Skip to main content

Steriltechnik — Kontaminationen

  • Chapter
  • 14k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Steriltechnik umfasst alle Arbeitsverfahren, die darauf abzielen, Kontaminationen mit unerwünschten Mikroorganismen in Zellkulturen zu verhindern. Eingeschlossen werden auch die Kontaminationen mit anderen Zellarten (Kreuzkontaminationen), auf die am Schluss des Kapitels eingegangen wird (Abschn.2.8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alston-Roberts C., Barallon R., Bauer S.R., Butler J., Capes-Davis A., Dirks W.G. et al. Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. A Report from the American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Organization Workgroup ASN-0002. Nature Rev. Cancer 10: 441–448,2010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American Type Culture Collection (ATCC): Quality Control Methods for Cell Lines (R.J. Hay, J. Caputo and M.L. Macy, Eds.). 2nd Ed., Rockville, Md., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Website: http://www.atcc.org/

  • Barallon R., Bauer S.R., Butler J., Capes-Davis A., Dirks W.G. et al. Recommendation of short tandem repeat profiling for authenticating human cell lines, stem cells, and tissues. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 46: 727–732, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blow N.S. Right cell, wrong cell. BioTechniques 51: 75, 2011.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruchmüller I., Pirkl e:, Herrmann R., Stoermer M. et al. Introduction of a validation concept für a PCR-based Mycoplasma detection assay. Cytotherapy 8: 62–69, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buehring G.C., Eby E.A. and Eby M.J. Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 40: 211–215, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capes-Davis A., Theodosopoulos G., Atkin I., Drexler H.G. et al. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 127: 1–8, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee R. Cases of mistaken identity. Science 315: 928–931, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choppa P.C., Vojdani A., Tagle C., Andrin R. and Magtoto L. Multiplex PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma fermentans, M. hominis and M. penetrans in cell culture and blood samples of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Molec. Cell. Probes 12: 301–308, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cisar, J.O., Xu D.-Q., Thompson J. et al. An alternative interpretation of nanobacteria-induced biomineralization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11511–11515, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), http://www.dsmz.de/

  • Dirks W.G., Drexler H.G. and MacLeod R.A.F. ECV304 (endothelial) is really T24 (baldder carcinoma): cell line cross-contamination at source. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 35: 558–559, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks W.G., Fähnrich S., Estella I.A.J. and Drexler H.G. Short tandem repeat DNA typing provides an international reference standard for authentication of human cell lines. ALTEX 22: 103–109, 2005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks W.G., MacLeod R.A.F., Nakamura Y., Kohara A. et al. Cell line cross-contamination initiative: an interactive reference database of STR profiles covering common cancer cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 126: 303–404, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler H.G. and Uphoff C.C. Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: Incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention. Cytotechnology 39: 75–90, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler H.G., Uphoff C.C., Dirks W.G. and MacLeod R.A.F. Mix-ups and mycoplasma: the enemies within. Leukemia Res. 26: 329–333, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham J.H. and Guthmiller P. Doing good science: Authenticating cell line identity. Promega Notes 101: 15–18, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig K. and Voelker L.L. Molecular biology of mycoplasmas. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50: 25–57, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC), http://www.ecacc.org.uk/

  • Freshney, R.I. Authentication of cell lines: ignore at your peril! Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 8: 311–314, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z., Tseng C., Pei Z. and Blaser M.J. Molecular analysis of human forearm superficial skin bacterial biota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 2927–2932, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gstraunthaler G. The Bologna Statement on Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP) — 10 years later. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Alternatives & Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Rome, Italy, 2009. ALTEX 27 (Special Issue): 141–146, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay R.J. The seed stock concept and quality control for cell lines. Anal. Biochem. 171: 225–237, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay R.J., Macy M.L. and Chen T.R. Mycoplasma infection of cultured cells. Nature 339: 487–488, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollricher K. Die unendliche Sorglosigkeit: Zellkulturen — von kontaminiert bis falsch typisiert. Laborjournal 06/2007: 30–34, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopert A., Uphoff C.C., Wirth M., Hauser H. and Drexler H.G. Specificity and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell lines. J. Immunol. Meth. 164: 91–100, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes P., Marshall D., Reid Y., Parkes H. and Gelber C. The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need? BioTechniques 43: 575–584, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kajander E.O. and Ciftcioglu N. Nanobacteria: An alternative mechanism for pathogenic intra-and extracellular calcification and stone formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8274–8279, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F., James G., Gordon S Zelynski A. and Gilbert G.L. Species-specific PCR for identification of common contaminant Mollicutes in cell culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3195–3200, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann I. The prophylactic use of antibiotics in cell culture. Cytotechnology 19: 95–105, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, M. Persistent use of “false” cell lines. Int. J. Cancer 122: 1–4, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucey B.P., Nelson-Rees W.A. and Hutchins G.M. Henrieta Lacks, HeLa cells, and cell culture contamination. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 133: 1463–1467,2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod R.A.F., Dirks W.G., Matsuo Y., Kaufmann K., Milch H. and Drexler H.G. Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int. J. Cancer 83: 555–563, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, R.A.F., Dirks, W.G. and Drexler, H.G. One falsehood leads easily to another. Int. J. Cancer 122: 2165–2168, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markovic O. and Markovic N. Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 34: 1–8, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martel J. and Young J. D.-E. Purported nanobacteria in human blood as calcium carbonate nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 5549–5554, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters J.R.W. Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy. Nature Rev. Molec. Cell Biol. 1: 233–236, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters J.R. HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly. Nature Rev. Cancer 2: 315–319, 2002a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters J.R. False cell lines: The problem and a solution. Cytotechnology 39: 69–74, 2002b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters J.R., Thomson J.A., Daly-Burns M., Reid Y.A., Dirks W.G. et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8012–8017, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe L., Ellis R.J., Ayling R.D. and Nicholas R.A.J. Differentiation of Mycoplasma species by 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting. J Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4844–4847, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGarrity G.J. Detection of mycoplasmal infection of cell cultures. Adv. Cell Culture 2: 99–131, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller V.M., Rodgers G., Charlesworth J.A., Kirkland B. et al. Evidence for nanobacterial-like structures in calcified human arteries and cardiac valves. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287: H1115–H1124, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone R.M. Eradication of cross-contaminated cell lines: A call for action. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 23: 367–372, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardone, R.M. Curbing rampant cross-contamination and misidentification of cell lines. BioTechniques 45: 221–227, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees W.A., Daniels D.W. and Flandermeyer R.R. Cross-contamination in cell culture. Science 212: 446–452, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nims R.W., Shoemaker A.P., Bauernschur M.A., Rec L.J. and Harbell J.W. Sensitivity of isoenzyme analysis for the detection of interspecies cell line cross-contamination. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 34: 35–39, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nims R.W., Sykes G., Cottrill K., Ikonomi P. and Elmore E. Short tandem repeat profiling: part of an overall strategy for reducing the frequency of cell misidentification. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 46: 811–819, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien S.J. Cell culture forensics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 7656–7658, 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parson W., Kirchebner R., Mühlmann R., Renner K., Kofler A., Schmidt S. and Kofler R. Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations. FASEB J. 19: 434–436, 2005.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkel J.M. Curing cell lines. BioTechniques 51: 85–90, 2011.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pils S. Kontaminationen in der Zellkultur II. Die sieben Plagen sind eigentlich fünf. Laborjournal 07-08/2002: 56–58, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramya R., Nagarajan T., Sivakumar V., Senthilkumar R.L. et al. Identification of cross-contaminated animal cells by PCR and isoenzyme analysis. Cytotechnology 61: 81–92, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razin S. Molecular Biology and Genetics of Mycoplasmas (Mollicutes). Microbiol. Rev. 49: 419–455, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razin S., Yogev D. and Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 1094–1156, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schimke R.T., Berlin C.M., Sweeney E.W. and Carroll W.R. The Generation of Energy by the Arginine Dihydrolase Pathway in Mycoplasma hominis 07. J. Biol. Chem. 241: 2228–2236, 1966.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J. and Erfle V. Elimination of mycoplasmas from cell cultures and establishment of mycoplasma-free cell lines. Exp. Cell Res. 152, 565–570, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz S. Der Experimentator: Zellkultur. 3. Aufl., Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann W. Biotop Mensch. Biologie i. u. Zeit 41: 182–189, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skloot R. Die Unsterblichkeit der Henrietta Lacks. Irisiana Verlag, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey G.N. Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature 403: 356, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey G.N., Bolton B.J. and Doyle A. DNA fingerprinting transforms the art of cell authentication. Nature 357: 261–262, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanbridge E. Mycoplasmas and cell culture. Bacteriol. Rev. 35: 206–227, 1971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steube K.G., Grunicke D. and Drexler H.G. Isoenzyme analysis as a rapid method for the examination of the species identity of cell cultures. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 31: 115–119, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff C.C. and Drexler H.G. Comparative PCR analysis for detection of mycoplasma infections in continuous cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 38: 79–85, 2002a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff C.C. and Drexler H.G. Comparative antibiotic eradication of mycoplasma infections from continuous cell lines. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 38: 86–89, 2002b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff C.C. and Drexler H.G. Detection of Mycoplasma Contaminations. In: Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 290: Basic Cell Culture Protocols. 3rd Ed., Humana Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volokhov D.V., George J., Liu S.X., Ikonomi P., Anderson C. and Chizhikov V. Sequencing of the intergenic 16S-23S rRNA spacer (ITS) region of Mollicutes species and their identification using microarray-based assay and DNA sequencing. Appl. Miocrobiol. Biotechnol. 71: 680–698, 2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallhäußer K.H. Sterilisation, Desinfektion, Konservierung, Keimdifferenzierung-Betriebshygiene. 5. Aufl., Thieme Stuttgart, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H., Kong F., Jelfs P., James G. and Gilbert G.L. Simultaneous detection and identification of common cell culture contaminant and pathogenic Mollicutes strains by reverse line blot hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 1483–1486, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wessman S.J. and Levings R.L. Benefits and risks due to animal serum used in cell culture production. Dev. Biol. Stand. 99: 3–8, 1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth M., Berthold E., Grashoff M., Pfützner H., Schubert U. and Hauser H. Detection of mycoplasma contaminations by the polymerase chain reaction. Cytotechnology 16: 67–77, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, K., Iimura, E., Saijo, K. et al. Essential role for gene profiling analysis in the authentication of human cell lines. Human Cell 19: 43–48, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young L., Sung J., Stacey G. and Masters J.R. Detection of Mycoplasma in cell cultures. Nature Protocols 5: 929–934, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gstraunthaler, G., Lindl, T. (2013). Steriltechnik — Kontaminationen. In: Zell- und Gewebekultur. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35997-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics