Abstract
The Water Framework Directive (WFD) was formulated for addressing the weaknesses of the previous water-related directives. The main steps that WFD involves could be summarized in the setting of ecological standards, the identification of anthropogenic pressures and the adoption of corrective measures. This introductory chapter describes the water situation in Greece and assesses the potential of the timely implementation of the European Union’s (EU) WFD. In this context, the significance of Asopos River Basin (RB) is put into perspective. More analytically, the chapter presents: (a) the employed methodology that enables rapid assessment of the status quo of the water situation in each Greek catchment, as compared to the requirements and targets of the EU WFD, (b) the implementation of this methodology on each of the 14 Greek River Basin Districts (RBDs) and (c) relevant empirical results. The main objective of the chapter is to present the rapid-appraisal methodology that was developed for the estimation of the cost-recovery level for water services in the 14 Greek RBDs. Results from this ‘quick appraisal’ clearly highlight the need for reforms in the current pricing policy and preparation of a package of measures, as proposed in Chaps. 9 and 10, in order for the water bodies to reach good ecological status and the water management to ensure full recovery of the cost of water services as required under article 11 of the WFD.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Costs are considered as disproportionate if they exceed the monetized benefits of achieving ‘good status’ in a water body.
- 2.
Since 2009 the name of the ministry is changed to Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change.
- 3.
Report on the implementation of Article 5 of the WFD (2008)
- 4.
Low Concentration: Ρ<0.17mg/l, ΝΟ3-Ν<5 mg/l, ΝΗ4-Ν<0.04 mg/l
Moderate Concentration : 0.17 mg/l <Ρ<0.31 mg/l, 5 mg/l <ΝΟ3-Ν<11 mg/l, 0.04 mg/l <ΝΗ4-Ν<1
High Concentration: Ρ>0.31 mg/l, ΝΟ3-Ν>11, ΝΗ4-Ν>1
- 5.
Report on the implementation of Article 5 of the WFD (2008)
- 6.
Ahmad et al. (2005), Basili et al. (2006), Bateman et al. (2004), Birol and Koundouri (2008b), Birol et al. (2006), Brouwer and Bateman (2005), Crandall (1991), Crutchfield et al. (1997), Day and Mourato (2002), Farber and Griner (2000), Forster (1985), Georgiou et al. (2000), Green et al. (1993), Green and Tunstall (1991), Hanley (1991), Jordan and Elnagheeb (1993), Lindhjem (1998), Oglethorpe and Miliadou (2000), Mitchell and Carson (1984), Ozdemiroglu et al. (2004), Poe and Bishop (1992), Whitehead and Groothuis (1992) and Koundouri (2007, 2010).
References
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64–75.
Ahmad, J., Goldar, B., & Misra, S. (2005). Value of arsenic-free drinking water to rural households in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 173–185.
Basili, M., Di Matteo, M., & Ferrini, S. (2006). Analysing demand for environmental quality: A willingness to pay/accept study in the Province of Siena (Italy). Waste Management, 26(3), 209–219.
Bateman, I. J., Cole, M., Cooper, P., Georgiou, S., Hadley, D., & Poe, G. L. (2004). On Visible choice sets and scope sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 71–93.
Birol, E., & Koundouri, P. (2008a). Choice experiments in Europe: Economic theory and applications. Edward-Elgar Publishing, Wally Oates and Henk Folmer’s ‘New Horizons in Environmental Economics’ Series. ISBN: 9781845427252.
Birol, E., & Koundouri, P. (2008b). Choice experiments informing environmental policy: A European perspective. Edward-Elgar Publishing, Wally Oates and Henk Folmer’s ‘New Horizons in Environmental Economics’ Series. ISBN: 9781845427252 (337pages).
Birol, E., Karousakis, K., & Koundouri, P. (2006). Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Science of the Total Environment, 365, 105–122.
Braden, J. B., & Kolstad, C. D. (Eds.). (1991). Measuring the demand for environmental quality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Brouwer, R. (2008). The role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597–614.
Brouwer, R., & Bateman, I. J. (2005). Temporal stability and transferability of models of willingness to pay for flood control and wetland conservation. Water Resources Research, 41(3), W03017.
Brouwer, R., & Pearce, D. W. (2005). Introduction. In R. Brouwer & D. W. Pearce (Eds.), Cost benefit analysis and water resources management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Brouwer, R., Barton, D. N., Bateman, I. J., Brander, L., Georgiou, S., Martín-Ortega, J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Schaafsma, M., & Wagtendonk, A. (2009). Economic valuation of environmental and resource costs and benefits in the Water Framework Directive: Technical guidelines for practitioners. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University.
Carter, J., & Howe, J. (2006). The Water Framework Directive and the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 287–300.
Commission of the European Communities. (2007). Towards Sustainable Water Management in the European Union. First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. Accompanying document to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. COM (2007) 128 final.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2000). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. 1997/0067 (COD), C5-0347/00.
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (CIS). (2000/60/EC). Moving to the next stage in the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive Progress and work programme for 2005 and 2006 AS AGREED BY THE WATER DIRECTORS 2/3 December 2004.
Crandall, K. B. (1991). Measuring the economic benefits of riparian areas. Masters thesis, University of Arizona.
Crutchfield, S. R., Cooper, J. C., & Hellerstein, D. (1997). Benefits of safer drinking water: The value of nitrate reduction. Washington, DC: Food and Consumer Economics Division, Economics Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Day, B., & Mourato, S. (2002). Valuing river water quality in China. In D. Pearce, C. Pearce, & C. Palmer (Eds.), Valuing the environment in developing countries: Case studies. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham/Northampton.
Desvousges, W. H., Naughton, M. C., & Parsons, G. R. (1992). Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resources Research, 28(3), 675–683.
European Communities. (2002). Guidance document No. 1, Economics and the environment – the implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive. A guidance document. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/wfd/library
Farber, S., & Griner, B. (2000). Valuing Watershed Quality Improvements Using Conjoint Analysis. Ecological Economics, 34, 63–76.
Forster, B. A. (1985). Economic impact of acid deposition in the Canadian Aquatic Sector. In D. F. Adams & W. W. Page (Eds.), Acid Deposition. New York: Plenum Publishers.
Georgiou, S., Bateman I., Cole M., & Hanley, N. (2000). Contingent ranking and valuation of river water quality improvements: Testing for scope, sensitivity, ordering and distance decay effects. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 2000–18, UK Economic and Social Research Centre.
Green, C. H., & Tunstall, S. M. (1991). The evaluation of river quality improvements by the contingent valuation method. Applied Economics, 23, 1135–1146.
Green, C., Tunstall, S., Herring M., & Sawyer, J. (1993). Customer preference and willingness to pay for selected water and sewerage services. Report to the Office for Water Services.
Hanley, N. (1991). The economics of nitrate pollution in the UK. In N. D. Hanley (Ed.), Farming and the countryside: An economic analysis of external costs and benefits. Oxford: CAB.
Hanley, N., & Black, A. R. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the Water Framework Directive in Scotland. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2(2), 156–165.
Hellenic Republic. Ministry of Environment Physical Planning and Public Works (MoEPPW). (2003). The law for the management of water resources of Greece, Law N.3199/03. Athens, Greece.
Hellenic Republic. Ministry of Environment Physical Planning and Public Works (MoEPPW). (2006). Report on the pressures and qualitative characteristics of water bodies in the water districts of Greece and a methodological approach for further analysis. Athens, Greece.
Hellenic Republic. Ministry of Environment Physical Planning and Public Works (MoEPPW). (2007). National programme for the management and protection of water resources, in Greek. Athens, Greece.
Jordan, J. L., & Elnagheeb, A. H. (1993). Willingness to pay for improvements in drinking water quality. Water Resources Research, 29(2), 237–245.
Kallis, G., & Butler, D. (2001). The EU water framework directive: measures and implications. Water Policy, 3, 125–142.
Kirchhoff, S., Colby, B. G., & LaFrance, J. T. (1997). Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 75–93.
Koundouri, P. (2004). Current issues in the economics of groundwater resource management. Journal of Economic Surveys, 18(5), 703–740.
Koundouri, P. (2007). Coping with water deficiency: From research to policy making (Environment and policy series, Vol. 48). Springer: Berlin. ISBN 978-1-4020-6614–6.
Koundouri, P. (2010). Water resources allocation: Policy and socioeconomic issues in Cyprus (Environment and policy series). Dordrecht: Springer.
Koundouri, P., & Remoundou, K. (2009). Introduction to the book. In P. Koundouri (Ed.), The use of economic valuation in environmental policy: Providing research support for the implementation of the EU water policy under AquaStress (Routledge explorations in environmental economics). London/New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Lindhjem, H. (1998). Willingness to pay for improved water quality of Steinsfjorden – Betalingsvillighet for en bedret vannkvalitet i Steinsfjorden. Oslo: The University of Oslo.
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1984). Willingness to pay for national freshwater quality improvements. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Morris, J. (2004). Economics of the water framework directive: purpose, principles and practice. Environmental Economics Conference, 26 March, The Royal Society, London.
Oglethorpe, D. R., & Miliadou, D. (2000). Economic valuation of the non-use attributes of a wetland: A case-study for Lake Kerkini. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 755–767.
Ozdemiroglu, E., Newcombe, J., Mourato, S., Atkinson, G., & deGaris, Y. (2004). The value of a Tidier Thames: WTP to reduce sewage overflows, applied environmental economics conference, The Royal Society, London.
Poe, G. L., & Bishop R. C. (1992). Measuring the benefits of groundwater protection from agricultural contamination: Results from a two-stage contingent valuation study (Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 341). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Ramsar Convention. (1996). Strategic plan 1997–2002. Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
Report on the implementation of Article 5 of the WFD, Hellenic Ministry of the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works, Athens March 2008, Prepared by RESEES – REsearch on Socio-Economic and Environmental Sustainability – team available at: http://www.aueb.gr/users/koundouri/resees/en/aswposprojen.html (In Greek).
UNEP (United Nations Environment Program). (2005). Vital water statistics. (http://www.unep.org/vitalwater/).
Water Development Department, Republic of Cyprus. (2005). Eu summary report articles 5&6. Available at: http://www.cyprus.gov.cy/moa/wdd/Wdd.nsf/All/B8D7262CBFCC9AF8C225711E00303F5A/$file/Page1-20.pdf. Accessed Dec 2008.
Whitehead, J. C., & Groothuis, P. A. (1992). Economic benefits of improved water quality: A case of North Carolina’s Tar-Pamlico River. Rivers, 3(3), 170–178.
WWF. (2006) EU Water Policy: Making economics work for the environment: Survey of the economic elements of the Article 5 report of the EU Water Framework Directive, available at http://assets.panda.org/downloads/eu_water_policy___may_2006.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koundouri, P., Papandreou, N., Remoundou, K., Kountouris, Y. (2014). A Bird’s Eye View of the Greek Water Situation: The Potential for the Implementation of the EU WFD. In: Koundouri, P., Papandreou, N. (eds) Water Resources Management Sustaining Socio-Economic Welfare. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7636-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7636-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7635-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7636-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)