Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolutorische Innovationsökonomik

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Innovationsforschung

Zusammenfassung

Die evolutorische Ökonomik setzt sich die Erklärung von dynamischen, überwiegend durch technologische und andere Innovationen verursachten Wirtschaftsprozessen zum Ziel. Theoretisch wurzelt sie in den Arbeiten von Joseph A. Schumpeter aus dem frühen 20. Jahrhundert, der den in der Volkswirtschaftslehre im Vordergrund stehenden Preiswettbewerb durch den Innovationswettbewerb ersetzt und dem passiven homo oeconomicus den umtriebigen Entrepreneur an die Seite gestellt hat. Durchsetzen konnte sich die moderne evolutorische Ökonomik seit den 1980er-Jahren und liefert heute mit dem Ansatz der Innovationssysteme, den Rahmen für die ökonomische Innovationsforschung und Innovationspolitik.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abernathy, William J., und James M. Utterback. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 7:40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz, Moses. 1993. The search for the sources of growth: Area of ignorance, old and new. Journal of Economic History 53(2): 217–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Moses. 1956. Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review 46:5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, Hrsg. Richard R. Nelson, 609–626. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, Brian. 2014. Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B., und Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1969. A new view of technological change. Economic Journal 79:116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, und Ryszard Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1:93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Norman, und Calestous Juma. 1987. Long run economics – an evolutionary approach to economic growth. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Michael D., Roger Burkhart, Giovanni Dosi, Massimo Egidi, Luigi Marengo, Massimo Warglien, und Sidney G. Winter. 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary reseach issues. Industrial Structure and Corporate Change 5:653–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Phil, Mikel Uranga, und Goio Etxebarria. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy 26(4–5): 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, Rod W. 1988. Technological opportunities and industrial organization. In Technical change and economic theory, Hrsg. Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard R. Nelson, Gerald Silverberg und Luc Soete, 295–308. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M., und James G. March. 1963. A behavioural theory of the firm. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha. 1986. The theory of technological competition. In New developments in the analysis of market structure. International economic association series, 77, Hrsg. Joseph E. Stiglitz und Frank G. F. Mathewson, 519–549. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul. 1975. Technical choice, innovation and economic growth. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bresson, Chris. 1987. The evolutionary paradigm and the economics of technical change. Journal of Economic Issues 21:751–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer, Kurt. 2004. The economic agent as rule maker and rule user: Homo sapiens oeconomicus. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14:177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change. Research Policy 11: 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 24:1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, und Massimo Egidi. 1991. Substantive and procedural rationality, an exploration of economic behaviour under uncertainty. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1:145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, Malte, und John L. Proobs. 1990. Evolution, time, and the environment. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, Roger, Shu-Heng Chen, Kurt Dopfer, Floris Heukelom, und Shabnam Mousavi, Hrsg. 2017. Routledge handbook of behavioural economics. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, Ken, und Yasunori Baba. 1991. Systemic innovation and cross-border networks, transcending markets and hierachies to create a new techno-economic system. In Technology and productivity: The challenge for economic policy, Hrsg. OECD, 389–405. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, und Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory. Econometrica 47:263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, und Amos Tversky. 1986. Rational choices and the framing of decisions. In Rational choice, the contrast between economics and psychology, Hrsg. Robin M. Hogarth und Melvin W. Reder, 251–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Chicago: The Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, Fumio. 1986. Technology fusion and the new R&D. Harvard Business Review 1992: 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. 1992. National systems of innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The lever of riches. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1989a. Capitalism as an engine of progress. In Industrial dynamics, Hrsg. Bo Carlsson, 177–192. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1989b. What is private and what is public about technology? Science, Technology & Human Values 14(3): 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1993. National innovation systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. 1995. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature XXXIII:48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., und Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., Giovanni Dosi, Connie Helfat, Andreas Pyka, Pier-Paolo Saviotti, Keun Lee, Kurt Dopfer, Franco Malerba, und Sidney G. Winter. 2018. Modern evolutionary economics – An overview. Cambrdige, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, Keith. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change, towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13:343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, Ilya, und Isabelle Stengers. 1993. Das Paradox der Zeit. Zeit, Chaos und Quanten. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyka, Andreas. 1999. Der kollektive Innovationsprozess – Eine theoretische Analyse informeller Netzwerke und absorptiver Fähigkeiten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyka, Andreas. 2002. Innovation networks in economics: From the incentive-based to the knowledge-based approaches. European Journal of Innovation Management 5(3): 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyka, Andreas. 2017. Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: Creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3(27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyka, Andreas, und Kurt Dopfer. 2018. Evolutionary economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyka, Andreas, und Giorgio Fagiolo. 2007. Agent-based modelling: A methodology for a neo-schumpeterian modelling. In The Elgar companion on neo-schumpeterian economics, Hrsg. Horst Hanusch und Andreas Pyka, 467–492. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the black-box: Technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaile, Michael, Sophie Urmetzer, Vincent Blok, Allan Dahl Andersen, Job Timmermans, Matthias Mueller, Jan Fagerberg, und Andreas Pyka. 2017. Innovation systems for transformations towards sustainability? Taking the normative dimension seriously. Sustainabillity 9(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3. Aufl. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1993 [1911]. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 8. Aufl. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1955. A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:98–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1979. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review 69:493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1986. Rationality in Psychology and Economics. In Rational choice, the contrast between Economics and Psychology, Hrsg. R. M. Hogarth und M. W. Reder. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning, Organization. Science 2: 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A., und James G. March. 1958. Organizations. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70:65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economic Statistics 47:312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Panne, Gerben, Cees van Beers, und Alfred Kleinknecht. 2003. Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management 7(3): 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein B. 1898. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics 12:371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. 1971. Satisficing, Selection and the innovating remnant. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G. 1994. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 5:287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1987. Individualistische Grundlagen der evolutorischen Ökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1992. Überlegungen zum gegenwärtigen Stand der evolutorischen Ökonomik. In Evolutorische Ökonomik: Neuerungen, Normen und Institutionen, Hrsg. Bernd Bievert, 23–55. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Andreas Pyka

Authors
  1. Andreas Pyka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Pyka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pyka, A. (2019). Evolutorische Innovationsökonomik. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation