Abstract
This paper aims to identify the significance of the emergence of experimental methods in economics, by reviewing behavioral theory in the history of economic thought. Economists have adopted numerous approaches in their attempts to resolve what is called das Adam Smith Probleme (the Adam Smith problem)—how to theoretically explain human behaviors driven by social and selfish incentives. For example, Menger separated economic aspects from social aspects, Mises or Weber established a comprehensive concept of purposive behavior, and Keynes strategically avoided micro-foundations for macroanalysis. Moreover, Popper attempted to solve the problem by introducing situational logic that understands human behaviors as appropriate responses to given social conditions. Meanwhile, institutional economists such as Commons attempted to understand humans as acting according to rules in given social institutions. Based on these historical discussions, this paper proposes three meanings of experimental methods: (1) such methods enrich micro-foundations of economics, by enabling the testing of behavioral hypotheses regarding human action under social institutions; (2) such methods serve to create micro-foundations for macro-theory, based on assumptions regarding a “behavioral trend”; and (3) such methods enable the reexamination of the behavioral assumptions of past theories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The behavioral assumptions associated with homo economicus, according to standard economic theories, can be summarized as follows: “Economic agents are rational”; “Economic agents are motivated by expected utility maximization”; “An agent’s utility is governed by purely selfish concerns, in the narrow sense that it does not take into consideration the utility of others”; “Agents are Bayesian probability operators”; “Agents have consistent time preferences according to the discounted utility model”; “All income and assets are completely fungible” (Wilkinson 2008, p. 5).
- 2.
Camerer and Loenstein (2004) states, “The neoclassical approach is useful because it provides economists with a theoretical framework that can be applied to almost any form of economic (and even noneconomic) behavior, and it makes refutable predictions” (p. 3).
- 3.
For instance, Locke (1689) states, “Custom settles habits of thinking in the understanding, as well as of determining in the will, and of motions in the body; all which seem to be but trains of motion in the animal spirits” (p. 529).
- 4.
- 5.
Regarding the tautological problem of a conceptualization of human action by Mises, see Tokumaru (2009).
- 6.
Smith states that every man “…must be rich or poor according to the quantity of that labour which he can command, or which he can afford to purchase” (Smith 1776, p. 47).
References
Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am Econ Rev 90(1):166–193
Camerer CF, Loewenstein G (2004) Behavioral economics: past, present, future. In: Camerer CF, Loewenstein G, Rabin M (eds) Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press, New York, pp 3–51
Cherry TL, Frykblom P, Shogren JF (2002) Hardnose the dictator. Am Econ Rev 92(4):1218–1221
Commons JR (1931) Institutional economics. Am Econ Rev 21:648–657
Commons JR (1934) Institutional economics: its place in political economy. Macmillan, New York
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868
Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. The University of Chicago, Chicago
Frohlich N, Oppenheimer J, Kurki A (2004) Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice 119:91–117
Güth W, Rolf S, Bernd S (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–388
Hayek FV (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market. Am Econ Rev 76(4):728–741
Keynes JM (1936/1961) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan/Maruzen, London/Tokyo
Locke J (1689) An essay concerning human understanding (1894). Clarendon Press, Oxford
Lundestad E (2014) The Adam Smith problem: a reinterpretation. J Scott Philos 12(2):181–197
Marx K (1867/1962) Das Capital. Buch I, Marx-Engels Werke, Band 23. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED. Diertz Verlag, Berlin
Menger C (1883/1985) Investigations into the method of the social science with special reference to economics (Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Verlag von Duncker & Humblot, Leibzig) (trans: Nock JF). New York University Press, New York
Mises L (1949) Human action: a treaties on economics. Yale University Press, New Haven
Mises Lv (1933/1960) Grundprobleme der Nationalökonomie: Untersuchungen über Verfahren, Aufgaben und Inhalt der Wirtschafts und Gesellschaftslehre. Epistemological problems of economics (trans: Reisman G). Van Nostrand, Princeton
Mises L (1962) The ultimate foundation of economic science: an essay on method. D. Van Nostrand, Princeton
Paganelli MP (2008) The Adam Smith problem in reverse: self-interest in the wealth of nations and the theory of moral sentiment. Hist Polit Econ 40(2):365–382
Popper K (1994) In search of a better world: lectures and essays from thirty years. Routledge, London/New York
Raphael DD (2007) The impartial spectator: Adam Smith’s moral philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Ricardo D (1817) On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray, London
Roscher WGF (1843) Grundriss zur Vorlesungen über die Staatswirthschaft nach geschichtlicher Methode. Druck und Verlag der Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, Göttingen
Schmoller G. v (1883/1987) Menger und Dilthey, Zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozialwissenschaften. Gustav schmoller Kleine Schriften zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte Wirtschaftstheorie und Wirtschaftspolitik. Wolfram Fiedler und Rolf Kard (Hrsg.), Teil6. DDR: Zentralantiquariat der DDR
Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (trans: Redvers O). Harvard University Press
Smith A (1759/1981) The theory of moral sentiments. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis
Smith A (1776/1984) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis
Tokumaru N (2009) Popper’s analysis of the problems of induction and demarcation and Mises’ justification of the theoretical social science. In: Cohen RS, Parusnikova Z (eds) Rethinking Popper, Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 272. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 161–174
Viner J (1927) Adam Smith and Laissez Faire. J Polit Econ 35(2):198–232
Weber M (1904/1922) Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre von Max Weber, 1.Aufl., J.C.B. Mohr
Weber M (1913/1922) Ueber einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie, in ibid
Wilkinson N (2008) An introduction to behavioral economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire/New York
Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. The Free Press, New York
Young J (1997) Economics as a moral science: the political economy of Adam Smith. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tokumaru, N. (2016). Introduction: Applying the Experimental Method to Economic Thought: From Adam Smith to Vernon Smith. In: Social Preference, Institution, and Distribution. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0137-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0137-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0136-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0137-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)