Skip to main content

A Comparison of Two Different Types of Online Social Network from a Data Privacy Perspective

  • Conference paper
Modeling Decision for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6820))

Abstract

We consider two distinct types of online social network, the first made up of a log of writes to wall by users in Facebook, and the second consisting of a corpus of emails sent and received in a corporate environment (Enron). We calculate the statistics which describe the topologies of each network represented as a graph. Then we calculate the information loss and risk of disclosure for different percentages of perturbation for each dataset, where perturbation is achieved by randomly adding links to the nodes. We find that the general tendency of information loss is similar, although Facebook is affected to a greater extent. For risk of disclosure, both datasets also follow a similar trend, except for the average path length statistic. We find that the differences are due to the different distributions of the derived factors, and also the type of perturbation used and its parameterization. These results can be useful for choosing and tuning anonymization methods for different graph datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shetty, J., Adibi, J.: Discovering Important Nodes through Graph Entropy - The Case of Enron Email Database. In: KDD 2005, Chicago, Illinois (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P.: On the Evolution of User Interaction in Facebook. In: Proc. 2nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN), Barcelona, Spain, August 17 (2009), http://socialnetworks.mpi-sws.org/

  3. Sweeney, L.: k-anonymity: a model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (IJUFKS) 10(5), 557–570 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Rebollo-Monedero: Measuring Risk and Utility of Anonymized Data Using Information Theory. In: Int. Workshop on Privacy and Anonymity in the Information Society, PAIS 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Tomkins: Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn, Y., Han, S., Kwak, H., Moon, S., Jeong: Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In: Proc. 16th Int. Conf. WWW 2007, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinberg, J.: Challenges in Mining Social Network Data. In: Proc. of the 13th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2007), pp. 4–5 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kleinberg, J., Backstrom, L., Dwork, C., Liben-Nowell, D.: Algorithmic Perspectives on Large-Scale Social Network Data. In: Data-Intensive Computing Symposium, (March 26, 2008 - Hosted by Yahoo! and the CCC), research.yahoo.com/files/7KleinbergSocialNetwork.pdf

  9. Mislove, A., Marcon, M., Gummadi, K.P., Druschel, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, San Diego, California, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hay, M., Miklau, G., Jensen, D., Weis, P., Srivastava, S.: Anonymizing Social Networks. SCIENCE Technical Report 07-19, vol. 245, pp. 107–3, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, B., Pei, J.: Preserving Privacy in Social Networks against Neighborhood Attacks. In: IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 506–515 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wondracek, G., Holz, T., Kirda, E., Kruegel, C.: A Practical Attack to De-Anonymize Social Network Users. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy, pp. 223–238 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, K., Terzi, E.: Towards Identity Anonymization on Graphs. In: SIGMOD 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nettleton, D.F., Sáez-Trumper, D., Torra, V. (2011). A Comparison of Two Different Types of Online Social Network from a Data Privacy Perspective. In: Torra, V., Narakawa, Y., Yin, J., Long, J. (eds) Modeling Decision for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6820. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22589-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22589-5_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22588-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22589-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics