Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biologie: materielle Dimensionen von Geschlecht in biologisch-kritischer Perspektive

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung

Part of the book series: Geschlecht und Gesellschaft ((GUG,volume 65))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag charakterisiert zwei zentrale Perspektiven der biologiebezogenen Geschlechterforschung: die biologieimmanente, methodisch und inhaltlich intervenierende Ebene und die geistes- bzw. sozialwissenschaftlich ausgerichtete, genderreflexive Wissenschaftsforschung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ah-King, Malin, Hrsg. 2013. Challenging popular myths of sex, gender and biology. Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, Lynda. 1986. Women, feminism and biology. The feminist challenge. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, Lynda. 1999. Feminism and the biological body. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and gender. A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, Ruth, Hrsg. 1986. Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm, Robyn, Anne Jaap Jacobson, und Heidi Lene Maibom, Hrsg. 2012. Neurofeminism. Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Frances, Hrsg. 1981. Women the gatherer. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1982. Teaching aids: Focus on women and science. Course closeup: The biology of gender. Women’s Studies Quarterly 10(2): 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1985. Gefangene des Geschlechts? Was biologische Theorien über Mann und Frau sagen. München/Zürich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1992. Building two-way streets: The case of feminism and science. National Womenʼs Studies Association Journal 4(3): 336–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1995. Gender, race, and nation. The comparative anatomy of „Hottentot“ women in europe, 1815–1817. In Deviant bodies. Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture, Hrsg. Jennifer Terry und Jacqueline Urla, 19–48. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body. Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2012. Sex/gender. Biology in a social world. New York/Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, Linda M. 1982. Primate paradigms. Sex roles and social bonds. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, Patricia A. 1997. Introduction: Darwinian feminists and feminist evolutionists. In Feminism and evolutionary biology, Hrsg. Patricia Gowaty, 1–18. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson Nelson, Lynn, und Alison Wylie, Hrsg. 2004. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. Special issue: Feminist science studies. 19(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate visions. In Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honegger, Claudia. 1996. Die Ordnung der Geschlechter. Die Wissenschaften vom Menschen und das Weib 1750–1850. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. 1981. The woman that never evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Ruth, Hrsg. 1990. The politics of women’s biology. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Ruth, Mary S. Henifin, und Barbara Fried, Hrsg. 1979. Women look at biology looking at women. A collection of feminist critiques. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Ruth, Mary S. Henifin, und Barbara Fried, Hrsg. 1982. Biological woman – The convenient myth. A collection of feminist essays and a comprehensive bibliography. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Young, Rebecca M. 2010. Brain storm. The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn F. 1998. Das Leben neu denken. Metaphern der Biologie im 20. Jahrhundert. München: Verlag Antje Kunstmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krall, Lisa, und und Sigrid Schmitz. 2016. Potentiale epigenetischer Forschung für das Konzept ‚sex vs. Gender‘. GENDER. Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft 8(2): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, Nancy. 2005. Embodiment: A conceptual glossary for epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59:350–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Thomas. 1996. Auf den Leib geschrieben. Die Inszenierung der Geschlechter von der Antike bis Freud. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Emily. 1991. The Egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. Signs 16(3): 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayberry, Maralee, Banu Subramaniam, und Lisa H. Weasel, Hrsg. 2001. Feminist science studies – A new generation. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Ruth, Martyn Pickersgill, Jörg Niewöhner, Paul Martin, und Sarah Cunningham-Burley. 2013. Mapping the new molecular landscape: Social and ethical aspects of epigenetics. New Genetics & Society 32(4): 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, Nelly. 1994. Beyond the natural body. An archeology of sex hormones. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Sarah. 2013. Sex itself. The search for male and female in the human genome. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rippon, Gina, Rebecca M. Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser, und und Cordelia Fine. 2014. Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: Key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8:650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Celia. 2002. A matter of embodied fact. Sex hormones and the history of bodies. Feminist Theory 3(1): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, Sue V. 1986. Teaching science and health from a feminist perspective: A practical Guide. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, Sue V., Hrsg. 1989. Women’s studies international forum. Special issue: Feminism and science. In memory of Ruth Bleier 12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, Sue V. 1992. Biology & Feminism. A dynamic Interaction. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 1993. Schöne Geister. Frauen in den Anfängen der modernen Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 1995. Am Busen der Natur. Erkenntnisse und Geschlecht in den Anfängen der Wissenschaft. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa. 1999. Forschen Frauen anders? Wie weiblich ist die Wissenschaft? München: Verlag C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, Sigrid, und Grit Höppner, Hrsg. 2014. Gendered neurocultures. Feminist and queer perspectives on current brain discourses. Wien: Zaglossus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, Bonnie B. 1995. Im/partial Science. Gender Ideology in molecular Biology. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan L. 1979. The politics of right and left: Sex differences in hemispheric brain asymmetry. In Women look at biology looking at women. A collection of feminist critiques, Hrsg. Ruth Hubbard, Mary S. Henifin und Barbara Fried, 61–76. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, Banu. 2001. And the mirror cracked! Reflections of natures and cultures. In Feminist science studies – A new generation, Hrsg. Maralee Mayberry, Banu Subramaniam und Lisa H. Weasel, 55–62. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, Banu. 2014. Ghost stories for Darwin: The science of variation and the politics of diversity. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, Nancy, und Adrienne Zihlman. 1976. Women in evolution. Part I: Innovation and selection in human Origins. Signs 1(3): 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Biology and Gender Study Group: Athena Beldecos, Sarah Bailey, Scott Gilbert, Karen Hicks, Lori Kenschaft, Nancy Niemczyk, Rebecca Rosenberg, Stephanie Schaertel, und Andrew Wedel. 1988. The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology. Hypatia 3(1): 172–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, Nancy, Hrsg. 1987. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. Special issue: Feminism and science I. 2(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, Nancy, Hrsg. 1989. Feminism and science. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermassen, Griet. 2005. Who’s afraid of Charles Darwin? Debating feminism and evolutionary theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß, Heinz-Jürgen. 2010. Making sex revisited. Dekonstruktion des Geschlechts aus biologisch-medizinischer Perspektive. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Suzanna Danuta, Hrsg. 2003. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Special Issue Gender and Science. 28(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weasel, Lisa H. 2004. Feminist intersections in science: Race, gender and sexuality through the microscope. Hypatia 19(1): 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zihlman, Adrienne. 1978. Women in evolution. Part II: Subsistence and social organization among early hominids. Signs 4(11): 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften, Gender and Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Kerstin Palm

Authors
  1. Kerstin Palm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerstin Palm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen , Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Beate Kortendiek

  2. Universität Paderborn , Bonn, Germany

    Birgit Riegraf

  3. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Katja Sabisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Palm, K. (2018). Biologie: materielle Dimensionen von Geschlecht in biologisch-kritischer Perspektive. In: Kortendiek, B., Riegraf, B., Sabisch, K. (eds) Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung. Geschlecht und Gesellschaft, vol 65. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12500-4_137-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12500-4_137-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12500-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12500-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation