Abstract
The average age of people presenting with esophageal adenocarcinoma is about 20 years older than that of patients with known or newly diagnosed Barrett’s esophagus1–3. The long duration between development of Barrett’s esophagus and its malignant degeneration is important to bear in mind since it suggests that there is a significant time interval during which therapeutic and/or preventive interventions may have the potential to be effective. The accessibility of the esophagus for inspection and biopsy and the observation that results of surgical treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma are directly linked to the stage of the disease at the time of discovery, have led to the introduction of endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett’s esophagus4–8. This approach has been supported by the reports that patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma detected within a surveillance program present at an early stage and have significantly better survival than those who present de novo6–9. Investigators have also found that the majority of patients with Barrett’s adenocarcinoma do report a past history of chronic heartburn when specifically questioned. This point emphasizes the need to endoscope patients with chronic heartburn and take multiple biopsies from the distal esophagus even when the appearance may be relatively normal. In doing so, the physician can exclude or identify Barrett’s esophagus prior to placing patients on long term therapy or offer antireflux surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cameron AJ, Ott BJ, Payne WS. The incidence of adenocarcinoma in columnar lined (Barrett’s) esophagus. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 857–9.
Haggit RC, Tryzelaar J, Ellis FH, Colcher H. Adenocarcinoma complicating columnar epithelium-lined (Barrett’s) esophagus. Am Soc CI Pathol 1978; 70: 1–5.
Skinner DB, Walther BC, Riddell RH, Schmidt H, Iascone C, DeMeester TR. Barrett’s esophagus. Comparison of benign and malignant cases. Ann Surg 1983: 554–65.
Hameeteman W, Tytgat GN, Houthoff HJ, van den Tweel JG. Barrett’s esophagus: Development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: 1249–56.
Streitz JM Jr, Andrews CW Jr, Ellis FH Jr. Endoscopie surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Does it help ? J Thoac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 105 (3): 383–7.
Peters JH, Clark GW, Ireland AP, Chandrasoma P, Smyrk TC, DeMeester TR. Outcome of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus in endoscopically surveyed and nonsurveyed patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 813–21.
Clark GW, Dreuw B, Burdiles P. The importance of endoscopie surveillance in the detection of early Barrett’s adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1993; 104: 392.
Spechler SJ, Goyal RK. Cancer surveillance in Barrett’s esophagus: What is the end point? Gastroenterology 1994; 106 (1): 275–7.
van Sandick JW, van Lanschot JJB, Kuiken BW, Tytgat GNJ, Offerhaus GJA, Obertorp H. Impact of endoscopie biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s carcinoma. Gut 1998: 43: 216–22.
Reid BJ, Haggitt RC, Rubin CE, Rabinovitsch PS. Barrett’s esophagus. Correlation between flow cytometri and histology in detection of patients at risk for adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol 1987;93:1-
Rabinovitsch PS, Reid BJ, Haggitt RC, Norwood TH, Rubin CE. Progression to cancer in Barrett’s esophagus is associated with genomic instability. Laboratory Investigation 1988; 60: 65–71.
Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 1976 Oct 1; 194: 23–8.
Raskind WH, Norwood T, Levine DS, Haggitt RC, Rabinovitsch PS, Reid BJ. Persistent clonal areas and clonal expansion in Barrett’s esophagus. Cancer Research 1992; 52: 2946–50.
Lane DP, Benchimol S. p53 oncogene or antioncogene? Genes Dev 1990; 4: 1–8
Levine MS, Carolione D, Thompson JJ, Kressel HY, Laufer I, Herlinger H. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: relationship to Barrett mucosa. Radiology 1984; 150 (2): 305–9.
McArdle JE, Lewin KJ, Randall G, Weinstein W. Distribution of dysplasias and early invasive carcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Hum Pathol 1992; 23: 479–82.
Iftikhar SY, James PD, Steele RJC et al. Length of Barrett’s esophagus: an important factor in the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gut 1992; 33: 1155–8.
Menke Pluymers MBE, Hop WCJ, Dees J et al. Risk factors for the development of an adenocarcinoma in columnar lined (Barrett) esopahgus. Cancer 1993; 72: 1155–8.
Spechler SJ, Robbins AH, Rubins HB, Vincent ME, Heeren T, Doos WG, Colton T, Schimmel EM. Adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. An overrated risk? Gastroenterology 1984; 87: 927–33.
Iftikhar SY, James PD, Steele RJ, Hardcastle JD, Atkinson M. Length of Barrett’s esophagus: An important factor in the development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gut 1992; 33 (9): 1155–8.
Pera M, Trastek VF, Carpenter HA, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Pairolero PC. Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: An indication for esophagectomy? Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54(2):199204.
Altorki NK, Sunagawa M, Little AG, Skinner DB. High-grade dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus. Am J Surg 1991; 161: 97–9.
Rice TW, Falk GW, Achkar E, Petras RE. Surgical management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88 (11): 1832–6.
Schmidt HG, Riddell RH, Walther B, Skinner DB. Riemann JF. Dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1985; 110 (2): 145–52.
Reid BJ, Haggitt RC, Rubin CE, Roth G, Surawicz CM, Van Belle G, Lewin K, Weinstein WM. Antonioli DA, Goldman H: Observer variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Hum Pathol 1988; 19: 166–78.
Prevo LJ, Sanchez CA, Galipeau PC, Reid BJ. p53-mutant clones and field effects in Barrett’s esophagus. Cancer Res 1999(19);4784-7.
Reid BJ, Levine DS, Longton G, Blount PL. Rabinovitch PS. Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett’s esophagus baseline histology and flow cytometry indetify low and high risk patients subsets. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95 (7): 1669–76.
DeMeester SR, Campos GMR, DeMeester TR, Bremner CG, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Crookes PF. The impact of an antireflux procedure on intestinal metaplasia of the cardia. Ann Surg 1998; 228 (4): 54756.
Clark GW, Ireland AP, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P. DeMeester TR, Bremner CG. Short-segment Barrett’s esophagus: A prevalent complication of gastresophageal reflux disease with malignant potential. J Gastrointest Surg 1997; 1: 113–22.
Zhang F, Subbaramaiah K, Altorki N, Dannenberg AJ. Dihydroxy bile acids activate the transcription of cyclooxygenase -2. J Bio Chem 1998; 273: 2424–8.
DeMeester TR. The surgical management of Barrett’s esophagus and mucosal ablation. In: Barrett’s esophagus. An update. Ed. Peracchia A, Bonavina L. EDRA Medical Publishing New Media 1990: 79–92.
Fitzgerald RC, Omary MB, Triadafilopoulos G. Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus: an ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model. J Clin Invest 1996; 98: 2120–8.
Ouatu-Lascar R, Fitzgerald RC, Triadafilopoulos G. Differentiation and proliferation in Barrett’s esophagus and the effects of acid suppression. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 327–35.
Peters FTM, Ganesh S, Kuipers EJ, De JagerKrikken A, Karrenbeld A, Harms G et al. Epithelial cell proliferative activity of Barrett’s esophagus. Methodology and correlation with traditional cancer risk markers. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 1501–6.
Devière J, Buset M, Dumonceau J et al. Regression of Barrett’s epithelium with omeprazole. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1497–8.
Ottenjann R, Heidt H. Regression der Zylinderepithel–Metaplasie bei Barrett-Esophagus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr1990; 115; 916–17.
Gore S, Healey CJ, Sutton R et al. Regression of columnar lined (Barrett’s) esophagus with continuous omeprazole therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993; 7: 623–8.
Neuman CS, Iqbal TH, Cooper BT. Long term continuous omeprazole treatment of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995; 9: 451–4.
Malesci A, Savarino V, Zentilin P et al. Partial regression of Barrett’s esophagus by long-term therapy with high-dose omeprazole. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 700–5.
Shaffer RT, Francis J, Carrougher JG et al. Effect of omeprazole on Barrett’s epithelium after 3 years of therapy (abstract). Gastroenterology I996;1 10: A255.
Caldwell MTP, Byrne Pi, Walsh TN et al. A randomised trial on the effect of acid suppression on regression of Barrett’s esophagus (abstract). Gastroenterology 1996: 110: A74
Sharma P, Sampliner RE, Camargo E. Normalization of esophageal pH with high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy does not result in regression of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 582–5.
Sharma P, Morales TG, Bhattacharyya A et al. Squamous islands in Barrett’s esophagus: what lies underneath? Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 332–5.
Katzka DA, Castell DO. Successful elimination of reflux symptoms does not ensure adequate control of acid reflux in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 989–91.
Ouatu-Lascar R, Triadafilopoulos G. Complete elimination of reflux symptoms does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal acid reflux in patients with Barrett’s esopgagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 711–6.
Kuo B, Castel) DO. Optimal dosing of omeprazole 40 mg daily: effects on gastric and esophageal pH and serum gastrin in healthy controls. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1532–8.
Ortiz A, Martinez de Haro LF, Parrilla P, Molina J, Bermejo J, Munitiz V. 24-h pH monitoring is necessary to assess acid reflux suppression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus undergoing treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 1472–4.
Johnson D, Winters C, Spurling T et al. Esophageal acid sensitivity in Barrett’s esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol 1987; 9: 23–7.
Peghini PL, Katz PO, Castell DO. Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole: a controlled study in normal subjects. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 1335–9.
Peters FTM, Ganesh S, Kuipers EJ, WJ Sluiter WJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Lamers CBH, Kleibeuker JH. Endoscopie regression of Barrett’s esophagus during omeprazole treatment. A randomised double blind study. Gut 1999; 45: 489–94.
Low DE, Levine DS, Dail DH, Kozarek RA. Histological and anatomic changes in Barrett’s esophagus after antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 80–85.
Weinstein WM, Lieberman DA. Lewin KJ et al. Omeprazole-induced regression of Barrett’s esophagus: a 2 year, randomized, controlled double blind trial. Gastroenterology 1996;110:A294.
Stein HJ, Kauer WKH, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Bile reflux benign and malignant Barrett’s esophagus: effect of Medical acid suppression and Nissen fundoplication. 1 Gastrointest Surg 1998; 2: 333–41.
Sagar PM, Ackroyd R, Hosie KB, Pattersson JE, Stoddard CI, Kingsnorth AN. Regression and progression of Barrett’s esophagus after antireflux surgery. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 806–10.
DeMeester TR, Peters JH, Bremner CG, Chandrasoma P. Biology of gastresophageal reflux disease: Pathophysiology relating to medical and surgical treatment. Annual Review of Medicine 1999; 50: 469–506.
Isolauri J, Loustarinen M, Isolauri E et al. Natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease 17-22 year follow up of 60 patients. Am J Gastroenterology 1997; 92: 37–41.
Whetscher GJ, Profanter C, Gadenstatter M et al. Medical treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease does not prevent the development of Barrett’s metaplasia and poor esophageal body motility. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1997; 382: 95–9.
Isolauri J, Loustarinen M, Viljakka M, Isolauro E, Keyrilainen O, Karvonen AL. Long-term comparison of antireflux surgery versus conservative therapy for reflux esophagitis. Ann Surg 1997; 225: 295–9.
Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Puente G, Korn O, Diasz JC, Maluenda F. Long term results of classic antireflux surgery in 152 patients with Barrett’s esophagus: Clinical, radiologie, endoscopie, manometric, and acid reflux test analysis before and late after operation. Surgery 1998; 123: 545–57.
Häkansson HO, Johnsson F, Johansson J, Kjellen G, Walther B. Development of adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Development of adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus after successful antireflux surgery. Eur J Surg 1996; 163: 469–47.
Ortiz A, Martinez de Haro LF, Parrilla P, Morales G, Molina J, Bermejo J, Liron R and Aguilar J. Conservative treatment versus antireflux surgery in Barrett’s esophagus: long-term results of a prospective study. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 274–78
Katz D, Rothstein R, Schned A, Dunn J, Seaver K, Antonioli D. The development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma during endoscopie surveillance of Barret esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 53641.
Williamson WA, Ellis FHE, Gibb SP, Shahian DM, Aretz T. Effect of antireflux operation on Barrett’s mucosa. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 537–42.
Starnes VA, Adkins RB, Ballinger JF, Sawyers JL. Barrett’s esophagus. A surgical entity. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 563–7.
Naef AP, Savary M, Ozzello L. Columnar-lined lower esophagus: An acquired lesion with malignant predisposition. Report on 140 cases of Barrett’s esophagus with 12 adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975; 70: 826–35.
McDonald ML, Trastek VF, Allen M. Deschamps C, Pairolero PC. Barrett’s esophagus: Does an antireflux procedure reduce the need of endoscopie surveillance? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 1135–40.
Hamilton SR, Hutcheon DF, Ravich WJ, Cameron JL, Paulsson M. Adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus after elimination of gastresophageal reflux. Gastroenterol 1984; 86: 356–9.
Attwood SEA, Barlow AP, Norris TL. Watson A. Barrett’s esophagus: effect of antireflux surgery on symptom control and development of complications. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1050–3.
Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Pattersson GA, Prakash D. Peptic ulcer in acquired columnar lined esophagus. Results of surgical treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43: 241–4.
Csendes A, Burdiles P, Korn O, Braghetto 1, Huertas C, Maluenda F, Diaz J, Rojas J. Late subjective and objective results of a prospective randomised study comparing total fundoplication versus calibration of the cardia with posterior gastropexy. Analysis of 164 patients. Br J Surg, 2000 in press.
Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold H et al. Long-term management of gastresophageal reflux disease with omeprazole or open antireflux surgery: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. The Nordic GORD Study Group. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12 (8): 879–87.
Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold et al. Continued (5 year) follow-up of a randomised clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastresophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 2000, in press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lundell, L. (2001). Prevention of Cancer by Control of Reflux. In: Tilanus, H.W., Attwood, S.E.A. (eds) Barrett’s Esophagus. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0829-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0829-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5860-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0829-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive