Skip to main content

The Gc System in Paternity Examinations; Application of Gc Subtyping by Isoelectrofocusing

Das Gc-System bei Vaterschaftsnachweisen; Bestimmung der Gc-Untergruppen durch isoelektrische Fokussierung

  • Chapter
Biomathematical Evidence of Paternity / Biomathematischer Beweis der Vaterschaft

Summary

Analysis of the Gc system was carried out by isoelectrofocusing on polyacrylamide gels. The six common phenotypes Gc IS, 1 F-lS, 1F, 2-1S, 2-1F, and 2 were observed, and, in addition, the rare variants Gc 1A 5, 1C3 and two new Gc 2 variants. In a sample of 1523 unrelated individuals from Southern Germany the following allele frequencies were found Gc*lS = 0.5975, Gc*lF = 0.1402, Gc*2 = 0.2610, Gc*Var = 0.0013. The assumed autosomal codominant mode of inheritance was confirmed by the examination of 349 pairs of parents with a total of 432 children. Analysis of 306 cases of disputed paternity revealed 52 exclusions of paternity in the Gc system. In two cases the exclusions were found in the Gc system only, while in the remaining cases further exclusions were obtained with blood groups and/or serum protein and enzyme systems. For paternity testing two different classification systems were employed. For classification of Gc subtypes isoelectrofocusing followed by immunofixation was used.

Zusammenfassung

Die Untersuchung des Gc-Systems erfolgte mittels der isoelektrischen Fokussierung auf Polyacrylamidgelen. Es wurden die sechs häufigen Phanotypen Gc 1 S, 1 F-l S, 1F, 2-1S, 2-1F und 2 sowie die seltenen Typen Gc 1A5, 1C3 und zwei neue Gc- 2-Varianten beobachtet. für eine Stichprobe von 1523 nicht verwandten Personen aus Siiddeutschland ergaben sich folgende Allelfrequenzen: Gc*l S = 0,5975, Gc*l F = 0,1402, Gc*2 = 0,2610, Gc*Var = 0,0013. Der angenommene autosomal kodominante Erbgang der Subtypenallele wurde durch die Untersuchung von 349 Elternpaaren mit insgesamt 432 Kindern bestatigt. Die Untersuchung von 306 strittegen Ein- und Mehrmannfällen ergab 52 Ausschlüsse im Gc-System. Mit Ausnah me von zwei isolierten Gc-Ausschliissen decken sich diese Ausschlüsse mit denen anderer Blutgruppen-, Serumprotein- und Enzymsysteme. für die Paternitatsbegutachtung wurden zwei unterschiedliche Bestimmungsmethoden verwendet. Zur sicheren Typisierung der Gc-Untergruppen wurde nach der Isoelektrofokussierung eine Immunofixation durchgefuhrt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bouillon R, Van Baelen H, Rombauts W, De Moor P (1976) The purification and characterization of the human serum binding protein for 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 (transcalciferin): identity with group-specific component. Eur J Biochem 66: 285–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve H, Patutschnick W (1977) The vitamin D binding of the common and rare variants of the group-specific component ( Gc ). Hum Genet 38: 289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve H, Patutschnick W, Nevo S, Wendt GG (1978) Genetic studies of the Gc subtypes. Hum Genet 44: 117–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve H, Constans J, Berg S, Hoste B, Ishimoto G, Matsumoto H, Spees EK, Weber W (1981) Gc revisited: six further Gc-phenotypes delineated by isoelectric focusing and by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Hum Genet 57: 312–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constans J, Cleve H (1979) Group-specific component. Report on the first international workshop in Paris, France 1978. Hum Genet 48: 143–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constans J, Viau M (1977) Group-specific component: Evidence for two subtypes of the Gc1 gene. Science 198: 1070–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constans J, Yiau M, Cleve H, Jaeger G, Quilici JG, Pallison MJ (1978) Analysis of the Gc polymorphism in human populations by isoelectrofocusing on polyacrylamide gels. Demonstration of subtypes of the Gc1 allele and of additional Gc variants. Hum Genet 41: 53–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daiger SP, Schanfield MS, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1975) Group-specific component (Gc) proteins bind vitamin D and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 2076–2080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld J (1959) Immuno-electrophoretic demonstration of qualitative differences in human sera and their relation to the haptoglobins. Acta Pathol microbiol Scand 47: 160–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld J, Jonsson B, Rasmuson M (1960) Inheritance of a new group specific system demonstrated in normal human sera by means of an immunoelectrophoretic technique. Nature 185: 931–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühnl P, Spielmann W, Loa M (1978) An improved method for the identification of Gc1 subtypes (group-specific component) by isoelectric focusing. Vox Sang 35: 401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen M, Jacobsen P, Henningsen K (1977) Possible localisation of Gc-system on chromosome 4. Loss of long arm 4 material associated with father-child incompatibility within the Gc-system. Hum Hered 27: 105–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Omoto K, Miyake K (1978) The distribution of the group-specific component ( Gc) subtypes in Japanese. Jpn J Hum Genet 23: 119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop O, Rackwitz A (1968) Beweis für die Existenz eines „neuen” Gc-Gens, aufgedeckt durch eine anscheinend inkompatible Mutter-Kind-Paarung: Mutter Gc 1-1, Kind Gc 2–2. Dtsch Z Gerichtl Med 62: 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Thymann M (1979) Gc subtype determination by isoelectrofocusing in agarose gels. Ref. 8th. Int. Congr. of the Soc. f. Forens. Hemogenetics, London, pp 437 – 448

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidinger S, Schwarzfischer F, Cleve H (1980) Classification of Transferrin (Tf) subtypes by isoelectric focusing. Z Rechtsmed 85: 255–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidinger S, Schwarzfischer F, Cleve H (1980) Pi-Subtyping by isoelectric focusing: Further genetic studies and application to paternity examinations. Z Rechtsmed 86: 1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weidinger, S., Cleve, H., Schwarzfischer, F., Patutschnick, W. (1981). The Gc System in Paternity Examinations; Application of Gc Subtyping by Isoelectrofocusing. In: Hummel, K., Gerchow, J. (eds) Biomathematical Evidence of Paternity / Biomathematischer Beweis der Vaterschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68341-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68341-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11133-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-68341-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics