Abstract
Software companies are becoming more and more concerned about software process improvement, when they are promoting the improvement of the final products. One of the main reason of the growing interest in software metrics has been the perception that software metrics are necessary for software process improvement. Measurement is essential for understanding, defining, managing and controlling the software development and maintenance processes and it is not possible to characterize the various aspects of development in a quantitative way without having a deep understanding of software development activities and their relationships. In this paper a representative set of metrics for software process models is presented in order to evaluate the influence of the software process models complexity in their quality. These metrics are focused on the main elements included in a model of software processes, and may provide the quantitative base necessary to evaluate the changes in the software processes in companies with high maturity levels. To demonstrate the practical utility of the metrics proposed at model level, an experiment has been achieved which has allowed us to obtain some conclusions about the influence of the metrics proposed on two sub-characteristics of the maintainability: understandability and modifiability, which besides confirm the results of a subjective experiment previously performed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Basili, V., Rombach, H.: The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14(6), 728–738 (1988)
Basili, V., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4), 435–437 (1999)
Briand, L., El Emam, K., Morasca, S.: Theoretical and empirical validation of software product measures. Technical Report ISERN-95-03, International Software Engineering Research Network (1995)
Briand., L., Wüst, J., Lounis, H.A.: Comprehensive Investigation of Quality Factors in Object-Oriented Designs: an Industrial Case Study. Technical Report ISERN-98- 29, International Software Engineering Research Network (1998)
Briand, L., Arisholm, S., Counsell, F., Houdek, F., Thévenod-Fosse, P.: Empirical Studies of Object-Oriented Artifacts, Methods, and Processes: State of the Art and Future Directions. Empirical Software Engineering 4(4), 387–404 (1999)
Calero, C., Piattini, M., Genero, M.: Empirical Validation of referential metrics. Information Software and Technology. Special Issue on Controlled Experiments in Software Technology 43(15) (2001)
Fenton, N.: Metrics for Software Process Improvement. In: Haug, M., Olsen, E.W., Bergman, L. (eds.) Software Process Improvement: Metrics, Measurement and Process Modelling, pp. 34–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Metamodeling and Measurement for the Software Process Improvement. In: Proceedings of ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA 2003), Tunis, Tunisia, July 14-18 (2003)
García, F., Ruiz, F., Cruz, J.A., Piattini, M.: Integrated Measurement for the Evaluation and Improvement of Software Processes. In: Oquendo, F. (ed.) EWSPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2786, pp. 94–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Proposal of Metrics for Software Process Models. Accepted for publication in Software Measurement European Forum 2004, Rome (January 28-30, 2004)
ISO/IEC: ISO IEC 15504 TR2:1998, part 2: A reference model for processes and process capability (1998)
Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)
Morisio, M.: Measurement Processes are Software Too. Journal of Systems and Software 49(1) (December 1999)
Perry, D., Porte, A., Votta, L.: Empirical Studies os Software Engineering: A Roadmap. In: Finkelstein, A. (ed.) Future of Software Engineering, pp. 345–355. ACM, New York (2000)
Pfleeger, S.L.: Integrating Process and Measurement. In: Melton, A. (ed.) Software Measurement, pp. 53–74. International Thomson Computer Press, London (1996)
Sjoberg, D., Anda, B., Arisholm, E., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M., Karahasanovic, A., Koren, E., Vokác, M.: Conducting Realistic Experiments in Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESE 2002 (2002)
Software Engineering Institute (SEI). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process (1995), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmm/cmm.html
Software Engineering Institute (SEI). Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMISM), version 1.1 (March 2002), http://www.sei.cmu/cmmi/cmmi.html
Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification; adopted specification, version 1.0. Object Management Group (November 2002), Available in http://cgi.omg.org/cgibin/doc?ptc/02-05-03
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlson, M., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
http://department.obg.cuhk.edu.hk/ResearchSupport/Minimum_correlation.asp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (2004). Definition and Empirical Validation of Metrics for Software Process Models. In: Bomarius, F., Iida, H. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3009. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21421-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24659-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive