Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter reviews social evolution and organization, highlighting termites. First, we review the distribution and evolutionary patterns of eusociality, characterized by the sterile worker and soldier castes, comparing the Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps) and Isoptera (termites). Second, we summarize theories of the origin of sociality: on kin selection, and on conflict and its resolution. We discuss social evolution and social organization with respect to social insects in general; specifically, the difference in the conditions for the evolution of the soldier and worker castes and the relationship between between social evolution and social organization. We then describe the case of termites, focusing on its unique features, that is, the presence of false (non-sterile) workers in some species instead of regular (sterile) workers (in contrast with false workers, called “true workers”) and the general presence of the soldier caste.

Masahiko Higashi and Takuya Abe died in the Sea of Cortez on 27 March 2000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe, T. (1984) Colonization of the Krakatau Islands by termites (Insecta: Isoptera). Physiology and Ecology Japan 21, 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abe, T. (1987) Evolution of life types in termites. In Evolution and Coadaptation in Biotic Communities (S. Kawano, J. H. Connell and T. Hidaka, Eds. ), pp. 125–148, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abe, T. (1991) Ecological factors associated with the evolution of worker and soldier castes in termites. Annals of Entomology 9, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abe, T., Higashi, M. (1991) Cellulose centered perspective on terrestrial community structure. Oikos 60, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, R. D. (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 325–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander, R. D., Noonan, K. M., Crespi, B. J. (1991) The evolution of eusociality. In The Biology of the Naked Mole Rat (P. W. Sherman, J. U. M. Jarvis and R. D. Alexander, Eds. ), pp. 3–44, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki, S. (1977) Colophina clematis (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), an aphid species with soldiers. Kontyu 45, 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aoki, S. (1987) Soldiers and altruistic dispersal in aphids. In Animal Societies; Theories and Facts (Y. Ito, J. L. Brown and J. Kikkawa, Eds. ), pp. 53–65, Japan Science Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartz, S. J. (1979) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 5764–5768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodot, P. (1967) Etude écologique des termites des savanes de Basse Côte d’Ivoire. Insectes Sociaux 14, 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourke, A. F. G. (1997) Sociality and kin selection in insects. In Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds. ), pp. 203227, Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bourke, A. F. G., Franks, N. R. (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brockman, H. J. (1984) The evolution of social behavior in insects. In Behavioral Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (J. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds. ), pp. 340–361, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brockman, H. J. (1997) Cooperative breeding in wasps and vertebrates: the role of ecological constraints In Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, Eds. ), pp. 347–371, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charnov, E. L. (1978) Evolution of social behavior: offspring choice or parental parasitism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 75, 451–465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choe, J. C., Crespi, B. J. Eds. (1997) Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cleveland, L. R., et al. (1934) The wood-feeding roach Cryptocercus, its protozoa, and the symbiosis between protozoa and roach. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Science 17, 185–342.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collins, N. M. (1981) Populations, age structure and survivorship of colonies of Macrotermems bellicosus (Isoptera:Macrotermitinae). Journal of Animal Ecology 50, 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, N. M. (1983) The utilization of nitrogen resources by termites (Isoptera). In Nitrogen as an Ecological Factor (J. A. Lee, S. McNeill and I. H. Rorison, Eds. ), pp. 381–412, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cowling, E. B., Merril, W. (1966) Nitrogen in wood and its role in wood deterioration. Canadian Journal of Botany 44, 1539–1554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crespi, B. J. (1992) Eusociality in Australian gall thrips. Nature 359, 724–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crespi, B. J. (1994) Three conditions for the evolution of eusociality: are they sufficient? Insectes Sociaux 41, 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Crespi, B. J., Yanega, D. (1995) The defmition of eusociality. Behavioral Ecology 6, 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Crozier, R. H., Pamilo, P. (1996) Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cruz, Y. P. (1981) A sterile defender morph in a polymorphic hymenopterous parasite. Nature 294, 446447.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Darlington, J. P. E. C. (1985) Multiple primary reproductives in the termite, Macrotermes michaelseni (Sjöstedt). In Caste Differentiation in Social Insects (J. A. L. Watson, B. M. Okot-Kother and C. Noirot, Eds. ), pp. 187–200, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Darlington, J. P. E. C. (1988) Multiple reproductives in nests of Macrotermes he rus (Isoptera: Termitidae). Sociobiology 2, 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deligne, J. A., Quennedey, A., Blum, M. S. (1981) The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. In Social Insects (H. R. Hermann, Ed. ), pp. 1–76, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeSalle, R., et al. (1992) DNA sequences from a fossil termite in Oligo-Miocene amber and their phylogenetic implications. Science 257, 1933–1936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Duffy, J. E. (1996) Eusociality in a coral reef shrimp. Nature 381, 512–514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Evans, H. E. (1958) The evolution of social life in wasps. Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Entomology 2, 449–457.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Evans, H. E. (1977) Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the evolution of insect sociality. Bioscience 27, 613617.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gadagkar, R. (1994) Why the defmition of eusociality is not helpful to understand its evolution and what we should do about it. Oikos 70, 485–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grafen, A. (1985) A geometric view of relatedness. In Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology (R. Dawkins and M. Ridley, Eds. ), pp. 28–89, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grafen, A. (1991) Modelling in behavioural ecology. In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds. ), pp. 5–31, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamilton, W. D. (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3, 193–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Heath, H. (1928) Fertile termite soldiers. Biological Bulletin 54, 324–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Higashi, M., Abe, T. (1997) Global diversification of termites driven by the evolution of symbiosis and sociality. In Biodiversity; an Ecological Perspective (T. Abe, S. A. Levin and M. Higashi, Eds. ), pp. 83–112, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Higashi, M., Abe, T., Burns, T. P. (1992) Carbon-nitrogen balance and termite ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 249, 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Higashi, M., et al. (1991) Why don’t all termite species have a sterile worker caste? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 246, 25–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hölldobler, B., Wilson, E. O. (1990) The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Imms, A. D. (1919) On the structure and biology of Archotermopsis, together with description of new species of intestinal protozoa and general observations on the Isoptera. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 209, 75–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Inoue, T., et al. (1997) Cellulose and xylan utilisation in the lower termite Reticulitermes speratus. Journal of Insect Physiology 43, 235–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Jarvis, J. U. M. (1981) Eusociality in a mammal. Cooperative breeding in naked-mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) colonies. Science 212, 57 1573.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jarvis, J. U. M., et al. (1994) Mammalian eusociality: A family affair. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 4751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kambhampati, S. (1995) A phylogeny of cockroaches and related insects based on DNA sequence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92, 2017–2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kent, D. S., Simpson, J. A. (1992) Eusociality in the beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Naturwissenschaften 79, 86–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lack, D. (1954) The evolution of reproductive rate. In Evolution as a Process (J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy and E. B. Ford, Eds. ), pp. 143–156, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  52. LaFage, J. P., Nutting, W. L. (1978) Nutrient dynamics of termites. In Production Ecology of Ants and Termites (M. V. Brian, Ed. ), pp. 165–232, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and London.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lenz, M., Runko, S. (1993) Long-term impact of orphaning on field colonies of Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Insectes Sociaux 40, 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lin, N., Michener, C. D. (1972) Evolution of sociality in insects. Quarterly Review of Biology 47, 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Longhurst, C., Johnson, R. A., Wood, T. G. (1978) Predation by Megaponera foetens (Fabr. ) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on termites in the Nigerian southern Guinea Savanna Oecologia 32, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Maki, K., Abe, T. (1986) Proportion of soldiers in the colonies of a dry wood termite, Neotermes koshunensis (Kalotermitidae, Isoptera). Physiology and Ecology Japan. 23, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Maynard Smith, J. (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201, 1145–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. McKittrick, F. A. (1965) A contribution to the understanding of cockroach-termite affinities. Annals of Entomological Society of America 58, 18–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Michener, C. D. (1969) Comparative social behavior of bees. Annual Review of Entomology 14, 299–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Michener, C. D. (1974) The Social Behavior of Bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Myles, T. G. (1986) Reproductive soldiers in Termopsidae (Isoptera). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 62, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Myles, T. G. (1988) Resource inheritance in social evolution from termites to man. In The Ecology of Social Behavior (C. N. Sloboidchikoff, Ed. ), pp. 379423, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Myles, T. G., Nutting, W. L. (1988) Termite eusocial evolution: a reexamination of Bartz’s hypothesis and assumptions. Quarterly Review of Biology 63, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nalepa, C. A. (1994) Nourishment and the origin of termite eusociality. In Nourishment and Evolution in Insect Societies (J. H. Hunt and C. A. Nalepa, Eds. ), pp. 57–104, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Noirot, C. (1985) Pathways of caste development in the lower termites. In Caste Differentiation in Social Insects (J. A. L. Watson, B. M. Okot-Kotber and C. Noirot, Eds. ), pp. 41–57, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Noirot, C. (1990) Evolution of polymorphism in Isoptera: developmental and behavioural constraints In Social Insects and the Environment (G. K. Veeresh, B. Malik and C. A. Viraktamath, Eds. ), pp. 333–334, Oxford IBI Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Noirot, C., Pasteels, J. (1987) Ontogenetic development and evolution of the worker caste in termites. Experientia 43, 851–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Noirot, C., Pasteels, J. (1988) The worker caste is polyphyletic in termites. Sociobiology 14, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Quennedey, A. (1984) Morphology and ultrastructure of termite defense glands. In Defensive Mechanisms in Social Insects (H. R. Hermann, Ed. ), pp. 151–200, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reeve, H. K., Ratnieks, L. W. (1993) Queen-queen conflicts in polygynous societies: Mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (L. Keller, Ed. ), pp. 45–85, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Roisin, Y. (1993) Selective pressures on pleometrosis and secondary polygyny: a comparison of termites and ants In Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. (L. Keller, Ed. ), pp. 402–421, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Roisin, Y. (1994) Intragroup conflicts and the evolution of sterile castes in termites. American Naturalist 143, 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Roisin, Y., Pasteels, J. M. (1991) Sex ratio and asymmetry between the sexes in the production of replacement reproductives in the termite, Neotermes papua (Desneux). Ethology, Ecology Evolution 3, 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Seger, J. (1983) Partial bivoltinism may cause sex-ratio biases that favour eusociality. Nature 301, 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Seger, J. (1991) Cooperation and conflict in social insects. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds. ), pp. 338373, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sewell, J. J., Watson, J. A. L. (1981) Developmental pathway in Australian species of Kalotermes Hagen (Isoptera). Sociobiology 6, 243–323.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Shellman-Reeve, J. (1997) The spectrum of eusociality in termites. In The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, Eds. ), pp. 52–93, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Sherman, P. W., Jarvis, J. U. M., Alexander, R. D. Eds. (1991) The Biology of the Naked Mole-rat. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sherman, P. W., et al. (1995) The continuum. Behavioral Ecology 6, 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Slaytor, M. (1992) Cellulose digestion in termites and cockroaches: what role do symbionts play? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 103B, 775784.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Springetti, A. (1969) Il controllo sociale della diffemtziazone degli alti in Kalotermes flavicollis Fabr. (Isoptera). Annali dell’Università di Ferrara Sezione 1113, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Stem, D. L. (1994) A phylogenetic analysis of soldier evolution in the aphid family Hormaphididae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 256, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Stem, D. L., Foster, W. A. (1996) The evolution of soldiers in aphids. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 71, 27–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Tayasu, I. et al. (1994) Xylophagous termites depending on atmospheric nitrogen. Naturwissenshafien 81 229–231.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Thorne, B. L. (1985) Termite polygyny: The ecological dynamics of queen mutualism. In Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (B. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer, Eds. ), pp. 325–342, Fischer, Stuttgart and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Thorne, B. L. (1997) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Thome, B. L., Carpenter, J. M. (1992) Phylogeny of the Dictyoptera. Systematic Entomology 17, 253–268. 89. Trivers, R. L. (1985) Social Evolution. BenjaminCummings, Menlo Park.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Waller, D. A., LaFage, J. P. (1987) Nutritional ecology of termites. In Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites and Spiders (F. Slanky and J. G. Rodriguez, Eds. ), pp. 487–531, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Watson, J. A. L. (1985) Caste development in Mastotermes and Kalotermes, which is primitive ? In Caste Differentiation in Social Insects (J. A. L. Waton, B. M. Okot-Kotber and C. Noirot, Eds. ), pp. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Watson, J. A. L., Okot-Kotber, B. M., Noirot, C. (1985) Caste Differentiation in Social Insects. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  92. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 50, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Wheeler, W. M. (1923) Social Life among the Insects. Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wheeler, W. M. (1928) The Social Insects: Their Origin and Evolution. Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wilson, E. O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wood, T. G., Sands, W. A. (1978) The role of termites in ecosystems. In Production Ecology of Ants and Termites (M. V. Brian, Ed. ), pp. 245–292, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Yamamura, N. (1993) Different evolutionary conditions for worker and soldier caste: genetic systems explaining caste distribution among social insects. Journal of Theoretical Biology 161, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Yamamura, N., Higashi, M. (1992) An evolutionary theory of conflict resolution between relatives: altruism, manipulation, compromise. Evolution 46, 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Zimmerman, R. B. (1983) Sibling manipulation and indirect fitness in termites. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12, 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Higashi, M., Yamamura, N., Abe, T. (2000). Theories on the Sociality of Termites. In: Abe, T., Bignell, D.E., Higashi, M. (eds) Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3223-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3223-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5476-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3223-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics