Skip to main content

NASA Remote Sensing and Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Satellite Remote Sensing

Part of the book series: Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing ((RDIP,volume 16))

Abstract

Although not its primary mission, NASA’s remote sensing missions have been providing archaeologists with useful and unique data since the launch of the very first earth observing missions. While imaging the Earth with a variety of multispectral and hyperspectral instrument mounted on both orbital and suborbital platforms, NASA scientists and collaborators from international universities have discovered, delineated and analyzed archaeological sites worldwide using remotely sensed digital imagery. Several of the ten NASA centers have collaborated with archaeologists to refine and validate the use of active and passive remote sensing for archeological use. The Stennis Space Center (SSC), located in Mississippi USA has been the NASA leader in archeological research. Together with colleagues from Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), SSC scientists have provided the archaeological community with useful images and sophisticated processing that have pushed the technological frontiers of archaeological research and applications. Successful projects include identifying prehistoric roads in Chaco canyon, mapping the Lewis and Clark Corps of Discovery route, assessing prehistoric settlement patterns in southeast Louisiana, discovering the lost city of Ubar and mapping ancient irrigation channels at Angkor. The Scientific Data Purchase (SDP) managed from SSC solicited commercial remote sensing companies to collect archaeological data. Recently, NASA formally solicited “space archaeology” proposals through its Earth Science Directorate and continues to assist archaeologists and cultural resource managers in doing their work more efficiently and effectively. Hyperspectral data offers new opportunities for future archeological discoveries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altaweel M (2005) The use of ASTER satellite imagery in archaeological contexts. Archaeol Prospect 12(3):151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belew LF, Stuhlinger E (1973) Skylab: a guidebook EP-107. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J, Smith L, Laustrup M (1986) The red river valley archaeological project. TIMS user workshop JPL, California Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RR, Johannes D (1990) Phytoarchaeology. Dioscorides Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CA (1936) The vegetation of the Indian mounds, middens, and marshes in Plaquemines and St. Bernard Parishes. Department of Conservation-Louisiana Geological Survey 8:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter GA (1994) Ratios of leaf reflectances in narrow wavebands as indicators of plant stress. Int J Remote Sens 15:697–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton DW, Benson CD (1983) Living and working in space: a history of Skylab. The NASA History Office Series Scientific and Technical Information Branch National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook JP, Stringer WJ (1975) Feasibility study for locating archaeological village sites by satellite remote sensing. Final report for contract NASS 21833, ERTS project 110-N. Greenbelt, Maryland: Goddard Space Flight Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer JF, Eveleigh T, Klemas V, Wells I (1986) Application of LANDSAT data and synoptic remote sensing to predictive models for prehistoric archaeological sites: an example from the Delaware coastal plain. Am Antiquity 51:572–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble LJ (2006) Holocene landscapes at Koobi for a, Kenya: application of geographic information science to archaeological questions of landuse and subsistence. PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn ME (1983) Coquille Flora (Louisiana): an ethnobotanical reconstruction. Econ Bot 37:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert JI, Lyons TR (1980) Prehistoric irrigation canals identified from Skylab III and landsat imagery in Phoenix, Arizona. In: Lyons TR, Mathien FJ (eds) Cultural resources remote sensing. Southwest Cultural Resources Center, National Park Service, Albuquerque, pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleuterius LN, Otvos EG (1979) Floristic and geologic aspects of Indian middens in salt marshes of Hancock County, Mississippi. Sida Contrib Bot 8:102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman A, Hensley S, Moore E (1999) Analysis of radar images of Angkor, Cambodia. IGARSS Proc 5:2572–2574

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino MJ (2009) NASA, remote sensing and archaeology: an example from Southeast Louisiana. EARSel Newsl 80:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino MJ, Haley BS (2006) Airborne remote sensing and geospatial analysis. In: Johnson J (ed) Remote sensing in archaeology: an explicitly North American perspective. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp 47–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (1984) The earthen face of civilization: mapping and testing at poverty point. Office of the State Archaeologist, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (1987) The ground truth about poverty point: the second season, 1985. Center for archaeological studies report 7. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (1989) Digging on the dock of the bay(ou): the 1988 excavations at poverty point. Center for archaeological studies report 8. University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumerman GJ, Lyons TR (1971) Archaeological methodology and remote sensing. Science 172:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JK (2006) Remote sensing in archaeology: an explicitly North American perspective. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J, Madry S, Sever T (1988) Remote sensing and GIS analysis in large scale survey design in North Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeol 7(2):124–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Giardino MJ (1997) Recent advances in remote sensing technology. Paper presented at the 54th annual meeting of the southeastern archaeological conference, Birmingham, 5–8 Nov 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Junkin BG, Pearson RW, Seyfarth BR, Kalcic MT, Graham MH (1981) Earth resources laboratory applications software (ELAS). Report no. 183. NASA, National Space Technology Laboratories, Earth Resources, NSTL, Mississippi, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle AB, Abbott E (eds) (1985) The TIMS data user’s workshop 18–19 June 1985. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsmizki KW, Spruce J, Giardino MJ (2003a) Archaeological remote sensing: searching for Fort Clatsop from space. In: Abstract in proceedings for society of historical archaeology 2003 conference. Providence, 14–19 Jan 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsmizki KW, Spruce J, Weymouth JW, Giardino M, English RW (2003b) Searching for Lewis and Clark’s Iron Boat: remote sensing on the ground and from space. In: Abstract in proceedings for 2003 society of American archaeology conference, Milwaukee, 9–14 April 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsmizki KW, Spruce J, Giardino MJ (2004) Use of remote sensing and GIS in search for Lewis and Clark’s rock fort camp site of The Dalles, Oregon. Presentation given at 2004 ESRI conference, San Diego, 9–13 Aug 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruchman L (1976) Remote sensing and archeology: a preliminary bibliography. RSEMS, Newsletter of the remote sensing committee of the Association of American Geographers 3(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp FW (1989) The use of multispectral digital imagery in archaeological investigations. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons TR, Avery TE (1977) Remote sensing: a handbook for archeologists and cultural resource managers. National Park Service, (U.S. Government Printing Office), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons TR, Ebert JE (eds) (1978) Remote sensing and non-destructive archeology. Cultural Resources Management Division, National Park Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons TR, Hitchcock RK (eds) (1977) Aerial remote sensing techniques in archeology. Reports of the Chaco Center, no. 2, National Park Service and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons TR, Mathien FJ (eds) (1980) Cultural resources remote sensing. Cultural Resources Management Division, National Park Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Madry S (1983) Remote sensing in archaeology. Archaeology, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee BR, Sever TL (1994) Remote sensing in the arenal region. In: Sheets PD, McKee BK (eds) Archaeology volcanism and remote sensing in the arenal region, Costa Rica. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mid-America Remote Sensing Center (1983) Determination of the utility of remote sensing data for land use/cover analyses in the Lower Appalachia Region-assessing the utility of remote sensing data for archaeological site reconnaissance. NASA Contract NAS13-200, Murray State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WF (1974) Applications of remote sensing in archeological site identification. Institute of Environmental Studies, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore E, Freeman T, Hensley S (2007) Spaceborne and airborne radar at Angkor: introducing new technology to the ancient site. In: Wiseman J, El-Baz F (eds) Remote sensing in archaeology interdisciplinary contributions in archaeology. Springer, New York, pp 185–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MASCA Newsletter (1969) Balloon and airfoil photography. Applied Science Center for Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania, Nov 1969, 5(2):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA/SSC (2003) The NASA scientific data purchase final report. Contract no. 13–650, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, John C. Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, Sept 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcak SH (2009) Satellite remote sensing for archaeology. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrington M (1983) Remote sensing. Annual Review of Anthropology 12:105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman D, Kalcic M (1982) Noise removal by Principal Component Analysis. Report no. 203, NASA National Space Technology Laboratories, Earth Resources Laboratory, NSTL, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalera MM (1970) Aerial archaeology in the space age. NASA Historical Division, Office of Policy, NASA-TM-X-68502, Aug 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaber GG, Gumerman GJ (1969) Infrared scanning images: archaeological application. Science 164(3880):712–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sever TL (1983) Feasibility study to determine the utility of advanced remote sensing technology in archeological investigations. Report no. 227, (NASA-TM-88650), NSTL, ERL, Dec 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Sever TL (1990) Remote sensing applications in archeological research: tracing prehistoric human impact upon the environment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Sever TL, Wagner DW (1991) Analysis of prehistoric roadways in Chaco Canyon using remotely sensed digital data. In: Trombold C (ed) Ancient road networks and settlement hierarchies in the New World. University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Sever TL, Wiseman J (1985) Conference on remote sensing: potential for the future. NASA Earth Resources Laboratory, NSTL, MS, Jan 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Short NM (1982) The landsat tutorial handbook: basics of satellite remote sensing. NASA Reference Publication 1078, Scientific and Technical Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Traviglia A (2008) A view of greater Angkor: a multi-scalar approach for investigating the Khmer forests. In: Lasaponara R, Masini N (eds) Advances in remote sensing for archaeology and cultural heritage management. Aracne Press, Rome, pp 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells I, Custer J, Klemas V (1981) Locating prehistoric archaeological sites using landsat. In: 15th International symposium on remote sensing of environment, Ann Arbor, 11–15 May 1981, Proceedings. vol 2. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 771–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman JR (1984) Archaeology in the space age. Context 4(1–2):1–3, Boston University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman J, El-Baz F (2007) Remote sensing in archaeology. Springer, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco J. Giardino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giardino, M.J. (2012). NASA Remote Sensing and Archaeology. In: Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (eds) Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics