Skip to main content

Modelling Context-Dependence: Ellipsis in Conversational Dialogue

(Keynote Talk)

  • Conference paper
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6967))

  • 925 Accesses

Abstract

Despite recognition that context dependence is endemic to natural language, arguably one of its core properties, standard grammar formalisms remain poor vehicles for expressing this. Grammars are standardly defined in terms of principles underpinning structures inhabited by sentence strings to yield a concept of sentence wellformedness, these being defined independently of any attribute of performance; and all data not characterisable in these terms are seen as in some sense peripheral, requiring grammar-external explication. Phenomena displaying context dependence all pose problems for this methodology, context dependence being no respecter of sentence boundaries. Ellipsis poses this challenge in a particularly acute way. A reasonable goal for accounts of ellipsis might be seen as one providing formal explication of the informal insight that ellipsis constitutes the license for expressions to be omitted if recoverable from context, with ellipsis data taken as a window on the requisite concept of context for language construal. But such a goal isn’t even addressed as a desideratum in current accounts. Ellipsis is seen as falling into two major types: sentence-internal and discourse ellipsis; and even within the former type, there is further bifurcation into those types of ellipsis characterisable as semantically grounded (Dalrymple et al 1991) and those requiring syntactic characterisation with a number of discrete structural types (Merchant 2009). And, with a pragmatic remainder falling outside grammar-based characterisation (Stainton 2006), the phenomenon is seen as irreducibly “fractally heterogeneous” (Ginzburg and Cooper 2004).

This talk reports results from collaborative work with Patrick Healey, Matthew Purver, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Arash Eshghi, Graham White, Ronnie Cann and Yo Sato on the ESRC RES-062-23-0962 “DynDial” project on The Dynamics of Conversational Dialogue. We are grateful to the ESRC for their support and to many other colleagues who have provided helpful feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cann, R., Kempson, R., Marten, L.: The Dynamics of Language. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cann, R., Kempson, R., Purver, M.: Context and Well-formedness: the Dynamics of Ellipsis. Research on Language and Computation 5, 333–358 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cann, R., Kempson, R., Purver, M.: Semantics: Meaning in Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S., Pereira, F.: Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginzburg, J., Cooper, R.: Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 297–365 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregoromichelaki, E., Kempson, R., Purver, M., Mills, G., Cann, R., Meyer-Viol, W., Healey, P.: Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue and Discourse 2(1), 199–233 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kempson, R., Gregoromichelaki, E., Howes, C. (eds.): The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces: Collected Papers on Dynamic Syntax. CSLI Publications, Chicago University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W., Gabbay, D.: Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merchant, J.: Ellipsis. In: Alexiadou, A., Kiss, T., Butt, M. (eds.) Handbook of Contemporary Syntax, 2nd edn., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Purver, M., Cann, R., Kempson, R.: Grammars as parsers: meeting the dialogue challenge. Research on Language and Computation 4, 289–326 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Purver, M., Howes, C., Gregoromichelaki, E., Healey, H.: Split utterances in dialogue: a corpus study. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL 2009: the 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group in Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 262–271 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Recanati, F.: Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stainton, R.: Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kempson, R. (2011). Modelling Context-Dependence: Ellipsis in Conversational Dialogue. In: Beigl, M., Christiansen, H., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Kofod-Petersen, A., Coventry, K.R., Schmidtke, H.R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6967. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24279-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24278-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24279-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics