Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Riechen Frauen anders als Männer?

  • Chapter
Gehirn und Geschlecht

Auszug

Die Forschung zu menschlichen Wahrnehmungsleistungen hat den chemischen Sinnen Geschmack und Geruch im Vergleich zum Gehör, zum Gesichts- und Tastsinn bislang verhältnismäßig wenig Aufmerksamkeit gewidmet. In den letzten Jahren sind jedoch einige Publikationen zum Geruchssinn erschienen und haben diesem Mangel etwas abgeholfen. Verschiedene Untersuchungen beschäftigten sich mit physiologischen, psychologischen und behavioralen Aspekten. Typisch für die Geruchswahrnehmung sind große interindividuelle Unterschiede in der Reaktion auf Duftstoffe, zu denen verschiedene Faktoren beitragen. Die wichtigsten sind Alter und Geschlecht. Wie man inzwischen weiß, verändern sich die olfaktorischen Fähigkeiten mit zunehmendem Alter. Geschlechtsunterschiede bei olfaktorischen Fähigkeiten stellen dagegen ein komplexeres, verwirrenderes Feld mit mehr ungeklärten Aspekten dar (Bran u. Millot 2001). Die Forschung zu Geschlechtsunterschieden bei sensorischen Funktionen hat deren Beiträge zu interindividuellen Unterschieden betont (Velle 1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Annett JM (1996) Olfactory memory: a case study in cognitive psychology. J Psychol 130:309–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh RD, Porter RH (1986) Olfactory preferences resulting from more exposure in human neonates. Infant Behav Develop 9:395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, CE (1997) Olfactory acuity as a function of age and gender: a comparison of African and American samples. Int J Aging Dev 44:317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Baydar A, Petrzilka M, Schott MP (1993) Olfactory thresholds for androstenone and Galaxolide: sensitivity, insensitivity and specific anosmia. Chem Senses 18:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglung B, Nordin S (1992) Detectability and perceived intensity for formaldehyde odor in smokers and nonsmokers. Chem Senses 17:291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betchen SA, Doty RL (1998) Bilateral detection thresholds in dextrals ans sinistrals reflect the more sensitive side of the nose, which is not lateralized. Chem Senses 23:453–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouloux PMG, Munroe P, Kirk J, Besser GM (1992) Sex and smell–an enigma resolved. J Endocrinol 133:323–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley EA (1984) Olfactory acuity to a pheromonal substance and psychotic illness. Biol Psychiat 19:899–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand G (1999) La latéralisation olfactive chez l’homme. Revue de la litérature. Neurophysiol Clin/Clin Neurophysiol 29:495–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand G (2006) Olfactory/trigeminal interactions in nasal chemoreception. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:908–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand G, Millot JL (2001) Sex differences in human olfaction: between evidence and enigma. Q J Exp Psychol 54B:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand G, Millot JL, Henquell D (1999) Olfaction and hemispheric asymmetry: unilateral stimulation and bilateral electrodermal recordings. Neuropsychobiology 39:160–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley SM, Doty RL (1995) Odor recognition is better under bilateral than unilateral test conditions. Cortex 31:25–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooksband BWL, Pryse-Phillips W(1964) Urinary 16-androsten-3-ol, 17 oxosteroids and mental illness. Brit Med J 20:1602–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck L, Axel R (1991) A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cain WS (1982) Odor identification by males and females: predictions vs performance. Chem Senses 7:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury ES, Moberg P, Doty RL (2003) Influences of age and sex on a microencapsulated odor memory test. Chem Senses 28:799–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark T (1978) Whose pheromone are you? World Medicine 26:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin H, Polemics J (1997) Brain dimorphisms and sex: a review. Int J Comp Psychol 10:25–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin J, Loury M, Gilbert AN (1995) Workplace, age and sex as mediators of olfactory function: data from the National Geographic Smell Survey. J Gerontol B-Psychol 50:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler WB, Preti G, Krieger A, Huggins GR, Garcia CR, Lawley HJ (1986) Human axillary secretions influence women’s menstrual cycles: the role of donor extract from men. Horm Behav 20:463–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis GB, Moller P, Bredie WLP, Rasmussen G, Martens M (2002) Gender and handedness effects on hedonicity of laterally presented odours. Brain Cognition 50:272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distel H, Schicker, I, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Martinez-Gomez M, Hudson R (1997) Influence of experience on the perception of every day odors. In: Kruse HP, Rothe M (eds) Flavour perception, aroma evaluation. Universität Potsdam, Berlin, pp 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martinez-Gomez M, Schiker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R (1999) Perception of everyday odors–correlations between intensity, familiarity and strengh of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses 24:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domes KM, Schmidt HJ, Beauchamp GK, Wysocki CJ (1989) Changes in sensitivity to the odor of androstenone during adolescence. Dev Psychobiol 22:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1977) A review of recent psychophysical studies examining the possibility of chemical communication of sex and reproductive state in humans. In: Muller-Schwarze D, Mozell MM (eds). Chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1986) Gender and endocrine-related influences upon olfactory function. In: Meiselman HL, Rivlin RS (eds) Clinical measurement of taste and smell. Macmillan, New York, pp 377–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1987) The primates III: humans. In: Brown RE, MacDonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 806–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1991a) Influences of aging on human olfactory function. In: Laing DG, Doty RL, Breipohl W (eds) The human sense of smell. Berlin: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1991b) Olfactory function in neonates. In: Laing DG, Doty RL, Breipohl W (eds) The human sense of smell. Berlin: Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1995) Intranasal trigeminal chemoperception. In: Doty RL (ed) Handbook of olfaction and gustation. Dekker, New York, pp 821–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Kerr K (2005) Episodic odor memory: influences of handedness, sex, and side of nose. Neuropsychologia 43:1749–1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Ford M, Preti G, Huggins G (1975) Human vaginal odors change in pleasantness and intensity during the menstrual cycle. Science, 190:1316–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Snyder P, Huggins G, Lowry LD (1981) Endocrine, cardiovascular and psychological correlates of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle. J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:45–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, RL, Green, PA, Ram, C, Yankell, SL (1982a) Communication of gender from human breath odors: relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness. Horm Behav 16:13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Hall JW, Flickinger GL, Sondheimer SJ (1982b) Cyclical changes in olfactory and auditory sensitivity during the menstrual cycle: no attenuation by oral contraceptive medication. In Breipohl W (ed) Olfaction and endocrine regulation. IRL Press, London, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum S, Giberson R, Sikorsky L, Rosenberg L (1984) Smell identification ability: Changes with age. Science 226:1441–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Applebaum S, Zusho H, Settle RG (1985) Sex differences in odor identification ability: a cross-cultural analysis. Neuropsychologia 23:667–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Bromley SM, Moberg PJ, Hummel T (1997) Laterality in human nasal chemoreception. In: Christman S (ed) Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 497–542

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis RS (1928) The psychology of individual differences. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen T (1987) Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist 75:497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans WJ, Cui L, Starr A (1995) Olfactory event-related potentials in normal human subjects: effect of age and gender. Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol 95:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger EE, Braun JJ, Monte WC, Linder D (1984) Human (Homo sapiens) responses to the pig (Sus Scrofa) sex pheromone 5 alpha-androst-16-en-3-one. J Comp Psychol 98:219–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger EE, Braun JJ, Monte WC (1990) Sex differences in response to the odor of alpha androstenone. Percept. Mot. Skills 70:216–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frye RE, Schwartz BS, Doty RL (1990) Dose related effects of cigarette smoking on olfactory function. J Am Med Assoc 263:1233–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ (1987) The national geographic smell survey results. Nat Geogr Mag 172:514–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ (1991) Quantitative assessment of olfactory experience during pregnancy. Psychosom Med 53:693–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert AN, Greenberg MS, Beauchamp GK (1989) Sex, handedness and side of nose modulate human odor perception. Neuropsychologia 27:505–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert AN, Knasko SC, Sabini J (1997) Sex differences in task performance associated with attention to ambient odor. Arch Environ Health 52:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer K (1993) ά-androst-16-en-3-one: a male pheromone? A brief report. Ethol Sociobiol 14:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griep Ml, Collys K, Mets TF, Slop D, Laska M, Massart DL (1996) Sensory detection of food odour in relation to dental status, gender and age. Gerodontology 13:56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths NM, Patterson RLS (1970) Human olfactory responses to 5-alpha-androst-16-en-3-one principal component of boar taint. J Sci Food Agric 21:4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavson AR, Dawson ME, Bonett DG (1987) Androstenol, a putative human pheromone, affects human male choice performance. J Comp Psychol 101:210–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin RI (1997) Brain mapping of olfaction by functional magnetic resonance imaging: differences between men and women. Aromachol Rev 6:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz RS, Engen T (1996) Odor memory: review and analysis. Psychol Bull Rev 3:300–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand JG, Shepherd GM (1997) Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:595–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hold B, Schleidt M (1977) The importance of human odor in non verbal communication. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 43:225–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung DE, Donald A, Leopold MD (1999) Relationship between uninasal anatomy and uninasal olfactory ability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:53–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R (1999) From molecule to mind: the role of experience in shaping olfactory function. J Comp Physiol A 185:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Mohammadian P, Kobal G (1998) Handedness is a determining factor in lateralized olfactory discrimination. Chem Senses 23:541–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk-Smith MD, Booth DA (1980) Effects of androstenone on choice of location in other’s presence. In: van der Starre H (ed) Olfaction and taste VII. IRL Press, London, pp 397–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloek J (1961) The smell of some steroids sex hormones and their metabolites: reflections and experiments concerning the significance of smell for the mutual relation of the sexes. Psychiat Neurol Neuroch 64:309–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Klukty N (1990) Sex differences in memory performance for odors, tone sequences and colors. Z Exp Angew Psychol 37:437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1970) Extraversion, sex arousal and olfactory sensitivity. Acta Psychol 34:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1979) Olfaction and sensory asymmetry. Chem Senses Flav 4:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1980) Preference for and sensitivity to the odours of androstenone and musk. In: van der Starre H (ed) Olfaction and taste, VII. IRL Press, London, p436 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1994a) Sex differences in olfactory sensitivity and the problem of the generality of smell acuity. Percept Mot Skills 78:203–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1994b) Prepubescent children may have specific deficits in olfactory sensitivity. Percept Mot Skills 78:191–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koeleg HS, Koster EP (1974) Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopala L, Clark C (1990) Implications of olfactory agnosia for understanding sex differences in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 16:255–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopala L, Clark C, Hurwitz TA (1989) Sex differences in olfactory function in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiat 146:1320–1322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M, Bäckman L (1993) Semantic activation and episodic odor recognition in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 8:582–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M, Bäckman L (1997) Age-related differences in episodic odor recognition: the role of access to specific odor names. Memory 5:361–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M, Lövdén M, Nilsson L (2003) Sex differences in recollective experience for olfactory and verbal information. Acta Psychol 112:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson M, Oberg C, Backman L (2005) Odor identification in old age: Demographic, sensory and cognitive correlates. Aging Neuropsychol Cog 12:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Teubner P (1999) Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for ten pairs of enantiomers. Chem Senses 24:161–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Koch B, Heid B, Hudson R (1996) Failure to demonstrate systematic changes in olfactory perception in the course of pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Chem Senses 21:567–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrner J (1993) Gender differences in long-term odor recognition memory: verbal versus sensory influences and consistency of label use. Chem Senses 18:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrner J, Glück J, Laska M (1999) Odor identification, consistency of label use, olfactory threshold and their relationships to odor memory over the human lifespan. Chem Senses 24:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Magnen J (1982) Olfacto-endocrine relationships: past and future lines of investigations. In: Breipohl W (ed) Olfaction and endocrine regulation. IRL Press, London, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold DA (1988) The relationship between nasal anatomy and human olfaction. Laryngoscope 189:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy LM, Henkin RI, Hutte, A, Lin CS, Martins D, Schellinger D (1997) Functional MRI of human olfaction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy LM, Henkin RI, Lin CS, Hutter A, Schellinger D (1999) Odor memory induces brain activation as measured by functional MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:487–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundström JN, Hummel T (2006) Sex-specific hemispheric differences in cortical activation to a bimodal odor. Behav. Brain Res 166:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makin JW, Porte, RH (1989) Attractiveness of lactating females breast odors to neonates. Child Development 60:803–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marlier L, Schaal B (1989) Olfactory, tactile and auditory cues in the recognition of individuality in children. 21st International Ethological Conference, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisami Z, Mikhail L, Bairn D, Bhatnagar KP (1998) Human olfactory bulb: Aging of glomeruli and mitral cells and a search for the accessory olfactory bulb. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:708–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millot JL, Brand G (2000) Behavioral lateralization during spontaneous smelling tasks. Percept. Mot Skills 90:444–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg PJ, Agrin R, Gur RE, Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Doty RL (1999) Olfactory dysfunction in schizophrenia: a qualitative and quantitative review. Neuropsychopharmacology 21:325–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monti-Bloch L, Jennings-White C, Dolberg DS (1994) The human vomeronasal system. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19:673–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan CD, Covington JW, Geisler JD, Polich J, Murphy C (1997) Olfactory event-related potentials: older males demonstrate the greatest deficits. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg C, Larsson M, Backman L (2002) Differential sex effects in olfactory functioning: The role of verbal processing. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8:691–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson JK, Nordin S (2004) Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials. Chem Senses 29:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pendse SG (1987) Hemispheric asymmetry in olfaction on a category judgement task. Percept. Mot Skills 64:495–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Platek SM, Burch RL, Gallup GG (2001) Sex differences in olfactory self-recognition. Physiol Behav 73:635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter RH, Moore JD (1981) Human kin recognition by olfactory cues. Physiol Behav 27:493–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JTE, Zucco GM (1989) Cognition and olfaction: a review. Psychol Bull 105:352–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richman RA, Post EM, Sheehe PR, Wright HN (1992) Olfactory performance during childhood. I Development of an odorant identification test for children. J Pediatr 121:908–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richman RA, Wallac, K, Sheehe PR (1995) Assessment of an abbreviated odorant identification task for children: a rapid screening device for schools and clinics. Acta Paediatr 84:434–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski A, Grammer K (1999) Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B-Biol Sci 266:869–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schab FR, Crowder RG (1995) Memory for odors. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilldale

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleidt M, Hold B, Attili G (1981) Across-cultural study on the attitude towards personal odours. J Chem Ecol 7:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal N, Topolski TD, Wilson SM, Brown KW, Araki L (1995) Twin analysis of odor identification and perception. Physiol Behav 57:605–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ship JA, Weiffenbach JM (1993) Age, gender, medical treatment, and medication effects on smell identification. J Gerontol 48:M26–M32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ship JA, Pearson JD, Cruise LJ, Brant LJ, Metter EJ (1996) Longitudinal changes in smell identification. J Gerontol 51A: M86–M91

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens DA, O’Connell RJ (1991) Individual differences in thresholds and quality reports of human subjects to various odors. Chem Senses 16:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulouse E, Vaschide N (1899a) Mesure del’odorat chez l’homme et chez la femme. Comp Rend Soc Biol 51:381–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulouse E, Vaschide N (1899b) Mesure de l’odorat chez des enfants. Comp Rend Soc Biol 51:487–489

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tolle C, Kirk-Smith M, Wood N, Lombard J, Dodd GH (1983) Skin conductance and subjective assessments associated with the odour of 5-a-androsténone-3-one. Biol Psychol 16:85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velle W (1987) Sex differences in sensory functions. Perspect Biol Med 4:490–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Velle W (1992) Sex differences in sensory functions. In: van der Dennen JMG (ed).The nature of sexes: the sociobiology of sex differences and »the battle of the sexes«. Origin Press, Groningen, pp. 29–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Verron H, Gaultier C (1976) Processus olfactifs et structures relationnelles. Psychol Franç 21:205–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace P (1977) Individual discrimination of humans by odors. Physiol Behav 19:577–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind C, Füri S (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simple heterozygosity. Pro. R Soc Lond B-Biol Sci 264:1471–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki CJ, Gilbert AN (1989) National geographic smell survey: effects of age are heterogeneous. Ann NY Acad Sci 561:12–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK (1991) Individual differences in human olfaction. In: Wysocki CJ, Kare MR (eds) Genetics of perception and communications. Chemical Senses, vol 3. Dekker, New York, pp 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki CJ, Dorries KM, Beauchamp GK (1989) Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:7976–7978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yousem DM, Maldjian JA, Siddiqi F, Hummel T, Alsop DC, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, Doty RL (1999) Gender effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging Brain Res 818:480–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M (1990) Right nostril advantage for discrimination of odor. Percept Psychophys 47:526–531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Neurosciences Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Franche-Comté, Place Leclerc, 25000, Besançon, Frankreich

    Gerard Brand Dr. & Laurence Jacquot Dr.

Authors
  1. Gerard Brand Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurence Jacquot Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Physiologische Psychologie, Universität Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, 96045, Bamberg

    Stefan Lautenbacher

  2. Fakultät für Psychologie Biopsychologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, GAFO 05/618, 44780, Bochum

    Onur Güntürkün

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, Großbritannien

    Markus Hausmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brand, G., Jacquot, L. (2007). Riechen Frauen anders als Männer?. In: Lautenbacher, S., Güntürkün, O., Hausmann, M. (eds) Gehirn und Geschlecht. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71628-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation