Skip to main content

A Case Study: Urban Agriculture in Portland, Oregon 2002–2012

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sowing Seeds in the City
  • 1886 Accesses

Abstract

Portland, Oregon houses approximately 587,865 residents in an area of roughly 400 square miles (Metro n.d.; Portland State University Population Research Center 2012). The city is known for its dense development; at the same time, however, Portland has become an example for its advancement of urban agriculture within city boundaries (Mendes et al. 2008). This begs an obvious question: how does a city with high population growth and steep competition for land foster small-scale food production and distribution in urban spaces?

Researched and written by Molly M. Hatfield and Framework provided

by Steve Cohen

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During World War II, the US Department of Agriculture--> popularized the concept of “Victory Gardens”: individual gardens designed to ease pressure from overburdened transportation--> and food production--> systems (USDA 1943). The Oregon State College (now Oregon State University) Extension Service took charge of promoting Victory Gardens in Oregon; their efforts yielded a marked increase in city gardens and a “splendid” ( McWhorter 1943) support of the war effort.

  2. 2.

    Oregon SB 100 mandated that cities adopt comprehensive plans regarding their urban development and implement zoning--> (and other) regulation in support of these plans (State of Oregon 1973).

  3. 3.

    Research also indicates that Portland’s relatively high housing prices—housing prices unrelated to the UGB—may also play a role in creating a premium for undeveloped city land (Nelson et al. 2002).

  4. 4.

    While the City provides infrastructure services such as water-->, fencing, and soil--> testing—as well as a list of guidelines that plot holders must follow—participants have direct control over the day-to-day management of their garden--> systems (L. Pohl-Kosbau, Portland Parks and Recreation 2013).

  5. 5.

    At the beginning of its lease at the Zenger property, the Urban Bounty Farm consisted of Marc Boucher-Colbert, Beth Rasgorshek, and apprentices Tanya Murray and John Tecklin.

  6. 6.

    The Portland Multnomah Food Policy--> Council was a subcommittee of the Portland Multnomah County Sustainable Development Commission.

  7. 7.

    By this time, the City of Portland had shifted toward more short-term, project-oriented collaboration with community--> interests (the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability’s work with the Code Development Advisory Group during the zoning--> code --> revisions is an example of this approach) (Hatfield 2012). County policymakers pursued a different strategy for community engagement, and FPC members themselves sought to develop an alternative model for influencing local or regional policy--> (Portland Multnomah Food Policy Council minutes, 9-12-12and 7-11-12).

  8. 8.

    Phase I of the Diggable City--> project took place before the creation of the Food Policy--> and Program Manager position.

  9. 9.

    The Bureau of Environmental Services, the Department of Transportation-->, Portland Parks and Recreation, and the Portland Water--> Bureau.

  10. 10.

    It should be mentioned that the County Digs program—an initiative of Multnomah County—began work in 2010 to donate tax-foreclosed properties for urban food production--> and green space. While unrelated to the Diggable City--> project, it successfully transferred six properties for use as community--> garden -->s between 2010 and 2012. All of these donated properties are within the urban growth boundary--> (K. Lynd).

  11. 11.

    This public process—in particular, the close collaboration with the Code Development Advisory Group—was considered an integral part (and one of the major successes) of the project (S. Cohen, J. Johnson, K. Kolker; Hatfield 2012).

References

  • Abbott C (1993) The Politics of Land-Use law in Oregon: Senate Bill 100, Twenty Years After. Or Hist Q 94(1):4–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer K, Rhoads A (2006) The Diggable City. PSU Sustainable Community Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer KJG, Kaplinger H, Miller J, Peterson M, Rhoads A, Rosenbloom P, Wall T, (2005) The Diggable City: Making Urban Agriculture a Planning Priority. Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Portland (1975) Oregon, Ordinance No. 139598

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (2010) Need for Strategic Code Package in 2010. City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (2011) Urban Food Zoning Code Update Concept Report. City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (n.d.) Project Advisory Group Wraps Up Discussions on the Five Topic Areas. Planning and Sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Urban Food Zoning Code Update (2012) City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Friends of Portland Community Gardens (n.d.) About. Friends of Portland Community Gardens. http://portlandcommunitygardens.org/about/. Accessed 26 Dec 2013

  • Friends of Zenger Farm (n.d.) A Century Old Working Urban Farm. Zenger Farm. http://www.zengerfarm.org/about-the-farm. Accessed 13 Dec 2013

  • Gisler J, Cohen S, Gilroy A (2011) Memo to urban food zoning code update advisory group. City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, 25 Apr 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Gragg R (2013) Zenger Farm Grows Community Ties. Portland Monthly Magazine, 03 Jun 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Growing Gardens (n.d.) About us. Gardening in Portland Oregon. http://growing-gardens.org/about-us/. Accessed 08 Jan 2014

  • Harper A, Shattuck A, Holt-Gimenez E, Alkon A, Lambrick F (2009) Food Policy Councils: Lessons Learned. Institute for Food and Development Policy. Oakland, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield M (2012) City Food Policy and Programs: Lessons Harvested from an Emerging Field. City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess DJ, Winner L (2005) Case studies of community gardens and urban agriculture. Vanderbilt University, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns A (2006) City to community gardeners: dig this. Portland Tribune, 02 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie M, Cohen S (2007) The diggable city phase III: implementation strategies and recommendations. City of Portland, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhorter O (1943) What the extension service of Oregon state college is doing on the victory garden program. Oregon State College, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes W, Balmer K, Kaethler T, Rhoads A (2008) Using land inventories to plan for urban agriculture: experiences from Portland and Vancouver. J Am Plan Assoc 74(4):435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metro (n.d.) Urban growth boundary. Metro: Making a great place. http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=277. Accessed 03 Dec 2013

  • Mickle L, Starin N (2009) East portland historical overview and historic preservation study. City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC, Moore T (1993) Assessing urban growth management: the case of Portland, Oregon, the USA’s largest urban growth boundary. Land Use Policy 10(4):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson AC, Pendall R, Dawkins C, Knaap GJ (2002) The link between growth management and housing affordability: the academic evidence, Discussion paper. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. History of Oregon’s land use planning. http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/Pages/history.aspx. Accessed 02 Jan 2014

  • Portland City Council (2002) Resolution No. 36074

    Google Scholar 

  • Portland City Council, Resolution No. 36272. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portland Multnomah Food Policy Council (2006) The diggable city phase II: urban agriculture inventory findings and recommendations. City of Portland, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Portland Multnomah Food Policy Council. FPC minutes 7-11-12. Portland Multnomah FPC 2012 meeting minutes, 11 Jul 2012. http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/406124. Accessed 09 Jan 2014

  • Portland Multnomah Food Policy Council. FPC minutes 9-12-12, Portland Multnomah FPC 2012 meeting minutes, 12 Sep 2012. http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/421369. Accessed 09 Jan 2014

  • Portland State University Population Research Center, Certified Population Estimates (2012) College of Urban and Public Affairs, 2012. http://www.pdx.edu/prc/population-estimates-0. Accessed 06 Jan 2014

  • Portland Parks and Recreation (2013) Community gardens policies and procedures. Portland Parks and Recreation

    Google Scholar 

  • Portland Parks and Recreation, Community Garden Facts. Parks and Recreation (n.d.) http://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/article/388440. Accessed 19 Dec 2013

  • Schukoske JE (2000) Community development through gardening: state and local policies transforming urban open space. N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy 351:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Simantel M (2003) Report with recommendations to the Portland/Multnomah Food Policy Council from the land use subcommittee. Portland/Multnomah Food Policy Council, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Oregon (1973) Oregon Land Conservation and Development Act

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture (1943) Victory garden leader’s handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hatfield, M.M., Cohen, S. (2016). A Case Study: Urban Agriculture in Portland, Oregon 2002–2012. In: Brown, S., McIvor, K., Hodges Snyder, E. (eds) Sowing Seeds in the City. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7453-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics