Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 944 Accesses

Abstract

In this book, the debate on public service organizations governance regimes has mainly focused on four main research questions: which governance regimes are needed and should be developed to manage public service organizations? Which is the governance system adopted by Italian local public utilities? Why do partial privatization processes exist? Does the board of directors contribute to SOEs’ innovation? Along each direction, various issues and concepts have been discussed, basing on different perspectives in order to catch the plurality of views and values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benz, M., & Frey, B. (2007). Corporate governance: What can we learn from Public Governance? Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borins, S. (1998). Innovating with integrity: How local heroes are transforming American Government. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B. (2009). Public values theory: Three big questions. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5), 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafferata, R. (1993). La società per azioni pubblica. Equilibrio economico e strategie di transizione. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2003). Narratives of Norwegian governance: Elaborating the strong state tradition. Public Administration, 81(1), 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in Government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C. (2003). The governance of public and non-profit organizations: What do boards do? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilulio, J. (1994). Principled agents: The cultural bases of behaviour in a Federal Government bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(1), 227–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D. (2005). Offshoring: Value creation through economic change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, G., & Mussari, R. (2009). The effects of corporatisation on financial reporting: The experience of the Italian Local Governments. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(3–4), 268–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2008). Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 10(5), 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, R., Wright, M., & Keasey, K. (1996). Corporate governance in the public services: Concepts and issues. Public Money and Management, 16(2), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. J., & Delevan, S. M. (1990). Public Administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50(6), 674–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, J., & Letza, S. (2003). Corporate governance and gatekeeper liability: The lessons from Public Authorities. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 11(3), 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. C. (1998). Sustaining innovation: Creating nonprofit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio, A., & Flores-Macias, F. (2009). The return of State-owned enterprises: Should we be afraid? Online Edition. Harvard International Review (March, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). Corporate governance accountability and transparency: A guide for State ownership. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2009). Debate: Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., & Ball, A. (2010). Social audit, accounting and accountability for the common good. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., & McLaughlin, K. (2004). The cross-cutting review of the voluntary sector: Where next for local government-voluntary sector relationships? Regional Studies, 38(5), 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2008). A democratic architecture for the Welfare State. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (2005). The character and significance of management research on the public services. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 973–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2009). Structural change and public service performance: International lessons? Public Money and Management, 29(5), 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranade, W., & Hudson, B. (2003). Conceptual issues in inter-agency collaboration. Local Government Studies, 29(3), 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2002). Putting people back into networks. Australian Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruter, R. X., Sahr, K., & Waldersee, G. G. (2005). Public corporate governance. Ein kodex für öffentliche unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C. (2007). Does democracy matter? A transatlantic research design on democratic performance and special purpose governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2005). E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of Local government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. M., Jeanes, E., & Rowlands, R. (2002). Measuring innovation: Applying the literature-based innovation output indicator to public services. Public Administration, 80(1), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Calabrò .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calabrò, A. (2011). Conclusions. In: Governance Structures and Mechanisms in Public Service Organizations. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2750-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics