Skip to main content

The Drivers of Long-Distance Commuting in Chile: The Role of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Population Change and Impacts in Asia and the Pacific

Abstract

Long-distance commuting has emerged as an alternative to migration to equilibrate spatial labour markets. Coupled to changes in the labour and housing markets, technological advances have promoted long-distance commuting by reshaping the links between the spatial distribution of population and regional economies. While previous research has examined these links in developed countries, less is known about how these changes have played out in developing economies. Using micro-census data and regression analysis, this chapter addresses how contextual factors have shaped long-distance commuting in Chile. Our results reveal that the nature and spatial distribution of mining and construction activities have been the primary drivers of long-distance commuting in Chile. This contrasts with developed countries where, along with these activities, factors associated with the new service economy also comprise predominant forces encouraging long-distance commuting, particularly for those in high-skilled occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Various thresholds have been used. Section 6.4 provides a short discussion of these thresholds and the definition of long-distance commuting.

  2. 2.

    Our model does not suffer from endogeneity problems. Long-distance commuting may be seen as a response to, and a cause of, migration. Our analysis seeks to estimate the influence of a past migration move on ‘present’ long-distance commuting. To this end, we capture migration by comparing census information on usual place of residence in 1997 and 2002; that is, prior to the date of the commuting data (i.e. the census date).

References

  • Agnes S (1974) Long-distance commuting as a solution to geographical limitation to career choices of two-career families. Master’s thesis, Alfres P. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Aroca P (2001) Impacts and development in local economies based on mining: the case of the Chilean II region. Resour Policy 27(2):119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aroca P, Atienza M (2008) La conmutación regional en Chile y su impacto en la regió de Antofagasta. Rev EURE 34(102):97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Aroca P, Atienza M (2011) Economic implications of long distance commuting in the Chilean mining industry. Resour Policy 36(3):196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artís M, Romaní J, Suriñach J (2000) Determinants of individual commuting in Catalonia, 1986-91: theory and empirical evidence. Urban Stud 37(8):1431–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atienza M, Lufín M, Sarrias M (2010) División espacial del trabajo en Chile 1992-2002. Ediciones Universitarias. Universidad Católica del Norte

    Google Scholar 

  • Axisa J, Newbold B, Scott D (2012) Migration, urban growth and commuting distance in Toronto’s commuter shed. Area 44(3):344–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M (1995) Internal migration in Australia 1986 to 1991. Overview report. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell M, Brown D (2006) Who are the visitors? Characteristics of temporary movers in Australia. Popul Space Place 12(2):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M, Ward G (2000) Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration. Tourism Geogr 2(1):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell M, Blake M, Boyle P, Duke-Williams O, Rees P, Stillwell J, Hugo G (2002) Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures. J R Stat Soc A 165(3):435–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle P, Flowerdew R (1997) Improving distance estimates between areal units in migration models. Geogr Anal 29(2):93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle P, Halfacree K, Robinson V (1998) Exploring contemporary migration. Longman Singapore Publishers (Pte), Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron G, Muellbauer J (1998) The housing market and regional commuting and migration choices. Scot J Polit Econ 45(4):420–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casado-Díaz JM, Martínez-Bernabéu L, Rowe F (2017a) An evolutionary approach to the delimitation of labour market areas: an empirical application for Chile. Spatial Econ Anal 12(4):379–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casado-Díaz JM, Rowe F, Martínez-Bernabéu L (2017b) Functional labour market areas for Chile. Region: J ERSA 4(3):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion T, Coombes M, Brown D (2009) Migration and longer-distance commuting in rural England. Reg Stud 43(10):1245–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark W, Dieleman F (1984) Households and housing: choice and outcomes in the housing market. CURP Press, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras D, De Mello L, Puentes E (2010) The determinants of labour force participation and employment in Chile. Appl Econ 21(43):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbo V, Lüders R, Spiller P (1997) The foundations of successful economic reforms: the case of Chile. Working Paper, Universidad Católica de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz J, Lüders R, Wagner G (2010) La República en Cifras. Base de Datos EH Clio Lab-Iniciativa Científica Milenio, Ministerio de Planificación (MIDEPLAN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2012) Foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2012. United Nations, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson K, Lindgren U, Westerlund O (2003) Geographical labour mobility: migration or commuting? Reg Stud 37(8):827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers G, Van Der Veen A (1985) A simultaneous non-linear model for labour migration and commuting. Reg Stud 19(3):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert A (1993) Third world cities: the changing national settlement system. Urban Stud 30(4/5):721–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano G (1998) Information technology, work patterns and intra-metropolitan location: a case study. Urban Stud 35(7):1077–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW (2003) Some methodological questions arising from large data sets. Stat Textbook Monogr 169:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Green A (1995) The geography of dual career households: a research agenda and selected evidence from selected data sources for Britain. Int J Popul Geogr 1(1):29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green A (1997) A question of compromise? Case study evidence on the location and mobility strategies of dual career households. Reg Stud 31(7):641–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green A, Hogarth T, Shackleton R (1999) Longer distance commuting as substitute for migration in Britain: a review of trends, issues and implications. Int J Popul Geogr 5(1):49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson J, Bell M (2007) Harvest trails in Australia: patterns of seasonal migration in the fruit and vegetable industry. J Rural Stud 23(1):101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson S, Pratt G (1995) Gender, work, and space. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardill I, Green A (2003) Remote working—altering the spatial contours of work and home in the new economy. N Technol Work Employ 18(3):212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helderman A, Mulder C, Van Ham M (2004) The changing effect of home ownership on residential mobility in the Netherlands, 1980-98. Housing Stud 19(4):601–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helderman A, Van Ham M, Mulder C (2006) Migration and homeownership. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 97(2):111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helminen V, Ristimäki M (2007) Relationships between commuting distance, frequency and telework in Finland. J Transport Geogr 15(5):331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick B (1965) urban migration and economic development in Chile. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton D (1993) Long-distance commuting: a new approach to mining in Australia. Geogr J 159(3):281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janelle D (2004) The geography of urban transportation. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) Impact of information technologies. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 86–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor Y, Nijkamp P, Rouwendal J (2013) Homeownership, unemployment and commuting distances. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2013-144/VIII, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap AK, Stein JC (2000) What do a million observations on banks say about the transmission of monetary policy? Am Econ Rev 90(3):407–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafourcade M, Thisse J (2011) New economic geography: the role of transport costs. In: De Palma A, Lindsey R, Quinet E, Vickerman R (eds) A handbook of transport economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA, pp 67–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos G, Blanco E (2010) Mining and development in the region of Antofagasta. Resour Policy 35(4):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long L, Tucker C, Urton W (1988) Migration distances: an international comparison. Demography 25(4):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden J (1981) Why women work closer to home. Urban Stud 18(2):181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo P, Graham D, Noland R (2012) The effect of labour market spatial structure on commuting in England and Wales. J Econ Geogr 12(3):717–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1978) Family migration decisions. J Polit Econ 86(5):749–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman M, Lindgren U (2003) Who is the long-distance commuter? Patterns and driving forces in Sweden. Cybergeo 243:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005) How persistent are regional disparities in employment? The role of geographic mobility. In: OECD (ed) OECD Employment Outlook 2005. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald A (1999) The housing market and Europe’s unemployment: a non-technical paper. Department of Economics. University of Warwick, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisarski A (2006) Commuting in America III: the third national report on commuting patterns and trends. No. 550. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld P, Vickerman R (2004) Transport in regional science: the death of distance is premature. Pap Reg Sci 83(1):229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles J (2010) The FDI and the regional development in Chile. PhD thesis, Urban and regional planning. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Rowe F (2017a) ¿Contribuye La Migració n Interna a Reducir La Segregació n Residencial?: El Caso de Santiago de Chile 1977–2002? Revista Latino-Americana de Población 11(21):7–46. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323854675002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Rowe F (2017b) The changing impacts of internal migration on residential socio-economic segregation in the Greater Santiago. 28th International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), Cape Town, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Rowe F (2018) How is internal migration reshaping metropolitan populations in Latin America? A new method and new evidence. Popul Stud 72(2):253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2017.1416155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Rowe F (2019) Efectos cambiantes de la migració n sobre el crecimiento, la estructura demográfica y la segregació n residencial en ciudades grandes: el caso de Santiago, Chile, 1977–2017, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile, Serie población y Desarrollo, No 125, LC/TS.2018/110

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers A, Raquillet R, Castro L (1978) Model migration schedules and their applications. Environ Plann A 10(5):475–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson P (1990) Buffon’s needle and the estimation of migration distances. Math Popul Stud 2(3):229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouwendal J, Rietveld P (1994) Changes in commuting distance of Dutch households. Urban Stud 31(9):1545–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F (2013a) Spatial labour mobility in a transition economy: migration and commuting in Chile. Ph.D. thesis. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F (2013b) The geography and determinants of regional human capital in eight Latin American and Caribbean countries. In: Cuadrado-Roura J, Aroca P (eds) Regional problems and policies in Latin America. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F (2014) Micro and macro drivers of long-distance commuting in Chile: the role of spatial distribution of economic activities and population. Paper presented at the 53rd Western Regional Science Association. San Diego, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F (2017) The CHilean Internal Migration (CHIM) database: temporally consistent spatial data for the analysis of human mobility. Region 4(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F, Bell M (2013) Creating an integrated database for the analysis of spatial mobility in Chile. Working Papers 02/2013, Queensland Centre for Population Research, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe F, Patias N, Rodríguez J (2019) Compositional Impact of Migration (CIM), R package. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11135.05280

  • Shick G, Tryon W (1982) Issues in the lives of dual-career couples. Clin Psychol Rev 2(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva H, Johnson L, Wade K (2011) Long distance commuting in Australia: a socio-economic and demographic profile. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum. ATRF, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey K (2001) Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: mining and regional development in Western Australia. Aust Geogr 32(2):133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey K, Shrimpton M (1988) Long distance commuting in the Canadian mining industry. Technical report. Report prepared for the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Memorial University of Newfoundland

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2004) World Population to 2300. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, New York, The United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Echevarría F (1995) Reestructuración económica y desigualdades interregionales. El caso de Chile. Revista de Estudios Regionales 3(43):297–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Echeverría F (1996) Reestructuración económica y desigualdades interregionales. El caso de Chile. Rev EURE 22(65):11–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham M, Hooimeijer P (2009) Regional differences in spatial flexibility: long commutes and job related migration intentions in the Netherlands. Appl Spat Anal Policy 2(2):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ham M, Mulder C, Hooimeijer P (2001) Spatial flexibility in job mobility: macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions. Environ Plann A 33(5):921–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ommeren J, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2000) Job mobility, residential mobility and commuting: a theoretical analysis using search theory. Ann Reg Sci 34(2):213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yapa L, Polese M, Wolpert J (1971) Interdependencies of commuting, migration and job site relocation. Econ Geogr 47(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky W (1971) The hypothesis of the mobility. Geogr Rev 61(2):219–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by The Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT) through its human capital development programme: BECAS Bicentenario. The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper from Jacques Poot, two anonymous referees and participants in the session ‘Labour Markets’ at the 2014 Western Regional Science Association Conference in San Diego, the United States.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Rowe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Data and Variable Definitions

Appendix 1: Data and Variable Definitions

Number (No.), Percentages (%) and Median Commuting Distance (MCD) in km

Variable

Definition

No.

%

MCD

Labour market characteristics

Industry sector

Agriculture

1 if respondent works in the agriculture sector; 0 otherwise

493,375

11.3

12.8

Mining

1 if respondent works in the mining sector; 0 otherwise

67,167

7.6

44.0

Manufacturing

1 if respondent works in the manufacturing sector; 0 otherwise

580,388

10.4

11.2

Utilities

1 if respondent works in the utility sector; 0 otherwise

31,102

0.9

13.7

Construction

1 if respondent works in the construction sector; 0 otherwise

321,749

21.7

14.5

Trade

1 if respondent works in the trade sector; 0 otherwise

954,591

12.9

11.2

Transport/communication

1 if respondent works in the transport and communication sector; 0 otherwise

349,722

9.4

12.5

Finance

1 if respondent works in the finance sector; 0 otherwise

92,065

1.0

12.7

Business services

1 if respondent works in the business service sector; 0 otherwise

440,138

10.6

12.5

Public administration

1 if respondent works in the public administration sector; 0 otherwise

220,179

4.9

12.7

Community/personal services

1 if respondent works in the community and personal service sector; 0 otherwise

934,285

9.3

10.9

Occupation

Managers

1 if respondent has a management occupation; 0 otherwise

557,415

4.7

11.5

Professionals

1 if respondent has a professional occupation; 0 otherwise

262,022

10.1

10.4

Technicians

1 if respondent has a technical occupation; 0 otherwise

450,074

14.1

11.4

Clerks

1 if respondent has a clerical occupation; 0 otherwise

633,478

5.0

12.9

Trades people

1 if respondent has a trade occupation; 0 otherwise

392,990

6.9

12.7

Agriculture/fishery workers

1 if respondent has an agricultural or fishery occupation; 0 otherwise

219,508

4.6

12.7

Craft workers

1 if respondent has a craft occupation; 0 otherwise

531,189

21.1

12.8

Plant operators

1 if respondent has a plant operator occupation; 0 otherwise

388,383

13.8

12.7

Labourers

1 if respondent has an elementary occupation; 0 otherwise

923,435

17.5

11.4

Armed forces

1 if respondent has a military occupation; 0 otherwise

50,082

2.3

14.4

Employment class

Wage earner

1 if respondent is employed, received a salary and is not included in the categories below; 0 otherwise

3,293,832

82.2

12.7

Domestic worker

1 if respondent is employed as domestic worker; 0 otherwise

258,982

2.8

10.5

Self-employed/employers

1 if respondent is self-employed or is an employer; 0 otherwise

869,140

9.3

10.5

Unpaid family workers

1 if respondent is employed but does not received a salary in return; 0 otherwise

62,999

4.3

10.9

Demographic characteristics

Age

A continuous variable that represents a respondent’s age, between 15 and 64 years

4,484,953

100.0

12.4

Age squared

The square of the continuous variable: age

4,484,953

100.0

12.4

Gender

Male

1 if respondent is male; 0 otherwise

2,914,950

85.4

12.7

Female

1 if respondent is female; 0 otherwise

1,570,003

14.6

10.9

Education

Preschool/non-formal education

1 if respondent has only preschool education, or has no formal education; 0 otherwise

81,380

1.7

12.1

Primary education

1 if respondent has as primary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise

1,096,735

23.4

12.2

Secondary education

1 if respondent has as secondary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise

2,016,700

45.8

12.4

Higher education

1 if respondent has as tertiary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise

1,290,138

29.1

12.4

Household composition

One-earner household

1 if respondent lives in a one-earner household; 0 otherwise

2,501,963

50.4

12.5

Two-earner household, without children

1 if respondent lives in a two-earner household without children younger than 15 years of age; 0 otherwise

449,228

6.3

11.2

Two-earner household, with children

1 if respondent lives in a one-earner household with children younger than 15 years of age; 0 otherwise

833,031

11.0

11.9

Alternative household structure

1 if respondent lives in a household with people aged 15 or over, and shares a home for employment, medical, religious or military reasons but without kinship; 0 otherwise

700,731

32.4

12.7

Housing characteristics

Owner-occupier

1 if respondent lives an owned dwelling; 0 otherwise

3,137,453

68.2

12.4

Renter

1 if respondent lives a rented dwelling; 0 otherwise

833,522

23.0

11.2

Rent-free occupier

1 if respondent lives a rent-free dwelling; 0 otherwise

402,138

8.8

12.5

Migration status

Stayer

1 if respondent has lived in the same municipality for the past 5 years; 0 otherwise

3,571,823

72.4

12.2

Migrant

1 if respondent has changed in the municipality of residence for the past 5 years; 0 otherwise

913,130

27.6

12.6

Geographical context

Population density

Low-density areas

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 0 and 79; 0 otherwise. The ratios of population density for this variable and those below were defined by using three quantile categories

1,514,185

33.8

19.3

Moderate-density areas

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 80 and 2490; 0 otherwise

1,552,100

34.6

10.4

High-density areas

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 2490 and 15,770; 0 otherwise

1,418,668

31.6

8.6

Job accessibility

Low job accessibility

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to only 52,362 jobs within a radius of 20 km; 0 otherwise

1,519,902

33.9

13.6

Moderate job accessibility

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to 1,304,780 jobs within a radius of 20 km; 0 otherwise

1,540,314

34.3

13.4

High job accessibility

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to 1,840,500 jobs within a radius of 20 km; 0 otherwise

1,424,737

31.8

8.2

Mining specialisation

1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a location quotation for mining index over 1

625,549

16.2

34.5

Geographical centrality

1 if respondent lives in a municipality in central Chile, i.e., the region of Valparaíso, the Metropolitan Region or O’Higgins

2,644,197

143.6

9.0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rowe, F., Bell, M. (2020). The Drivers of Long-Distance Commuting in Chile: The Role of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities. In: Poot, J., Roskruge, M. (eds) Population Change and Impacts in Asia and the Pacific. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 30. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0230-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics