Skip to main content

Induction and Maintenance Therapy

  • Chapter
  • 1351 Accesses

Abstract

The optimal immunosuppressive regimen for initial, maintenance and rejection therapy after hand transplantation has not yet been identified. Composite tissue allograft (CTA), such as hand transplantation, has been performed only experimentally for many years because of the skin’s high degree of immunogenicity. Indeed, it was assumed that the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs required to prevent rejection were too high to be used safely in the clinical setting. Advances in immunopharmacology and the encouraging results achieved in animal models [1]–[3] in this last decade allowed the realization of different human CTAs, including larynx, knee, hand and part of a face. These positive outcomes have been made possible through the use of the latest induction and maintenance regimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Perez-Abadia G, Laurentin-Perez L, Gorantla VS et al (2003) Low-dose immunosuppression in a rat hindlimb transplantation model. Transpl Int 16:835–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones JW Jr, Ustuner ET, Zdichavsky M et al (1999) Long-term survival of an extremity composite tissue allograft with FK 506-mycophenolate mofetil therapy. Surgery 126:384–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ustuner ET, Zdichavsky M, Ren X et al (1998) Longterm composite tissue allograft survival in a porcine model with cyclosporine/mycophenolate mofetil. Transplantation 66:1581–1587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Halloran PF, Lui SL (1998) Approved immunosuppressants. In: Norman DJ, Suki WN (eds) Primer on transplantation. American Society of Transplant Physicians, Thorofare, pp 93–102

    Google Scholar 

  5. Najarian JS, Simmons RL, Condic RM et al (1976) Seven years’ experience with antilymphoblast globulin for renal transplantation from cadaver donors. Ann Surg 184:352–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy MA (1982) Beneficial effects of heterologous antilymphoid globulins in renal transplantation: one “believer’s view”. Am J Kidney Dis 2:79–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fenton SS, Tober JA, Cardella CJ (1994) A comparison of rabbit antithymocyte serum and OKT3, as prophylaxis against renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 57:60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincenti F, Kirkman R, Light S et al (1998) Interleukin-2 blockade with Daclizumab to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation. Daclizumab Triple Therapy Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lan NC, Karin M, Nguyen T et al (1984) Mechanisms of glucocorticoid hormone action. J Steroid Biochem 20:77–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Borel JF (1981) Cyclosporin-A — present experimental status. Transplant Proc 13:344–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Land W (1988) Cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation: five year follow-up results of the European Multicentric Trial. Transplant Proc 20:73–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goto T, Kino T, Hatanaka H et al (1987) Discovery of FK 506, a novel immunosuppressant, isolated from Streptomices tsukubaensis. Transplant Proc 19:4–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki N, Sakane T, Tsunematsu T (1990) Effects of a novel immunosuppressive agent, FK 506 on human B-cell activation. Clin Exp Immunol 79:240–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ransom JT (1995) Mechanism of action of Mycophenolate Mofetil. Ther Drug Monit 17:681–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group (1998) A blinded long-term, randomised study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation: results at three years. Transplantation 65:1450–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vezina C, Kudelski A, Sehgal SN (1975) Rapamycin (AY-22989), a new antifungal antibiotic: taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle. J Antibiot 28:721–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lai JH, Tan H (1994) CD28 signaling causes a sustained down-regulation of I kappa B alpha which can be prevented by the immunosuppressant rapamycin. J Biol Chem 269:30077–30080

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Margreiter R et al (2005) The International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplantation. Transplantation. 79:1210–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Michallet MC, Preville X, Flacher L et al (2003) Functional antibodies to leukocyte adhesion molecules in antithymocyte globulins. Transplantation 75:657–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Genestier L, Fournel L, Flacher M et al (1998) Induction of Fas (Apo-1, CD95)-mediated apoptosis of activa Blood 91:2360–2368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris PE, Kendall-Taylor P (1989) Steroid therapy and surgery. Curr Pract Surg 11:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barbul A, Breslin RJ, Woodyard JP et al (1989) The effect of in-vivo T-helper and T-suppressor lymphocyte depletion on wound healing AA Surg 209:479–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH et al (1997) A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation 63:977–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gold BG, Yew JY, Zeleny-Pooley M (1998) The immunosuppressant FK506 increases GAP-43 mRNA levels in axotomized sensory neurons. Neurosci Lett 241:25–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabl M, Pechlaner S, Lutz M et al (2004) Bilateral hand transplantation: bone healing under immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. J Hand Surg [Am] 29:1020–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petruzzo, P. (2007). Induction and Maintenance Therapy. In: Lanzetta, M., Dubernard, JM., Petruzzo, P. (eds) Hand Transplantation. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0374-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0374-3_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0373-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0374-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics