Abstract
The extraction of the huge amount of information stored in the last generation of VHR satellite imagery, is a big challenge to be addressed. At the current state of the art, the available classification techniques are still inadequate for the analysis and classification of VHR data. This issue is much more critical in the field of archaeological applications being that the subtle signals, which generally characterize the archaeological features, cause a decrease in: (i) overall accuracy, (ii) generalization attitude and (iii) robustness. In this paper, we present the methods used up to now for the classification of VHR data in archaeology. It should be considered that: (i) pattern recognition and classification using satellite data is a quite recent research topic in the field of cultural heritage; (ii) early attempts have been mainly focused on monitoring and documentation much more than detection of unknown features. Finally, we discuss the expected improvements needed to fully exploit the increasing amount of VHR satellite data today available also free of charge as in the case of Google Earth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams M (2000) The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER): data products for the high spatial resolution imager on NASA’s Terra platform. Int J Remote Sens 21(5):847–859
Aurdal L, Eikvil L, Koren H, Loska A (2006) Semi-automatic search for cultural heritage sites in satellite images. In: Proceedings of ‘From Space to Place’, 2nd international conference on remote sensing in archaeology, Rome, 4–7 Dec 2006. BAR International Series 1568, pp 1–6
Baatz M, Schape A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T (eds) Angewandte Geographische Informations verarbeitung XII. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 12–23
Bhaskaran S, Paramananda S, Ramnarayan M (2010) Per-pixel and object-oriented classification methods for mapping urban features using Ikonos satellite data. Appl Geogr 30(4):650–665
Buck PE, Sabol DE, Gillespie AR (2003) Sub-pixel artifact detection using remote sensing. J Archaeol Sci 30:973–989
Cavalli RM, Pascucci S, Pignatti S (2009) Optimal spectral domain selection for maximizing archaeological signatures: Italy case studies. Sensors 9:1754–1767
Ciminale M, Gallo D, Lasaponara R, Masini N (2009) A multiscale approach for reconstructing archaeological landscapes: applications in Northern Apulia (Italy). Archaeol Prospect 16:143–153
Congalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis, Boca Raton
De Laet V, Paulissen E, Waelkens M (2007) Methods for the extraction of archaeological features from very high-resolution Ikonos-2 remote sensing imagery, Hisar (southwest Turkey). J Archaeol Sci 34:830–841
Desclée B, Bogaert P, Defourny P (2006) Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sens Environ 102:1–11
eCognition User Guide (2002) http:\crwww.definiensimaging.com
Giada S, De Groeve T, Ehrlich D (2003) Information extraction from very high-resolution satellite imagery over Lukole refugee camp, Tanzania. Int J Remote Sens 24(22):4251–4266
Hofmann P (2001) Detecting informal settlements from Ikonos image data using methods of object oriented image analysisdan example from Cape Town (South Africa). In: Jurgens C (ed) Remote sensing of urban areas/Fernerkundung in urbanen Ra¨umen. Regensburger GeographischeSchriften, Regensburg, pp 107–118
Ichku C, Karnieli A (1996) A review of mixture modeling techniques for sub-pixel land cover estimation. Remote Sens Rev 13:161–186
Kiema JBK (2002) Texture analysis and data fusion in the extraction of topographic objects from satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens 23(4):767–776
Kruse FA, Lefkoff AB (1993) Knowledge-based geologic mapping with imaging spectrometers. Remote sensing reviews, special issue on NASA Innovative Research Program (IRP) results, vol 8, pp 3–28
Lasaponara R, Lanorte A (2006) Multispectral fuel type characterization based on remote sensing data and Prometheus model. Forest Ecol Manag 234:S226
Lasaponara R, Masini N (2007) Statistical evaluation of spectral capability of satellite QuickBird data in detecting buried archaeological remains. In: Gomarasca M (ed) GeoInformation in Europe. Millpress, Rotterdam. ISBN 9789059660618657 663
Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (2000) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New York
McFeeters SK (1996) The use of Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17(7):1425–1432
Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C (2011) Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS J Photogramm 66(3):247–259
Pacifici F, Chini M, Emery WJ (2009) A neural network approach using multi-scale textural metrics from very high-resolution panchromatic imagery for urban land-use classification. Remote Sens Environ 113(6):1276–1292
PCI Geomatics (1998) OrthoEngine reference manual. PCI Geomatics, Richmond Hill
Pulvirenti L, Chini M, Pierdicca N, Guerriero L, Ferrazzoli P (2011) Flood monitoring using multi-temporal COSMO-SkyMed data: image segmentation and signature interpretation. Remote Sens Environ 115(4):990–1002
Richards JA, Jia X (2006) Remote sensing digital image analysis -hardback, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 476 p
Richards JA, Xiuping J (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis an introduction. Springer, New York
Rumelhart D, Hinton G, Williams R (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE, The PDP Research Group (eds) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, vol 1, pp 318–362
Thomas IL, Ching NP, Benning VM, D’Aguanno A (1987) A review of multichannel indices of class separability. Int J Remote Sens 3:331–350
Trelogan J (2000) Remote sensing and GIS in the Chora of Chersonesos. In: The Study of ancient territories. Chersonesos and Metaponto. 2000 annual report. Institute of Classical Archaeology, The University of Texas, Austin, pp 25–31
Werbos P (1974) Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (2012). Pattern Recognition and Classification Using VHR Data for Archaeological Research. In: Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (eds) Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8800-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8801-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)