Abstract
In this chapter, we provide an overview of literature on the relation between technology and design and the values of democracy and justice. We first explore how philosophy has traditionally conceptualized democracy and justice. We then examine general philosophical theories and arguments about this relation, dealing with the conception of technology as being “value-free” as well as with pessimistic and more optimistic assessments with regard to technology’s potential for advancing democracy and justice. Next, we turn to three concrete design methods that seek to promote democracy and justice in the design process, namely, participatory design, technology assessment, and value-sensitive design. Finally, we examine two cases of technology influencing democracy and justice: one regarding the relation between energy technology and democracy and one regarding the use of social media during the Arab Spring. We conclude that many pessimists focus on the “technological mind-set” as a problem that undermines democracy and justice; that in the absence of general design guidelines for democracy and justice, a focus on democracy and justice in the design process seems all the more important; and that design methods tend to include values rather than theories of democracy and justice, which suggests that a further integration of philosophy and the design sciences could create added value for both disciplines.
References
Adorno Th (1999) Aesthetic theory, New edn. Athlone, London
Adorno TW, Horkheimer M (1979) Dialectic of enlightenment, New edn.Verso, London
Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE and Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–224
Allagui I, Kuebler J (2011) The Arab Spring and the role of ICTs: editorial introduction. Int J Commun 5:1435–1442
Apel KO (1973) Transformation der Philosophie: Sprachanalytik, Semantik, Hermeneutik. Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Bacon F (1620) The new organon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
Bacon F (1627) New Atlantis: a worke vnfinished. In: Bacon F (ed) Sylva sylvarum: or a naturall historie, in ten centuries. William Lee, London
Bimber B (1998) The internet and political transformation: populism, community and accelerated pluralism. Polity 31(1):133–160
Bohman J, Rehg W (eds) (1997) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Caney S (2005) Justice beyond borders. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Chess C, Purcell K (1999) Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Technol 33(16):2685–2692
Christiano T (1996) The rule of the many: fundamental issues in democratic theory. Westview Press, Boulder
Christiano T (2008) Democracy. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2008 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/democracy/. Accessed 30 Mar 2014
Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Keates S, Lebbon C (2003) Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Springer, London
Clement A, Besselaar P van den (1993) A retrospective look at PD projects. In: Muller M, Kuhn S (eds) Participatory design: special issue of the communications of the ACM, vol 36, no 4. pp 29–39
Cohen J, Sabel C (2006) Extram republicam nulla justitia? Philos Public Aff 34(2):147–175
Dechesne F, Warnier M, Van den Hoven J (2013) Ethical requirements for reconfigurable sensor technology: a challenge for value sensitive design. Ethics Inf Technol 15(3):173–181
Deluca KM (2005) Thinking with Heidegger: rethinking environmental theory and practice. Ethics Environ 10(1):67–87
Devine-Wright P (ed) (2013) Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. Routledge, London/Washington DC
Dewey J (1920) Reconstruction in philosophy. Henry Holt, New York
Dijstelbloem H, Meijer A (2011) Migration and the new technological borders of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Donovan T, Bowler S (1998) Direct democracy and minority rights: an extension. Am J Polit Sci 42:1020–1024
Ellul J (1964) The technological society. Knopf, New York (french orig. 1954)
Feenberg A (1991) Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Feenberg A (1992) Subversive rationalization: technology, power, and democracy. Inquiry 35(3–4):301–322
Feenberg A (2002) Transforming technology. A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Floridi L (2005) Information technologies and the tragedy of the good will. Ethics Inf Technol 8:253–262
Freeman S (2006) The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Soc Philos Policy 23(1):29–68
Friedman B (1996) Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3(6):16–23
Friedman B, Nissenbaum H (1996) Bias in computer systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 14(3):1–18
Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr, Borning A (2005) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang P, Galletta D (eds) Human-computer interaction in management information systems. M.E. Sharp, New York, pp 348–372
Fung A (2005) Deliberation before the revolution toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Polit Theory 33(3):397–419
Gardiner SM (2011) A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gosseries A (2008) On future generations future rights. J Polit Philos 16(4):446–474
Greenwood M (2007) Stakeholder engagement: beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. J Bus Ethics 74:315–327
Grønbæk K, Kyng M, Mogensen P (1997) Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach. In: Kyng M, Mathiassen L (eds) Computers and design in context. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 201–238
Habermas J (1971) Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action vol. I: reason and the rationalization of society (trans: McCarthy T). Beacon, Boston (German, 1981, vol 1)
Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action vol. II: lifeworld and system (trans: McCarthy T). Beacon, Boston (German, 1981, vol 2)
Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Habermas J (1993) Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Habermas J (1994) Three normative models of democracy. Constellations. Int J Crit Democr Theory 1(1):1–10
Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology, and other essays. Harper & Row, New York (orig. 1953)
Hoffman SM, High-Pippert A (2005) Community energy: a social architecture for an alternative energy future. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25(2):387–401
Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Manag Sci 60(4):805–823
Hösle V (1994) Philosophie der ökologischen Krise: Moskauer Vorträge. CH Beck, München
Hösle V (2004) Morals and politics. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame
Howard PN, Duffy A, Freelon D, Hussain M, Mari W, Mazaid M (2011) Opening closed regimes: what was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Project on Information Technology & Political Islam, Seattle, working paper, 2011.1
Introna LD, Nissenbaum H (2000) Shaping the web: why the politics of search engines matters. Inf Soc Int J 16(3):169–185
Introna LD (2005) Disclosive ethics and information technology: disclosing facial recognition systems. Ethics Inf Technol 7:75–86.
Johnson DG (1997) Is the global information infrastructure a democratic technology? In: Spinello RA, Tavani HT (eds) Readings in cyberethics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, pp 121–133
Jonas H (1979/1984) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main/The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kensing F, Blomberg J (1998) Participatory design: issues and concerns. Comput Supported Coop Work 7:167–185
Kensing F, Simonsen J, Bodker K (1998) MUST: a method for participatory design. Hum Comput Interact 13(2):167–198
Khondker HH (2011) Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations 8(5):675–679
Kiran AH (2012) Does responsible innovation presuppose design instrumentalism? Examining the case of telecare at home in the Netherlands. Technol Soc 34(3):216–226
Kowalski E (2002) Technology assessment : Suche nach Handlungsoptionen in der technischen Zivilisation. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zürich
Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking, New York
Latour B (1979) The social construction of scientific facts. Sage, Beverly Hills
Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 225–258
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Law J (1999) Actor network theory and after. Blackwell/Sociological Review, Oxford/Malden
Levidow L (1998) Democratizing technology-or technologizing democracy? Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe. Technol Soc 20(2):211–226
Lewis JI, Wiser RH (2007) Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energ Policy 35(3):1844–1857
Lim M (2012) Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. J Commun 62:231–248
Manders-Huits N (2011) What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design. Sci Eng Ethics 17:271–287
Massa P, Avesani P (2007) Trust metrics on controversial users: balancing between tyranny of the majority and echo chambers. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 3(1):39–64
Marx K (1938) Capital. London: Allen & Unwin
Mill JS (1859) On liberty. In: Robson JM (ed) Collected works of John Stuart Mill, vol 18. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 213–310, 1963ff
Mill JS (1861) Considerations on representative government. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, p, 1991
Mitcham C (1990) Three ways of being-with-technology. In: Ormiston GL (ed) From artifact to habitat: studies in the critical engagement of technology. Bethlehem, PA, Lehigh University Press, pp 31–59
Mitcham C (1994) Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Morozov E (2011) The net delusion: the dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs, New York
Nagel T (2005) The problem of global justice. Philos Public Aff 33:113–147
Nagenborg M (2005) Search engines, special issue of International Review of Information Ethics, vol 3
Nieusma D, Riley D (2010) Designs on development: engineering, globalization, and social justice. Eng Stud 2(1):29–59
Noble DF (1984) Forces of production. A social history of industrial automation. Knopf, New York
Noveck BS (2009) Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Oosterlaken I (2009) Design for development: a capability approach. Des Issues 25(4):91–102
Ornetzeder M, Rohracher H (2006) User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energ Policy 34(2):138–150
Palm E, Hansson SO (2006) The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technol Forecast Soc Change 73:543–558
Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press, New York
Pogge TW (2002) World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Polity Press, London
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1999 revised edition
Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Robertson T, Wagner I (2013) Ethics: engagement, representation and politics-in-action. In: Simonsen J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New York, pp 64–85
Roth SK (1994) The unconsidered ballot: how design effects voting behaviour. Visible Lang 28(1):48–67
Rousseau J-J (1750) The social contract and discourses. Everyman, London (1993)
Savulescu J, Bostrom N (2009) Human enhancement. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Scanlon T (1998) What we owe to each other. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Schneier B (2013a) The US government has betrayed the internet. We need to take it back. The Guardian, 5 Sept 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/05/government-betrayed-internet-nsa-spying. Accessed 2 Apr 2014
Schneier B (2013b) Why the NSA’s attacks on the internet must be made public. The Guardian, 4 Oct 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/04/nsa-attacks-internet-bruce-schneier. Accessed 2 Apr 2013
Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change 54:251–268
Schudson M (1998) The good citizen. A history of American civil life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Sclove RE (1995) Democracy & technology. The Guilford Press, New York
Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Knopf, New York
Shelley C (2012) Fairness in technological design. Sci Eng Ethics 18:663–680
Singer P (1973) Democracy and disobedience. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Snow C (1959) The two cultures and the scientific revolution, The Rede lecture, 1959. Cambridge University Press, New York
Spahn A (2010) Technology. In: Birx H (ed) 21st century anthropology: a reference handbook. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 132–144
Steen M (2011) Upon opening the black box of participatory design and finding it filled with ethics. In: Proceedings of the Nordic design research conference no 4: Nordes 2011: making design matter. Helsinki, 29–31 May
Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1568–1580
Sunstein C (2001) Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sutherland S (1992/2007) Irrationality: the enemy within. Constable and Company/Irrationality. Pinter and Martin, London
Swierstra T, Rip A (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology. Nanoethics 1:3–20
Taebi B, Correljé A, Cuppen E, Dignum M, Pesch U (2014) Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research. J Responsib Innov 1(1):118–124
Tavani H (2014) Search engines and ethics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2014 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/ethics-search/. Accessed 15 July 2014
Thompson DF (2010) Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Crit Rev Int Polit Philos 13(1):17–37
Van den Hove S (2006) Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy 23(1):10–17
Van den Hoven J (2005) E-democracy, E-contestation and the monitorial citizen. Ethics Inf Technol 7:51–59
Van der Velden M (2009) Design for a common world: on ethical agency and cognitive justice. Ethics Inf Technol 11:37–47
Vico G (1709) De nostri temporis studiorum ratione Lateinisch-Deutsche Ausg. Wiss. Buchges., Darmstadt (1974)
Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109:121–123. Also in 1986. The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology, 19–39. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Winner L (1992) Introduction. In: Winner L (ed) Democracy in a technological society. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–14
Yetim F (2011) Bringing discourse ethics to value sensitive design: pathways to toward a deliberative future. AIS Trans Hum Comput Interact 3(2):133–155
Young IM (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Young IM (2006) Responsibility and global labor justice. J Polit Philos 12(4):365–388
Acknowledgments
This research was supported the MVI research programme “Biofuels: sustainable innovation or gold rush?”, financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pols, A., Spahn, A. (2014). Design for the Values of Democracy and Justice. In: van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., van de Poel, I. (eds) Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_13-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_13-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6994-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities