Skip to main content

Dictionaries and crowdsourcing, wikis and user-generated content

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography

Abstract

It is tempting to dismiss crowdsourcing as a largely trivial recent development which has nothing useful to contribute to serious lexicography. This temptation should be resisted. When applied to dictionary-making, the broad term “crowdsourcing” in fact describes a range of distinct methods for creating or gathering linguistic data. A provisional typology is proposed, distinguishing three approaches which are often lumped under the heading “crowdsourcing.” These are: user-generated content (UGC), the wiki model, and what is referred to here as “crowd-sourcing proper.” Each approach is explained, and examples are given of their applications in linguistic and lexicographic projects. The main argument of this chapter is that each of these methods – if properly understood and carefully managed – has significant potential for lexicography. The strengths and weaknesses of each model are identified, and suggestions are made for exploiting them in order to facilitate or enhance different operations within the process of developing descriptions of language. Crowdsourcing – in its various forms – should be seen as an opportunity rather than as a threat or diversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkins, B. T. S., & Rundell, M. (2008). The Oxford guide to practical lexicography. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedictus, L. (2014). The Urban Dictionary guide to sex: Mopeds, porb and awkward arms. The Guardian, March 18, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/mar/18/urban-dictionary-sex-moped-porb-awkward-arm-sexual-slang?CMP=twt_gu

  • Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casebourne, I., Davies, C., Fernandes, M., & Norman, N. (2012). Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias: A comparative preliminary study across disciplines in English, Spanish and Arabic. Epic. Brighton, UK. Retrieved from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EPIC_Oxford_report.pdf

  • Creese, S. (2013). Exploring the relationship between language change and dictionary: Compilation in the age of the collaborative dictionary. In I. Kosem, J. Kallas, P. Gantar, S. Krek, M. Langemets, & M. Tuulik, (Eds.), Electronic lexicography in the 21st century: Thinking outside the paper. Proceedings of the eLex 2013 conference, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 392–406). Ljubljana/Tallinn: Trojina, Institute for Applied Slovene Studies/Eesti Keele Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J. (2005). Special Report: Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2012). Dictionaries are not democratic. The Guardian, September 13, 2012. http://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2012/sep/13/dictionaries-democratic-crowdsourcing

  • Greene, R. L. (2014). Internet lexicography: A, you’re adorkable. The Economist, May 22, 2014. http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2014/05/internet-lexicography

  • Hanks, P. (1998). Enthusiasm and condescension. In T. Fontenelle, P. Hiligsmann, A. Michiels, A. Moulin, & S. Theissen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th EURALEX international congress (pp. 151–166). Liege: English and Dutch Departments, University of Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, P. (2012). Corpus evidence and electronic lexicography. In S. Granger & M. Paquot (Eds.), Electronic lexicography (pp. 57–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Higby, D. (2013). Tapping the brain for words. Macmillan Dictionary Blog, August 27, 2013. http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/tapping-the-brain-for-words

  • Kilgarriff, A., Husák, M., McAdam, K., Rundell, M., & Rychlý, P. (2008). GDEX: Automatically finding good dictionary examples in a corpus. In E. Bernal & J. DeCesaris (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX international congress (pp. 425–433). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosem, I., Gantar, P., & Krek, S. (2013). Automation of lexicographic work: An opportunity for both lexicographers and crowd-sourcing. In I. Kosem, J. Kallas, P. Gantar, S. Krek, M. Langemets, & M. Tuulik, (Eds.), Electronic lexicography in the 21st century: Thinking outside the paper. Proceedings of the eLex 2013 conference, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 32–48). Ljubljana/Tallinn: Trojina, Institute for Applied Slovene. Studies/Eesti Keele Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, R. (2014). User-generated content (UGC) in English online dictionaries. OPAL: Online publizierte Arbeiten zur Linguistik. Institut für Deutsche Sprache. 4/2014, 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., & Gurevych, I. (2012). Wiktionary: A new rival for expert-built lexicons? Exploring the possibilities of collaborative lexicography. In S. Granger & M. Paquot (Eds.), Electronic lexicography (pp. 259–292). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, J. (2013). The future of dictionaries. Kernerman Dictionary News, 21(July 2013), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poesio, M., Chamberlain, J., Kruschwitz, U., Robaldo, L., & Ducceschi, L. (2010). Phrase detectives: Utilizing collective intelligence for internet-scale language resource creation. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 9(4), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundell, M. (2014). What goes in the dictionary when the dictionary is online? Macmillan Dictionary Blog, July 15, 2014. http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/what-goes-in-the-dictionary-when-the-dictionary-is-online

  • Rundell, M., & Kilgarriff, A. (2011). Automating the creation of dictionaries: Where will it all end? In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. A tribute to Professor Sylviane granger (pp. 257–281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Dictionaries

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rundell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rundell, M. (2017). Dictionaries and crowdsourcing, wikis and user-generated content. In: Hanks, P., de Schryver, GM. (eds) International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_26-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45369-4_26-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45369-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics