Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kreativität und Innovation bei der Unternehmensgründung

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbuch Innovationsforschung

  • 364 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir, nach kurzer Klärung des Verhältnisses von Kreativität und Innovation, welche Rolle das Thema bislang in der wissenschaftlichen Entrepreneurship-Literatur spielt, und wie vor allem eine explizite Kreativitätsforschung in diesem Bereich in Zukunft ausgebaut werden könnte. Dazu analysieren wir zunächst die bislang noch eher überschaubare explizite Kreativitätsforschung im Entrepreneurship-Feld, die das Individuum, das Team oder das soziale Netzwerk von Gründerinnen fokussiert. Sodann diskutieren wir, inwieweit das Thema der Kreativität in dieser Forschung ein zumindest implizites Thema darstellt. Darauf aufbauend identifizieren wir Potenziale für die Kreativitätsforschung im Entrepreneurship-Feld.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Siehe: http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/forschung/organized-creativity/index.html. Zugegriffen am 13.05.2019.

Literatur

  • Agogue, Marine, Mats Lundqvist, und Karen Williams Middleton. 2015. Mindful deviation through combining causation und effectuation: A design theory-based study of technology entrepreneurship. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(4): 629–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlin, Branka, Mateja Drnovsek, und Robert D. Hisrich. 2014. Entrepreneurs’ creativity and firm innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Small Business Economics 43(1): 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, Raphael, und Christoph Zott. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Neil, Kristina Potočnik, und Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40(5): 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anokhin, Sergey, und William S. Schulze. 2009. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza, und James G. Almeida. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Ted, und Reed E. Nelson. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Robert A., und Jintong Tang. 2011. The role of entrepreneurs in firm-level innovation: Joint effects of positive affect, creativity, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Venturing 26(1): 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicen, Pelin, und William H. A. Johnson. 2015. Radical innovation with limited tesources in high-turbulent markets: The role of lean innovation capability. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(2): 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, Dieter, und Udo Staber. 1994. Von Dämonen zu Demiurgen? Zur (Re-) Organisation des Unternehmertums in Marktwirtschaften. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Timo, Aristides Ferreira, Thomas Schmidt, und Jörg Sydow. 2018. Another post-heroic view on entrepreneurship: The role of employees in networking the start-up process. British Journal of Management 29(4): 652–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tim. 2009. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, Josef, Peter Preisendörfer, und Rolf Ziegler. 1998. Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe: eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen, 2. Aufl. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, Lowell W., Lawrence A. Plummer, Anthony C. Klotz, Ali Shahzad, und Kevin Rhoads. 2014. Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38(5): 981–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, Melissa S., Denis A. Gregoire, Christopher E. Stevens, und Pankaj C. Patel. 2013. Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of Business Venturing 28(3): 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, Dominic M., und Eleanor Shaw. 2016. The endogenous construction of entrepreneurial contexts: A practice-based perspective. International Small Business Journal 35(1): 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D. Economic Journal 99(397): 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W., und Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, Per. 2015. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing 30(5): 674–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, Hrsg. Lynne G. Zucker, 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimov, Dimo. 2017. The reflective entrepreneur. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dushnitsky, Gary, und Michael J. Lenox. 2005. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy 34(5): 615–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, Supradeep, und Timothy B. Folta. 2016. A comparison of the effect of angels and venture capitalists on innovation and value creation. Journal of Business Venturing 31(1): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eftekhari, Nazanin, und Marcel Bogers. 2015. Open for entrepreneurship: How open innovation can foster new venture creation. Creativity and Innovation Management 24(4): 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eling, Katrin, und Cornelius Herstatt. 2017. Managing the front end of innovation – Less fuzzy, yet still not fully understood. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34(1): 864–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallgatter, Michael J. 2004. Entrepreneurship: Konturen einer jungen Disziplin. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 56(2): 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florin, Juan, Michael Lubatkin, und William Schulze. 2003. A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal 46(3): 374–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortwengel, Johann, Elke Schüßler, und Jörg Sydow. 2017. Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management 26(1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaba, Vibha, und Shantanu Bhattacharya. 2012. Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 6(2): 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, William B. 1985. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, Christian. 2014. Tools re-visited. Wie der matrialisierte Aufforderungscharakter von Tools Management- und Beratungsarbeit beeinflusst. Managementforschung 24:139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, Gerard, Shaker A. Zahra, und D. Robley Wood. 2002. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing 17(6): 577–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik, Michael M., Michael Frese, Johanna M. Graf, und Anna Kampschulte. 2012. Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information. Journal of Business Venturing 27(5): 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grichnik, Dietmar, und Lars Immerthal. 2005. Rationalität und Risiko der Gründungsentscheidung. Die Betriebswirtschaft 65(6): 563–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T., und John Freeman. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Jennifer E., Tim Edwards, P. Devereaux Jennings, und Rick Delbridge. 2015. Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: Combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory. Journal of Business Venturing 30(1): 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, David J., R. Duane Ireland, und Charles C. Snow. 2007. Stragegic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(3–4): 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. General theory of employment, interest and money. New York: Harcourt & Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, Jill, und Lisa K. Gundry. 2001. Breaking through boundaries for organizational innovation: New managerial roles and practices in e-commerce firms. Journal of Management 27(3): 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M. 2009. The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics 32(2): 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, Tobias, und Christoph Stockmann. 2014. Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38(5): 1001–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joseph, Benson Honig, und Israel Drori. 2014. Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organization Studies 35(4): 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chonwoo, Kyungmook Lee, und Johannes M. Pennings. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebl, Franz, und Thomas Düllo. 2015. Strategie als Kultivierung: Grundlagen-Methoden-Prozesse. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Jane W., und Paul W. Beamish. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, Jeffrey S., und Dimo Dimov. 2013. Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies 50(8): 1481–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, Anne S., Paula Bassoff, und Christine Moorman. 2001. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(2): 304–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, Nicos, Scott Shane, Lynn Cherkas, und Tim D. Spector. 2008. The influence of sensation seeking in the heritability of entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(1): 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, David. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Günther, und Jörg Sydow. 2018. Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organization Studies 39(7): 899–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Haemin D., und H. Kevin Steensma. 2013. The selection and nurturing effects of corporate investors on new venture innovativeness. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7(4): 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Mike W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Russel W. Coff. 2011. In the mood for entrepreneurial creativity? How optimal group effect differs for generating and selecting ideas for new ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 5(3): 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Pier V. Mannucci. 2017. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review 42(1): 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, Jill E., und Christina E. Shalley. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review 28(1): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, Gifford. 1985. Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piva, Evila, Francesco Rentocchini, und Cristina Rossi-Lamastra. 2012. Is open source software about innovation? Collaborations with the open source community and innovation performance of software entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Small Business Management 50(2): 340–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, Richard L., Sali L. Li, und Jon C. Carr. 2012. Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. Journal of Management 38(1): 346–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, Jörg, und Patrick Kenis. 2009. Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry 18(3): 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch, und Michael Hutter, Hrsg. 2016. Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Susan E., und Ulrike De Brentani. 2004. The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: A theoretical model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(3): 170–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammerl, Nadine, Bernd W. Wirtz, und Oliver Schilke. 2008. Innovationsfähigkeit von Unternehmen. Die Betriebswirtschaft 68(2): 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, Yolanda, Tom Dean, und Jesse F. Dillard. 2006. Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing 21(3): 286–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, Saras D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2): 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarooghi, Hessamoddin, Dirk Libaers, und Andrew Burkemper. 2015. Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing 30(5): 714–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Thomas. 2017. Creativity in the entrepreneurial journey: A state-of-the-art review and processual integration. In 4th Interdisciplinary European Conference on Entrepreneurship Research (Universität Siegen, Germany, 20–22 September 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Thomas, und Timo Braun. 2015. When cospecialization leads to rigidity: Path dependenc in successful strategic networks. Schmalenbach Business Review 67(4): 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1934 [1912]. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, Christina E., Jing Zhou, und Greg R. Oldham. 2004. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management 30(6): 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Scott. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4): 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Scott, und Sankaran Venkataraman. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotte-Kock, Susanna, und Nicole Coviello. 2010. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34(1): 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sheryl W., und Sonali K. Shah. 2013. Do innovative users generate more useful insights? An analysis of corporate venture capital investments in the medical device industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 7(2): 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Patricia D. 2005. Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg, und Thomas Schmidt. 2017. Entrepreneurship as strategic network-creation: The case of a science-based start-up. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College 37(6): 152–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, Jörg, Elke Schüßler, und Gordon Müller-Seitz. 2016. Managing inter-organizationa relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Jintong, K. Michele Kacmar, und Lowell Busenitz. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing 27(1): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6): 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H., und Marshall Scott Poole. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 510–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, Frederike. 2011. Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35(1): 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Leslie K., und Stephen J. McGuire. 2010. Economic creativity and innovation implementation: The entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries. Small Business Economics 34(4): 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard W., John E. Sawyer, und Ricky W. Griffin. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18(2): 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., und Gerard George. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Shaker A., R. Duane Ireland, und Michael A. Hitt. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 925–950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Jörg Sydow & Thomas Schmidt

Authors
  1. Jörg Sydow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Sydow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sydow, J., Schmidt, T. (2020). Kreativität und Innovation bei der Unternehmensgründung. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation