Skip to main content

Comparison of Autogenous Cortical Graft and Demineralized Allogenic Bone Matrix (DABM) in the Fixation of Segmental Prosthesis

  • Conference paper
Limb Salvage
  • 77 Accesses

Abstract

Numerous options are available today to reconstruct large bony defects after tumor resection, failed total joint arthroplasty, or trauma. Custom-designed segmental bone and joint implants [2] are being used widely, but the conventional prosthetic fixation method may lead to stem loosening or fracture after prolonged in vivo utilization. Since these late complications are mainly attributed to failure of the bone cement [3], biological fixation. using porous implants has been advocated. Porous coating applied to the stems to achieve biological fixation of segmental prostheses has several disadvantages which may predispose the implants to stem fracture or cause bone resorption. A new concept of prosthetic fixation through extracortical bone bridging and growth over the porous-coated segmental portion of the implant has been introduced [4–6]. Morselized corticocancellous autogenous bone grafts are applied over the porous-coated segment and adjacent to cortex to induce bone formation. The stems of these implants are solid and are cemented to achieve initial implant stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bolander ME, Balian G (1986) The use of demineralized bone matrix in the repair of segmental defects. Augmentation with extracted matrix proteins and a comparison with autologous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68: 1264–1274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradish CF, Kemp HBS, Scales JT, Wilson JN (1987) Distal femoral replacement by custom made prosthesis: clinical foJlow-up and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69: 276–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chao EY, Coventry MB (1981) Fracture of the femoral component after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63: 1078–1094

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chao EY, Sim FH (1985) Modular prosthetic system for segmental bone and joint replacement after tumor resection. Orthopedics 8: 641–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chao EY, Okada Y, Hein T, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC (1987) Extracortical bone bridging: a new concept for implant fixation. Transactions of the 33rd ORS 12: 435

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chao EYS (1989) A composite fixation principle for modular segmental defect replacement (SDR) prostheses. Orthop Clin North Am: 20(3): 439–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heck DA, Chao EYS, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Shives TC (1986) Titanium fibermetal segmental replacement prostheses. Clin Orthop 204: 266–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heck DA, Nakajima I, Kelly PJ, Chao EY (1986) The effect ofload alteration on the biological and biomechanical performance of a titanium fibermetal segmental prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68: 118–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohler P, Kreichbergs A (1987) Incorporation of autoclaved antogeneic bone supplemented with allogenic demineralized bone matrix. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Orthop 218: 247–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo KN, Gitelis S, Sim FH, Pritchard D, Chao E, Rostoker W, Galante JO, McDonald P (1983) Segmental replacement of long bones using titanium fiber metal composite following tumor resection. Clin Orthop 176: 108–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindholm TS, Urist MR (1980) A quantitative analysis of new bone formation by induction in compositive grafts of bone marrow and bone matrix. Clin Orthop 150: 288–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson OS, Urist MR, Dawson EG, Schmalzried TP, Finerman GA (1986) Bone repair induced by bone morphogenetic protein in ulnar defects in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68: 4: 635–642

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada Y, Suka T, Sim FR, Gorski JP, Chao EYS (1988) Comparison of replacement prostheses for segmental defects of bone. Different porous coatings for extracortical fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70(2): 160–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wippermann, B.W., Hsu, R.W.W., Chao, E.Y.S., Sim, F.H. (1991). Comparison of Autogenous Cortical Graft and Demineralized Allogenic Bone Matrix (DABM) in the Fixation of Segmental Prosthesis. In: Langlais, F., Tomeno, B. (eds) Limb Salvage. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75879-9_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75881-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75879-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics