Abstract
The Law n. 240 approved on December the 30th 2010 aims at introducing deep modifications to the internal governance of Italian Universities. This chapter aims at understanding the underlying rationales, motivations and justifications of the actual reform and highlighting the ideas, principles, values and belief, thus cultural and cognitive frameworks, shaping the national academic system. This analysis relies on historical neo‐institutionalism and literature on models of governance. A longitudinal analysis of the reform text, from its presentation to its approval after several modifications is presented. It shows that the innovative character of the reform has been softened and affected by the traditional features of the Italian context. This chapter contributes to the discussion on academic reforms policy design: as stressed by the literature on the construction of public policies, the combination between institutions, interests and ideas and paradigms plays a major role in the ongoing reforms. The chapter also delineates the major importance of underlying policy designs in the reform process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The institution of the Ministry for Universities and Science and Technological Research (MURST, then changed to MIUR) is dated to this period.
- 2.
Law 59/1997.
- 3.
Law 15/2009, “Delegation to the Government to improve public offices’ productivity, efficiency and effectiveness, the transparency of public administrations and new regulations of functions assigned to the CNEL (National Council of the Economy and Labour) and to the Court of Auditors”, came into effect with Decree 150/2009.
- 4.
The previous DPR 254 of 2001 allowed universities only to establish private foundations for the management of teaching and research activities.
- 5.
Title I, art. 3.
- 6.
Title I, art. 2, par. 1 lett. b,c,d,s.
- 7.
Art. 2, par. 1 lett c.
- 8.
Title I, art. 2, par. 1 lett. e,f,g.
References
Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20, 477–493.
Braun, D. (1999). Changing governance models in higher education: The case of the new managerialism. Swiss Political Science Review, 5(3), 1–24.
Capano, G. (2003). Administrative traditions and policy change: When policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781–801.
Capano, G. (2008). Looking for serendipity: The problematical reform of government within Italy’s universities. Higher Education, 55, 481–504.
Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job: A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89, 1622–1642.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CUN-National University Committee. (2009, February 12). Comments to the guidelines for the governance of the university, n. 6. http://www.cun.it/media/100682/pa_2009_02_14.pdf
Dente, B. (2006). I Nuclei di Valutazione dell’Università. Una Ricerca Promossa dal CNVSU. Rome: CNVSU.
Drori, S. G., Meyer, G. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eurydice. (2008). La Governance nell’Istruzione Superiore in Europa. Politiche, Strutture, Finanziamento e Personale Accademico, Eurydice, CE.
Ferlie, E., Pedron, L., & Reale, E. (2007, September). Changes in doctoral education in England and in Italy. In CHER 20th annual conference “The Research Mission of the Universities”, Dublin, 30th August–1st September.
Féron, E., & Crowley, J. (2002). Internationalization and the governance of research. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(4), 279–305.
Gornitzka, A. (1999). Governmental policies and organizational changes in higher education. Higher Education, 38, 5–31.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
Hanberger, A. (2001). What is the policy problem? Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 45–62.
Harman, G. (1992). Governance, administration and finance. Oxford: Pergamon.
Huisman, J. (2006, August 24–25). Governing bodies of higher education institutions: Roles and responsibilities. Conduct of governing bodies. In OECD Seminar, Paris.
Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity? New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.
Lenschow, A., Liefferink, D., & Veenman, S. (2005). When birds sing. A framework for analyzing domestic factors behind policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 797–816.
Leresche, J. P., Laredo, P., & Weber, K. (2009). L’internationalisation des Systèmes de Recherche en Action. Les Cas Français et Suisse. Lausanne: PPUR Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
Luzzatto, G., & Moscati, R. (2007). University reform in Italy: Fears, expectations and contradictions. In A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2010). The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education, 61(6), 757–769.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MIUR. (2009). Autonomia e responsabilità degli atenei: governance, valutazione e reclutamento, Roma, 24 Marzo. http://www.cun.it/media/101336/autonomia_responsabilita_atenei.pdf
Musselin, C. (2000, March). The role of ideas in the emergence of convergent higher education policies in Europe: The case of France (Working Paper Series 73). Paris: Center for European Studies. http://aei.pitt.edu/9148/1/Musselin.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au
Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organisations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.
