Skip to main content

Objectives and Performance Indicators for Biological Features

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Management Planning for Nature Conservation
  • 1935 Accesses

Abstract

Objectives should lie at the very heart of a management plan; they are the outcomes of management and the single most important component of any plan. An objective is the description of something that we want to achieve. Wildlife outcomes are habitats, communities or populations at a favourable status. Objectives must be quantified so that they can be monitored. This is quite a tall order: an objective is a multi-purpose statement that describes the required outcome of a feature (something that we want to achieve) using both plain and quantified scientific language. The solution is to prepare composite statements that combine a vision for the feature with quantified and measurable performance indicators. A number of performance indicators can be used to quantify the objective and provide the evidence that a feature is in a favourable condition or otherwise. Two different kinds of performance indicators are used to monitor an objective. Specified limits define the degree to which the value of a performance indicator is allowed to fluctuate without creating any cause for concern. In many ways, specified limits can be regarded as limits of confidence. When the values of all the performance indicators fall within the specified limits, we can be confident that the feature is at Favourable Conservation Status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Countryside Council for Wales was the successor in Wales of the Nature Conservancy Council.

  2. 2.

    For Natura 2000 sites an objective must be written for each Natura feature.

  3. 3.

    Although there is no widely accepted definition of long term, some authors have suggested what it might mean. For example, Sinclair et al. (2006), writing about ecosystems, conclude, ‘In most cases planning should be for 30–50 year periods or longer’.

  4. 4.

    A paper, ‘Evidence of Effectiveness’ (Pullin 2002), provides a compelling case for evidence-based conservation.

  5. 5.

    In this context, a feature can be a habitat, biotope, plant community or population of a species. However, the concept can also be applied to many other non-biological features, for example, geology, geomorphology, archaeology.

  6. 6.

    A detailed account of attributes for UK grassland and all other habitats is available from JNCC (JNCC 2004).

  7. 7.

    This and the remaining sections on limits are adapted from Alexander (2005).

  8. 8.

    Reminder: monitoring is surveillance undertaken to ensure that formulated standards are being maintained.

References

  • Alexander, M. (2003). CCW Guide to Management Planning for SSSIs, Natura 2000 Sites and Ramsar Sites. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (1994). Management Planning Handbook. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2005). The CMS Guide to Management Planning. The CMS Consortium, Talgarth, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (1996). A Guide to the Production of Management Plans for Nature Conservation and Protected Areas. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2000). Guide to the Production of Management Plans for Protected Areas. CMS Partnership, Aberystwyth, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona State Office (1995). Eagletail Mountains Wilderness Management Plan, Environment Assessment and Decision Record. US department of the Interior, Bureau of land Management, Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. and Perrins, C. M. (1997). Auk studies on Skomer Island. In: Welsh Islands: Ecology, Conservation and Land Use. Rhind, P. M., Blackstock, T. H. and Parr, S. J. (ed.), Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales, pp. 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. and Mount, D. (1998). Site Management Planning. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W., Willoughby, J. W. and Gibbs, J. P. (2001). Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations: A Handbook for Field Biologists. Blackwell Science, Inc. Malden, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • English Nature (2005). NNR Management Plans: A Guide. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosite (1999). Toolkit for Management Planning. Eurosite, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, P.B. (2000). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Cerulean Warbler Status Assessment, U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Fort Snelling, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton-Ellis, T. (2011). Can the Keystone Species and Keystone Habitats concepts be usefully applied in the Natural Environment Framework? Unpublished report Countryside, Council for Wales, Bangor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idle, E. T. and Bines, T. J. H. (2005). Management Planning for Protected Areas, A Guide for Practitioners and Their Bosses. Eurosite, English Nature, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • JNCC (1998). A Statement on Common Standards Monitoring. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • JNCC (2004). Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey – A Technique for Environmental Audit, Revised reprint 2003. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaljuste, T. (1998). Guidelines for Development of Management Plans for Protected Areas. Ministry of Environment of Estonia, Tallinn, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D. B., Margules, C. B. and Botkin, D. B. (2000). Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conservation Biology, 14(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. E. (1986). Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Oregon State University Press, Cornwallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis, R. and Salafsky, N. (1998). Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool, S. F. (1989). Limits of acceptable change: some principles towards serving visitors and managing our resources; Proceedings of the visitor management strategies symposium. University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministere charge de l’Environmement (1991). Plans de gestion des reserves Naturelles. Direction de la Protection de la Nature, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Parks and Wildlife Service (2005). Management Plan for the Wicklow Mountain National Park (2005 – 2009). The National Park and Wildlife Service – Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1981). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans for National Nature Reserves in Wales. Nature Conservancy Council, Wales, Bangor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1983). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1988). Site Management Plans for Nature Conservation, A Working Guide. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. (1993). Woodland Conservation and Management, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G. F. (1996). Natural Woodland, Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. and Yates, J. T. (1993). Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A. S. (2003). Support for decision-making in conservation. English Nature research reports, 493. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Bureau (2002). New Guidelines for Management Planning for Ramsar Sites and Other Wetlands, Ramsar resolution VIII.14. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. A. (1993). Common Standards for Monitoring SSSIs. JNCC Peterborough. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPB (1993). RSPB Management Plan Guidance Notes, version 3. Internal publication, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways, M. J. (2005). Insect Diversity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. R. E., Fryxell, J. M. and Caughley, G. (2006). Wildlife Ecology, Conservation, and Management, second edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., McCool, S. F. and Stokes, G. L. (1984). Limits of acceptable change: A new framework for managing the Bob Marshall Wilderness. Western Wildlands, 10(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasmania Parks and Wildlife service (2003) www.parks.tas.gov.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. and Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. A. (1992). Population trends of guillemots Urial aalge and razorbills Alca torda on Skomer Island, Wales, 1963 – 1991. Unpublished report to Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. B. and Warren, A. (ed.) (1976). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans – Conservation Course Format, Revision 1. University College London, Discussion Papers in Conservation, No. 18. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. B. and Warren, A. (Ed.) (1978). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans – Conservation Course Format, Revision 2. University College London, Discussion Papers in Conservation No. 18, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Alexander .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexander, M. (2013). Objectives and Performance Indicators for Biological Features. In: Management Planning for Nature Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5116-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics