Levien, Strategy as ecology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68–78, 126 (2004)
J.F. Moore, The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Ecosystems (1996)
S.T. Pan, Y.L. Zheng, Network relationship strength and enterprise technology innovation performance—based on the empirical research of exploratory learning and exploitative learning. Stud. Sci. Sci. 29(11), 1736–1743 (2011) (In Chinese)
M.S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties (1973)
D. Krackhardt, The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. Netw. Org. 216–239 (1992)
T.L. Saaty, What is the analytic hierarchy process? Mathematical models for decision support (Springer, New York, Inc. 1988), pp. 109–121
J. E. J. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, ed. by H.A. Linstone, M. Turoff. J. Market. Res. 18(3), 363–364 (1975)
Y.M. Wang, Using maximization of deviations for multiple index decisions and sorting. Syst. Eng. Electr. 7, 24–26 (1988). (In Chinese)
G. Zhang, Q.S. Bo, The theory of modular organization structure based on NK model. Soft Sci. 23(6), 24–27 (2009). (In Chinese)
C.Y. Gao, X.Y. He, Research on the Improvement of Knowledge Innovation in HTVIC based on NK model. Stud. Sci. Sci. 32(11) (2014) (In Chinese)
J. Ma, H. Zhang, Y.M. Xi, Simulation Research on Maneger’s Recognition based on NK model[J]. Operations Research and Management Science 17(1), 000137–000143 (2008). (In Chinese)
Judy estrin. American innovation is in decline? [M]. China Machine Press,2010
R. Adner, R. Kapoor, Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations[J]. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(3), 306–333 (2010)
M. Iansiti, R. Levien, Strategy as ecology [J]. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(3), 68 (2004)
R. Gulati, P. Puranam, M. Tushman, Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strateg. Manag. J. 33(6), 571–586 (2012)
M.A. Cusumano, A. Gawer, The elements of platform leadership. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 31(1), 8–8 (2003)
M. Iansiti, R. Levien, The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Future Surv. 20(2), 88–90 (2004)
Y.R. Li, The technological roadmap of Cisco’s business ecosystem. Technovation 29(5), 379–386 (2009)
L. Pierce, Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strateg. Manag. J. 30(3), 323–347 (2009)
M. Weiner, N. Nohria, A. Hickeman et al., Value networks—the future of the U.S. electric utility industry. Sloan Manage. Rev. 38(4), 21–34 (1997)
J.F. Moore, Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3), 75 (1993)
D.S. Evans, A. Hagiu, R. Schmalensee, Invisible engines: how software platforms drive innovation and transform industries. Mit Press Books 1(4), 410–411 (2007)
R. Normann, R. Ramírez, J. Champy et al., From value chain to value constellation (1996)
K. Möller, S. Svahn, Role of knowledge in value creation in business nets. J. Manage. Stud. 43(5), 985–1007 (2010)
M. Pagani, C.H. Fine, Value network dynamics in 3G-4G wireless communications: a systems thinking approach to strategic value assessment. J. Bus. Res. 61(11), 1102–1112 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Feng, N., Ruan, F., Wei, F. (2019). Evolutionary Characteristics and the Adaptability Improvement of an Innovation Ecosystem Based on an Extension NK Model. In: Jia, Y., Du, J., Zhang, W. (eds) Proceedings of 2018 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 528. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2288-4_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2288-4_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2287-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2288-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)