Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Mapping Wilderness pp 157–176Cite as

Purism Scale Approach for Wilderness Mapping in Iceland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Coincident with increased utilization of the Icelandic highlands, its image as a unique and pristine wilderness is gradually changing. People’s perception of wilderness is influenced by a number of factors relating to their culture and socio-economic background. Furthermore, how people value pristine land or define wilderness varies depending on the location and function of the assessment. Therefore, understanding perceived wilderness is likewise of major importance in the planning and long term management of tourism within the Icelandic highlands. This paper attempts to identify and map perceived wilderness areas within the southern Icelandic highlands, using the purism scale approach. The results indicate that constructions related to power plants (i.e. plants, power lines, and dams) are considered undesirable by all four tourism market groups. The results moreover show that non-purists visiting the Icelandic highlands do not favour paved roads. Conversely, mountain huts do not affect the perceived wilderness for any of the purism groups. The perceived wilderness mapping of the southern Icelandic highlands shows that nearly the whole area, or 97.2 %, is perceived as wilderness by the non-purism group, while less than half, or 45.4 %, is perceived as wilderness by the strong purism group. Once a wilderness area becomes known as a tourist destination, maintaining its wilderness condition becomes increasingly difficult. In order to avoid the overuse of wilderness for tourism and other economic sectors, ambitious planning and appropriate management are critical. This includes identifying limits of growth and further development. Without such limitations, the use of wilderness is simply unsustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benediktsson, K. (2008). Moving places? The emotional politics of nature. In J. O. Bærenholdt & B. Granås (Eds.), Mobility and place: Enacting Northern European peripheries (pp. 205–217). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S., Evans, A., & Fritz, S. (2002). Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Wilderness, 8(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1998). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69–90). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. S., & Anderson, S. (2008). Mapping perceived wilderness to support protected areas management in the San Juan National Forest, Colorado. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(5), 1039–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, P., & Emmelin, L. (2001). Wilderness purism, willingness to pay and management preferences: A study of Swedish mountain tourists. Tourism Economics, 7, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gössling, S., & Hultman, J. (2006). Ecotourism in Scandinavia, lessons in theory and practice. Wallingford: CABI International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., Catton, W. R., Jr, Marlow, L. D., & Brockman, C. F. (1968). Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest: Their characteristics, values, and management preferences (Research paper PNW). Portland: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., Stankey, G. H., & Lucas, R. C. (1990). Wilderness management (2nd ed.). Golden: North American Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, J. (1998). Sustaining the physical and social dimensions of wilderness tourism: The perceptual approach to wilderness management in New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6(1), 26–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higham, J., Kearsley, G. W., & Kliskey, A. D. (2001). Multiple wilderness recreation management. Sustaining wilderness values – Maximising wilderness experiences. In G. Cessford (Ed.), The state of wilderness in New Zealand (pp. 81–93). Wellington: Department of Conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbens, E. H., & Benediktsson, K. (2007). Practising highland heterotopias: Automobility in the interior of Iceland. Mobilities, 2(1), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icelandic Act no. 44/1999 on Nature Conservation, section 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Icelandic Act no. 60/2013 on Nature Conservation, section 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ísleifsson, S. R. (1996). Ísland, framandi land [Iceland, a strange country]. Reykjavík: Mál og menning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ísleifsson, S. R. (2009). Ideas of an island in the north. Scandia, 75(2), 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITB (Icelandic Tourist Board). (2012). International visitors in Iceland: Visitor survey summer 2011. Reykjavík: Icelandic Tourist Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Júlíusson, Á. D. (1995). Farmers during epidemic times. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Copenhagen, 597 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, G. (1975). Frá þjóðveldi til konungsríkis [From Commonwealth to kingdom]. In Saga Íslands II [Icelandic history II] (pp. 3–54). Reykjavík: Hið íslenzka bókmenntafélag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, G., & Kjartansson, H. S. (1994). Plágurnar miklu á Íslandi [The great epidemics in Iceland]. Saga, tímarit Sögufélagsins, 32, 11–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliskey, A. D., & Kearsley, G. W. (1993). Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in southern New Zealand. Applied Geography, 13, 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsvirkjun. (2013). Hydro and geothermal stations. Retrieved May 22, 2013 from http://www.landsvirkjun.com/Company/PowerStations/

  • Lesslie, R. G., & Taylor, S. G. (1985). The wilderness continuum concept and its implication for Australian Wilderness Preservation Policy. Biological Conservation, 32, 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupp, G., Höchtl, F., & Wende, W. (2011). Wilderness- A designation for Central European landscapes? Land Use Policy, 28, 594–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment. (2010). Velferð til framtíðar. Sjálfbær þróun í íslensku samfélagi. Áherslur 2010–2013 [Welfare for the future. Iceland’s national strategy for sustainable development. Emphasis 2010–2013]. Reykjavík: Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment & The National Planning Agency. (1999). Miðhálendi Íslands, Svæðisskipulag 2015 [The Central Highlands, regional plan 2015]. Reykjavík: Ministry of the Environment/The National Planning Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miriam, R. (2006). Iceland’s ecological crisis: Large scale renewable energy and wilderness destruction. Retrieved March 24, 2013 from http://www.ru.org/ecology-and-environment/iceland-s-ecological-crisis-large-scale-renewable-energy-and-wilderness-destruction.html

  • Mohsin, A. (2005). Tourist attitudes and destination marketing – The case of Australia’s Northern Territory and Malaysia. Tourism Management, 26(5), 723–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsdóttir, R., & Runnström, M. C. (2011a). How wild is Iceland? Assessing wilderness quality with respect to nature based tourism. Tourism Geographies, 13(2), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsdóttir, R., & Runnström, M. C. (2011b). Endalaus víðátta? Mat og kortlagning íslenskra víðerna [Endless expanses, Assessing and Mapping Icelandic Wilderness]. Náttúrufræðingurinn, 81(2), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsdóttir, R., & Runnström, M. C. (2013). Assessing hiking trails condition in two popular tourist destinations in the Icelandic highlands. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 3–4, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oslund, K. (2011). Iceland imagined. Nature, culture, and storytelling in the North Atlantic. London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálsdóttir, S. (2005). Landsvirkjun : fyrirtækið, framkvæmdir þess og hlutverk [Landsvirkjun: The company, practices and function]. In S. Pálsdóttir (Ed.), Landsvirkjun 1965–2005: Fyrirtækið og umhverfi þess [Landsvirkjun 1965–2005: The company and its environment] (pp. 13–110). Reykjavík: Hið íslenska bókmenntafélag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer, R. (1976). Sociological and political factors in carrying capacity decision-making. In Proceedings, third resources management conference, April 29–30, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Southwest Region, Fort Worth/Santa Fe, 1976 (pp. 228–258).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity (Vol. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT – 142.) Ogden: Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 61 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., & Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behaviour: A state-of-knowledge review. General Technical Report, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, No. INT-220, pp. 246–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Iceland. (2013a). Ferðamál, samgöngur og upplýsingatækni. Ferðaþjónusta. Útflutningur vöru og þjónustu eftir atvinnugreinum [Tourism, transportation and information technology. Tourism industry. Export of goods and services by industries]. Retrieved June 26, 2013 from http://www.hagstofa.is/Hagtolur/Ferdamal-samgongur-UT/Ferdathjonusta

  • Statistics Iceland. (2013b). Mannfjöldi [Population]. Retrieved March 24, 2013 from http://www.hagstofa.is/Hagtolur/Mannfjoldi/

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2008). Wilderness tourism in Iceland: Threats and opportunities. In C. M. Hall, D. K. Müller, & J. Saarinen (Eds.), Nordic tourism: Issues and cases. Bristol: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2010a). Planning nature tourism in Iceland based on tourist attitudes. Tourism Geographies, 12(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2010b). Tourism struggling as the wilderness is developed. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 10(3), 334–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2011). Wilderness tourism in Iceland – land use and conflicts with power production. PhD thesis, The Geographical Society of Northern Finland and The Department of Geography, University of Oulu, Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2012a). Tourism and power plant development: An attempt to solve land use conflicts. Tourism Planning & Development, 9(4), 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2012b). Ferðamennska á miðhálendi Íslands: Staða og spá um framtíðarhorfur [Tourism in the central Icelandic highlands. Current situation and future expectations]. Reykjavík: Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D. (2013). Managing popularity: Changes in tourist attitudes to a wilderness destination. Tourism Management Perspectives, 7, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D., & Stefánsson, Þ. (2009). Töluleg greining á viðhorfum ferðamanna á Kili [Statistical analyse on tourists’ attitudes in Kjölur]. Reykjavík: Institute of Geography and Tourism, University of Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæþórsdóttir, A. D., Hall, C. M., & Saarinen, J. (2011). Making wilderness: Tourism and the history of the wilderness idea in Iceland. Polar Geography, 34(4), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. F. (2011). GIS assessment of Icelandic wilderness from 1936–2010. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Iceland. Retrieved March 24, 2013 from http://skemman.is/item/view/1946/9876

  • The Environment Agency of Iceland & National Land Survey of Iceland. (2009). A map of Icelandic wilderness.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wilderness Act. (1964). Section 2. (c) Definition of wilderness. Public Law 88–577 (16 U.S. C. 1131–1136). 88th Congress, Second Session, September 3, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thórhallsdóttir, T. E. (2007). Environment and energy in Iceland: A comparative analysis of values and impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(6), 522–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, A. E., & Koole, S. L. (2006). New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistad, O. I. (1995). I skogen og I skolten. Ein analyse av friluftsliv, miljöoppleving, påverknad og forvaltning i Fremundsmarka, med jamföringar til Rogen og Långfjället [In woods and mountains. An analysis of outdoor recreation, environmental experience, impact and management in Fremundsmarka, compared with Rogen and Långfjället]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten, P. (1988). Rekreation i Rogen. Tillämpning av en planeringsmetod for friluftliv. Kommit-rapport 1988:2. Kommiteen for miljövern, Universitetet iTrondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R. (2002). The social construction of arctic wilderness: Place meanings, value pluralism, and globalization. In A. E. Watson, L. Alessa, & J. Sproull (Eds.), USDA Forest Service proceedings RMRS-P-26. Wilderness in the Circumpolar North: Searching for compatibility in ecological, traditional, and ecotourism values, Anchorage, Alaska, May 15–16, 2001, pp. 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The questionnaire surveys were supported by The Icelandic Ministry of Industries and Innovation, The Icelandic Tourist Board and The Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration. In addition, we are grateful to David Folkmann Drost for English correction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, IS-101, Reykjavík, Iceland

    Rannveig Ólafsdóttir & Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir

  2. GIS Centre, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 10, SE-223 52, Lund, Sweden

    Micael Runnström

Authors
  1. Rannveig Ólafsdóttir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Micael Runnström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rannveig Ólafsdóttir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leeds, School of Geography, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Stephen J. Carver

  2. Ecosystem Services and Mgmt, Int’l Inst Applied System Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    Steffen Fritz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ólafsdóttir, R., Sæþórsdóttir, A.D., Runnström, M. (2016). Purism Scale Approach for Wilderness Mapping in Iceland. In: Carver, S., Fritz, S. (eds) Mapping Wilderness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7399-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation