Abstract
The ability of our brain to respond to small extrinsic or intrinsic perturbations points out that the brain as a complex system is operating close to instability, or criticality, because any system at the critical state has a very high sensitivity to tiny perturbations [Haken 1996]. Per Bak gives another reason why the brain should be critical: the input signal must be able to access everything that is stored in the brain. The brain cannot be in subcritical state. In this case input signal would be access to only a limited part of information. But the brain cannot be supercritical either: in this case any input would cause an explosive process in the brain, and connect the input with everything that is stored in the brain [Bak 1996]. Hence, the waking brain must operate strongly at the critical state, where a neural network reveals Weber-Fechner logarithmic law and Steves power law [Kinouchi 2006]. The critical point maximizes information transmission within a neural network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haken, H., 1996, Principles of Brain Functioning, Springer, (Berlin)
Bak, P., 1996, How Nature Works, Copernicus (New York)
Kinouchi, O., & Copell, M., 2006, Physics of Psychophysics: Dynamics Range of Excitable Networks is Optimized at Criticality. ArXiv:q-bio. NC/0601037 v1 23Jan. 2006
Arnheim, R., 1964, Art and Visual Perception, University of California Press (Berkeley and Los Angeles)
Chek Ling Ngo, D., Seng Ten L. Byrne J.G. A Mathematical Theory of Interface Aesthetics Visual Mathematics N 1, 2001
Nodine, C. and McGinnis, J., 1982, Artistic Style, Compositional Design, and Visual Scanning. Visual Art Research, 12, pp. 1–9
Toulouse, G., 1979, Theory of the Frustrational Effect in Spin Glasses. Communications on Physics, 2, 115–119
Vygotsky, L.S., 1971, The psychology of the Art, (Cambridge. Massachusetts. London)
Mandelbrot, B., 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman (San Francisco)
Voss, R., Wyatt, J., 1993, Multifractals and the Local Connected Fractal Dimension: Classification of Early Chinese Landscape Paintings. In: A.J. Crilly, R.A. Earnshaw, H. Jones, eds., Applications of Fractals and Chaos, Springer (Berlin)
Taylor, R., 2003, Fractal Expressionism — Where Art Meets Science, In: J. Casti and A. Karlqvist (Eds). Art and Complexity. Elsevier, pp. 117–144
Orlov, Yu., 1980, Unvisible Harmony. “Chislo i Mysl”, No3, Znanie (Moscow) (in Russian)
Schenkel, A., Zhang, J., Yi-Cheng Zhang, 1993, Long-Range Correlation in Human Writings, Symmetry: Culture and Science. 4(3) 229–241.
Berlyne, D., 1971, Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts (New York).
Kohonen, T., 1993, Self-Organization and Associative Memory, 3rd ed., Springer (Berlin).
Yevin, I., 2000, Ambiguity and Art, Visual Mathematics, 2, No. 1
Yevin, I., 2001, Complexity theory of art: Recent investigations, InterJournal
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 NECSI Cambridge, Massachusetts
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yevin, I. (2008). Criticality of the Brain and Criticality of Art. In: Minai, A.A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73849-7_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73848-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73849-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)