Abstract
Monocrystalline, polycrystalline and amorphous silicon solar cell panels were installed side-by-side on the same fixed rig to determine the relative performance in a tropical location. This study was conducted at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Thailand. The fixed panel rig was positioned at a tilt angle of 30°, facing south. Overall performance of the solar cell panels is given via both annual output and an average conversion efficiency over one whole year. The results show that for a fixed orientation the monocrystalline, polycrystalline and amorphous panels, had average conversion efficiencies of 6.8%±2.4%, 5.7%±2.0% and 4.2%±1.5% respectively in terms of total incident solar energies on the plane of cells which were 809.4 kW • a/m2, 860.8 kW • a/m2 and 820.6 kW.year/m2 respectively. The uncertainties shown represent the standard deviation in the conversion efficiencies determined over the 12 month period of the study. These conversion efficiencies are lower than expected but are in part due to local conditions and their significant impact on movements in the maximum power point, which was not tracked in these fixed load experiments. This study also examined the effects of ambient air temperature and wind speed close to the panels which in this locale had very little impact on conversion efficiency. A detailed economic analysis was then carried out including relative maintenance costs. In terms of return on investment the panels ranked in their performance order; fixed monocrystalline, then polycrystalline and finally amorphous but the overall economics was not attractive and significant system cost reductions are needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sinha, S., A. Shukla, and N. Hazarika, From sunlight to electricity: solar photovoltaic applications. 1998, New Delhi: Tata Energy Research Institute. xii, p.86.
Wenham, S.R., M.A. Green, and M.E. Watt, Applied photovoltaics. 2003, Sydney, NSW Bridge Printery. p. 290.
Lorenzo, E., Energy collected and delivered by PV modules, in Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering, J. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., xxvii, 1138 p., A. Luque and S. Hegedus, Editors. 2003.
Durisch, W., J. Urban, and G. Smestad, Characterisation of solar cells and modules under actual operating conditions. Renewable Energy, 1996. 8(1–4): p. 359–366.
Chow, T.T., J.W. Hand, and P.A. Strachan, Building-integrated photovoltaic and thermal applications in a subtropical hotel building. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2003. 23(16): p. 2035–2049.
Oparaku, O.U., Assesment of the cost-effectiveness of photovoltaic system for telecommunication in Nigeria. International Journal of Solar Energy, 2002. 22(3–4): p. 123–129.
Herold, Dirk, and A. Neskakis, A small PV-driven reverse osmosis desalination plant on the island of Gran Canaria. Desalination, 2001. 137(1–3): p. 285–292.
Gottschalg and Ralph, Module/Cell Performance Evolution. Photovoltaic Technology for Bangladesh
A.K.M.S. Islam and D.G. Infield, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 2001.
Thomson, M., Reverse-Osmosis Desalination of Sea Water Powered by Photovoltaics without Batteries. 2003, Loughborough University, UK.
Janjai, S., Solar radiation maps of Thailand: data from satellites for Thailand. 1999, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Silapakorn University, Nakhon Pratom. p. 219.
Baumann, A., et al., Photovoltaic technology review. 2004.
ACRC. Solar cell principles and applications. [online] 1999 [cited 2002 June,9]; Available from: http://acre.murdoch.edu.au/refiles/pv/text.html.
Messenger, R. and J. Ventre, Photovoltaic systems engineering. 2000, Boca Raton; London: CRC Press. p. 400.
Bhattacharya, T., Terrestrial solar photovoltaics. 1998, New Delhi: Narosa Pub. House. xx, p. 265.
Markvart, T. and K. Bogus, Solar electricity. 1994, Chichester: Wiley. xix, p. 228.
Mazer, J.A., Solar cells: an introduction to crystalline photovoltaic technology. 1996, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. xv, p. 216.
Boulder, Semiconductor Fundamentals. 2004. p. Copyright to all material in the directory http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/ and all its subdirectories is owned by Bart Van Zeghbroeck.
ANU, Photovoltaic Panel Simulation User’s Guide 1998.
King, D.L. Photovoltaic module and array performance characterization methods for all system operating conditions. in NREL/SNL Photovoltaics Program Review Meeting. 1996. Lakewood,CO: AIP Press, New York.
TMD. User guide: Table of Province’s Position in Thailand. 2002 [cited 2005 13 December]; Available from: http://www.tmd.go.th/program/frames_sun/f_ left.html.
Messenger, R. and J. Ventre, Photovoltaic systems engineering. 2nd ed. 2003, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jumrusprasert, P., Smith, G., Kirkup, L. (2008). Comparing the Efficiency of Fixed Solar Cell Panels in a Tropical Location. In: Goswami, D.Y., Zhao, Y. (eds) Proceedings of ISES World Congress 2007 (Vol. I – Vol. V). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_300
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75997-3_300
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75996-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75997-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)