Skip to main content

Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations

  • Chapter
Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry
  • 253 Accesses

Abstract

The offshore oil and gas industry had its beginnings in the Gulf of Mexico in 1947. The first offshore development used a multipiled steel jacket to support the topside production facilities, a design which has since been used extensively. Now there are more than 7000 drilling and production platforms located on the Continental Shelves of 53 countries [1]. Some of these structures have been installed in areas of deep water and treacherous climates, and consequently structure designs have adapted to withstand the environmental conditions of these areas. Some typical designs are shown in Figs 5.1-5.5. In the North Sea, which is an area that experiences some extreme environmental conditions, more than 200 structures have been installed, about 25% of which are in water depths greater than 75 m and can be exposed to maximum storm wave heights of 30 m. This combination of deep waters and extreme storm forces dictates large structures, some with component weights that exceed 50 000 tonnes [6]. One of the world’s largest gravity base structures (GBS) is scheduled to be installed off the coast of Canada in 1996. It is designed to withstand impacts by icebergs and will weigh approximately 1.5 million tonnes including ballast [7]. Now, as oil and gas fields begin to deplete their reserves, the concern has turned to the removal and disposal of these structures at the end of their producing lives. Estimates indicate that the cost of some removals may exceed the cost of the original installation. The structures located on the Norwegian Continental Shelf contain only 1% of the world’s offshore structures, but will account for nearly 20% of the worldwide removal costs [4]. Innovative removal and disposal techniques must be developed to limit costs and minimize the impact on the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Offshore abandonment heats up: North Sea, Gulf of Mexico deepwater platforms are costly, difficult to remove. Journal of Petroleum Technology, August 1995, 643–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific (1994), Waste Recycling of Obsolete Oil and Gas Production Structures in Asia Pacific Waters (Overview), Volume 2, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific (1994), Waste Recycling of Obsolete Oil and Gas Production Structures in Asia Pacific Waters (Overview), Volume 1, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Habersholm, L. and Robberstad, L. (1994) Environmental impact from removal of offshore installations: the North East Frigg field case. Second International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, 25–27 January, Jakarta, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deepsea disposal for Brent Spar. Offshore Engineer, March 1995, 12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dymond, P.F. (1995) The operators’ perspective on the decommissioning of UKCS offshore installation. Petroleum Review, April, 176–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoff, G.C., Mobil Exploration and Producing Technology, personal communication, October 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts, M. (1994) Abandonment (field decommissioning): the legal requirements, 26th Annual OTC 2–5 May, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw, K. (1994) Decommissioning and abandonment: the safety and environmental issues, SPE Paper 27235, 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Welding Society (1987) Welding Technology Welding Handbook, 8th edn, Volume 1, American Welding Society, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  11. UKOOA (1994) Decommissioning UK Offshore Installations, the Right Balance, UKOOA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snell, R., Corr, R.B., Gorf, P.K. and Sharp, G.K. (1993) Options for abandonment; an operators perspective, IBC Technology Services, Ltd. Decommissioning and Removal of Offshore Structures Conference, 15–16 September, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. UKOOA (1995) An Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Decommissioning Options for Oil and Gas Installations in the UK North Sea, Executive Summary, Auris International, Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Minerals Management Service (1992) Notice to Lessees No. 92–02: Minimum Interim Requirements for Site Clearance (and Verification) of Abandoned Oil and Gas Structures in the Gulf of Mexico, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, D. (1995) North Sea operators tackling platform abandonment problems. Oil and Gas Journal, 20 March, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman, D. (1994) Abandonment — the North Sea’s newest industry. Petroleum Review, September, 413–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. (1994) Decommissioning and abandonment: the safety and environmental issues Second International Conference on Health Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production25–27 January, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, T.W. (1994) Deconstruction of an offshore platform. 26th Annual OTC, 2–5 May, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Day, M.D., Marks, M.H. (1997). Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations. In: Orszulik, S.T. (eds) Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1447-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1447-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-1449-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1447-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics