Skip to main content

Criticality of the Brain and Criticality of Art

  • Conference paper
Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IV
  • 1354 Accesses

Abstract

The ability of our brain to respond to small extrinsic or intrinsic perturbations points out that the brain as a complex system is operating close to instability, or criticality, because any system at the critical state has a very high sensitivity to tiny perturbations [Haken 1996]. Per Bak gives another reason why the brain should be critical: the input signal must be able to access everything that is stored in the brain. The brain cannot be in subcritical state. In this case input signal would be access to only a limited part of information. But the brain cannot be supercritical either: in this case any input would cause an explosive process in the brain, and connect the input with everything that is stored in the brain [Bak 1996]. Hence, the waking brain must operate strongly at the critical state, where a neural network reveals Weber-Fechner logarithmic law and Steves power law [Kinouchi 2006]. The critical point maximizes information transmission within a neural network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Haken, H., 1996, Principles of Brain Functioning, Springer, (Berlin)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P., 1996, How Nature Works, Copernicus (New York)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kinouchi, O., & Copell, M., 2006, Physics of Psychophysics: Dynamics Range of Excitable Networks is Optimized at Criticality. ArXiv:q-bio. NC/0601037 v1 23Jan. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R., 1964, Art and Visual Perception, University of California Press (Berkeley and Los Angeles)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chek Ling Ngo, D., Seng Ten L. Byrne J.G. A Mathematical Theory of Interface Aesthetics Visual Mathematics N 1, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Nodine, C. and McGinnis, J., 1982, Artistic Style, Compositional Design, and Visual Scanning. Visual Art Research, 12, pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulouse, G., 1979, Theory of the Frustrational Effect in Spin Glasses. Communications on Physics, 2, 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S., 1971, The psychology of the Art, (Cambridge. Massachusetts. London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman (San Francisco)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R., Wyatt, J., 1993, Multifractals and the Local Connected Fractal Dimension: Classification of Early Chinese Landscape Paintings. In: A.J. Crilly, R.A. Earnshaw, H. Jones, eds., Applications of Fractals and Chaos, Springer (Berlin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., 2003, Fractal Expressionism — Where Art Meets Science, In: J. Casti and A. Karlqvist (Eds). Art and Complexity. Elsevier, pp. 117–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlov, Yu., 1980, Unvisible Harmony. “Chislo i Mysl”, No3, Znanie (Moscow) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkel, A., Zhang, J., Yi-Cheng Zhang, 1993, Long-Range Correlation in Human Writings, Symmetry: Culture and Science. 4(3) 229–241.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D., 1971, Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T., 1993, Self-Organization and Associative Memory, 3rd ed., Springer (Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yevin, I., 2000, Ambiguity and Art, Visual Mathematics, 2, No. 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Yevin, I., 2001, Complexity theory of art: Recent investigations, InterJournal

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 NECSI Cambridge, Massachusetts

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yevin, I. (2008). Criticality of the Brain and Criticality of Art. In: Minai, A.A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics