Abstract
Long-distance commuting has emerged as an alternative to migration to equilibrate spatial labour markets. Coupled to changes in the labour and housing markets, technological advances have promoted long-distance commuting by reshaping the links between the spatial distribution of population and regional economies. While previous research has examined these links in developed countries, less is known about how these changes have played out in developing economies. Using micro-census data and regression analysis, this chapter addresses how contextual factors have shaped long-distance commuting in Chile. Our results reveal that the nature and spatial distribution of mining and construction activities have been the primary drivers of long-distance commuting in Chile. This contrasts with developed countries where, along with these activities, factors associated with the new service economy also comprise predominant forces encouraging long-distance commuting, particularly for those in high-skilled occupations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Various thresholds have been used. Section 6.4 provides a short discussion of these thresholds and the definition of long-distance commuting.
- 2.
Our model does not suffer from endogeneity problems. Long-distance commuting may be seen as a response to, and a cause of, migration. Our analysis seeks to estimate the influence of a past migration move on ‘present’ long-distance commuting. To this end, we capture migration by comparing census information on usual place of residence in 1997 and 2002; that is, prior to the date of the commuting data (i.e. the census date).
References
Agnes S (1974) Long-distance commuting as a solution to geographical limitation to career choices of two-career families. Master’s thesis, Alfres P. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Aroca P (2001) Impacts and development in local economies based on mining: the case of the Chilean II region. Resour Policy 27(2):119–134
Aroca P, Atienza M (2008) La conmutación regional en Chile y su impacto en la regió de Antofagasta. Rev EURE 34(102):97–120
Aroca P, Atienza M (2011) Economic implications of long distance commuting in the Chilean mining industry. Resour Policy 36(3):196–203
ArtÃs M, Romanà J, Suriñach J (2000) Determinants of individual commuting in Catalonia, 1986-91: theory and empirical evidence. Urban Stud 37(8):1431–1450
Atienza M, LufÃn M, Sarrias M (2010) División espacial del trabajo en Chile 1992-2002. Ediciones Universitarias. Universidad Católica del Norte
Axisa J, Newbold B, Scott D (2012) Migration, urban growth and commuting distance in Toronto’s commuter shed. Area 44(3):344–355
Bell M (1995) Internal migration in Australia 1986 to 1991. Overview report. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
Bell M, Brown D (2006) Who are the visitors? Characteristics of temporary movers in Australia. Popul Space Place 12(2):77–92
Bell M, Ward G (2000) Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration. Tourism Geogr 2(1):97–107
Bell M, Blake M, Boyle P, Duke-Williams O, Rees P, Stillwell J, Hugo G (2002) Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures. J R Stat Soc A 165(3):435–464
Boyle P, Flowerdew R (1997) Improving distance estimates between areal units in migration models. Geogr Anal 29(2):93–107
Boyle P, Halfacree K, Robinson V (1998) Exploring contemporary migration. Longman Singapore Publishers (Pte), Singapore
Cameron G, Muellbauer J (1998) The housing market and regional commuting and migration choices. Scot J Polit Econ 45(4):420–446
Casado-DÃaz JM, MartÃnez-Bernabéu L, Rowe F (2017a) An evolutionary approach to the delimitation of labour market areas: an empirical application for Chile. Spatial Econ Anal 12(4):379–403
Casado-DÃaz JM, Rowe F, MartÃnez-Bernabéu L (2017b) Functional labour market areas for Chile. Region: J ERSA 4(3):7–9
Champion T, Coombes M, Brown D (2009) Migration and longer-distance commuting in rural England. Reg Stud 43(10):1245–1259
Clark W, Dieleman F (1984) Households and housing: choice and outcomes in the housing market. CURP Press, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Contreras D, De Mello L, Puentes E (2010) The determinants of labour force participation and employment in Chile. Appl Econ 21(43):1–12
Corbo V, Lüders R, Spiller P (1997) The foundations of successful economic reforms: the case of Chile. Working Paper, Universidad Católica de Chile
Diaz J, Lüders R, Wagner G (2010) La República en Cifras. Base de Datos EH Clio Lab-Iniciativa CientÃfica Milenio, Ministerio de Planificación (MIDEPLAN)
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2012) Foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2012. United Nations, Santiago
Eliasson K, Lindgren U, Westerlund O (2003) Geographical labour mobility: migration or commuting? Reg Stud 37(8):827–837
Evers G, Van Der Veen A (1985) A simultaneous non-linear model for labour migration and commuting. Reg Stud 19(3):217–229
Gilbert A (1993) Third world cities: the changing national settlement system. Urban Stud 30(4/5):721–740
Giuliano G (1998) Information technology, work patterns and intra-metropolitan location: a case study. Urban Stud 35(7):1077–1095
Granger CW (2003) Some methodological questions arising from large data sets. Stat Textbook Monogr 169:1–10
Green A (1995) The geography of dual career households: a research agenda and selected evidence from selected data sources for Britain. Int J Popul Geogr 1(1):29–50
Green A (1997) A question of compromise? Case study evidence on the location and mobility strategies of dual career households. Reg Stud 31(7):641–657
Green A, Hogarth T, Shackleton R (1999) Longer distance commuting as substitute for migration in Britain: a review of trends, issues and implications. Int J Popul Geogr 5(1):49–67
Hanson J, Bell M (2007) Harvest trails in Australia: patterns of seasonal migration in the fruit and vegetable industry. J Rural Stud 23(1):101–117
Hanson S, Pratt G (1995) Gender, work, and space. Routledge, New York
Hardill I, Green A (2003) Remote working—altering the spatial contours of work and home in the new economy. N Technol Work Employ 18(3):212–222
Helderman A, Mulder C, Van Ham M (2004) The changing effect of home ownership on residential mobility in the Netherlands, 1980-98. Housing Stud 19(4):601–616
Helderman A, Van Ham M, Mulder C (2006) Migration and homeownership. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 97(2):111–125
Helminen V, Ristimäki M (2007) Relationships between commuting distance, frequency and telework in Finland. J Transport Geogr 15(5):331–342
Herrick B (1965) urban migration and economic development in Chile. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Houghton D (1993) Long-distance commuting: a new approach to mining in Australia. Geogr J 159(3):281–290
Janelle D (2004) The geography of urban transportation. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) Impact of information technologies. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 86–112
Kantor Y, Nijkamp P, Rouwendal J (2013) Homeownership, unemployment and commuting distances. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2013-144/VIII, Amsterdam
Kashyap AK, Stein JC (2000) What do a million observations on banks say about the transmission of monetary policy? Am Econ Rev 90(3):407–428
Lafourcade M, Thisse J (2011) New economic geography: the role of transport costs. In: De Palma A, Lindsey R, Quinet E, Vickerman R (eds) A handbook of transport economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA, pp 67–115
Lagos G, Blanco E (2010) Mining and development in the region of Antofagasta. Resour Policy 35(4):265–275
Long L, Tucker C, Urton W (1988) Migration distances: an international comparison. Demography 25(4):633–640
Madden J (1981) Why women work closer to home. Urban Stud 18(2):181–194
Melo P, Graham D, Noland R (2012) The effect of labour market spatial structure on commuting in England and Wales. J Econ Geogr 12(3):717–737
Mincer J (1978) Family migration decisions. J Polit Econ 86(5):749–773
Öhman M, Lindgren U (2003) Who is the long-distance commuter? Patterns and driving forces in Sweden. Cybergeo 243:1–33
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005) How persistent are regional disparities in employment? The role of geographic mobility. In: OECD (ed) OECD Employment Outlook 2005. OECD, Paris
Oswald A (1999) The housing market and Europe’s unemployment: a non-technical paper. Department of Economics. University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Pisarski A (2006) Commuting in America III: the third national report on commuting patterns and trends. No. 550. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA
Rietveld P, Vickerman R (2004) Transport in regional science: the death of distance is premature. Pap Reg Sci 83(1):229–248
Robles J (2010) The FDI and the regional development in Chile. PhD thesis, Urban and regional planning. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA
RodrÃguez J, Rowe F (2017a) ¿Contribuye La Migració n Interna a Reducir La Segregació n Residencial?: El Caso de Santiago de Chile 1977–2002? Revista Latino-Americana de Población 11(21):7–46. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323854675002
RodrÃguez J, Rowe F (2017b) The changing impacts of internal migration on residential socio-economic segregation in the Greater Santiago. 28th International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), Cape Town, South Africa
RodrÃguez J, Rowe F (2018) How is internal migration reshaping metropolitan populations in Latin America? A new method and new evidence. Popul Stud 72(2):253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2017.1416155
RodrÃguez J, Rowe F (2019) Efectos cambiantes de la migració n sobre el crecimiento, la estructura demográfica y la segregació n residencial en ciudades grandes: el caso de Santiago, Chile, 1977–2017, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile, Serie población y Desarrollo, No 125, LC/TS.2018/110
Rogers A, Raquillet R, Castro L (1978) Model migration schedules and their applications. Environ Plann A 10(5):475–502
Rogerson P (1990) Buffon’s needle and the estimation of migration distances. Math Popul Stud 2(3):229–238
Rouwendal J, Rietveld P (1994) Changes in commuting distance of Dutch households. Urban Stud 31(9):1545–1557
Rowe F (2013a) Spatial labour mobility in a transition economy: migration and commuting in Chile. Ph.D. thesis. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Rowe F (2013b) The geography and determinants of regional human capital in eight Latin American and Caribbean countries. In: Cuadrado-Roura J, Aroca P (eds) Regional problems and policies in Latin America. Springer, Berlin
Rowe F (2014) Micro and macro drivers of long-distance commuting in Chile: the role of spatial distribution of economic activities and population. Paper presented at the 53rd Western Regional Science Association. San Diego, United States
Rowe F (2017) The CHilean Internal Migration (CHIM) database: temporally consistent spatial data for the analysis of human mobility. Region 4(3):1–6
Rowe F, Bell M (2013) Creating an integrated database for the analysis of spatial mobility in Chile. Working Papers 02/2013, Queensland Centre for Population Research, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
Rowe F, Patias N, RodrÃguez J (2019) Compositional Impact of Migration (CIM), R package. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11135.05280
Shick G, Tryon W (1982) Issues in the lives of dual-career couples. Clin Psychol Rev 2(1):49–65
Silva H, Johnson L, Wade K (2011) Long distance commuting in Australia: a socio-economic and demographic profile. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum. ATRF, Adelaide, Australia
Storey K (2001) Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: mining and regional development in Western Australia. Aust Geogr 32(2):133–148
Storey K, Shrimpton M (1988) Long distance commuting in the Canadian mining industry. Technical report. Report prepared for the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Memorial University of Newfoundland
United Nations (2004) World Population to 2300. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, New York, The United States
Uribe-EchevarrÃa F (1995) Reestructuración económica y desigualdades interregionales. El caso de Chile. Revista de Estudios Regionales 3(43):297–337
Uribe-EcheverrÃa F (1996) Reestructuración económica y desigualdades interregionales. El caso de Chile. Rev EURE 22(65):11–38
Van Ham M, Hooimeijer P (2009) Regional differences in spatial flexibility: long commutes and job related migration intentions in the Netherlands. Appl Spat Anal Policy 2(2):129–146
Van Ham M, Mulder C, Hooimeijer P (2001) Spatial flexibility in job mobility: macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions. Environ Plann A 33(5):921–940
Van Ommeren J, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2000) Job mobility, residential mobility and commuting: a theoretical analysis using search theory. Ann Reg Sci 34(2):213–232
Yapa L, Polese M, Wolpert J (1971) Interdependencies of commuting, migration and job site relocation. Econ Geogr 47(1):59–72
Zelinsky W (1971) The hypothesis of the mobility. Geogr Rev 61(2):219–249
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by The Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT) through its human capital development programme: BECAS Bicentenario. The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper from Jacques Poot, two anonymous referees and participants in the session ‘Labour Markets’ at the 2014 Western Regional Science Association Conference in San Diego, the United States.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1: Data and Variable Definitions
Appendix 1: Data and Variable Definitions
Number (No.), Percentages (%) and Median Commuting Distance (MCD) in km
Variable | Definition | No. | % | MCD |
---|---|---|---|---|
Labour market characteristics | ||||
Industry sector | ||||
Agriculture | 1 if respondent works in the agriculture sector; 0 otherwise | 493,375 | 11.3 | 12.8 |
Mining | 1 if respondent works in the mining sector; 0 otherwise | 67,167 | 7.6 | 44.0 |
Manufacturing | 1 if respondent works in the manufacturing sector; 0 otherwise | 580,388 | 10.4 | 11.2 |
Utilities | 1 if respondent works in the utility sector; 0 otherwise | 31,102 | 0.9 | 13.7 |
Construction | 1 if respondent works in the construction sector; 0 otherwise | 321,749 | 21.7 | 14.5 |
Trade | 1 if respondent works in the trade sector; 0 otherwise | 954,591 | 12.9 | 11.2 |
Transport/communication | 1 if respondent works in the transport and communication sector; 0 otherwise | 349,722 | 9.4 | 12.5 |
Finance | 1 if respondent works in the finance sector; 0 otherwise | 92,065 | 1.0 | 12.7 |
Business services | 1 if respondent works in the business service sector; 0 otherwise | 440,138 | 10.6 | 12.5 |
Public administration | 1 if respondent works in the public administration sector; 0 otherwise | 220,179 | 4.9 | 12.7 |
Community/personal services | 1 if respondent works in the community and personal service sector; 0 otherwise | 934,285 | 9.3 | 10.9 |
Occupation | ||||
Managers | 1 if respondent has a management occupation; 0 otherwise | 557,415 | 4.7 | 11.5 |
Professionals | 1 if respondent has a professional occupation; 0 otherwise | 262,022 | 10.1 | 10.4 |
Technicians | 1 if respondent has a technical occupation; 0 otherwise | 450,074 | 14.1 | 11.4 |
Clerks | 1 if respondent has a clerical occupation; 0 otherwise | 633,478 | 5.0 | 12.9 |
Trades people | 1 if respondent has a trade occupation; 0 otherwise | 392,990 | 6.9 | 12.7 |
Agriculture/fishery workers | 1 if respondent has an agricultural or fishery occupation; 0 otherwise | 219,508 | 4.6 | 12.7 |
Craft workers | 1 if respondent has a craft occupation; 0 otherwise | 531,189 | 21.1 | 12.8 |
Plant operators | 1 if respondent has a plant operator occupation; 0 otherwise | 388,383 | 13.8 | 12.7 |
Labourers | 1 if respondent has an elementary occupation; 0 otherwise | 923,435 | 17.5 | 11.4 |
Armed forces | 1 if respondent has a military occupation; 0 otherwise | 50,082 | 2.3 | 14.4 |
Employment class | ||||
Wage earner | 1 if respondent is employed, received a salary and is not included in the categories below; 0 otherwise | 3,293,832 | 82.2 | 12.7 |
Domestic worker | 1 if respondent is employed as domestic worker; 0 otherwise | 258,982 | 2.8 | 10.5 |
Self-employed/employers | 1 if respondent is self-employed or is an employer; 0 otherwise | 869,140 | 9.3 | 10.5 |
Unpaid family workers | 1 if respondent is employed but does not received a salary in return; 0 otherwise | 62,999 | 4.3 | 10.9 |
Demographic characteristics | ||||
Age | A continuous variable that represents a respondent’s age, between 15 and 64 years | 4,484,953 | 100.0 | 12.4 |
Age squared | The square of the continuous variable: age | 4,484,953 | 100.0 | 12.4 |
Gender | ||||
Male | 1 if respondent is male; 0 otherwise | 2,914,950 | 85.4 | 12.7 |
Female | 1 if respondent is female; 0 otherwise | 1,570,003 | 14.6 | 10.9 |
Education | ||||
Preschool/non-formal education | 1 if respondent has only preschool education, or has no formal education; 0 otherwise | 81,380 | 1.7 | 12.1 |
Primary education | 1 if respondent has as primary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise | 1,096,735 | 23.4 | 12.2 |
Secondary education | 1 if respondent has as secondary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise | 2,016,700 | 45.8 | 12.4 |
Higher education | 1 if respondent has as tertiary educational qualification as the highest qualification; 0 otherwise | 1,290,138 | 29.1 | 12.4 |
Household composition | ||||
One-earner household | 1 if respondent lives in a one-earner household; 0 otherwise | 2,501,963 | 50.4 | 12.5 |
Two-earner household, without children | 1 if respondent lives in a two-earner household without children younger than 15Â years of age; 0 otherwise | 449,228 | 6.3 | 11.2 |
Two-earner household, with children | 1 if respondent lives in a one-earner household with children younger than 15Â years of age; 0 otherwise | 833,031 | 11.0 | 11.9 |
Alternative household structure | 1 if respondent lives in a household with people aged 15 or over, and shares a home for employment, medical, religious or military reasons but without kinship; 0 otherwise | 700,731 | 32.4 | 12.7 |
Housing characteristics | ||||
Owner-occupier | 1 if respondent lives an owned dwelling; 0 otherwise | 3,137,453 | 68.2 | 12.4 |
Renter | 1 if respondent lives a rented dwelling; 0 otherwise | 833,522 | 23.0 | 11.2 |
Rent-free occupier | 1 if respondent lives a rent-free dwelling; 0 otherwise | 402,138 | 8.8 | 12.5 |
Migration status | ||||
Stayer | 1 if respondent has lived in the same municipality for the past 5Â years; 0 otherwise | 3,571,823 | 72.4 | 12.2 |
Migrant | 1 if respondent has changed in the municipality of residence for the past 5Â years; 0 otherwise | 913,130 | 27.6 | 12.6 |
Geographical context | ||||
Population density | ||||
Low-density areas | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 0 and 79; 0 otherwise. The ratios of population density for this variable and those below were defined by using three quantile categories | 1,514,185 | 33.8 | 19.3 |
Moderate-density areas | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 80 and 2490; 0 otherwise | 1,552,100 | 34.6 | 10.4 |
High-density areas | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a ratio of population to area between 2490 and 15,770; 0 otherwise | 1,418,668 | 31.6 | 8.6 |
Job accessibility | ||||
Low job accessibility | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to only 52,362 jobs within a radius of 20Â km; 0 otherwise | 1,519,902 | 33.9 | 13.6 |
Moderate job accessibility | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to 1,304,780 jobs within a radius of 20Â km; 0 otherwise | 1,540,314 | 34.3 | 13.4 |
High job accessibility | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with access to 1,840,500 jobs within a radius of 20Â km; 0 otherwise | 1,424,737 | 31.8 | 8.2 |
Mining specialisation | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality with a location quotation for mining index over 1 | 625,549 | 16.2 | 34.5 |
Geographical centrality | 1 if respondent lives in a municipality in central Chile, i.e., the region of ValparaÃso, the Metropolitan Region or O’Higgins | 2,644,197 | 143.6 | 9.0 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowe, F., Bell, M. (2020). The Drivers of Long-Distance Commuting in Chile: The Role of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities. In: Poot, J., Roskruge, M. (eds) Population Change and Impacts in Asia and the Pacific. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 30. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0230-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0230-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0229-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0230-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)