Abstract
It strikes me that there is an inconsistency between the first and third guidelines given by Journel for modelling uncertainty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
We find this model appropriate despite the fact that we know that the sum of the two dice is not truly random but is merely the result of some very complicated combination of physical principles that are completely deterministic and well understood.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Srivastava, R.M. (1994). Comment on “Modeling Uncertainty: Some Conceptual Thoughts” by A.G. Journel. In: Dimitrakopoulos, R. (eds) Geostatistics for the Next Century. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0824-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0824-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4354-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0824-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive