Abstract
Sensorimotor contingency theory holds that the law-like relations between actions and contingent changes in the sensory signals constitute the basis for sensory experience and awareness in humans. These Sensory-Motor Contingencies (SMCs) are not only passively observed and recorded by the agent, but are actively exercised and used to control behavior. We have previously introduced a computational model of SMCs for robot control that employs a set of Markov models for the conditional probabilities of making sensory observations given an action. In this article we extend this model by showing how prediction and evaluation of future sensorimotor events can be achieved. We investigate this prediction and planning method in a scenario where the robot’s actions do not take immediately effect, so that it has to plan ahead. Exploiting an action selection method that takes into account previous experiences, the robot learns to move in an energy-efficient, naturalistic manner and to avoid known obstacles. We also make a first step towards analyzing the robot’s behavior in a dynamically changing environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bovet, S., Pfeifer, R.: Emergence of delayed reward learning from sensorimotor coordination. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2272–2277 (August 2005)
Duff, A., Sanchez-Fibla, M., Verschure, P.F.M.J.: A biologically based model for the integration of sensory-motor contingencies in rules and plans: A prefrontal cortex based extension of the distributed adaptive control architecture. Brain Research Bulletin 85(5), 289–304 (2011)
Maye, A., Engel, A.K.: A discrete computational model of sensorimotor contingencies for object perception and control of behavior. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3810–3815. IEEE (May 2011)
Maye, A., Engel, A.K.: Time Scales of Sensorimotor Contingencies. In: Zhang, H., Hussain, A., Liu, D., Wang, Z. (eds.) BICS 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7366, pp. 240–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Möller, R., Schenck, W.: Bootstrapping cognition from behavior – a computerized thought experiment. Cognitive Science 32(3), 504–542 (2008)
Noë, A.: Action in perception. MIT Press (2004)
O’Regan, J.K., Noë, A.: What it is like to see: A sensorimotor theory of perceptual experience. Synthese 129(1), 79–103 (2001); ArticleType: research-article/Issue Title: Perception, Action and Consciousness/Full publication date: October 2001/Copyright © 2001 Springer
O’Regan, J.K., Noë, A.: A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 939–1031 (2001)
Pfeifer, R., Scheier, C.: Understanding Intelligence. MIT Press (September 2001)
Watkins, C.J.C.H., Dayan, P.: Technical note on Q-learning. Machine Learning 8, 279–292 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maye, A., Engel, A.K. (2012). Using Sensorimotor Contingencies for Prediction and Action Planning. In: Ziemke, T., Balkenius, C., Hallam, J. (eds) From Animals to Animats 12. SAB 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7426. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33093-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33093-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33092-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33093-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)