Skip to main content

The Role of Assessment in Improving Learning in a Context of High Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 1))

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the issue of accountability and its effects on teaching and learning. We examine different forms of accountability, and take the stance that accountability can improve learning outcomes if accompanied by curriculum support rather than financial penalties. We draw example data from a range of national and systemic high-stakes testing programs and the effects on achievement levels over time. We consider contrasting effects of formative and summative roles of assessment within a context of accountability frameworks. This is not to question the role of accountability, but to assess ways in which the potential damaging effects can be reduced and student performance can be identified, validated and enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baltimore Sun (2000). ‘More MSPAP results’, 1 December, at <http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2000-12-01/news/0012010208_1_na-na-baltimore-county-elementary-schools>. Accessed 10 Sept 2012.

  • Baltimore Sun (2003). ‘Bye-bye, MSPAP, hello, MSA’, editorial, 5 March, at <http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-03-05/news/0303050013_1_tests-maryland-school-school-assessment>. Accessed 10 Sept 2012.

  • Berliner, D. C., Popham, W. J., & Shepard, L. A. (2000). Three blueprints for a revolution. How to halt the harm caused by high-stakes tests. General session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 8, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Assessment and reporting: A new approach. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2012). Challenges in internet-based CPS assessment. Paper presented at the conference of the International Testing Commission, Amsterdam, 5 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., Woods, K., Storey, P., Wong, E. K. P., & Fung, W. Y. W. (2007). Evaluation of the native-speaking English teacher scheme for primary schools in Hong Kong 2004-2006. Melbourne: School of Enterprise, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., Murray, L., Care, E., Thomas, A., & Perri, P. (2010). Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. (1994). Putting the national profiles to use. Unicorn, 20(2), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, J. P. (2009). Mistaken impressions of large-scale cognitive diagnostic testing. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing (pp. 219-246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. P. (2005). The rich, robust literature on testings achievement benefits. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardised testing. (pp. 55-90). Mahwah: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. (2012). The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910-2010. International Journal of Testing, 12, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (n.d.). Cited at ‘Examining student work to inform instruction’, School Improvement in Maryland website (1997–2012), <http://mdk12.org/data/examining/index.html>. Accessed 14 Nov 2012.

  • Roderick, M., & Engel, M. (2001). The grasshopper and the ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing. Educational Analysis and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 197–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volante, L., & Ben Jaafar, S. (2008). Profiles of educational systems worldwide, educational assessment in Canada. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Griffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffin, P., Care, E., Francis, M., Scoular, C. (2014). The Role of Assessment in Improving Learning in a Context of High Accountability. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., Colbert, P. (eds) Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics