Abstract
The final chapter concludes with remarks on the application of the expected utility hypothesis to medical decision making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Wakker, P. P. – Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in Medical Decision Making – Medical Decision Making, 28(5): 690–698, 2008, p. 697.
References
Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sciences, 46(11), 1497–1512.
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. L. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sciences, 46(11), 1485–1496.
Eeckhoudt, L. (2002). Risk and medical decision making. Boston: Kluwer.
List, J. (2004). Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the market place. Econometrica, 72(2), 615–625.
Raiffa, H. (1968). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wakker, P. P. (2008). Lessons learned by (from?) an economist working in medical decision making. Medical Decision Making, 28(5), 690–698.
Yaari, Y. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica, 55(1), 95–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Felder, S., Mayrhofer, T. (2011). Conclusion. In: Medical Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18330-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18329-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18330-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)