Neave, G. (1996). Homogenization, integration and convergence: The Cheshire cats of higher education analysis. In V. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, & R. Rinne (Eds.), The mockers and the mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 26–41). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
OECD. (2001). Education at a glance 2001. Paris: OECD.
Paletta, A. (2004). Il Governo dell’Università, tra competizione e accountability. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Peters, G. B. (2004). Institutional theory in political science. The new institutionalism. London: Continuum.
Reale, E. (2010, October 28–29). Governance as a policy instrument for shaping the higher education systems balancing between autonomy, accountability and academic freedom. In EU-SPRI international conference ‘Tentative Governance in Emerging Science and Technology’, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Reale, E., & Potì, B. (2009). Italy: Local policy legacy and moving to an “in-between” configuration. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Vught, F. (2007). Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Challenges for the knowledge society. Higher Education Policy, 20, 2.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organization as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
Woolf, S. (2003). On university reform in Italy: Contradictions and power relations in structure and function. Minerva, 4(41), 347–363.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Year | Regulation | Subject | Articles mainly considered in the discussion |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | L. 168/1989 | Institution of the MURST (Ministry for Universities and Scientific and Technological Research) and acknowledgment of autonomy to universities. | Title I art. 1 |
Title II artt. 6–7 | |||
1997 | L. 59/1997 | “Bassanini Law” Decentralization from Government to the universities of administrative and managerial tasks (subsidiarity as main principle regulating the State and academic institutions’ relationships). | Title I art. 1 |
1997 | L. 449/1997 | Attribution to the universities of autonomy and responsibility over financial issues and recruitment, definition of activities and responsibilities of the universities’ Internal Evaluation Units. | Title III art. 51 par. 6 |
1998–1999 | L. 204/1998 and Decree 381/1999 | MURST becomes MIUR, introduction of the National Research Plan for Universities. New regulations for the recruitment of professors and constitutions of the CIVR. | L. 204/1998 art. 1–7 |
Decree 381/1999 Title II art. 8, Title V art. 11 | |||
1999 | L. 370/1999 | Regulations concerning universities and scientific and technological research. ‘Osservatorio’ for evaluation changes into CNVSU, the Internal Evaluation Units are replaced by the NUVs. | Title I artt. 1,2,6 |
2001 | Decree 165/2001 | Competences of administrative and technical staff are decentralized to the universities. | Art. 41, Artt. 48 |
2005 | L. 230/2005 | Modification of the recruitment system. | |
2005 | L. 43/2005 | Regulations concerning the 3-year strategic plan of universities. | Art. 1 |
2008 | L. 133/2008 and Decree 112/2008 | Regulations concerning the improvement of public financial resources. They establish the possibility for universities to change their status from public bodies to not-for-profit private institutions (“Fondazioni”). | Artt.16 |
2009 | L. 15/2009 and Decree 150/2009 | Reform of the Public Administration enabling the Government to introduce regulations to improve production, efficiency, effectiveness and transparency of public administrations. | Title I and III, artt. 56 and 60 which modify Decree 165/2001 |
2008–2009 | L. 1/2009 | Regulations concerning the right to HE study, the merit recognition and quality improvement of the HE system. | Artt. 2 , 3 |
2010 | DPR 76/2010 | Regulation concerning the ANVUR, the National Agency for the Evaluation of Research. | Title, art. 1–3 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reale, E., Primeri, E. (2014). Reforming Universities in Italy: Towards a New Paradigm?. In: Musselin, C., Teixeira, P. (eds) Reforming Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7028-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7028-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7027-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7028-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)