Abstract
Field trials are an important step in the experimental research with and commercial development of genetically modified (GM) plants, including GM trees . Field trials with GM plants in the European Union (EU) are subject to authorisation granted on the basis of an environmental risk assessment (ERA). Data requirement for the ERA varies depending on the purpose of the field trial and the level of knowledge on the GM plant and its environmental impact. In the Netherlands a step-by-step approach has been developed for the categorisation of field trials. Under this approach the confinement of GM plants in a field trial can be gradually decreased and the scale of the trial increased in a step-wise manner at the same time that knowledge on the GM plant and its environmental interactions increases. Very few other countries seem to apply a similar classification of field trials. We argue that a formal step-by-step approach may be a helpful tool to facilitate the approval process for field trials of GM plants and the collection of relevant data/material for the ERA without compromising the environmental safety, and that this approach is also applicable to field trials with GM trees.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aguilera J, Nielsen KM, Sweet J (2013) Risk assessment of GM trees in the EU: current regulatory framework and guidance. iForest 6:127–131
CFIA (2014) Directive Dir2000-07: Conducting confined research field trials of plant with novel traits in Canada. Available online: www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/applicants/directive-dir2000-07/eng/1304474667559/1304474738697
COGEM (2005) Advies indeling veldwerkzaamheden genetisch gemodificeerde planten CGM/050929-03. Available online: www.cogem.net
COGEM (2008) Herziening advies indeling veldwerkzaamheden met genetisch gemodificeerde planten. CGM/081125-02. Available online: www.cogem.net
COGEM (2010a) Kleinschalige veldproef met genetisch gemodificeerde populieren met een verminderd ligninegehalte. CGM/081205-01. Available online: www.cogem.net
COGEM (2010b)Veldproef met genetisch gemodificeerde schurftresistente appelbomen. CGM/101214-01. Available online: www.cogem.net
CPB (2012) Guidance on risk assessment of Living Modified Organisms. Available online: www.bch.cbd.int
EC (2002) Commission Decision 2002/623/EC of 24 July 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official J Eur Commu L200:22–33
EFSA (2008) Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants—challenges and approaches. IN colloquium Es (Ed.) EFSA scientific colloquium—summary report
EFSA (2009) Guidance of the scientific committee on transparency in the scientific aspects of risk assesments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: general principles. EFSA J 1051:1–22
EFSA (2010) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). EFSA J 8(11):1879–1990
EU (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official J Eur Commun L106:1–38
EU (2003) Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official J Eur Commun L 268:1–23
Finstad K, Bonfils A-C, Shearer W, Macdonald P (2007) Trees with novel traits in Canada: regulations and related scientific issues. Tree Genet Genomes 3:135–139
Fladung M, Altosaar I, Bartsch D, Baucher M, Boscaleri F, Gallardo F, Häggman H, Hoenicka H, Nielsen K, Paffetti D, Séguin A, Stotzky G, Vettori C (2012) European discussion forum on transgenic tree biosafety. Nat Biotechnol 30:37–38
Glandorf DCM (2014) Categorisation of field trials with GM plants in the Netherlands: applicable to field trials with GM forest trees? iForest 8:222–225 doi:10.3832/ifor1311-008. Available online: www.sisef.it/iforest/contents/?id=ifor1311-008
Häggman H, Raybould A. Borem A, Fox T, Handley L, Hertzberg M, Lu M, MacDonald P, Oguchi T, Pasquali G, Pearson L, Peter G, Quemada H, Séquin A, Tattersall K, Ulian E, Walter C, McLean M (2013) Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment. Plant Biotechnol J:1–14
Hoenicka H, Fladung M (2006) Biosafety in Populus spp. and other forest trees: from non-native species to taxa derived from traditional breeding and genetic engineering. Trees 20:131–144
Lang A, Lauber E, Darvas B (2007) Early-tier tests insufficient for GMO risk assessment. Nat Biotechnol 25(1):35–36; Author reply 36–37
OECD (2014) Safety assessment of transgenic organisms. OECD Consensus Documents. Available online: www.oecd.org/env/ehs/biotrack
Romeis J, Meissle M, Bigler F (2006) Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nat Biotechnol 24(1):63–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glandorf, D.C.M., Breyer, D. (2016). Field Trials with GM Trees: A Step-by-Step Approach. In: Vettori, C., et al. Biosafety of Forest Transgenic Trees. Forestry Sciences, vol 82. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7531-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7531-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7529-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7531-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)