Abstract
Despite recognition that context dependence is endemic to natural language, arguably one of its core properties, standard grammar formalisms remain poor vehicles for expressing this. Grammars are standardly defined in terms of principles underpinning structures inhabited by sentence strings to yield a concept of sentence wellformedness, these being defined independently of any attribute of performance; and all data not characterisable in these terms are seen as in some sense peripheral, requiring grammar-external explication. Phenomena displaying context dependence all pose problems for this methodology, context dependence being no respecter of sentence boundaries. Ellipsis poses this challenge in a particularly acute way. A reasonable goal for accounts of ellipsis might be seen as one providing formal explication of the informal insight that ellipsis constitutes the license for expressions to be omitted if recoverable from context, with ellipsis data taken as a window on the requisite concept of context for language construal. But such a goal isn’t even addressed as a desideratum in current accounts. Ellipsis is seen as falling into two major types: sentence-internal and discourse ellipsis; and even within the former type, there is further bifurcation into those types of ellipsis characterisable as semantically grounded (Dalrymple et al 1991) and those requiring syntactic characterisation with a number of discrete structural types (Merchant 2009). And, with a pragmatic remainder falling outside grammar-based characterisation (Stainton 2006), the phenomenon is seen as irreducibly “fractally heterogeneous” (Ginzburg and Cooper 2004).
This talk reports results from collaborative work with Patrick Healey, Matthew Purver, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Arash Eshghi, Graham White, Ronnie Cann and Yo Sato on the ESRC RES-062-23-0962 “DynDial” project on The Dynamics of Conversational Dialogue. We are grateful to the ESRC for their support and to many other colleagues who have provided helpful feedback.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cann, R., Kempson, R., Marten, L.: The Dynamics of Language. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)
Cann, R., Kempson, R., Purver, M.: Context and Well-formedness: the Dynamics of Ellipsis. Research on Language and Computation 5, 333–358 (2007)
Cann, R., Kempson, R., Purver, M.: Semantics: Meaning in Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S., Pereira, F.: Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452 (1991)
Ginzburg, J., Cooper, R.: Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 297–365 (2004)
Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R., Purver, M., Mills, G., Cann, R., Meyer-Viol, W., Healey, P.: Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2(1), 199–233 (2011)
Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Kempson, R., Gregoromichelaki, E., Howes, C. (eds.): The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces: Collected Papers on Dynamic Syntax. CSLI Publications, Chicago University Press (2011)
Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W., Gabbay, D.: Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2001)
Merchant, J.: Ellipsis. In: Alexiadou, A., Kiss, T., Butt, M. (eds.) Handbook of Contemporary Syntax, 2nd edn., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2009)
Purver, M., Cann, R., Kempson, R.: Grammars as parsers: meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation 4, 289–326 (2006)
Purver, M., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., Healey, H.: Split utterances in dialogue: a corpus study. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2009: the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group in Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 262–271 (2009)
Recanati, F.: Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1986)
Stainton, R.: Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kempson, R. (2011). Modelling Context-Dependence: Ellipsis in Conversational Dialogue. In: Beigl, M., Christiansen, H., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Kofod-Petersen, A., Coventry, K.R., Schmidtke, H.R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6967. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24278-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24279-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)