Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Ben-Naim, Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties, Europhys. Lett. 69, 671–677 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.P. Bouchaud, M. Mézard,Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy, Physica A, 282, 536–545 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Chakraborti, B.K. Chakrabarti, Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distributions, Eur. Phys. J. B., 17, 167–170 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Chatterjee, B.K. Chakrabarti, S.S. Manna, Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity. Physica A, 335, 155–163 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Cordier, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani, On a kineticmodel for a simple market economy. J. Stat. Phys., 120, 253–277 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Drăgulescu, V.M. Yakovenko, Statistical mechanics of money, Eur.Phys. J. B, 17, 723–729 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Hayes, Follow the money, American Scientist, 90,(5), 400–405 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ispolatov, P.L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, Wealth distributions in asset exchange models, Eur. Phys. J. B, 2, 267–276 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Malcai, O. Biham, S. Solomon, P. Richmond, Theoretical analysis and simulations of the generalized Lotka-Volterra model, Phys. Rev. E, 66, 031102 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Pareschi, G. Toscani, Self-similarity and power-like tails in nonconservative kinetic models, J. Statist. Phys. (in press) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Pareto, Cours d’Economie Politique, Lausanne and Paris (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Slanina, Inelastically scattering particles and wealth distribution in an open economy, Phys. Rev. E, 69, 046102 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Slanina, H. Lavička, Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation, Eur. Phys. J. B, 35, 279–288 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Solomon, Stochastic Lotka-Volterra systems of competing auto-catalytic agents lead generically to truncated Pareto power wealth distribution, truncated Levy distribution of market returns, clustered volatility, booms and crashes, Computational Finance 97, eds. A-P.N. Refenes, A.N. Burgess, J.E. Moody, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Toscani, Kinetic models of opinion formation, Com. Math. Sci. (in press) (2006)9

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Weidlich Sociodynamics: A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences, Harwood Academic Publishers, (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Sigmund: Games of Life: Explorations in Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, Penguin Books LTD, (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Markowich, P.A., Toscani, G. (2007). Socio-Economic Modeling. In: Applied Partial Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34646-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics