Abstract
In this chapter, we review recent trends in the philosophy of chemistry and its applications in chemical education. Chemistry has maintained quite a peripheral existence in the philosophy of science for a long time, thus evading focused attention and critical analysis. However, since the 1990s an increasing number of books, journals, conferences and associations focused on philosophy of chemistry highlighting the contributions of chemistry to philosophy of science (Bhushan and Rosenfeld, Of minds and molecules: new philosophical perspectives on chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000; Hendry, The metaphysics of chemistry. Oxford University Press, 2012; McIntyre and Scerri, Synthese 111(3):211–212, 1997; Scerri and McIntyre, Synthese 111(3):213–232, 1997; Schummer, The philosophy of chemistry: From infancy toward maturity. In: Baird D, Scerri E, McIntyre L (eds) Philosophy of chemistry: synthesis of a new discipline. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 19–39, 2006; Van Brakel, Ambix 57(2):233–234, 2010; Van Brakel, Synthese 111(3):253–282, 1997; Woody, Philosophy of Science 67 (Proceedings):S612–S627, 2000). The uptake of this new domain in the context of chemical education research and practice has been minimal despite some earlier acknowledgment of the potential significance for chemical education (Erduran, Science & Education 10:581–593, 2001; Gilbert et al. Research and development for the future of chemical education. In: Gilbert et al. (eds) Chemical education: towards research-based practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 391–408, 2003). The special edition of the Science & Education journal on ‘Philosophy, Chemistry and Education: An Introduction’ (Erduran, Science & Education, 2013) is the first collection where the work on the applications of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education has been collated. This chapter will begin with an overview of some of the key and example debates in philosophy of chemistry. These examples will include themes such as reductionism (e.g. Scerri, Journal of Chemical Education 68(2):122–126, 1991) and supervenience (e.g. Papineau, Arguments for supervenience and physical realization. In: Savellos EE, Yalcin U (eds) supervenience: new essays. Cambridge University Press, 1995) as well as aspects of chemical knowledge such as laws (e.g. Christie and Christie, “Laws” and “theories” in chemistry do not obey the rules. In: Bhushan N, Rosenfeld S (eds) Of minds and molecules. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 34–50, 2000), models (e.g. Woody, Science & Education, 2013) and explanations (e.g. Hendry, The chemical bond: structure, energy and explanation. In: Dorato M, Redei M, Suarez M (eds) EPSA: Philosophical issues in the sciences: launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–127, 2010.). Second, the implications of these themes for chemical education research and practice will be explored. The central argument is that understanding of how chemistry is conceptualised and how chemistry is learned, chemical education research has to be informed by the debates about the epistemology and ontology of chemistry. The discussion will be contextualised in the area of nature of science (NOS) that has been one of the highly studied areas of research in science education (Chang et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2010). Contributions of how philosophy of chemistry can contribute to the characterisation of NOS by nuanced perspectives on the nature of chemistry will be discussed. Theoretical perspectives and empirical studies on NOS have tended to focus on domain-general aspects of scientific knowledge with limited understanding of domain-specific ways of thinking. NOS literature can be further developed both theoretically and empirically, thereby contributing more to HPS studies in science education. Third, some applications of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education will be reviewed in more detail. For example, proposed work for secondary chemical education, including the context of the teaching of periodic law through argumentation, will be visited (e.g. Erduran, Foundations of Chemistry 9(3):247–263, 2007). Fourth, the chapter will argue that there is developing potential for reciprocal interplay between philosophy of chemistry and chemical education. While philosophy of chemistry has the potential to influence chemistry education, chemistry education in turn can influences philosophy of chemistry, particularly in relation to empirical foundations of chemical reasoning. The paper will conclude with some recommendations on the future directions of research in chemical education that is informed by philosophy of chemistry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, B. (1997). A Note on the Nature of ‘Water’, Mind 106, 311–319.
Adúriz-Bravo, A. & Erduran, S. (2003). La epistemología específica de la biología como disciplina emergente y su posible contribución a la didáctica de la biología. Revista de Educacion en Biología, 6(1), 9–14.
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2013). A semantic view of scientific models for science education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1593–1611.
Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95: 518–542. doi: 10.1002/sce.20432.
Au, W. (2007). High Stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Baird, D., Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L. (2006). Introduction: The invisibility of chemistry. In D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Philosophy of chemistry: Synthesis of a new discipline. Dordrecht: Springer.
Barnett, D. (2000) ‘Is Water Necessarily Identical to H2O? Philosophical Studies 98: pp. 99–112.
Bhushan, N. & Rosenfeld, S. (1995). Metaphorical models in chemistry. Journal of Chem Educ 72, 578–582.
Bhushan, N., & Rosenfeld, S. (Eds.) (2000). Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bunge, M. (1982). Is Chemistry a Branch of Physics?, Zeitsch rift fur all geme me Wisenschaftstheorie 13, 209–223.
Carr, M. (1984). Model confusion in chemistry. Research in Science Education, 14, 97–103.
Chalmer, A. (2010). The scientist’s atom and the philosopher’s stone: How science succeeded and philosophy failed to gain knowledge of atoms. New York: Springer.
Chamizo, J. A. (2007). Teaching modern chemistry through recurrent historical teaching models. Science & Education, 16, 197–216.
Chamizo, J. A. (2013). A new definition of models and modeling in chemistry’s teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1613–1632.
Chang, Y., Chang, C. & Tseng, Y (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, doi: 10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2.
Chang, H. (2012). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.
Chomsky, N. (1995). Language and Nature, Mind 104, 1–61.
Christie, M., & Christie, J. (2000). “Laws” and “theories” in chemistry do not obey the rules. In: Bhushan, N., Rosenfeld, S. (eds.) Of Minds and Molecules, pp. 34–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christie, M. (1994). Chemists versus philosophers regarding laws of nature. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 25, 613–629.
Christie, J. R. & Christie, M. (2003). Chemical laws and theories: A response to Vihalemm. Foundations of Chemistry, 5(2), 165–174.
Coll, R.K. & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 183–198.
Cros, D., Chastrette, M., & Fayol, M. (1987). Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 331–336.
De Sousa, R. (1984). The Natural Shiftiness of Natural Kinds, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, 561–580.
Driver, R. Leach, J. Millar, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young People’s Images of Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography - STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Online available at: http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html [13.09.2012].
Duit, R. (2012). Research on students’ conceptions: developments and trends. Bibliography: Students’ Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. IPN at the University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany (Available Online)
Earley, J. (2013). The new ‘idea of nature’ for chemical education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1775–1786.
Elmore, R. C. (2004). School Reform from the Inside Out: Policy, Practice, and Performance, Harvard Educational Press: CA Mass.
Erduran, S. (2000a). Emergence and applications of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education. School Science Review, 81, 85–97.
Erduran, S. (2000b). A missing component of the curriculum? Education in Chemistry, 37(6), 168.
Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for Chemistry education. Science & Education, 10, 581–593.
Erduran, S. & Duschl, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary characterization of models and the nature of chemical knowledge in the classroom. Studies in Science Education, 40, 111–144.
Erduran. S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, J. M. (2012). Research on argumentation in science education in Europe. In, D. Jorde, & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective, pp. 253–289. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.) (2008). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erduran, S. & Scerri, E. (2003). The nature of chemical knowledge and chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Tragust & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 7–27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Erduran, S., Bravo, A. A., & Naaman R. M. (2007). Developing epistemologically empowered teachers: Examining the role of philosophy of chemistry in teacher education. Science & Education, 16(9–10), 975–989. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9072-4.
Erduran, S. (2005). Applying the philosophical concept of reduction to the chemistry of water: Implications for chemical education. Science & Education, 14(2), pp. 161–171.
Erduran, S. (2007). Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in science education in the context of arguing about the Periodic Law in chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 9(3), 247–263.
Erduran, S. (2009). Beyond philosophical confusion: Establishing the role of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education research. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(1), 5–14.
Erduran, S. (2013). Editorial: Philosophy, Chemistry and Education: An Introduction, Science & Education, 22(7), 1559–1562.
Farrell, R. (1983), ‘Metaphysical Necessity and Epistemic Location’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 283–294.
Fernandez-Gonzalez, M. (2013). Idealization in chemistry: pure substance and laboratory product. Science & Education, 22(7), 1723–1740.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change, NY and London: Teachers College Press, 4th edition
Gable, D. & Bunce, D. (1984). Research on problem solving in chemistry. In, D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–326). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Garritz, A. (2013). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science & Education, 22(7), 1787–1807.
Gilbert, J (1997). Models in science and science education. In J. Gilbert (ed), Exploring models and modelling in science and technology education: Contributions from the mistre group (pp. 5–19). Reading: The University of Reading.
Gilbert, J. K. de Jong, O., Justi, R. Tragust, D. F. & van Driel, J. H. (2003). Research and development for the future of chemical education, In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Tragust & J. H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 391–408). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 115–130.
Good, R. J. (1999). Why are chemists turned off by philosophy? Foundations of Chemistry, 1, 65–96.
Goodwin, W. M. (2008). Structural formulas and explanation in organic chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 10, 117–127.
Gillespie, R. J. (1997). Commentary: Reforming the general chemistry textbook. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 484–485.
Heeren, J. K. (1990). Teaching chemistry by the Socratic Method. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(4), 330–331.
Hendry, R. (2010). The chemical bond: structure, energy and explanation. In, Mauro Dorato, Miklos Redei and Mauricio Suarez (eds.), EPSA: Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 117–127. Berlin: Springer.
Hendry, R. (2012). The Metaphysics of Chemistry. Oxford University Press.
Herron, J. D. (1996). The chemistry classroom. Washington DC: American Chemical Society.
Ihde, D. (2003). Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Irzik, G. (2000). Back to basics: A philosophical critique of constructivism. Science & Education, 9(6), 621–639. Doi: 10.1023/A:1008765215314.
Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2013). School chemistry: an historical and philosophical approach. Science & Education, 22(7), 1633–1653.
Jacob, C. (2001). Interdependent operations in chemical language and practice. HYLE–International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7(1), 31–50.
Jones, G. & Jacob, C. (2003), Report: Teaching Philosophy of Chemistry at the University of Exeter, HYLE - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 9(1), 126–128.
Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.
Justi, R. (2000). Teaching with historical models. In J.K. Gilbert & C.J. Boutler (eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 209–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kauffman, G.B. (1989). History in the chemistry curriculum, Interchange 20(2), 81–94. Reprinted in M.R. Matthews (ed.) History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: Selected Readings, OISE Press, Toronto, 1991, pp. 185–200.
Kaya, E., & Erduran, E. (2013). Integrating epistemological perspectives on chemistry in chemical education: the cases of concept duality, chemical language and structural explanations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1741–1755.
Kovac, J. (2004). The Ethical Chemist: Professionalism and Ethics in Science. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Kovac, J. (2000). Professionalism and ethics in chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 2: 207–219.
Kripke, S. (1971) Identity and necessity. In M. K. Munitz (Ed), Identity and individuation (p. 135–164) New York: New York University Press.
Laszlo, P. (1999). Circulation of concepts. Foundations of Chemistry, 1, 225–238.
Lazslo, P. (2013). Towards teaching chemistry as a language. Science & Education, 22(7), 1669–1706.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. NJ: Ablex, Norwood.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Brooks, J. G., Carlson, M. O., Kuerbis, P. J., Marsh, D. D., Padilla, M. J. (1990). Developing and supporting teachers for science education in the middle years. National Center for Improving Science Education, Andover, MA.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., Stiles, K. E. (1998) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Luisi, P.L. (2002). Emergence in Chemistry: Chemistry as the Embodiment of Emergence, Foundations of Chemistry, 4, 183–200.
Lythcott, J. (1990). Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 248–252.
Matthews, M. (1994/2014). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science, Dordrecht: Routledge.
Matthews, M. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McComas, W. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
McIntyre, L. & Scerri, E. (1997). The philosophy of chemistry - Editorial introduction. Synthese, 111(3), 211–212.
Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2001). Radical constructivism in science education. Unpublished master thesis. Bogazici University, Turkey.
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Newman, M. (2013). Emergence, supervenience and introductory chemical education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1655–1667.
Niaz, M. (2008). Teaching General Chemistry: A History and Philosophy of Science Approach. New York: Nova Publishers.
Nussbaum, J. & Novak, J. D. (1979). Assessment of children’s conceptions of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60, 535–550.
Papineau, D. (1993). Philosophical naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Papineau, D. (1995). Arguments for Supervenience and Physical Realization. In Elias E. Savellos & U. Yalcin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Penslar, R. L. (Ed.) (1995). Research Ethics: Cases and Materials. Bloomington, IN.
Primas, H. (1983). Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reduction, Springer, Berlin.
Psarros, N. (1998). What has philosophy to offer to chemistry? Foundations of Science, 3(1), 183–202.
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of Meaning, in Putnam, H. (ed.), Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Routledge, London and New York.
Ribeiro, M. A. P. & Pereira, D. C. (2013). Constitutive pluralism of chemistry: thought planning, curriculum, epistemological and didactic orientations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1809–1837.
Rodriguez, M. A. and Niaz, M. (2002) How in Spite of the Rhetoric, History of Chemistry has Been Ignored in Presenting Atomic Structure in Textbooks, Science & Education 11: 423–441.
Salmon, M.H., Earman, J., Glymour, C., Lennox, J.G., Machamer, P., McGuire, J.E., Norton, J.D., Salmon, W.C., Schaffner, K.F. (1992). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Scerri, E. R. (1991). Chemistry, spectroscopy and the question of reduction. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(2), 122–126.
Scerri, E. R. (1995). The exclusion principle, chemistry and hidden variables. Synthese, 102, 169–192.
Scerri, E. R. & McIntyre, L. (1997). The case for the philosophy of chemistry. Synthese, 111(3), 213–232.
Scerri, E. (1997). Are chemistry and philosophy miscible?, Chemical Intelligencer, 3, 44–46.
Scerri, E. (2000). Philosophy of chemistry—A new interdisciplinary field? Journal of Chemical Education, 77(4), 522–525.
Scerri, E. R (2003). Constructivism, relativism and chemistry in chemical explanation. In J. Earley (Ed.), Chemical explanation: Characteristics, development, autonomy (pp. 359–369). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Scerri, E. R (2007). The Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scerri, E. R (2008). Collected papers on philosophy of chemistry. London: Imperial College Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2): 4–14.
Schummer, J. (2006). The philosophy of chemistry: From infancy toward maturity. In D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Philosophy of chemistry: Synthesis of a new discipline (pp. 19–39). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sjostrom, J. (2013). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1873–1890.
Stanford Dictionary of Philosophy (2012). Available online at http://plato.stanford.edu/.
Stroll, A. (1991). Observation and the Hidden, Dialectica 45(2–3), 165–179.
Taber, K. (2006). Constructivism’s new clothes: the trivial, the contingent and a progressive research programme into the learning of science. Foundations of Chemistry, 8, 189–219.
Talanquer, V. (2013). School chemistry: the need for transgression. Science & Education, 22(7), 1757–1773.
Thalos, M. (2013). The lens of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1707–1721.
Tobin, E. (2013). Chemical laws, idealisation and approximation. Science & Education, 22(7), 1581–1592.
Van Brakel, J. (2000). Philosophy of chemistry: Between the manifest and the scientific image. Leuven: Leuven university press.
Van Brakel, J. (2010). A subject to think about: Essays on the history and philosophy of chemistry. Ambix, 57(2), 233–234.
Van Brakel, J. (1997). Chemistry as the science of the transformation of substances. Synthese, 111(3), 253–282.
Vesterinen, V. M., Aksela, M, & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855.
Vihalemm, R. (2003). Are laws of nature and scientific theories peculiar in chemistry? Scrutinizing Mendeleev’s discovery. Foundations of Chemistry, 5(1), 7–22.
Vilches, A. & Gil-Perez, D. (2013). Creating a sustainable future: some philosophical and educational considerations for chemistry teaching. Science & Education, 22(7), 1857–1872.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wallace J. & Louden, W. (2000). Dilemmas of science teaching: perspectives on problems of practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wasserman, E., & Schaefer, H. F. (1986). Methylene geometry, Science, 233, p. 829.
Weisberg, M. (2006). Water is not H2O. In D. Baird, E. Scerri & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Philosophy of chemistry: Synthesis of a new discipline. Dordrecht: Springer.
Weisberg, M., Needham, P., & Hendry, R. (2011). Philosophy of chemistry. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University.
Woody, A. (1995). The explanatory power of our models: A philosophical analysis with some implications for science education. In Finley F, Allchin D, Rhees D, & Fifield S (Eds), Proceedings of the third international history, philosophy, and science teaching conference (pp 1295–1304). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Woody, A. (2000). Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation, Philosophy of Science 67 (Proceedings): S612-S627.
Woody, A. I. (2004a). Telltale Signs: What Common Explanatory Strategies in Chemistry Reveal about Explanation Itself, Foundations of Chemistry 6: 13–43.
Woody, A. I. (2004b). “More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals about Scientific Explanation”, Philosophy of Science 71: 780–793.
Woody, A. I. (2013). How is the ideal gas law explanatory? Science & Education, 22(7), 1563–1580.
Woody, A., Hendry, R., & Needham, P. (2011). Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 6: Philosophy of Chemistry. Elsevier Press.
Yarroch, W. L. (1985). Student understanding of chemical equation balancing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 449–559.
Yeany, R. H. (1991). A unifying theme in science education?, NARST News, 33(2), 1–3.
Zeidler, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zoller, U. (1990). Students’ misunderstandings and misconceptions in college freshman chemistry (General and Organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053–1065.
Zohar, A. (2004). Higher order thinking in science classrooms: students’ thinking and teachers’ professional development. Dordrecht, Boston, & London: Kluwer Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erduran, S., Mugaloglu, E.Z. (2014). Philosophy of Chemistry in Chemical Education: Recent Trends and Future Directions. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7653-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7654-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)