Skip to main content

Engagement and Retention: Introduction and Overview

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Human Resources Management

Abstract

Companies should develop an in-depth understanding of their employees’ needs, for example, by conducting employee surveys, in order to develop measures matching these needs. Research on burnout and engagement found that the core dimensions of burnout (exhaustion and cynicism) and engagement (vigor and dedication) are opposites of each other (Gonzalez-Roma et al.; J Vocat Behav 68:165–174, 2006). Maslach et al. (Ann Rev Psychol 52:397–422, 2001) argue that job engagement is associated with a sustainable workload, feelings of choice and control, appropriate recognition and rewards, a supportive work community, fairness and justice, and meaningful and valued work. The topics introduced in “Engagement and Retention” will link to these dimensions and discuss them more closely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2008) Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev Int 13:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag 31:874–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-enz J (1997) It’s costly to lose good employees. Workforce 76(8):8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Roma V, Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Lloret S (2006) Burnout and work engagement: independent factors or opposite poles? J Vocat Behav 68:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S (2000) A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover, update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J Manag 26(3):463–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR Oldham GR (1980) Work redesign. Mass: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg F (1966) Work and the nature of man. World, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll SE, Johnson RJ, Ennis N, Jackson AP (2003) Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. J Pers Soc Psychol 84(632):643

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtom BC, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Eberly MB (2008) Turnover and retention research: a glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Acad Manag Ann 2:231–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J 33:692–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreitner R, Kinicki A (1998) Organizational behavior, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach C, Schaufelli WB, Leiter MP (2001) Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 52:397–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown JL (2002) Retaining top employees. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 22 Jan 2014

  • Oxford Dictionary. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/retention. Accessed 22 Jan 2014

  • Pinder C (1984) Work motivation: theory, issues, and applications. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JJ, Connell AO (2004) Managing employee retention: a strategic accountability approach. Franklin Covey, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramlall S (2007) Managing employee retention as a strategy for increasing organizational competitiveness. Appl Hum Resour Manag Res 8(2):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins S (1993) Organizational behavior, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Perryman S, Hayday S (2004) The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Brighton, Institute for Employment Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard N (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family. Dissertation Abstracts International US: University Microfilms International 59: 10-A

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks AM (2005) Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J Manag Psychol 21(6):600–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuck B, Wollard K (2006) Employee engagement and HRD: a seminal review of the foundations. Hum Resour Dev Rev 9(1):89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauss B, Chojnacki K, Decker A, Hoffman F (2001) Retention effects of a customer club. Int J Serv Ind Manag 12(1):7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanova C, Holtom BC (2008) Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four European countries. Int J Hum Resour Manag 19:1553–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley JW (1996) Strategic employee surveys: evidence-based guidelines for driving organizational success. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley JW, Campbell BH (2006) Using linkage research to drive high performance. In: Kraut A (ed) Getting action from organizational surveys: new concepts, technologies and applications. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 150–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Schönebeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schönebeck, J., Schönebeck, M. (2015). Engagement and Retention: Introduction and Overview. In: Zeuch, M. (eds) Handbook of Human Resources Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40933-2_51-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40933-2_51-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40933-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics