Skip to main content

Reforming Universities in Italy: Towards a New Paradigm?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reforming Higher Education

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 41))

Abstract

The Law n. 240 approved on December the 30th 2010 aims at introducing deep modifications to the internal governance of Italian Universities. This chapter aims at understanding the underlying rationales, motivations and justifications of the actual reform and highlighting the ideas, principles, values and belief, thus cultural and cognitive frameworks, shaping the national academic system. This analysis relies on historical neo‐institutionalism and literature on models of governance. A longitudinal analysis of the reform text, from its presentation to its approval after several modifications is presented. It shows that the innovative character of the reform has been softened and affected by the traditional features of the Italian context. This chapter contributes to the discussion on academic reforms policy design: as stressed by the literature on the construction of public policies, the combination between institutions, interests and ideas and paradigms plays a major role in the ongoing reforms. The chapter also delineates the major importance of underlying policy designs in the reform process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The institution of the Ministry for Universities and Science and Technological Research (MURST, then changed to MIUR) is dated to this period.

  2. 2.

    Law 59/1997.

  3. 3.

    Law 15/2009, “Delegation to the Government to improve public offices’ productivity, efficiency and effectiveness, the transparency of public administrations and new regulations of functions assigned to the CNEL (National Council of the Economy and Labour) and to the Court of Auditors”, came into effect with Decree 150/2009.

  4. 4.

    The previous DPR 254 of 2001 allowed universities only to establish private foundations for the management of teaching and research activities.

  5. 5.

    Title I, art. 3.

  6. 6.

    Title I, art. 2, par. 1 lett. b,c,d,s.

  7. 7.

    Art. 2, par. 1 lett c.

  8. 8.

    Title I, art. 2, par. 1 lett. e,f,g.

References

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. (1999). Changing governance models in higher education: The case of the new managerialism. Swiss Political Science Review, 5(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2003). Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2008). Looking for serendipity: The problematical reform of government within Italy’s universities. Higher Education, 55, 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job: A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89, 1622–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUN-National University Committee. (2009, February 12). Comments to the guidelines for the governance of the university, n. 6. http://www.cun.it/media/100682/pa_2009_02_14.pdf

  • Dente, B. (2006). I Nuclei di Valutazione dell’Università. Una Ricerca Promossa dal CNVSU. Rome: CNVSU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, S. G., Meyer, G. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2008). La Governance nell’Istruzione Superiore in Europa. Politiche, Strutture, Finanziamento e Personale Accademico, Eurydice, CE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Pedron, L., & Reale, E. (2007, September). Changes in doctoral education in England and in Italy. In CHER 20th annual conference “The Research Mission of the Universities”, Dublin, 30th August–1st September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Féron, E., & Crowley, J. (2002). Internationalization and the governance of research. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A. (1999). Governmental policies and organizational changes in higher education. Higher Education, 38, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanberger, A. (2001). What is the policy problem? Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (1992). Governance, administration and finance. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J. (2006, August 24–25). Governing bodies of higher education institutions: Roles and responsibilities. Conduct of governing bodies. In OECD Seminar, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity? New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow, A., Liefferink, D., & Veenman, S. (2005). When birds sing. A framework for analyzing domestic factors behind policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 797–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leresche, J. P., Laredo, P., & Weber, K. (2009). L’internationalisation des Systèmes de Recherche en Action. Les Cas Français et Suisse. Lausanne: PPUR Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto, G., & Moscati, R. (2007). University reform in Italy: Fears, expectations and contradictions. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2010). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 61(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIUR. (2009). Autonomia e responsabilità degli atenei: governance, valutazione e reclutamento, Roma, 24 Marzo. http://www.cun.it/media/101336/autonomia_responsabilita_atenei.pdf

  • Musselin, C. (2000, March). The role of ideas in the emergence of convergent higher education policies in Europe: The case of France (Working Paper Series 73). Paris: Center for European Studies. http://aei.pitt.edu/9148/1/Musselin.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au

  • Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organisations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1996). Homogenization, integration and convergence: The Cheshire cats of higher education analysis. In V. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, & R. Rinne (Eds.), The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 26–41). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Education at a glance 2001. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paletta, A. (2004). Il Governo dell’Università, tra competizione e accountability. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. B. (2004). Institutional theory in political science. The new institutionalism. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E. (2010, October 28–29). Governance as a policy instrument for shaping the higher education systems balancing between autonomy, accountability and academic freedom. In EU-SPRI international conference ‘Tentative Governance in Emerging Science and Technology’, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, E., & Potì, B. (2009). Italy: Local policy legacy and moving to an “in-between” configuration. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Challenges for the knowledge society. Higher Education Policy, 20, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organization as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, S. (2003). On university reform in Italy: Contradictions and power relations in structure and function. Minerva, 4(41), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Reale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Year

Regulation

Subject

Articles mainly considered in the discussion

1989

L. 168/1989

Institution of the MURST (Ministry for Universities and Scientific and Technological Research) and acknowledgment of autonomy to universities.

Title I art. 1

Title II artt. 6–7

1997

L. 59/1997

“Bassanini Law” Decentralization from Government to the universities of administrative and managerial tasks (subsidiarity as main principle regulating the State and academic institutions’ relationships).

Title I art. 1

1997

L. 449/1997

Attribution to the universities of autonomy and responsibility over financial issues and recruitment, definition of activities and responsibilities of the universities’ Internal Evaluation Units.

Title III art. 51 par. 6

1998–1999

L. 204/1998 and Decree 381/1999

MURST becomes MIUR, introduction of the National Research Plan for Universities. New regulations for the recruitment of professors and constitutions of the CIVR.

L. 204/1998 art. 1–7

Decree 381/1999 Title II art. 8, Title V art. 11

1999

L. 370/1999

Regulations concerning universities and scientific and technological research. ‘Osservatorio’ for evaluation changes into CNVSU, the Internal Evaluation Units are replaced by the NUVs.

Title I artt. 1,2,6

2001

Decree 165/2001

Competences of administrative and technical staff are decentralized to the universities.

Art. 41, Artt. 48

2005

L. 230/2005

Modification of the recruitment system.

 

2005

L. 43/2005

Regulations concerning the 3-year strategic plan of universities.

Art. 1

2008

L. 133/2008 and Decree 112/2008

Regulations concerning the improvement of public financial resources. They establish the possibility for universities to change their status from public bodies to not-for-profit private institutions (“Fondazioni”).

Artt.16

2009

L. 15/2009 and Decree 150/2009

Reform of the Public Administration enabling the Government to introduce regulations to improve production, efficiency, effectiveness and transparency of public administrations.

Title I and III, artt. 56 and 60 which modify Decree 165/2001

2008–2009

L. 1/2009

Regulations concerning the right to HE study, the merit recognition and quality improvement of the HE system.

Artt. 2 , 3

2010

DPR 76/2010

Regulation concerning the ANVUR, the National Agency for the Evaluation of Research.

Title, art. 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reale, E., Primeri, E. (2014). Reforming Universities in Italy: Towards a New Paradigm?. In: Musselin, C., Teixeira, P. (eds) Reforming Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7028-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics