Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Innovationsforschung pp 1–12Cite as

Neo-institutionalistische Innovationstheorien

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Während Innovationen in klassischer soziologischer Lesart eine spezifische Form der Abweichung darstellen, ist aus neo-institutionalistischer Perspektive auffällig, dass diese in zunehmender Weise erwartet, geplant, vermessen und normativ eingefordert werden. Vor dem Hintergrund einer derartigen Institutionalisierung von Innovationen behandelt der Beitrag erstens für Hightech-Innovationen charakteristische Formen der Vernetzung und zweitens Fragen der Diffusion eines hierauf bezogenen Innovationsmodells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Amable, Bruno. 2000. Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy 7:645–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen R., John Freeman, und Ralph C. Hybels. 1992. Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In Networks and organizations, Hrsg. Nitin Nohria und Robert G. Eccles, 311–347. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, William P. 2008. The red queen among organizations. How competitiveness evolves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Joel A. C., Tony Calabrese, und Brian S. Silverman. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., und Thomas Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli, John, und George M. Thomas. 1997. World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American Sociological Review 62(2): 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14:19–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Steven. 2007a. How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within San Diego biotechnology. Research Policy 36:438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Steven. 2007b. Creating Silicon Valley in Europe. Public policy towards new technology industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S., Elihu Katz, und Herbert Menzel. 1966. Medical innovation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Hrsg. Paul J. DiMaggio und Walter W. Powell, 267–292. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., und Walter W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited. American Sociological Review 48:147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, Wendy N., und Mitchell L. Stevens. 2008. A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology 49:401–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil. 1996. Markets as politics. A political and cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review 61:656–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, Neil, und Doug McAdam. 2012. A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenfschilling, Lea, und Bernhard Truffer. 2014. The structuration of socio-technical-regimes – conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy 43(4): 772–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenfschilling, Lea, und Bernhard Truffer. 2016. The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems – An analysis of the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 103:298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald, und J. Rogers Hollingsworth. 2000. A strategy for analysis of idea innovation networks and institutions. Organization Studies 21(5): 971–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund. 2003. Die Innovationsfähigkeit der Organisationsgesellschaft. Organisation, Wettbewerb und sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Georg Krücken. 2008a. Institution. In Handbuch Soziologie, Hrsg. Nina Baur, Hermann Korte, Martina Löw und Markus Schroer, 163–182. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Georg Krücken. 2008b. Systems theory, societal contexts, and organizational heterogeneity. In The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin und Roy Suddaby, 539–559. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Eva Passarge. 2015. Silicon Valley und sonst nichts Neues? Biotechnologie in der Schweiz als Beispiel für neue Organisationsformen und deren Legitimierung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44:6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Eva Passarge. 2016. Institution, dominant actors, and financial markets. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 13(6): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, Sophie Mützel, und Judith Nyfeler. 2019. Hauptsache neu? Die Organisation von Innovation und Kreativität. In Handbuch Organisationssoziologie, Hrsg. Maja Apelt, Ingo Bode, Raimund Hasse, Uli Meyer, Victoria von Groddeck, Maximiliane Wilkesmann und Arnold Windeler. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald L. 1991. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Hrsg. Walter W. Powell und Paul J. DiMaggio, 143–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, Martin. 2000. Understanding silicon valley. The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, Matthew, und Emily Block. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In Organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin und Roy Suddaby, 243–275. London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, Georg. 2005. Der „world polity“-Ansatz in der Globalisierungsdiskussion: Grundzüge und Perspektiven eines sozialtheoretischen Forschungsprogramms. In Weltkultur: Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen, Hrsg. John W. Meyer und Georg Krücken, 299–318. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, Georg, und Frank Meier. 2003. Wir sind alle überzeugte Netzwerktäter. Netzwerke als Formalstruktur und Mythos der Innovationsgesellschaft. Soziale Welt 54:71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., und A. Rip. 2018. Next-generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and Public Policy 45(4): 448–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markard, Jochen, Rob Raven, und Bernhard Truffer. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41(6): 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1938. Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review 3:672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John. 2011. Otherhood: The promulgation and transmission of ideas in the modern organizational environment. In Translating organizational change, Hrsg. Barbara Czarniawska und Sevon Guje, 241–272. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W. 2010. World societies, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology 36:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., John Boli, und George M. Thomas. 1994. Ontology and rationalization in the western cultural account. In Institutional environments and organizations. Structural complexity and individualism, Hrsg. William R. Scott und John W. Meyer, 9–26. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John F., und Walter W. Powell. 2012. The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, und Laurel Smith-Doer. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kelley Packalen, und Kjersten Whittington. 2012. Organizational and institutional genesis. The emergence of high-tech clusters in the life sciences. In The emergence of organizations and markets, Hrsg. John F. Padgett und Walter W. Powell, 434–465. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch, und Michael Hutter. 2016. Die Ausweitung der Innovationszone. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 3–13. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, 5. Aufl. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, Kerstin, und Linda Wedlin. 2008. Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin und Roy Suddaby, 218–242. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiberg, Marc, und Elisabeth S. Clemens. 2006. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory 24:195–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schülein, Johann A. 1987. Theorie der Institution. Eine dogmengeschichtliche und konzeptionelle Analyse. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David, und John W. Meyer. 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society 22:487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David, und Sarah A. Soule. 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pill. Annual Review of Sociology 24:265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Mark C., Daniel J. Steward, und A. Clifford. 2001. The legal environment of entrepreneurship: Observations on the legitimation of venture finance in Silicon Valley. In The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries, Hrsg. Claudia B. Schoonhoven und Elaine Romanelli, 349–382. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitols, Sigurt. 2001. Frankfurt’s neuer Markt and the IPO explosion: Is Germany on the road to Silicon Valley? Economy and Society 30:553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Kjersten B., Jason Owen-Smith, und Walter W. Powell. 2009. Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly 54: 90–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne G. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review 42:726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Ezra W. 1999. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1398–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Luzern, Luzern, Schweiz

    Raimund Hasse

  2. Lund University, Lund, Schweden

    Lea Fünfschilling

Authors
  1. Raimund Hasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lea Fünfschilling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimund Hasse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hasse, R., Fünfschilling, L. (2020). Neo-institutionalistische Innovationstheorien. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation