This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
1. Allgemeine Studien
Abbott, D.P. “The Renaissance”, in: W. Horner (ed.), The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric, Columbia, Mo./ London 1983, pp. 75–100.
Atkins, J.W.H. English Literary Criticism: The Renascence, London 1947; repr. New York/London 1968.
Baldwin, C.S. Renaissance Literary Theory and Practice: Classicism in the Rhetoric and Poetic of -Italy, France, and England, 1400–1600, ed. D.L. Clark, New York 1939; repr. Gloucester, Mass., 1959.
Berdan, J.M. “The Influence of the Medieval Latin Rhetorics on the English Writers of the Early Renaissance”, RR 7 (1916), 288–313.
Clark, D.L. Rhetoric and Poetry in the Renaissance: A Study of Rhetorical Terms in English Renaissance Literary Criticism, New York 1922; repr. 1963.
Clark, D.L. “Ancient Rhetoric and English Renaissance Literature”, SQ 2 (1951), 195–204.
Craig, H. Thé Enchanted Glass: The Elizabethan Mind in Literature, New York/Oxford 1936; repr. Oxford 1950, Westport, Conn., 1975, Kap. 6, 7.
Crane, W.G. Wit and Rhetoric in the Renaissance: The Formal Basis of Elizabethan Prose Style (Columbia University Studies in English and Comparative Literature, 129), New York 1937; repr. Gloucester, Mass., 1964.
Crane, W.G. “English Rhetorics of the Sixteenth Century”, in: Schwartz/Rycenga (eds.), The Province of Rhetoric (Nr. C. 113 ), pp. 212–226.
Donker, M., G.M. Muldrow. Dictionary of Literary-Rhetorical Conventions of the English Renaissance, Westport, Conn./London 1982.
Doran, M. Endeavors of Art: A Study of Form in Elizabethan Drama, Madison, Wis., 1954; repr. 1964.
Hafner, Ch.Y. Foundations of English Poetics, 1570–1575, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 3143A.
Hale, E.E. “Ideas on Rhetoric in the Sixteenth Century”, PMLA 18 (1903), 424–444.
Hall, V. Renaissance Literary Criticism: A Study of Its Social Content, New York 1945; repr. Gloucester, Mass., 1959.
Hamilton,K.G. The Two Harmonies: Poetry and Prose in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford 1963; repr. Westport, Conn., 1978.
Harris, V. “The Arts of Discourse in England, 15001700”, PQ 37 (1958), 484–494.
Hollowell, B.M. The Beginnings of English Criticism, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University 1922.
Howell, W.S. Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700, Princeton 1956; repr. New York 1961.
Howell, W.S. “Renaissance Rhetoric and Modern Rhetoric: A Study in Change”, in: Bryant (ed.), The Rhetorical Idiom (Nr. C. 100 ), pp. 53–70
Schwartz/Rycenga (eds.), The Province of Rhetoric (Nr. C.113), pp. 292–308
Howell, Poetics, Rhetoric, and Logic: Studies in the Basic Disciplines of Criticism, Ithaca 1975, pp. 141–162.
Howell, W.S. “The Arts of Literary Criticism in Renaissance Britain: A Comprehensive View”, in: Howell, Poetics, Rhetoric, and Logic (s. Nr. C. 19 ), pp. 73–122.
Klein, K.L. “Rhetorik und Dichtungslehre in der elisabethanischen Zeit”, in: H. Viebrock/W. Erzgräber (eds.), Festschrift zum 75. Geburtstag von Theodor Spira, Heidelberg 1961, pp. 164–183.
Korshin, P.J. From Concord to Dissent: Major Themes in English Poetic Theory 1640–1700, Menston, Yorkshire, 1973.
Loebner, H.-D. Wesen und Sinn der Dichtung im Spiegel der englischen Literaturkritik des 16. Jahrhunderts, Diss. Münster 1959.
McCullen, J.T. “Renaissance Rhetoric: Use and Abuse”, Discourse 5 (1962), 252–264.
Mohrmann, G.P. “Oratorical Delivery and Other Problems in Current Scholarship on English Renaissance Rhetoric”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 56–83.
Ong, W.J. “Tudor Writings on Rhetoric [, Poetic, and Literary Theory]”, SRen 15 (1968), 36–69; repr. in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C.112), pp. 48–103 [erweitert].
Plett, H.F. Rhetorik der Affekte: Englische Wirkungsästhetik im Zeitalter der Renaissance (Studien zur Englischen Philologie, NF, 18), Tübingen 1975.–EASG 1975, 63 (cf. EASG 1969, 31–32 ).
Rubel, V.L. Poetic Diction in the English Renaissance from Skelton through Spenser (MLA, Revolving Fund Series, 12), New York 1941; repr. 1966.
Saintsbury, G. A History of English Criticism, Edinburgh/ London 1911;. repr. 1962, bes. Kap.2:“Elizabethan Criticism”.
Sandford, W.P. English Theories of Public Address, 1530–1828, Columbus, Ohio, 1931 [= Ph.D. diss., 1929 ].
Sandford, W.P. “English Rhetoric Reverts to Classicism, 16001650”, QJS 15 (1929), 503–525.
Sasek, L.A. The Literary Temper of the English Puritans (Louisiana State University Studies, Humanities Series, 9), Baton Rouge, La., 1961; repr. Westport, Conn., 1969.
Schulte-Middelich, B. Apology for Poetry“: Dichtungstheorie im Widerstreit mit den Theorien benachbarter Disziplinen in der elisabethanischen Zeit, Diss. München 1977.
Spingarn, J.E. A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance, New York 1899; 21908; 31963 (Einleitung B. Weinberg); repr. Westport, Conn., 1976.
Steadman, J.M. The Lamb and the Elephant: Ideal Imitation and the Context of Renaissance Allegory, San Marino, Cal., 1974.
Sweeting, E.J. Early Tudor Criticism: Linguistic and Literary, Oxford 1940; repr. New York 1964.
Tuve, R. Elizabethan and Metaphysical Imagery: Renaissance Poetic and Twentieth-Century Critics, Chicago 1947; repr. 1957, 1961.
Vickers, B. Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry, London 1970.
Vickers, B. “Englische Rhetorik und Poetik”, Wolfenbütteler RenM I/1–2 (1977), 21–24.
Wallerstein, R. Studies in Seventeenth-Century Poetic, Madison/Milwaukee 1950; repr. 1961, 1965.
Wetzel, G. Die literarische Kritik in England von Sidney bis Dryden, Diss. Kiel 1941.
Willey, B. Tendencies in Renaissance Literary Theory, Cambridge 1922; repr. Folcroft, Pa., 1970.
Barillì, R. Poetica e Retorica, Mailand 1969, bes. Kap. 5.
Barner, W. Barockrhetorik: Untersuchungen zu ihren geschichtlichen Grundlagen, Tübingen 1970.
Bayley, P. French Pulpit Oratory 1598–1650: A Study in Themes and Styles, with a Descriptive Catalogue of Printed Texts, Cambridge 1980.
Bolgar, R.R. The Classical Heritage and Its Beneficiaries: From the Carolingian Age to the End of the Renaissance, London 1954; repr. New York 1977.
Borinski, K. Die Antike in Poetik und Kunsttheorie: Vom Ausgang des klassischen Altertums bis auf Goethe und Wilhelm von Humboldt (Erbe der Alten, 9–10), 2 vol., Leipzig 1914–1924; repr. Darmstadt 1965.
Bray, R. La Formation de la Doctrine Classique en France, Paris 1963.
Breen, Q. Christianity and Humanism: Studies in the History of Ideas, Grand Rapids, Mich., 1968.
Buck, A. Italienische Dichtungslehren: Vom Mittelalter bis zum Ausgang der Renaissance (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 94), Tübingen 1952.
Buck, A. “Dichtungslehren der Renaissance und des Barocks”, in: A. Buck (ed.), Renaissance und Barock (Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft, 9–10), 2 vol., Frankfurt 1972, vol. I, pp. 28–60.
Burckhardt, J. Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien, Basel 1860; repr. Stuttgart 1976.
Burger, H.O. Renaissance - Humanismus - Reformation: Deutsche Literatur im europäischen Kontext, Bad Homburg v.d.H. 1969.
Castor, G. Pléiade Poetics: A Study in Sixteenth-Century Thought and Terminology, Cambridge 1964.
Cave, T.Ch. The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance, Oxford 1979.
Clements, R.J. Critical Theory and Practice of the Pléiade, Cambridge, Mass., 1942; repr. New York 1970.
Curtius, E.R. Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter, Bern/München 1948; repr. 1978.
Dockhorn, K. Macht und Wirkung der Rhetorik: Vier Aufsätze zur Ideengeschichte der Vormoderne (Respublica Literaria, 2), Bad Homburg v.d.H. 1968.
Dyck, J. Ticht-Kunst: Deutsche Barockpoetik und literarische Tradition, Bad Homburg v.d.H./Berlin/Zürich 1966; 21969.
Fumaroli, M. L’Age de l’Eloquence (Nr. A.33).
Galletti, A. L’Eloquenza (Dalle Origini al XVI Secolo), Mailand 1938.
Garin, E. Geschichte und Dokumente der abendländischen Pädagogik, 3 vol., Reinbek b. Hamburg 1964/1966/1967.
Grassi, E. Macht des Bildes: Ohnmacht der rationalen Sprache. Zur Rettung des Rhetorischen, Köln 1970.
Grassi, E. Rhetoric as Philosophy: The Humanist Tradition, University Park, Pa., 1980.
Gray, H.H. “Renaissance Humanism: The Pursuit of Eloquence”, JHI 24 (1963), 497–514; repr. in: Kristeller/Wiener (eds.), Renaissance Essays from the “Journal of the History of Ideas (Nr. C. 108 ), pp. 199–216.
Greenfield, C.C. Humanist and Scholastic Poetics, 1250–1500, Lewisburg/Toronto/London 1981.
Guthrie, W. “The Development of Rhetorical Theory in America”, SM 13 (1946), 14–22; 14 (1947), 38–54; 15 (1948), 61–71; 16 (1949), 98–113; 18 (1951), 17–30.
Hathaway, B. The Age of Criticism: The Late Renaissance in Italy, Ithaca, N.Y., 1962; repr. 1972.
Kennedy, G.A. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, Chapel Hill 1980.
Kennedy, W.J. Rhetorical Norms in Renaissance Literature, New Haven/London 1978.
Kibédi Varga, A.S. Rhétorique et Littérature: ‘Etudes de Structures Classiques, Paris 1970.
Kristeller, P.O. Renaissance Thought I/II, New York 1961/1965.
Kristeller, P.O. Studien zur Geschichte der Rhetorik und zum Begriff des Menschen in der Renaissance (Gratia, 9), Göttingen 1981.
Lange, H.-J. Aemulatio Veterum sive de optimo genere dicendi: Die Entstehung des Barockstils im XVI. Jahrhundert durch eine Geschmacksverschiebung in Richtung der Stile des manieristischen Typs (Europäische Hochschulschriften, I/99), Bern/ Frankfurt 1974.
Lange, K.-P. Theoretiker des literarischen Manierismus: Tesauros und Pellegrinis Lehre von der “Acutezza” oder von der Macht der Sprache (Humanistische Bibliothek, I/4), München 1968.
Lanham, R.A. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance, New Haven/London 1976.
Lindhardt, J. Rhetor, Poeta, Historicus: Studien über rhetorische Erkenntnis und Lebensanschauung im italienischen Renaissancehumanismus (Acta Theologica Danica, 13), Leiden 1979.
Marti, A. La Preceptiva Retórica Espanola en el Siglo de Oro (Biblioteca romanica hispanica, I: Tradados y monograflas, 12), Madrid 1972.
Miller, P. The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century, New York 1939; repr. Cambridge, Mass., 1954, Boston 1961, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
Munteano, B. Constantes Dialectiques en Littérature et en Histoire: Problèmes, Recherches, Perspectives, Paris 1967.
Murphy, J.J. “One Thousand Neglected Authors: The Scope and Importance of Renaissance Rhetoric”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 20–36.
Patterson, W.F. Three Centuries of French Poetic Theory: A Critical History of the Chief Arts of Poetry in France, 1328–1630, 2 vol., Ann Arbor 1935; repr. 3 vol., New York 1966.
Rico Verdú, J. La retórica espanola de los siglos XVI Y XVII, Madrid 1973.
Sandys, J.E. A History of Classical Scholarship, 3 vol., Cambridge 21906–1908; repr. New York 1967.
Scaglione, A. The Classical Theory of Composition: From Its Origins to the Present (University of North Carolina Studies in Comparative Literature, 53 ), Chapel Hill, N.C., 1972.
Tigerstedt, E.N. “The Poet as Creator: Origins of a Metaphor”, CLS 5 (1968), 455–488.
Trabalza, C. La critica letteraria nel Rinascimento, Mailand 1915.
Trapp, J.B. “Rhetoric and the Renaissance”, in: Trapp (ed.), Background to the English Renaissance: Introductory Lectures, London 1974, pp. 90–108.
Vasoli, C. La dialettica e la retorica dell’Umanesimo: “Invenzione” e “Metodo” nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo, Mailand 1968.
Vickers, B. “Rhetoric and Renaissance Literature”, Rhetorik 2 (1981), 106–130 [review article].
Vossler, K. Poetische Theorien in der italienischen Frührenaissance, Berlin 1900.
Weber, H. La Création Poétique au XVIe Siècle en France de Maurice Scève à Agrippa d’Aubigné, Paris 1956.
Weinberg, B. A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance, 2 vol., Chicago 1961; repr. 1974.
Williams, R.C. “The Purpose of Poetry, and Particularly the Epic, as Discussed by Critical Writers of the Sixteenth Century in Italy”, RR 12 (1921), 1–20.
Wimsatt, W.K./C. Brooks. Literary Criticism: A Short History, New York 1959; repr. 2 vol., Chicago 1978.
Wolff, M.J. “Die Theorie der italienischen Tragödie im 16. Jahrhundert”, Archiv 128 (1912), 161–183, 339–362.
Ahrens, R./E. Wolff (eds.). Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie: Studien zu ihrer historischen Entwicklung, 2 vol. (Anglistische Forschungen, 126/127), Heidelberg 1978/1979, vol. I (1978): “Renaissance, Klassizismus und Romantik”.–EASG 1978, 43–45.
Alpers, P.J. (ed.). Elizabethan Poetry: Modern Essays in Criticism, London/Oxford/New York 1967.
Bailey, D. (ed.). Essays on Rhetoric, New York 1965.
Bryant, D.C. (ed.). The Rhetorical Idiom ( FS Winchelns ), Ithaca, N.Y., 1958.
Bryant, D.C. (ed.). Papers in Rhetoric, St. Louis 1940.
Castelli, E. (ed.). Retorica e Barocco. Atti del III Congresso Internazionale di Studi Umanistici, Venezia, 15–18 giugno 1954, Rom 1955.
Corbett, E.P.J. (ed.). Rhetorical Analyses of Literary Works, New York/London/Toronto 1969.
Groll, M.W. Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm, ed. J.M. Patrick et al., Princeton, N.J., 1966.
Drummond, A.M. (ed.). Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking ( FS Winans ), New York 1925.
Fish, St.E. (ed.). Seventeenth-Century Prose: Modern Essays in Criticism, New York 1971.
Howes, R.F. (ed.). Historical Studies of Rhetoric and Rhetoricians, Ithaca, N.Y., 1961.
Kristeller, P.O./Ph.P. Wiener (eds.). Renaissance Essays from the “Journal of the History of Ideas, New York/ Evanston 1968.
Lawrence, N.G./J.A. Reynolds (eds.). Sweet Smoke of Rhetoric: A Collection of Renaissance Essays (UMPEAL, 7), Coral Gables, Fla., 1964.
Murphy, J.J. (ed.). Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1983.
Nugel, B. (ed.). Englische Literaturtheorie von Sidney bis Johnson (Wege der Forschung, 578), Darmstadt 1984.
Ong, W.J. Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology: Studies in in the Interaction of Expression and Culture, Ithaca, N.Y./London 1971.
Schwartz, J./J.A. Rycenga (eds.). The Province of Rhetoric, New York 1965.
Sloan, Th.O./R.B. Waddington (eds.). The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry: From Wyatt to Milton, Berkeley/ Los Angeles/London 1974.
Wallace, K.R. (ed.). History of Speech Education in America: Background Studies, New York 1954.
2. Studien zu den Rhetorischen Gattungen
Bundy, M.W. “’Invention’ and ‘Imagination’ in the Renaissance”, JEGP 29 (1930), 535–545.
Höltgen, K.J. “John Drydens ‘nimble spaniel’: Zur Schnelligkeit der inventìo und imaginatio, in: H. Meller/H.-J. Zimmermann (eds.), Lebende Antike ( FS Sühnel ), Berlin 1967, pp. 233–249.
Lee, I.J. “Some Conceptions of Emotional Appeal in Rhetorical Theory”, SM 6 (1939), 66–86.
Ragsdale, J.D. “Invention in English ‘Stylistic’ Rhetorics: 1600–1800”, QJS 51 (1965), 164–167.
Shafter, E.M. A Study of Rhetorical Invention in Selected English Rhetorics 1550–1600, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1956. - SM 24 (1957), 112. - DA 17 (1957), 1415.
Vancil, D.L. The Disappearance of ‘Topoi’ in English Rhetoric: 1550–1830, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 1974. - DAI 35 (1975), 4733A.
Ashley, L.R.N. “Research Opportunities in English Homiletics and Rhetoric, 1500–1700” (Nr. A.28).
Bernstein, E.H. A Revaluation of the Plain Genre of Homiletics in Its Evolution as a Theory of Persuasion from Ramus to John Wilkins, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles 1973. - DAI 34 (1973), 3591A.
Blench, J.W. Preaching in England in the Late Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries: A Study of English Sermons, 1450-c.1600, Oxford/New York 1964.
Bozell, R.B. “English Preachers of the Seventeenth Century on the Art of Preaching”, Cornell University Abstracts of Theses (1939), 56–59.
Brown, J. Puritan Preaching in England, London 1900.
Connors, J.M. “Homiletic Theory in the Late Sixteenth Century”, AER-138 (1958), 316–332.
Davies, G. “English Political Sermons, 1603–1640”, HLQ 3 (1939–1940), 1–22.
Davies, H. Worship and Theology in England: From Cranmer to Hooker, 1534–1603, Princeton, N.J., 1970, bes. Kap. 6, 8.
Evans, M.F. A Study in the Development of a Theory of Homiletics in England from 1534–1692, 2 vol., Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa 1932.
Herr, A.F. The Elizabethan Sermon: A Survey and a Bibliography, Philadelphia 1940; repr. New York 1969.
Hudson, R.F. The Theory of Communication of Colonial New England Preachers, 1620–1670, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University Graduate School 1953.–SM 21 (1954), 172.
Koller, K. “The Puritan Preacher’s Contribution to Fiction”, HLQ 11 (1947–1948), 321–340.
MacLure, M. The Paul’s Cross Sermons, 1534–1642, Toronto 1958.
Mitchell, W.F. English Pulpit Oratory from Andrewes to Tillotson: A Study of Its Literary Aspects, London/New York 1932• repr. New York 1962.
Parkander, D.J. Rhetorical Theory and Practice: The Sermons of the English Puritans from 1570–1644, Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago 1963.
Parks, K.C. The Progress of Preaching in England During the Elizabethan Period, Ph.D. diss., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Graduate School 1954.
Putzer, F. Prediger des englischen Barock - stilistisch untersucht, Diss. Bonn 1929.
Rechtien, J.G. “Logic in Puritan Sermons in the Late Sixteenth Century and Plain Style”, Style 13 (1979), 237–258.
Richardson, C.F. English Preachers and Preaching, 1640–1670, London/New York 1928.
Sherwin, W. The Rhetorical Structure of the English Sermon in the Sixteenth Century, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1958.–DA 19 (1958), 1072–1073.
Smyth, Ch. The Art of Preaching: A Practical Survey of Preaching in the Church of England, 747–1939, London 1940.
Tromly, F.B. “’Accordinge to sounde religion’: The Elizabethan Controversy over the Funeral Sermon”, JMRS 13 (1983), 293–312.
Westby, S.N. The Puritan Funeral Sermon in Seventeenth Century England, Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 6076A.
White, E.E. Puritan Rhetoric: The Issue of Emotion in Religion, Carbondale/Edwardsville, Ill., 1972.
Wilson, J.F. Pulpit in Parliament: Puritanism during the English Civil Wars 1640–1648, Princeton, N.J., 1969.
Grund, G. R. “From Formulary to Fiction: The Epistle and the English Anti-Ciceronian Movement”, TSLL 17 (1975), 379–395.
Hansche, M.B. The Formative Period of English Familiar Letter-writers and Their Contribution to the English Essay, Philadelphia 1902; repr. New York 1970.
Hornbeak, K.G. The Complete Letter Writer in English 1568–1800 (Smith College Studies in Modern Languages, 15/3–4), Northampton, Mass., 1934.
Humiliata, Sr. M. “Standards of Taste Advocated for Feminine Letter Writing, 1640–1797”, HLQ 13 (19491950), 261–277.
Irving, W.H. The Providence of Wit in the English Letter Writers, Durham 1955.
John, L.C. “Elizabethan Letter Writer”, PQ 24 (1945), 106–113.
John, L.C. “Rowland Whyte, Elizabethan Letter-Writer”, SRen 8 (1961), 217–235.
Patrides, C.A. “The Epistolary Art of the Renaissance: The Biblical Premises”, PQ 60 (1981), 357–367.
Ramsey, R.W. “Some English Letter Writers of the Seventeenth Century”, EDH, NS, 14 (1935), 1–27.
Rieger, B.M. The Development of the English Literary Letter, 1500–1640, Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland 1973. - DAI 35 (1974), 1058A - 1059A.
Robertson, J. The Art of Letter Writing: An Essay on the Handbooks Published in England During the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, Liverpool 1942, 2 1943.
Thompson, E.N.S. “Familiar Letters”, in: Literary Bypaths of the Renaissance, New Haven 1924, pp. 91–126.
Whigham, F. “The Rhetoric of Elizabethan Suitors’ Letters”, PMLA 96 (1981), 864–882.
Williams, F.B. “Special Presentation Epistles before 1641: A Preliminary Check-List”, Library, 5th ser., 7 (1952), 15–20.
Worstbrock, F.J. “Die Antikerezeption in der mittelalterlichen und der humanistischen Ars dictandi”, in: A. Buck (ed.), Die Rezeption der Antike: Zum Problem der Kontinuität zwischen Mittelalter und Renaissance (Wolfenbütteler Abhandlungen zur Renaissanceforschung, 1), Hamburg 1981, pp. 187–207.
Bornscheuer, L. “Topik”, in: Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 2. Aufl., vol. IV, ed. K. Kanzog/ A. Masser, Berlin/New York 1981, pp. 454–475.
Clark, D.L. ’“The Rise and Fall of Progymnasmata in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Grammar Schools”, SM 19 (1952), 259–263.
Close, A.J. “Commonplace Theories of Art and Nature in Classical Antiquity and in the Renaissance”, JHI 30 (1969), 467–486.
Farmer, N.K. “Robert Herrick’s Commonplace Book? Some Observations and Questions”, PBSA 66 (1972), 21–34.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’, Considered as a Typical Rhetorical Ornament, in the Tragedies of Seneca, and in those of Gascoigne, Kyd, Heywood, Jonson, Marston, Dekker, Webster and Greville, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University 1950.
Hunter, G.K. “The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems, and Romances”, Library 6 (1951–1952), 171–188.
Lechner, Sr. J.M. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces, New York 1962; repr. Westport, Conn., 1974.
Mandeville, Sr. Sch. The Rhetorical Tradition of the ‘Sententia’: With a Study of Its Influence on the Prose of Sir Francis Bacon and of Sir Thomas Browne, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University Graduate School 1960. - DA 21 (1961), 3099.
Marks, C.L. “Thomas Traherne’s Commonplace Book”, PBSA 58 (1964), 458–465.
Mertner, E. “Topos und Commonplace”, in: G. Dietrich/ F.W. Schulze (eds.), Strena Anglica (FS Ritter), Halle 1956, pp. 178–224; repr. in: P. Jehn (ed.), Toposforschung: Eine Dokumentation, Frankfurt 1972, pp. 20–68.
Nadeau, R.E. “Oratorical Formulas in Seventeenth-Century England”, QJS 38 (1952), 149–154.
Nadeau, R.E. “An Analysis of the Commonplaces”, QJS 49 (1963), 328–331.
Nallaseth, H. A Literary Study of Four Verse Commonplace Books in the British Museum (MSS nos. Add. 30982, Add. 22118, Eg. 923, Eg. 2421), Ph.D. thesis, University of London 1951–1952.
Rechtien, J.G. Thought Patterns: The Commonplace Book as Literary Form in Theological Controversy During the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1975. - DAI 36 (1975), 3661A - 3662A.
Rechtien, J.G. “John Foxe’s Comprehensive Collection of Commonplaces: A Renaissance Memory System for Students and Theologians”, SCJ 9 (1978), 83–89.
Schmidt-Biggemann, W. Topica Universalis: Eine Modellgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft (Paradeigmata, 1), Hamburg 1983.
Schoell, F.L. “G. Chapman’s ‘Commonplace Book’”, MP 17 (1919/1920), 199–218.
Uhlig, C. Hofkritik im England des Mittelalters und der Renaissance: Studien zu einem Gemeinplatz der europäischen Moralistik (Quellen und Forschungen zur Sprach-und Kulturgeschichte der germanischen Völker, NF, 56), Berlin/New York 1973, Kap. IV: Loci communes als historische Kategorien“ (pp. 139–174).–EASG 1973, 48–52.
Verweyen, Th. Apophthegma und Scherzrede: Die Geschichte einer einfachen Gattungsform und ihre Entfaltung im 17. Jahrhundert, Bad Homburg v.d.H. 1970.
Zeitlin, J. “Commonplaces in Elizabethan Life and Letters”, JEGP 19 (1920), 47–65.
Adolph, R. The Rise of Modern Prose Style, Cambridge, Mass./London 1968.
Allen, D.C. “Style and Certitude”, ELH 15 (1948), 167–175.
Allen, J.B. “The Style and Content of Baptist Sermons in Seventeenth-Century England”, FurmS, NS, 15 (1968), 1–21.
Borinski, L. “Mittelalter und Neuzeit in der Stilgeschichte des 16. Jahrhunderts”, ShJ 97 (1961), 109–133.
Bullough, G. “The Grand Style in English Poetry”, Cairo St Engl (1969), 9–25.
Carpenter, R.H. “The Essential Schemes of Syntax: An Analysis of Rhetorical Theory’s Recommendations for Uncommon Word Orders”, QJS 55 (1969), 161–168.
Cochrane, K. “Orpheus Applied: Some Instances of His Importance in the Humanist View of Language”, RES, NS, 19 (1968), 1–13.
Cope, J.I. “Seventeenth-Century Quaker Style”, PMLA 71 (1956), 725–754;-repr. in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 200–235.
Groll, M.W. “The Sources of the Euphuistic Rhetoric”, in: J. Lyly, Euphues: The Anatomy of Wit/Euphues and His England, ed. M.W. Croll/H. Clemons, London 1916; repr. New York 1964, pp. xv-lxiv; repr. in: Groll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 241–295 (Einl.: R.J. Schoeck/J.M. Patrick, pp. 237–240 ).
Groll, M.W. “’Attic Prose’ in the Seventeenth Century”, SP 18 (1921), 79–128; repr. in: Groll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 51–101 (Einl.: J.M. Wallace, pp. 45–50 ).
Groll, M.W. “Attic Prose: Lipsius, Montaigne, Bacon”, Schelling Anniversary Papers, New York 1923, pp. 117–150; repr. in: Groll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 167–202 (Einl.: R.O. Evans, pp. 163–165 ).
Groll, M.W. “Muret and the History of ‘Attic’ Prose”, PMLA 39 (1924), 254–309; repr. in: Groll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 107–162 (Einl.: R.O. Evans, pp. 103–105 ).
Groll, M.W. “The Baroque Style in Prose”, in: K. Malone/ M.B. Ruud (eds.), Studies in English Philology (FS Klaeber), Minneapolis 1929, pp. 427–456; repr. in: Groll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 207–233 (Einl.: J.M. Wallace, pp. 203–206 ).
Daniells, R. “English Baroque and Deliberate Obscurity”, JAAC 5 (1946–1947), 115–121.
Ellis, K. Rhetoric and Ideology: A Study of Seventeenth Century Prose Style, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1972. - DAI 34 (1973), 271A.
Fisch, H. “The Puritans and the Reform of Prose-Style”, ELH 19 (1952), 229–248.
Hall, A.D. “Tudor Prose Style: English Humanists and the Problem of a Standard”, ELR 7 (1977), 267–296.
Hazard, M.E. “An Essay to Amplify ‘Ornament’: Some Renaissance Theory and Practice”, SEL 16 (1976), 15–32.
Helmick, E.T. “The Seventeenth-Century Background of Puritan Plain Style”, ILR (1970), 21–24.
Howell, A.C. “Res et Verba: Words and Things”, ELH 13 (1946), 131–142; repr. in Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 187–199.
Howell, W.S. “Baroque Rhetoric: A Concept at Odds with Its Setting”, P and R 15 (1982), 1–23.
Jones, R.F. The Triumph of the English Language: A Survey of Opinions Concerning thé Vernacular from the Introduction of Printing to the Restoration, Stanford/London 1953; repr. 1974.
Jones, R.F. et al. The Seventeenth Century: Studies in the History of English Thought and Literature from Bacon to Pope, Stanford, Cal., 1951; repr. 1969.
Krapp, G.Ph. The Rise of English Literary Prose, New York 1915; repr. 1963.
Landmann, F. Der Euphuismus, Diss. Gießen 1881.
Lasser, M.L. “Discordia Concors: A Humanistic Reconciliation”, Discourse 5 (1962), 436–443.
Mazzeo, J.A. “Seventeenth-Century English Prose Style: The Quest for a Natural Style”, Mosaic 6 (1973), 107–144.
McMahon, F.R. A History of the Concepts of Style in English Public Address: 1600–1700, Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California Graduate School 1958.
Miner, E. “Patterns of Stoicism in Thought and Prose Styles, 1530–1700”, PMLA 85 (1970), 1023–1034.
Müller, W.G. Topik des Stilbegriffs: Zur Geschichte des Stilverständnisses von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (Impulse der Forschung, 34), Darmstadt 1981, bes. Kap. II und IV.–EASG 1981, 20–22.
Ogden, H.V.S. “The Principles of Variety and Contrast in Seventeenth Century Aesthetics, and Milton’s Poetry”, JHI 10 (1949), 159–182.
Ong, W.J. “Oral Residue in Tudor Prose Style”, PMLA 80 (1965), 145–154; repr. in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C. 112 ), pp. 23–47.
Plett, H.F. “The Place and Function of Style in Renaissance Poetics”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 356–375.
Richards, I.A. “The Places and the Figures”, KR 11 (1949), 17–30; repr. in: Richards, Speculative Instruments, London 1955, pp. 155–169; repr. in: Alpers (ed.), Elizabethan Poetry (Nr. C. 98 ), pp. 78–89.
Richardson, D.A. Decorum and Diction in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1972. - DAI 34 (1973), 1293A.
Ringler, W. “The Immediate Source of Euphuism”, PMLA 53 (1938), 678–686.
Sandbank, S. “Euphuistic Symmetry and the Image”, SEL 11 (1971), 1–13.
Schäfer, J. “Elizabethan Rhetorical Terminology and Historical Lexicography”, Dictionaries 3 (19801981), 7–17.
Shapiro, B.J. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England, Princeton, N.J., 1983, bes. Kap. VII: “Language, Communication, and Literature” (pp. 227–266 [324–331]).
Sharp, R.L. “Some Light on Metaphysical Obscurity and Roughness”, SP 31 (1934), 497–518.
Shuger, D.K. The Grand Style in English Renaissance Prose from Sandys to Barrow (1560–1680), Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1983. - DAI 43 (1983), 3606A.
Smith, A.J. “Figures or Colours”, EIC 19 (1969), 320–325 (Rezension von Sonnino [Nr. C.243] und Lanham [Nr. C.241]).
Soter, I. La Doctrine Stylistique des Rhétoriques du XVIIe Siècle, Budapest 1937.
Staton, W.F. “The Characters of Style in Elizabethan Prose”, JEGP 57 (1958), 197–207.
Stull, W.L. “Sacred Sonnets in Three Styles”, SP 79 (1982), 78–99.
Sutherland, J. On English Prose, Toronto 1957; repr. 1965.
Teets, B.E. “Two Faces of Style in Renaissance Prose Fiction”, in: Lawrence/Reynolds (eds.), Sweet Smoke of Rhetoric (Nr. C. 109 ), pp. 69–81.
Toor, D.S. Euphuism in England Before John Lyly, Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon 1965. - DA 26 (1966), 4642.
Vickers, B. “Rhetorical and Anti-Rhetorical Tropes: On Writing the History of elocutio, CCrit 3 (1981), 105–132.
Vos, A. “Humanistic Standards of Diction in the Inkhorn Controversy”, SP 73 (1976), 376–396.
Wallace, K.R. “Early English Rhetoricians on the Structure of Rhetorical Prose”, in: Bryant (ed.), Papers in Rhetoric (Nr. C. 101 ), pp. 18–26.
Webber, J. The Eloquent ‘I’: Style and Self in Seventeenth-Century Prose, Madison/London 1968.
Webber, J. “Stylistics: A Bridging of Life and Art in Seventeenth-Century Studies”, NLH 2 (1971), 283–296.
Williamson, G. “The Rhetorical Pattern of Neo-Classical Wit”, MP 33 (1935), 60–67.
Williamson, G. “Senecan Style in the Seventeenth Century”, PQ 15 (1936), 321–351; repr. in: Williamson, Milton and Others, Chicago 1965, 21970, pp. 192–223.
Williamson, G. “Strong Lines”, ES 18 (1936), 152–159.
Williamson, G. The Senecan Amble: A Study in Prose Form from Bacon to Collier, Chicago 1951; repr. 1966.
Wilson, F.P. Seventeenth-Century Prose, Berkeley 1960; repr. Westport, Conn., 1976.
Wood, D.N.L. “Decorum and Decoration in the Language of Elizabethan Poetry”, RUO 42 (1972), 470–478.
Lanham, R.A. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms: A Guide for Students of English Literature, Berkeley 1969.
Oyama, T. English Rhetorics, Tokio 1956, 2 1975.
Sonnino, L.A. A Handbook to Sixteenth-Century Rhetoric, London 1968.
Taylor, W. Tudor Figures of Rhetoric, Whitewater, Wis., 1972.
Allen, D.C. Image and Meaning: Metaphoric Traditions in Renaissance Poetry, Baltimore 1960; repr. 1968.
Allen, D.C. ’Mysteriously Meant’: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance, Baltimore 1970.
Allen, D.C. “The Renaissance Antiquarian and Allegorical Interpretation”, Med Ren Ser 4 (1970), 3–20.
Bloom, E.A. “The Allegorical Principle”, ELH 18 (1951), 163–190.
Brewer, D.S. “Metaphor and Symbol in the Sixteenth Century: A Comment”, EIC 4 (1954), 108–111.
Brie, F. “Umfang und ursprung der poetischen beseelung in der englischen renaissance bis zu Philip Sidney”, EnglSt 50 (1916–1917), 383–425.
Cannon, Ch.K. “William Whitaker’s Disputatio de Sacra Scriptura: A Sixteenth-Century Theory of Allegory”, HLQ 25 (1961–1962), 129–138.
Dundas, J. “Allegory as a Form of Wit”, SRen 11 (1964), 223–233.
Dunlap, Rh. “The Allegorical Interpretation of Renaissance Literature”, PMLA 82 (1967), 39–43.
Eber, B. Die Apostrophe in der englischen Tragödie des 16. Jahrhunderts, Diss. München 1951.
’. Evans, M. “Metaphor and Symbol in the Sixteenth Century”, EIC 3 (1953), 267–284.
Fisher, W.N. “’Occupatio’ in Sixteenth-and Seventeenth-Century Verse”, TSLL 14 (1972), 203–222.
Fletcher, A. Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode, Ithaca, N.Y., 1964; repr. 1970.
Frazer, R. “The Origin of the Term ‘Image’”, ELH 27 (1960), 149–161.
Gang, T.M. “Hobbes and the Metaphysical Conceit - A Reply” (Nr. B.349.3). - Vgl. Nr. C.279.
Gnerro, M.L. The Influence of Classical and ‘Cinquecento’ Style Theory on British Invocatory Structure Through Milton, Ph.D. diss., Catholic University of America 1971. - DAI 32 (1971), 1471A.
Green, J. “Figures of Speech”, N and Q 180 (1941), 238, 349–350, 368–369.
Hegnauer, S. Systrophe: The Background of Herbert’s Sonnet “Prayer (European University Studies, XIV/87), Bern/Frankfurt/Las Vegas 1981.
Heninger, S.K. “Metaphor as Cosmic Correspondence”, Med Ren Ser 3 (1968), 3–22.
Knox, N. The Word ‘Irony’ and Its Context, 1500–1755, Durham, N.C., 1961.
McCann, E. “Oxymora in Spanish Mystics and English Metaphysical Writers”, CL 13 (1961), 16–25.
McClennen, J. “On the Meaning and Function of Allegory in the English Renaissance”, UMCMP 6 (1947), 1–38.
McCoy, D.S. Tradition and Convention: A Study of Periphrasis in English Pastoral Poetry from 1557–1715 (Studies in English, 5), Den Haag 1965.
Mead, D.S. The Literary Comparison in Jacobean Prose, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1926.
Mullaney, St. “Lying Like Truth: Riddle, Representation and Treason in Renaissance England”, ELH 47 (1980), 32–47.
Murrin, M. The Veil of Allegory: Some Notes Toward a Theory of Allegorical Rhetoric in the English Renaissance, Chicago 1969.
Ong, W.J. “From Allegory to Diagram in the Renaissance Mind”, JAAC 17 (1959), 423–440.
Papajewski, H. “Chimäre und Metapher: Ein Beitrag zum kritischen’Prbblem von Phantasie und Rationalität im englischen Neoklassizismus”, Anglia 82 (1964), 88–104.
Pineas, R. “Polemical exemplum in Sixteenth Century Religious Controversy”, BHR 28 (1966), 393–396.
Plett, H.F. “Konzepte des Allegorischen in der englischen Renaissance”, in: W. Haug (ed.), Formen und Funktionen der Allegorie: Symposion Wolfenbüttel 1978, Stuttgart 1979, pp. 310–335.
Ruthven, K.K. The Conceit (The Critical Idiom, 4),. London 1969.
Sandbank, S. “On the Structure of Some Seventeenth-Century Metaphors”, ES 52 (1971), 323–330.
Taylor, W. “A Note on English Figures of Speech”, MLN 53 (1938), 514–515.
Wärtli, H. Stilistische Dämpfung als Mittel der Ausdruckssteigerung und der Ausdrucksmilderung im Altenglischen und Neuenglischen (Litotes und Understatement), Diss. Zürich 1935.
Watson, G. “Hobbes and the Metaphysical Conceit” (Nr. B.349.7). - Vgl. Nr. C.259.
Duhamél, P.A. “The Logic and Rhetoric of Peter Ramus”, MP 46 (1949), 163–171.
Graves, F.P. Peter Ramus and the Educational Reformation of the Sixteenth Century, New York 1912.
Hooykaas, R. Humanisme, Science, et Réforme: Pierre de la Ramée, 1515–1572, Leiden 1958.
Howell, W.S. “Ramus and English Rhetoric: 1574–1681”, QJS 37 (1951), 299–310.
Howell, W.S. “Ramus and the Decay of Dialogue”, QJS 46 (1960), 86–92.
Nelson, N. “Peter Ramus and the Confusion of Logic, Rhetoric, and Poetry”, UMCMP 2 (1947), 1–22.
Ong, W.J. “Peter Ramus and the Naming of Methodism: Medieval Science Through Ramist Homiletic”, JHI 14 (1953), 235–248.
Ong, W.J. “Fouquelin’s French Rhetoric and the Ramist Vernacular Tradition”, SP 51 (1954), 127–142.
Ong, W.J. “Ramus: Rhetoric and the Pre-Newtonian Mind”, EIE 1952 (1954), 138–170; repr. in: W.K. Wimsatt (ed.), Literary Criticism: Idea and Act. The English Institute, 1939–1972: Selected Essays, Berkeley/ Los Angeles/London 1974, pp. 128–148.
Ong, W.J. “Ramus and the Transit to the Modern Mind”, ModS 32 (1955), 301–311.
Ong, W.J. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason, Cambridge, Mass., 1958; repr. 1983.
Ong, W.J. “Ramist Classroom Procedure and the Nature of Reality”, SEL 1 (1961), 31–47; repr. in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C. 112 ), pp. 142–164.
Ong, W.J. “Ramist Rhetoric”, in: Schwartz/Rycenga (eds.), The Province of Rhetoric (Nr. C. 113 ), pp. 226–255.
Ong, W.J. “Ramist Method and the Commercial Mind”, SRen 8 (1961), 155–172; Yepr. in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C. 112 ), pp. 165–189.
Rossi, P. “Ramismo, Logica, Retorica nei Secoli XVI e XVII”, RCSF 12 (1957), 357–365.
Sharratt, P. “The Present State of Studies on Ramus”, SFr 16 (1972), 201–213.
Smith, A.J. “An Examination of Some Claims for Ramism”, RES, NS, 7 (1956), 348–359; repr. in: Roberts (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. C.759.43), pp. 178–188 (500–501).
Tuve, R. “Imagery and Logic: Ramus and Metaphysical Poetics”, JHI 3 /4 (1942), 365–400.
Walton, C. “Ramus and the Art of Judgement”, P and R 3 (1970), 152–164.
Watson, G. “Ramus, Miss Tuve, and the New Petromachia”, MP 55 (1958), 259–262. - Vgl. Nr. C.297.
Abrams, R.H. Memory and Making in the Poetics of Renaissance England, Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Buffalo 1973. - DAI 34 (1973), 758A.
Blum, H. Die antike Mnemotechnik (Spudasmata, 15), Hildesheim/New York 1969. (Rez.: D. Newton-de Molina, “Ars Memorativa”, ETC 20 [1970], 353–359.)
Camden, C. “Memory, the Warder of the Brain”, PQ 18 (1939), 52–72.
Caplan, H. “Memoria: Treasure-House of Eloquence”, in: Caplan, Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Mediaeval Rhetoric, ed. A. King/H. North, Ithaca/ London 1970, pp. 196–246.
Dockhorn, K. “Memoria in der Rhetorik”, ABG 9 (1964), 27–35; repr. in: Dockhorn, Macht und Wirkung der Rhetorik (Nr. C. 58 ), pp. 96–104.
Dorsten, J.A. van. “The Arts of Memory and Poetry”, ES 48 (1967), 419–425.
Green, R.M. The Treasure Chest of the Mind: Uses of Memory in Sidney, Shakespeare, and Renaissance Lyric Poetry, Ph.D. diss., Boston University Graduate School 1976. - DAI 37 (1976), 1563A.
Hargis, D.E. “Memory in Rhetoric”, SSJ 17 (1951), 114–124.
Harré, R. “Memorabilia”, EIC 17 (1967), 473–478. (Rez. von Yates [Nr. C.320].)
Hickey, R.L. “Donne’s Art of Memory” (Nr. C. 759. 16 ).
Martz, L.L. The Poetry of Meditation: A Study in the English Religious Literature of the Seventeenth Century, London 1954; repr. New Haven, Conn., 1962.
Middleton, A.E. Memory Systems: New and Old. Enlarged, with Bibliography of Mnemonics, 1325–1888, by G.S. Fellows, New York 1888.
Newton-de Molina, D. A Critical Select History of the Classical Arts of Memory and Their Interpretation, with Special Reference to English Arts of Memory, 1509–1620, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1971–1972.
Ong, W.J. “Memory as Art”, in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C.112), pp. 104–112 (urspr. Rez. von Yates [Nr. C.320] in RenQ 20 [1967], 253–259).
Plett, H.F. “Topik und Memoria. Strukturen mnemonischer Bildlichkeit in der englischen Literatur des XVII. Jahrhunderts”, in: D. Breuer/H. schanze (eds.), Topik: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Diskussion, München 1981, pp. 307–333.
Rossi, P. “Studi sul Lullismo e sull’Arte della Memoria nel Rinascimento: Immagini e memoria locale nei secoli XIV e XV”, RCSF 13 (1958), 148–190.
Rossi, P. “Studi sul Lullismo e sull’ Arte della Memoria nel Rinascimento: Enciclopedismo ecombinatoria nel secolo XVI”, RCSF 13 (1958), 243–279.
Rossi, P. Clavìs Universalis: Arti mnemoniche e logica combinatoria da Lullo a Leibniz, Mailand/Neapel 1960.
Volkmann, L. “Ars Memorativa”, Jb KS Wien, NF, 3 (1929), 111–200.
Weinrich, H. ’“Typen der Gedächtnismetaphorik”, ABG 9 (1964), 23–26; repr. als “Metaphora memoriae”, in: Weinrich, Sprache in Texten, Stuttgart 1976, pp. 291–294 [leicht verändert].
Yates, F.A. The Art of Memory, London/Chicago 1966; repr. Harmondsworth 1978.
Yates, F.A. “The Stage in Robert Fludd’s Memory System”, SStud 3 (1967), 138–166.
Yates, F.A. Theatre of the World, Chicago 1969, bes. Kap. 8.
Bachrach, A.G.H. “The Great Chain of Acting”, Neophil 33 (1949), 160–172.
Bentley, G.E. (ed.). The Seventeenth-Century Stage: A Collection of Critical Essays, Chicago/London 1968.
Bethell, S.L. “Shakespeare’s Actors”, RES, NS, 1 (1950), 193–205.
Binas, J.W. “Women or Transvestites on the Elizabethan Stage?: An Oxford Controversy”, SCJ 5 (1974), 95–120.
Bowers, R.H. “Gesticulation in Elizabethan Acting”, SFQ 12 (1948), 267–277.
Brown, J.R. “On the Acting of Shakespeare’s Plays”, QJS 39 (1953), 477–484; repr. in: Bentley (ed.), The Seventeenth-Century Stage (Nr. C. 324 ), pp. 41–54.
Brown, J.R. Shakespeare’s Plays in Performance, London 1966; repr. Harmondsworth 1969.
Downer, A.S. “Prolegomenon to a Study of Elizabethan Acting”, MuK 10 (1964), 625–636.
Foakes, R. “’The Player’s Passion’. Some Notes on Elizabethan Psychology and Acting”, E and S, NS, 7 (1954), 62–77.
Goldstein, L. “On the Transition from Formal to Naturalistic Acting in the Elizabethan and Post-Elizabethan Theater”, BNYPL 62 (1958), 330–349.
Gurr, A.J. Elizabethan Acting and Shakespeare’s Company, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1963.
Gurr, A.J. “Who Strutted and Bellowed?”, ShS 16 (1963), 95–102.
Gurr, A.J. “Elizabethan Action”, SP 63 (1966), 144–156.
Gurr, A.J. The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642, Cambridge 1970, Kap. 3.
Harbage, A. “Elizabethan Acting”, PMLA 54 (1939), 685–708.
Joseph, B.L. Elizabethan Acting (Oxford English Monographs, 2), Oxford 1951, 2 1964.
Joseph, B.L. “The Elizabethan Stage and the Art of Elizabethan Drama”, ShJ 91 (1955), 145–160.
Klein, D. “Elizabethan Acting”, PMLA 71 (1956), 280–282.
Marker, L.-L. “Nature and Decorum in the Theory of Elizabethan Acting”, in: D. Galloway (ed.), The Elizabethan Theatre, vol. II, London 1970, pp. 87–107.
McNeir, W.F. “Gayton on Elizabethan Acting”, PMLA 56 (1941), 579–583.
Miles, B. “Elizabethan Acting”, TLS 2. 4. 1954, p. 217.
Rosenberg, M. “Elizabethan Actors: Men or Marionettes?”, PMLA 69 (1954), 915–927.
Seltzer, D. “The Actors and the Staging”, in: K. Muir/ S. Schoenbaum (eds.), A New Companion to Shakespeare Studies, Cambridge 1971, pp. 35–54 (263–264).
3. Studien zu Poetologischen Themen
Adams, R.P. “Bold Bawdry and Open Manslaughter: The English New Humanist Attack on Medieval Romance”, HLQ 23 (1.959–1960), 33–41.
Altman, J.B. The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1978.
Armstrong, W.A. Damon and Pithias and Renaissance Theories of Tragedy“ (Nr. C. 762. 2 ).
Bareiss, K.-H. Comòedia: Die Entwicklung der Komödiendiskussion von Aristoteles bis Ben Jonson (Europäische Hochschulschriften, XIV/100), Frankfurt/ Bern 1982.
Barish, J.A. “The Antitheatrical Prejudice”, CritQ 8 (1966), 329–348.
Barish, J.A. “Exhibitionism and the Antitheatrical Prejudice”, ELH 36 (1969), 1–29.
Barish, J.A. The Antitheatrical Prejudice, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1981.
Baroway, I. “The Bible as Poetry in the English Renaissance: An Introduction”, JEGP 32 (1933), 447–480.
Behrens, I. Die Lehre von der Einteilung der Dichtkunst–vornehmlich vom 16. bis 19. Jahrhundei»t: Studien zur Geschichte der poetischen Gattungen (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 92), Halle 1940, pp. 118–126.
Bennett, A.L. “The Principal Rhetorical Conventions in the Renaissance Personal Elegy”, SP 51 (1954), 107–125.
Boas, F.S. University Drama in the Tudor Age, London 1914; repr. New York 1966.
Borinski, L. “Die Vorgeschichte des englischen Essay”, Anglia 83 (1965), 48–77.
Boyce, B. The Theophrastan Character in England to 1642, Cambridge, Mass., 1947; repr. London 1967.
Boyce, B. The Polemic Character, 1640–1661: A Chapter in English Literary History, Lincoln, Nebr., 1955; repr. New York 1969.
Bushman, M.A. The Case Against Rhetoric: Problems of Judgement in Jacobean Tragedy, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1982. - DAI 44 (1983), 173A.
Campbell, L.B. Divine Poetry and Drama in Sixteenth-Century England, Cambridge 1959; repr. New York 1972.
Church, M. “The First English Pattern Poems”, PMLA 61 (1946), 636–650.
Clemen, W. Die Tragödie vor Shakespeare: Ihre Entwicklung im Spiegel der dramatischen Rede (Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft, NF, 5), Heidelberg 1955; engl. Übers.: English Tragedy before Shakespeare: The Development of Dramatic Speech, übers. T.S. Dorsch, London 1961; repr. 1967.
Cochrane, K.B. Sixteenth-Century Theories of Effective Speech and Rhetoric, and Their Manifestations in English Renaissance Drama, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1970–1971.
Colie, R.L. Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tradition of Paradox, Princeton, N.J., 1966; repr. Hamden, Conn., 1976.
Colie, R.L. The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance, ed. B.K. Lewalski, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1973.
Comito, T. “The Lady in a Landscape and the Poetics of Elizabethan Pastoral”, UTQ 41 (1972), 200–218.
Craig, H. “The Shackling of Accidents: A Study of Elizabethan Tragedy”, PQ 19 (1940), 1–19.
Daniells, R. “Baroque Form in English Literature”, UTQ 14 (1945), 393–408.
Davis, W.R. Idea and Act in Elizabethan Fiction, London/Princeton, N.J., 1969.
Deakins, R. “The Tudor Prose Dialogue: Genre and Anti-Genre”, SEL 20 (1980), 5–23.
Dean, W.K. The Concept of the Comic in English Drama, ca. 1400–1612, Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto 1970. - DAI 32 (1971), 914A - 915A.
DeNeef, A.L. “Epideictic Rhetoric and the Renaissance Lyric”, JMRS 3 (1973), 203–231.
Deubel, V. Tradierte Bauformen und lyrische Struktur (Studien zur Poetik und Geschichte der Literatur, 14), Stuttgart 1971.
Donohue, J.J. The Theory of Literary Kinds: Ancient Classifications of Literature, Dubuque, Ia., 1943.
Durling, R.M. The Figure of the Poet in Renaissance Epic, Cambridge, Mass./London 1965.
Enzensberger, Ch. Sonett und Poetik: Die Aussagen der elisabethanischen Sonettzyklen über das Dichten im Vergleich mit der zeitgenössischen Dichtungslehre, Diss. München 1962.
Freer, C. The Poetics of Jacobean Drama, Baltimore/ London 1982.
Friedland, L.S. “The Dramatic Unities in England”, JEGP 10 (1911), 56–89, 280–299, 453–467.
Fucilla, J.G. “A Rhetorical Pattern in Renaissance and Baroque Poetry”, SRen 3 (1956), 23–48.
Hardison, O.B. The Literature of Praise: A Study in Renaissance Aesthetics, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1956. - DA 16 (1956), 964.
Hardison, O.B. The Enduring Monument: A Study of the Idea of Praise in Renaissance Literary Theory and Practice, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1962; repr. Westport, Conn., 1973.
Heninger, S.K. “The Renaissance Perversion of Pastoral”, JHI 22 (1961), 254–261.
Herrick, M.T. “The Theory of the Laughable in the Sixteenth Century”, QJS 35 (1949), 1–16.
Herrick, M.T. Comic Theory in the Sixteenth Century (Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 34/1–2), Urbana, Ill., 1950; repr. 1964.
Herrick, M.T. Tragicomedy: Its Origin and Development in Italy, France, and England (Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 39), Urbana, Ill., 1955; repr. 1962.
Hudson, H.C. The Development of Dramatic Criticism in England and Spain During the Elizabethan Period and the Golden Age, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1962. - DA 23 (1962), 235.
Hulse, S.C. “Elizabethan Minor Epic: Toward a Definition of Genre”, SP 73 (1976), 302–319.
Hurst, Ph.B. The Renaissance Grammar School Genesis of English Tragic Style, Ph.D. diss., Arizona State University 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 1171A.
Hyde, M.C. Playwriting for the Elizabethans: 1600–1605, New York 1949.
Imbrie, A.E. Studies in ‘The Other Harmony’: Prose Genres in the Later English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1979. - DAI 41 (1980), 261A.
Jones, J. The Theory of Comic Drama in England Before 1625, University of Iowa Programs Announcing Candidates for Higher Degrees 1944.
Joseph,B.L. “’Scenes Invented Merely to Be Spoken’: Towards Standards of Criticism for Elizabethan Drama”, DramS 1 (1961), 18–33.
Joseph,B.L. “Character and Plot: Towards Standards of Criticism for Elizabethan Drama, II”, DramS 3 (1964), 541–544.
Kernodle, G.R. From Art to Theatre: Form and Convention in the Renaissance, Chicago/London 1944; repr. 1965.
Kinney, A.F. “Rhetoric as Poetic: Humanist Fiction in the Renaissance”, ELH 43 (1976), 413–443.
Kinney, A.F. “Rhetoric and Fiction in Elizabethan England”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 385–393.
LaBranche, A. “Poetry, History, and Oratory: The Renaissance Historical Poem”, SEL 9 (1969), 1–19.
Lanahan, W.F. Rhetorical Characterization in Elizabethan Drama, Ph.D. diss., Fordham University 1971. - DAI 32 (1971), 922A - 923A.
Leverenz, D. “Why Did Puritans Hate Stage Plays?”, in: Leverenz, The Language of Puritan Feeling: An Exploration in Literature, Psychology, and Social History, New Brunswick 1980, Kap. 1 (pp. 23–40 ).
Malloch, A.E. “The Techniques and Function of the Renaissance Paradox”, SP 53 (1956), 191–203.
Mason, H.A. Humanism and Poetry in the Early Tudor Period, London 1959; repr. 1980.
McCulley, C.M. “Dramatic Criticism in the English Renaissance”, Abstracts of Theses: S. Methodist University, Dallas, Tex., 8 (1941), 45–46.
McDonald, Ch.O. “’Decorum’, ‘Ethos’, and ’Pathos’ in the Heroes of Elizabethan Tragedy, with Particular Reference to Hamlet, JEGP 61 (1962), 330–348.
McDonald, Ch.O. The Rhetoric of Tragedy: Form in Stuart Drama, Amherst, Mass., 1966.
Miller, H.K. “The Paradoxical Encomium, with Special Reference to Its Vogue in England, 1600–1800”, MP 53 (1956), 145–178.
Morgan, E.S. “Puritan Hostility to the Theatre”, PAPS 110 (1966), 340–347.
Nelson, W. “The Boundaries of Fiction in the Renaissance: A Treaty between Truth and Falsehood”, ELH 36 (1969), 30–58.
Nelson, W. Fact or Fiction: The Dilemma of the Renaissance Storyteller, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.
Nicoll, A. “’Tragical-Comical-Historicall-Pastoral’: Elizabethan Dramatic Nomenclature”, BJRL 63 (1960), 70–78.
Peterson, D.L. The English Lyric from Wyatt to Donne: A History of the Plain and Eloquent Styles, Princeton, N.J., 1967.
Pfeiffer, K.L. “Zur Theorie des Tragischen in der Tragödie der frühen Stuart-Zeit”, GRM 60 (1979), 170–184.
Plett, H.F. “Typen der Textklassifikation in der englischen Renaissance”, Sprachkunst 12 /1 (1981), 212–227.
Randolph, M.C. “The Medical Concept in English Renaissance Satiric Theory: Its Possible Relationships and Implications”, SP 38 (1941), 125–157.
Randolph, M.C. “Thomas Drant’s Definition of Satire, 1566”, N and Q 180 (1941), 416–418.
Rewa, M.P. The Rhetoric of Biography: Classical Conventions of Praise in Seventeenth-Century English Biography, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1967. - DA 28 (1967), 1057A.
Ringler, W. “The First Phase of the Elizabethan Attack on the Stage, 1558–1579”, HLQ 5 (1941–1942), 391–418.
Robinson, J.E. The Dramatic Unities in the Renaissance: A Study of the Principles, with Application to the Development of English Drama, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1959. - DA 20 (1959), 292.
Rohr-Sauer, Ph.v. English Metrical Psalms from 1600 to 1660: A Study in the Religious and Aesthetic Tendencies of that Period, Diss. Freiburg 1938.
Rothstein, E. “English Tragic Theory in the Late Seventeenth Century”, ELH 29 (1962), 306–323.
Sackton, A.H. “The Paradoxical Encomium in Elizabethan Drama”, SE 28 (1949), 83–104.
Schabert, I. Die Lyrik der Spenserianer: Ansätze zu einer absoluten Dichtung in England 1590–1660 (Buchreihe der Anglia, 18), Tübingen 1977.–EASG 1977, 76–77.
Schumann, K. “Charakterdarstellung und Rhetorik”, in: H. Viebrock/W. Erzgräber (eds.), Festschrift zum 75. Geburtstag von Theodor Spira, Heidelberg 1961, pp. 184–196.
Semper, I.J. “The Jacobean Theater through the Eyes of Catholic Clerics”, SQ 3 (1952), 45–51.
Smith, H. “English Metrical Psalms in the Sixteenth Century and their Literary Significance”, HLQ 9 (1945–1946), 249–271.
Soens, A.L. Criticism of Formal Satire in the Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1957.–DA 18 (1958), 593–594.
Spinucci, P. Teatro elisabettiano, teatro di stato: La polemica dei Puritani inglesi contro il teatro nei secc. XVI e XVII, Florenz 1973.
Stamnitz, S. Discordia concors: Aspekte der englischen Tragikomödientheorie, 1540–1640“, in: Ahrens/Wolff (eds.), Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 149–174.
Swedenberg, H.T. The Theory of the Epic in England, 1650–1800 (University of California Publications in English, 15), Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1944; repr. New York 1972.
Symmes, H.S. Les débuts de la critique dramatique en Angleterre jusqu’à la mort de Shakespeare, Thèse Paris 1903.
Thompson, E.N.S. The Controversy between the Puritans and the Stage (Yale Studies in English, 20), New York 1903; repr. 1966.
Tieje, A.J. Theory of Characterization in Prose Fiction Prior to 1740 (Studies in Language and Literature, 5), Minneapolis 1916; repr. Philadelphia 1976.
Travis, P.J.M. The Three Unities: Their History and Application in the Development of Dramatic Criticism and Technique in England and France before 1800, 2 vol., Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1980. - DAI 41 (1980), 464A.
Trousdale, M. “A Possible Renaissance View of Form”, ELH 40 (1973), 179–204.
Wallerstein, R. “Rhetoric in the English Renaissance: Two Elegies”, EIE (1948), 153–178.
Weiss, A. The Rhetorical Concept of ‘Narratio’ and Narrative Structure in Elizabethan Prose Fiction, Ph.D. diss., Ohio University 1969. - DAI 30 (1969), 2503A - 2504A.
Ahrens, R. “Literatur und Imagination in der Poetik der englischen Renaissance”, Trierer Beiträge 2 (1976), 21–26.
Ahrens, R. “Literatur und das System der Wissenschaften in der Literaturtheorie der Renaissance”, in: Ahrens/Wolff (eds.), Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 121–148.
Allison, A.W. “Poetry and Rhetoric: In Defense of Elizabethan Criticism”, in: F. Bowers (ed.), English Studies in Honor of James Southall Wilson (University of Virginia Studies, 4 ), Charlottesville, Va., 1951, pp. 203–210.
Angelescu, V. The Concept of Originality in English Literary Criticism, Ph.D. diss., Wayne State University 1968. - DAI 29 (1969), 3571A.
Baker, C.D. “Certain Religious Elements in the English Doctrine of the Inspired Poet During the Renaissance”, ELH 6 (1939), 300–323.
Barkan, L. Nature’s Work of Art: The Human Body as Image of the World, New Haven/London 1975.
Baron, H. “The Querelle of the Ancients and the Moderns as a Problem for Renaissance Scholarship”, JHI 20 (1959), 3–22.
Benson, D.R. “’Ideas’ and the Problem of Knowledge in Seventeenth Century English Aesthetics”, EM 19 (1968), 83–104.
Bethell, S.L. “Gracihn, Tesauro, and the Nature of Metaphysical Wit”, in: D.W. Jefferson (ed.), The Northern Miscellany of Literary Criticism, No. 1, Hull 1953, pp. 19–40.
Boyd, J.D. The Function of Mimesis and Its Decline, Cambridge, Mass., 1968; New York 21979.
Chaplin, M.H. A Scientific Theory of the Imagination: A Study in the Sources of Modern Aesthetics, 1600–1750, Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 848A.
Clements, R.J. “Poetry and Philosophy in the Renaissance”, CLS 8 (1971), 1–20.
Current, R.D. The Curious Art: A Study of Literary Criticism in Verse in the Seventeenth Century, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 304A.
Doherty, M.J.M. The Mistress-Knowledge: Literary Architectonics in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison 1977. - DAI 38 (1978), 4840A.
Doran, M. “On Elizabethan ‘Credulity’:-With Some Questions Concerning the Use of the Marvelous in Literature”, JHI 1 (1940), 151–176.
Endicott, A.M. Renaissince Theories of Poetic Decorum, and Their Relation to Late Sixteenth-Century Poetic Practice, Ph.D. thesis, University of London 1966.
Feinstein, B.G. Creation and Theories of Creativity in English Poetry of the Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., City University of New York 1967. - DA 28 (1967), 1394A.
Firestine, M.W. The Doctrine of Imitation in the English Renaissance: Roger Ascham, Sir Philip Sidney, and Ben Jonson, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1974. - DAI 35 (1974), 447A.
Fish, St.E. Self-Consuming Artefacts: The Experience of Seventeenth-Century Literature, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1972.
Fraser, R. The War Against Poetry, Princeton, N.J., 1970.
Fregly, M.S. From Allegory to Realistic Illusion in Renaissance Drama: A Study of Mimetic and Logical-Rhetorical Devices in Dramatic Expression, with Special Reference to Shakespeare’s Plays, Gainesville, Fla., 1967.
giovannini, G. “Historical Realism and the Tragic Emotions in Renaissance Criticism”, PQ 32 (1953), 304–320.
Guss, D.L. “Renaissance Practical Criticism–A Polemical Survey”, PMASAL 52 (1967), 337–344.
Hallo, J.L. “The Metaphor of Conception and Elizabethan Theories of the Imagination”, Neophil 50 (1966), 454–461.
Hardison, 0.B. “The Orator and the Poet: The Dilemma of Humanist Literature”, JMRS 1 (1971), 33–44.
Harrier, R. “Invention in Tudor Literature: Historical Perspectives”: in: E.P. Mahoney (ed.), Philosophy and Humanism ( FS Kristeller ), Leiden 1976, pp. 370–386.
Harris, V. “Allegory to Analogy in the Interpretation of Scriptures”, PQ 45 (1966), 1–23.
Hathaway, B. Marvels and Commonplaces: Renaissance Literary Criticism, New York 1968.
Hazard, M.E. “The Anatomy of ‘Liveliness’ as a Concept in Renaissance Aesthetics”, JAAC 33 (1974–1975), 407–418.
Heninger, S.K. Touches of Sweet Harmony: Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics (Nr. C.637).
Herrick, M.T. “The Place of Rhetoric in Poetic Theory”, QJS 34 (1948), 1–22.
Herrick, M.T. “Some Neglected Sources of admiratio, MLN 62 (1947), 222–226.
Hill, B.A. The Grotesque in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of Washington 1975. - DAI 36 (1975), 3652A - 3653A.
Horn, A. Geschichte der anthropologischen Fragestellung in der englischen Ästhetik von Bacon bis Alison (Arbeiten zur Ästhetik, Didaktik, Literatur-und Sprachwissenschaft, 3), Bern/Frankfurt 1976, pp. 11–27.–EASG 1976, 59–61.
LaBranche, A. “Imitation: Getting in Touch”, MLQ 31 (1970), 308–329.
LaGuardia, E. “Figural Imitation in English Renaissance Poetry”, in: F. Jost (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the ICLA, Den Haag 1966, pp. 844–854.
Leimberg, I. “’Kein Wort darf fehlen’: Das Thema und seine Variationen in der elisabethanischen Dichtungstheorie”, in: P.G. Buchloh/I. Leimberg/H. Rauter (eds.), Studien zur englischen und amerikanischen Sprache und Literatur (FS Papajewski), Neumünster 1974, pp. 267–293; repr. in: Nugel (ed.), Englische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.111), pp. 391–420.
Leimberg, I. “Die Dichtungstheorie der englischen Renaissance unter dem Gesichtspunkt von Kunst und Natur”, in: Ahrens/Wolff (eds.), Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 94–120.
Mainusch, H. “Dichtung als Nachahmung: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Renaissancepoetik”, GRM 41 (1960), 122–138.
Mazzeo, J.A. “A Seventeenth-Century Theory of Metaphysical Poetry”, RR 42 (1951), 245–255.
Mazzeo, J.A. “Metaphysical Poetry and the Poetic of Correspondence”, JHI 14 (1953), 221–234.
Mazzeo, J.A. Renaissance and Seventeenth Century Studies, London 1964.
Meissner, P. “Der Gedanke der dichterischen Sendung in der englischen Literaturkritik”, DVLG 14 (1936), 31–59.
Miller, G.M. The Historical Point of View in English Literary Criticism from 1570–1770, Heidelberg 1913; repr. New York 1968.
Miner, E. “Inclusive and Exclusive Decorums in Seventeenth-Century Prose”, Lang and S 5 (1972), 192–203.
Miner, E. “Essaying the Golden World of English Renaissance Poetics”, Centrum 4 /1 (1976), 5–20.
Miner, E. Literary Uses of Typology: From the Late Middle Ages to the Present, Princeton, N.J., 1977.
Monk, S.H. “’A Grace Beyond the Reach of Art’”, JHI 5 (1944), 131–150; repr. in: Nugel (ed.), Englische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C. 111 ), pp. 106–127.
Mooney, M.E. The Concept of Mimesis in Seventeenth Century English Criticism, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1965. - DA 28 (1968), 4137A - 4138A.
Murrin, M. “Poetry as Literary Criticism”, MP 65 (1968), 202–207.
Nelson, W. “The Boundaries of Fiction in the Renaissance: A Treaty between Truth and Falsehood”, ELH 36 (1969), 30–58.
Nicolson, M.H. The Microscope and English Imagination (Smith College Studies in Modern Languages, 16/4), Northampton, Mass., 1935.
Nicolson, M.H. “The Telescope and Imagination”, MP 32 (1935), 233–260.
Nugel, B. The Just Design (Nr. C.607).
O’Brien, G.W. Renaissance Poetics and the Problem of Power (Institute of Elizabethan Studies, 2), Chicago 1956.
Papajewski, H. “An Lucanus sit poeta”, DVLG 40 (1966), 485–508.
Partee, M.H. Plato and the Elizabethan Defense of Poetry, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas 1966. - DA 27 (1966), 459A - 460A.
Pigman, G.W. “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance”, RenQ 33 (1980), 1–32.
Plett, H.F. “Aesthetic Constituents in the Courtly Culture of Renaissance England”, NLH 14 (1982–1983), 597–621.
Potter, G.R. “A Protest against the Term ‘Conceit’”, PQ 20 (1941), 474–483.
Reichert, J.F. Formal Logic and English Renaissance Poetry, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1963.–DA 24 (1963), 1174–1175.
Rhodes, N. Elizabethan Grotesque, London/Boston/Henley 1980.
Ringler, W. “’Poeta nascitur non fit’: Some Notes on the History of an Aphorism”, JHI 2 (1941), 497–504.
Rötzer, H.G. Traditionalität und Modernität in der europäischen Literatur: Ein Überblick vom Attizismus-Asianismus-Streit bis zur “Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes, Darmstadt 1979, bes. Kap. VI.
Rossky, W. The Theory of Imagination in Elizabethan Literature: Psychology, Rhetoric, and Poetic, Ph.D. diss., New York University 1953.
Rossky, W. “Imagination in the English Renaissance: Psychology and Poetic”, SRen 5 (1958), 49–73.
ROstvig, M.-S. “Ars Aeterna: Renaissance Poetics and Theories of Divine Creation”, Mosaic 3 /2 (1970), 40–61.
Rotermund, E. “Der Affekt als literarischer Gegenstand: Zur Theorie und Darstellung der Passiones im 17. Jahrhundert”, in: H.R. Jauß (ed.), Die nicht mehr schönen Künste (Poetik und Hermeneutik, 3), München 1968, pp. 239–269.
Salman, Ph. “Instruction and Delight in Medieval and Renaissance Criticism”, RenQ 32 (1979), 303–332.
Saunders, J.W. “The Façade of Morality”, ELH 19 (1952), 81–114.
Schäfer, J. “’Twins by Birth’: Literaturtheoretische Aspekte elisabethanischer Rhetorik”, in: Ahrens/ Wolff (eds.), Englische und Amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 45–72.
Seeger, O. Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Antike und Moderne in England bis zum Tode Dr. Samuel John-sons, Diss. Leipzig 1927.
Sen, M.K. “English Poet-Critics and their Views on Poetic Communication”, VQ 21 (1955), 155–180.
Shawcross, J.T. “The Poet as Orator: One Phase of His Judicial Pose”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 5–36.
Sheidley, W.E. “The Autor penneth, wherof he hath no proofe’: The Early Elizabethan Dream Poem as a Defense of Poetic Fiction”, SP 81 (1984), 56–74.
Sloan, Th.O. “The Crossing of Rhetoric and Poetry in the English Renaissance”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 212–242.
Smith, A.J. “Theory and Practice in Renaissance Poetry: Two Kinds of Imitation”, BJRL 47 (1964), 212–243.
Smyth, M. The Ethical Conception of Literature in English Literary Theory, Ph.D. diss., University of Kansas 1941. - MA 3 (1941), 17.
Sowton, I. “Hidden Persuaders as a Means of Literary Grace: Sixteenth-Century Poetics and Rhetoric in England”, UTQ 32 (1962), 55–69.
Stackelberg, J.v. “Klarheit als Dichtungsideal”, in: F. Schalk (ed.), Ideen und Formen ( FS Friedrich ), Frankfurt 1965, pp. 257–273.
Tayler, E.W. Nature and Art in Renaissance Literature, New York 1964.
Thüme, H. Beiträge zur Geschichte des Geniebegriffs in England (Studien zur Englischen Philologie, 71), Halle 1927.
Vulliamoz, I. Zur Geschichte des Imitationsgedankens in England 1500–1750 ( Diss. Köln ), Zella-Mehlis 1930.
Waller, G.F. “Critical Puritanism and the Elizabethan Lyric Poets”, English 21 (1972), 83–88.
Wallerstein, R.C. “The Development of the Rhetoric and Metre of the Heroic Couplet, Especially in 1625–1645”, PMLA 50 (1935), 166–209.
White, H.O. Plagiarism and Imitation During the English Renaissance: A Study in Critical Distinctions (Harvard Studies in English, 12), Cambridge, Mass., 1935; repr. New York 1965.
Wilson, H.S. “Concepts of ‘Nature’ in the Rhetorical Tradition: A Chapter in the History of Classical Humanism before Ben Jonson”, Harvard University Summaries of Theses (1939), 255–257.
Wilson, H.S. “Some Meanings of ‘Nature’ in Renaissance Literary Theory”, JHI 2 (1941), 430–448.
Winter, H. “Zur Entwicklung des imitatio-Konzepts in der englischen Literaturtheorie des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts”, LiLi VIII/30–31 (1978), 35–47.
Wolff, E. “Einleitung: Funktionsgeschichtliche Aspekte der englischen Literaturtheorie (16.18. Jh.)”, in: Ahrens/Wolff (eds.), Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 11–44.
Woodfield, A.J. The Theory and Practice of Poetry among Puritans and Early Dissenters from Gosson to Watts, Ph.D. thesis, University of London 1961–1962.
Ziff, L. “The Literary Consequences of Puritanism”, ELH 30 (1963), 293–305.
Attridge, D. Well-Weighed Syllables: Elizabethan Verse in Classical Metres, Cambridge 1974.
Baroway, I. “Tremellius, Sidney, and Biblical Verse”, MLN 49 (1934), 145–149.
Baroway, I. “The Hebrew Hexameter: A Study in Renaissance Sources and Interpretation”, ELH 2 (1935), 66–91.
Baroway, I. “’The Lyre of David’: A Further Study in Renaissance Interpretation of Biblical Form”, ELH 8 (1941), 119–142.
Baroway, I. “The Accentual Theory of Hebrew Prosody: A Further Study in Renaissance Interpretation of Biblical Form”, ELH 17 (1950), 115–135.
Berry, E. “The Reading and Uses of Elizabethan Prosodies”, Lang and S 14 (1981), 116–142 (143–154).
Dunn, C.M. A Survey of the Experiments in Quantitative Verse in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles 1967. - DA 28 (1967), 193A.
Hendrickson, G.L. “Elizabethan Quantitative Hexameters”, PQ (1949), 237–260.
Ing, C. Elizabethan Lyrics: A Study in the Development of English Metres and Their Relation to Poetic Effect, London 1951; repr. 1968.
McKerrow, R.B. “The Use of Classical Metres in Elizabethan Verse”, MLQ (London) 4 (1901), 172–178; 5 (1902), 6–13, 148–149.
Omond, T.S. English Metrists: Being a Sketch of English Prosodical Criticism from Elizabethan Times to the Present Day, Oxford 1921; repr. New York 1968.
Spiegel, G.S. “Perfecting English Meter: Sixteenth-Century Criticism and Practice”, JEGP 79 (1980), 192–209.
Stack, R.C. From Sweetness to Strength: A Study of the Development of Metrical Style in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 616A.
Standop, E. “Zur Beurteilung der elisabethanischen Hexameter”, in: P.G. Buchloh/I. Leimberg/ H. Rauter (eds.), Studien zur englischen und amerikanischen Sprache und Literatur ( FS Papajewski ), Neumünster 1974, pp. 350–362.
Thompson, J. The Founding of English Metre, London 1961.
Weiner, S.J. Renaissance Prosodic Thought as a Branch of ‘Musica Speculativa’, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1981. - DAI 42 (1981), 1166A.
Willcock, G.D. “Passing Pitefull Hexameters: A Study of Quantity and Accent in English Renaissance Verse”, MLR 29 (1934), 1–19.
4. Rhetorik, Poetik und Ihre Nachbardisziplinen
Brown, J.L. The “Methodus ad Facilem Historiarum Cognitionem” of Jean Bodin: A Critical Study, Washington 1939; repr. New York 1969.
Campbell, L.B. Tudor Conceptions of History and Tragedy in “A Mirror for Magistrates (Nr. B. 327. 1 ).
Dean, L.F. Tudor Theories of History Writing (University of Michigan Contributions in Modern Philosophy, 1), Ann Arbor/London 1947.
Dean, L.F. “Bodin’s Methodus in England Before 1625”, SP 39 (1942), 160–166.
Dyck, J. “Philosoph, Historiker, Orator und Poet”, Arcadia 4 (1969), 1–15.
Ferguson, A.B. “Circumstances and the Sense of History in Tudor England: The Coming of the Historical Revolution”, Med Ren Ser 3 (1968), 170–205.
Fussner, F.S. The Historical Revolution: English Historical Writing and Thought, 1580–1640, London 1962.
Heitmann, K. “Das Verhältnis von Dichtung und Geschichtsschreibung in älterer Theorie”, AKG 52 (1970), 244–279.
Jenkins, O. The Art of History in Renaissance England: A Chapter in the History of Literary Criticism, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1954.–DA 15 (1955), 123–124.
Kinghorn, A.M. The Chorus of History: Literary-Historical Relations in Renaissance Britain 1485–1558, London 1971.
Landfester, R. Historia Magistra Vitae: Untersuchungen zur humanistischen Geschichtstheorie des 14. bis 16. Jahrhunderts, Genf 1972.
Langendorf, Sr. M.L. The Attitude Toward History in English Renaissance Courtesy Literature, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1948.
Levine, J.M. From Caxton to Camden: The Quest for Historical Truth in Sixteenth Century England, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1965. - DA 29 (1968), 200A - 201A.
Levy, F.J. Tudor Historical Thought, San Marino, Cal., 1967.
Reynolds, B. “Shifting Currents in Historical Criticism”, JHI 14 (1953), 471–492; repr. in: Kristeller/Wiener (eds.), Renaissance Essays (Nr. C. 108 ), pp. 115–136.
Struever, N.S. The Language of History in the Renaissance: Rhetoric and Historical Consciousness in Florentine Humanism, Princeton, N.J., 1970.
Trimble, W.R. “Early Tudor Historiography, 1485–1548”, JHI 11 (1950), 30–41.
Weisinger, H. “Ideas of History during the Renaissance”, JHI 6 (1945), 415–435; repr. in: Kristeller/Wiener (eds.), Renaissance Essays (Nr. C. 108 ), pp. 74–94.
Wright, L.B. “The Elizabethan Middle-Class Taste for History”, JMH 3 (1931), 175–197.
Barasch, M. Light and Color in the Italian Renaissance Theory of Art, New York 1978.
Baxandall, M. Giotto and the Orators: Humanist Observers of Painting in Italy and the Discovery of Pictorial Composition 1350–1450 ( Oxford-Warburg Studies ), Oxford 1971.
Bevilacqua, V.M. “Rhetoric and the Circle of Moral Studies: An Historiographic View”, QJS 55 (1969), 343–357.
Borinski, K. Die Antike in Poetik und Kunsttheorie (Nr. C.47).
Chambers, D. “’A Speaking Picture’: Some Ways of Proceeding in Literature and the Fine Arts in the Late-Sixteenth and Early-Seventeenth Centuries”, in: J.D. Hunt (ed.), Encounters: Essays on Literature and the Visual Arts, London 1971, pp. 28–57.
Chew, S.C. The Pilgrimage of Life, New Haven/London 1962; repr. Port Washington, N.Y., 1973.
Clements, R.J. Picta Poesis: Literary and Humanistic Theory in Renaissance Emblem Books (Temi e Testi, 6), Rom 1960.
Clements, R.J. The Peregrine Muse (University of North Carolina Studies in the Romance Languages and Literatures, 31), Chapel Hill, N.C., 1959; repr. 1969, Kap. I.
Clements, R.J. “The Cult of the Poet in Renaissance Emblem Literature”, PMLA 59 (1944), 672–685.
Clements, R.J. “Pen and Sword in Renaissance Emblem Literature”, MLQ 5 (1944), 131–141.
Clements, R.J. “Condemnation of the Poetic Profession in Renaissance Emblem Literature”, SP 43 (1946), 213–232.
Clements, R.J. “Princes and Literature: A Theme of Renaissance Emblem Books”, MLQ 16 (1955), 114–123.
Clements, R.J. “Literary Quarrels and Cavils: A Theme of Renaissance Emblem Books”, MLN 70 (1955), 549–558..
Clements, R.J. “Emblem Books on Literature’s Role in the Revival of Learning”, SP 54 (1957), 85–100.
Daly, P.M. “Trends and Problems in the Study of Emblematic Literature”, Mosaic 5 /4 (1972), 53–68.
Daly, P.M. Literature in the Light of the Emblem: Structural Parallels between Emblem and Literature in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, Toronto/Buffalo/ London 1979.
Daly, P.M. (ed.). The European Emblem, Waterloo, Ont., 1980.
Daly, P.M. “Zur Inventarisierung der Emblematik”, JIG 15 (1983), 100–120.
Daniells, R. “The Mannerist Element in English Literature”, UTQ 36 (1966), 1–11.
Doebler, J. “Bibliography for the Study of Iconography in English Renaissance Literature”, RORD 22 (1976), 45–55.
Dolders, A. Ut Pictura Poesis: A Selective Annotated Bibliography of Books and Articles, Published between 1900 and 1980, on the Interrelation of Literature and Painting from 1400 to 1800“, YCGL 32 (1983), 105–124.
Farmer, N.K. Poets and the Visual Arts in Renaissance England, Austin, Tex., 1984.
Fehl, Ph.P. “Poetry and the Entry of the Fine Arts into England: ut pictura poesis, in: C.A. Patrides/ R.B. Waddington (eds.), The Age of Milton: Backgrounds to Seventeenth-Century Literature, Manchester/ Totowa, N.J., 1980, pp. 273–306.
Frankel, H.H. “Poetry and Painting: Chinese and Western Views Of Their Convertibility”, CL 9 (1957), 289–307.
Freeman, R. English Emblem Books, London 1948; repr. 1970.
Gent, L. Picture and Poetry 1560–1620: Relations between Literature and the Visual Arts in the English Renaissance, Leamington Spa 1981.
Gombrich, E.H. Icones Symbolicae: The Visual Image in Neo-Platonic Thought“, JWCI 11 (1948), 163–192; repr. als Icones Symbolicae: Philosophies of Symbolism and their Bearing on Art”, in: Gombrich, Symbolic Images: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance, London 1972, pp. 123–195 (228–235) [erweitert].
Gordon, D.J. The Renaissance Imagination: Essays and Lectures, ed. St. Orgel, Berkeley/Los Angeles/ London 1975.
Graham, J. “’Ut pictura poesis’: A Bibliography”, BB 29 (1972), 13–15, 18.
Hagstrum, J.H. The Sister Arts: The Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray, Chicago 1958; repr. 1974.
Hazard, M.E. “The Anatomy of ‘Liveliness’” (Nr. C.465).
Höltgen, K.J. “Some Aspects of the Reception of Italian Art Theory in Elizabethan and Jacobean Art and Literature”, in: J.X. Evans/P. Horwath (eds.), Adjoining Cultures as Reflected in Literature and Language (Proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the FILLM, 1981), Arizona State University 1983, pp. 257–258.
Höltgen, K.J. “The Reformation of Images and Some Jacobean Writers on Art”, in: U. Broich et al. (eds.), Functions of Literature ( FS Wolff ), Tübingen 1984, pp. 119–146.
Howard, W.G. “Ut Picture Poesis”, PMLA 24 (1909), 40–123.
Jensen, H.J. The Muses’ Concord (Nr. C.640).
Kirby, G.R. A Consideration of the Early English Aesthetic: A Study of Renaissance Art Treatises, 1563–1660, Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 2895A.
Kristeller, P.O. “The Modern System of-the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics”, JHI 12 (1951), 496–527, 13 (1952), 17–46; repr. in: Kristeller, Renaissance Thought II (Nr. C. 72 ), pp. 163–227.
LeCoat, G. The Rhetoric of the Arts, 1550–1650 (European University Papers, 18/3), Bern/Frankfurt 1975.
Lee, P.W. Ut Picture Poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting“, AB 22 (1940), 197–269; repr. New York 1967.
Leisher, J.F. “George Puttenham and Emblemata (Nr. B. 289. 9 ).
Leslie, M. “The Dialogue Between Bodies and Souls: Pictures and Poesy in the English Renaissance”, W and I 1 /1 (1985), 16–30.
Nugel, B. “Architekturmetaphern und Gesamtplankonzeption in der englischen Literaturkritik des 17. Jahrhunderts”. LiLi VIII/30–31 (1978), 48–70.
Nugel, B. ’The Just Design’: Studien zu architektonischen Vorstellungsweisen in der neoklassischen •Literaturtheorie am Beispiel Englands (Komparatistische Studien, 11), Berlin 1980.–EASG 1980, 62–65.
Nugel, B. “Zur Konstituierung des Strukturbegriffs in der englischen Literaturtheorie des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts”, in: Nugel (ed.), Englische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C. 111 ), pp. 421–441.
Orgel, St. “The Poetics of Spectacle”, NLH 2 (1971), 367–389.
Osborne, M.T. Advice-to-a-Painter Poems, 1633–1856: An Annotated Finding-List, Austin, Tex., 1949.
Panofsky, E. Idea: Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsgeschichte der älteren Kunsttheorie (Studien der Bibliothek Warburg, 5), Leipzig 1924; Berlin 41982; engl. Obers.: Idea: A Concept in Art Theory, übers. J.S. Peake, Columbia 1968.
Phillips, J. The Reformation of Images: Destruction of Art in England, 1535–1660, Berkeley 1973.
Praz, M. Studies in Seventeenth Century Imagery (Studies of the Warburg Institute, 3–4), 2 vol., London 1939; Rom 21964.
Praz, M. Mnemosyne: The Parallel Between Literature and the Visual Arts, Princeton, N.J., 1970.
Salerno, L. “Seventeenth-Century English Literature on Painting”, JWCI 14 (1951), 234–258.
Spencer, J.R. ’Ut Rhetorica Pictura: A Study of Quattrocento Theory of Painting“, JWCI 20 (1957), 26–44.
Spencer, T.J.B. “The Imperfect Parallel Betwixt Painting and Poetry”, G and R 29 (1960), 173–186.
Sulzer, D. “Zu einer Geschichte der Emblemtheorien”, Euphorion 64 (1970), 23–50.
Sypher, W. Four Stages of Renaissance Style: Transformations in Art and Literature 1400–1700, Garden City, N.Y., 1955.
Trimpi, W. “The Meaning of Horace’s ‘Ut pictura poesis’”, JWCI 36 (1973), 1–34.
Volkmann, L. Bilderschriften der Renaissance: Hieroglyphik und Emblematik in ihren Beziehungen und Fortwirkungen, Leipzig 1923; repr. Stuttgart 1969.
Wittkower, R. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism, London 1949; repr. 1977.
Ammann, P.J. “The Musical Theory and Philosophy of Robert Fludd”, JWCI 30 (1967), 198–227.
Betts, J.C. The Marriage of Music and Rhetoric: A Study of the Use of Classical Rhetoric as a Rationale for Musical Innovation During the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 2315A - 2316A.
Blume, F. Renaissance and Baroque Music, übers. M.D. Herter Norton, New York 1967.
Boyd, M.C. Elizabethan Music and Musical Criticism, Philadelphia 1940; repr. Westport, Conn., 1973.
Brandes, H. Studien.zur musikalischen Figurenlehre im 16. Jahrhundert, Diss. Berlin 1935.
Braun, W. Der Stilwandel in der Musik um 1600 (Erträge der Forschung, 180), Darmstadt 1982.
Buelow, G.J. “Music, Rhetoric, and the Concept of the Affections: A Selective Bibliography”, Notes: The Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association 30 (1973), 250–259.
Buelow, G.J. “Rhetoric and Music”, in: The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. St. Sadie, London 1980, vol. XV, pp. 793–803.
Butler, G.G. “Fugue and Rhetoric”, JMUT 21 /1 (1977), 49–109.
Butler, G.G. “Music and Rhetoric in Early Seventeenth-Century English Sources”, MQ 66 (1980), 53–64.
Dammann, R. Der Musikbegriff im deutschen Barock, Köln 1967; repr. Laaber 1984.
Fellerer, K. “Zur Erforschung der antiken Musik im 16.-18. Jahrhundert”, JbMP (für 1935 ) 42 (1936), 84–95.
Finney, G.L. Musical Backgrounds for English Literature: 1580–1650, New Brunswick, N.J., 1963; Westport 1976.
Gurlitt, W. “Musik und Rhetorik. Hinweise auf ihre geschichtliche Grundlageneinheit”, Helicon 5 (1944), 67–86; repr. in: Gurlitt, Musikgeschichte und Gegenwart, ed. H.H. Eggebrecht, 2 vol., Wiesbaden 1966, vol. I, pp. 62–81.
Heninger, S.K. Touches of Sweet Harmony: Pythagorean Cosmology and Renaissance Poetics, San Marino, Cal., 1974.
Hollander, J. The Untuning bf the Sky: Ideas of Music in English Poetry, 1500–1700, Princeton, N.J., 1961; repr. New York 1970.
Hutton, J. “Some English Poems in Praise of Music”, EM 2 (1951), 1–63; repr. in: Hutton, Essays on Renaissance Poetry, ed. R. Guerlac, Ithaca, N.Y./ London 1980, pp. 17–73.
Jensen, H.J. The Muses’ Concord: Literature, Music, and the Visual Arts in the Baroque Age, Bloomington, Ind./London 1976.
Joiner, M.E. Music and Rhetoric in English Drama of the Later Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1967–1968.
Jorgens, E.B. The Well-Tun’d Word: Musical Interpretations of English Poetry: 1597–1651, Minneapolis, Minn., 1982, bes. Kap. 6: “Pathetic Airs” (pp.214251 [277–280]).
Kerman, J. “The Elizabethan Motet: A Study of Texts for Music”, SRen 9 (1962), 273–308.
Kretzschmar, H. “Allgemeines und Besonderes zur Affektenlehre. I.II.”, JbMP (für 1911) 18 (1912), 63–77; (für 1912 ) 19 (1913), 65–78.
Kristeller, P.O. “The Modern System of the Arts” (Nr. C.601).
Le Huray, P. Music and the Reformation in England, 1549–1660, New York 1967.
Maniates, M.R. “Maniera: The Central Issue in 16th-Century Musical Controversy”, CAUSM Journal 7 (1977), 1–30.
Maniates, M.R. Mannerism in Italian Music and Culture, 1530–1630, Manchester 1979.
Milner, R.H. “The Study of Elizabethan Music”, EA 6 (1953), 214–225.
Palisca, C.V. Ut Oratoria Musica: The Rhetorical Basis of Musical Mannerism“, in: F.W. Robinson/ S.G. Nichols (eds.), The Meaning of Mannerism, Hanover, N.H., 1972, pp. 37–65.
Pattìson, B. Music and Poetry of the English Renaissance, London 1948, 2 1970.
Plett, H.F. “POETA MUSICUS-Musikästhetische Konzepte in der elisabethanischen Literaturtheorie”, in: Rüegg/Schmitt (eds.), Musik in Humanismus und Renaissance (Nr. C. 655 ), pp. 55–75.
Pratt, W.S. The Music of the French Psalter of 1562: A Historical Survey and Analysis, New York 1939.
Rubio, H.E. Der Manierismus in der Vokalpolyphonie des 16. Jahrhunderts (Frankfurter Beiträge zur Musikwissenschaft, 5), Tutzing 1982.
Rüegg, W./A. Schmitt (eds.). Musik in Humanismus und Renaissance ( DFG: Mitteilung VII der Kommission für Humanismusforschung ), Weinheim 1983.
Schäfke, R. Geschichte der Musikästhetik in Umrissen, mit einem Vorwort von W. Korte, Tutzing 21964.
Schering, A. “Die Lehre von den musikalischen Figuren im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert”, KJb 21 (1908), 106–114.
Schering, A. “Geschichtliches zur ‘ars inveniendi’ in der Musik”, JbMP (1925), 25–34.
Schmitz, A. “Figuren, musikalisch-rhetorische”, in: Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, vol. IV, Kassel/ Basel 1955, pp. 176–183.
Scholes, P.A. The Puritans and Music in England and New England: A Contribution to the Cultural History of Two Nations, Oxford 1934; repr. New York 1962.
Stevens, J. Music and Poetry in the Early Tudor Court, London 1961.
Stoll, A.D. Figur und Affekt: Zur höfischen Musik und zur bürgerlichen Musiktheorie der Epoche Richelieu (Frankfurter Beiträge zur Musikwissenschaft, 4), Tutzing 1977; repr. 1981.
Strunk, O. (ed.). Source Readings in Music History, New York 1950.
Unger, H.-H. Die Beziehungen zwischen Musik und Rhetorik im 16.-18. Jahrhundert (Musik und Geistesgeschichte: Berliner Studien zur Musikwissenschaft, 4), Würzburg 1941; repr. Hildesheim 1969.
Vickers, B. “Figures of Rhetoric/Figures of Music?”, Rhetorica 2 /1 (1984), 1–44.
Walker, D.P. “Musical Humanism in the 16th and Early 17th Centuries”, MR 2 (1941), 1–13, 111–121, 220–227, 288–308; 3 (1942), 55–71; dte. Obers.: Der musikalische Humanismus im 16. und frühen 17. Jahrhundert (Musikwissenschaftliche Arbeiten, 5), Kassel/Basel 1949.
Walker, D.P. Studies in Musical Science in the Late Renaissance (Studies of the Warburg Institute, 37), London/Leiden 1978.
Yates, F.A. The French Academies in the Sixteenth Century, London 1947.
Zoltai, D. Ethos und Affekt: Geschichte der philosophischen Musikästhetik von den Anfängen bis zu Hegel, Berlin (Ost)/Budapest 1970.
Baldwin, Th.W. William Shakspere’s ‘Small Latine and Lesse Greeke’, 2 vol., Urbana, Ill., 1944; repr. 1956.
Barker, E. “The Education of the English Gentleman in the Sixteenth Century”, in: Traditions of Civility, Cambridge 1948, pp. 124–158.
Burton, K.M. “Cambridge Exercises in the Seventeenth Century”, The Eagle 54 (1951), 248–258.
Buys, W.E. Speech Education of the English Gentleman in Tudor Behavior Books, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin Graduate School 1952.
Charlton, K. Education in Renaissance England, Toronto/ London 1965.
Clarke, M.L. Classical Education in Britain, 1500–1900, Cambridge 1959.
Costello, M.T. The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-Century Cambridge, Cambridge, Mass.,/ London 1958.
Cressy, D. Education in Tudor and Stuart England, London 1975.
Cressy, D. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England, Cambridge 1980.
Curtis, M.H. Oxford and Cambridge in Transition, 1558–1642, Oxford 1959.
Freedman, R.L. Rhetoric in the English Educational System, 1520–1550, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1980. - DAI 41 (1980), 1835A.
Jardine, L. “The Place of Dialectic Teaching in Sixteenth-Century Cambridge”, SRen 21 (1974), 31–62.
MacKinnon, M.H.M. “School Books Used at Eton College about 1600”, JEGP 56 (1957), 429–433.
Miller, W.E. “Double Translation in English Humanistic Education”, SRen 10 (1963), 163–174.
Mulder, J.R. The Temple of the Mind: Education and Literary Taste in Seventeenth-Century England ( Pegasus Backgrounds in English Literature ), New York 1969.
Nelson, W. “The Teaching of English in Tudor Grammar Schools”, SP 49 (1952), 119–143.
Ong, W.J. “Latin Language Study as a Renaissance Puberty Rite”, SP 56 (1959), 103–124; repr. in: Ong, Rhetoric, Romance, and Technology (Nr. C. 112 ), pp. 113–141.
Parks, G.B. “The First Italianate Englishmen”, SRen 8 (1961), 197–216.
Rice, G.P. “Early Stuart Rhetorical Education”, QJS 29 (1943), 433–437.
Simon, J. Education and Society in Tudor England, New York 1966; repr. 1979.
Smith, B. “Extracurricular Disputations: 1400–1650”, QJS 34 (1948), 473–476.
Vincent, W.A.L. The State and School-Education in England and Wales 1640–1660, London 1950.
Wallace, K.R. “Rhetorical Exercises in Tudor Education”, QJS 22 (1936), 28–51.
Watson, F. “The Curriculum and Text-Books of English Schools in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century”, TBS (für 1900–1902) 6 /2 (1903), 159–267.
Watson, F. The English Grammar Schools to 1660: Their Curriculum and Practice, Cambridge 1908; repr. Clifton, N.J., 1973.
Woodward, W.H. Studies in Education during the Age of the Renaissance 1400–1600, Cambridge 1906; repr. 1924.
Ahrens, R. “Literaturtheorie und Aristokratie in der Tudor-zeit. Ein Beitrag zur Funktion des Mäzens im England des 16. Jahrhunderts”, Anglia 99 (1981), 279311.
Ahrens, R. “Literaturtheorie in ihrem Verhältnis zum Mäzenatentum der Tudorzeit”, in: A. Buck et al. (eds.), Europäische Hofkultur im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, 3 vol., Hamburg 1981, vol. II, pp. 171–178.
Auberlen, E. The Commonwealth of Wit: The Writer’s Image and His Strategies of Self-Representation in Elizabethan Literature (Studies and Texts in English, 5), Tübingen 1984.
Bauman, R. “Aspects of 17th Century Quaker Rhetoric”, QJS 56 (1970), 67–74.
Bland, D.S. “Rhetoric and the Law Student in Sixteenth-Century England”, SP 54 (1957), 498–508.
Caspari, F. Humanism and the Social Order in Tudor England, Chicago 1954; repr. New York 1968.
Clark, S. The Elizabethan Pamphleteers: Popular Moralistic Pamphlets 1580–1640, London 1983, bes. Kap. 5.
Crowell, L. “Three Plain Speakers in Stuart England”, QJS 53 (1967), 272–278.
Dietz, H. “Der Einfluß der antiken Literatur auf die forensische Rhetorik Englands um 1600”, Archiv 177 (1941), 21–27.
Horsten, J.A.van. Poets, Patrons, and Professors (Nr.B.292.21).
Horsten, J.A.van. “Literary Patronage in Elizabethan England: The Early Phase”, in: Lytle/Orgel (eds.), Patronage in the Renaissance (Nr. C. 719 ), pp. 191–206.
Gair, R.W. Literary Societies in England from Parker to Falkland, c. 1572–1640, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1968–1969.
Gauger, H. Die Kunst der politischen Rede in England, Tübingen 1952.
Haller, W. The Rise of Puritanism, New York 1938; repr. Philadelphia, Pa., 1972.
Helgerson, R. “The Elizabethan Laureate: Self-Presentation and the Literary System”, ELH 46 (1979), 193–220.
Hill, Ch. Puritanism and Revolution, London 1958.
Hill, Ch. Society and Puritanism in Pre-Revolutionary England, New York 1964; repr. 1967.
Houghton, W.E. “The English Virtuoso in the Seventeenth Century”, JHI 3 (1942), 51–73, 190–219.
Javitch, D. “The Impure Motives of Elizabethan Poetry”, Genre 15 (1982), 225–238.
Jungmann, E. Die politische Rhetorik in der englischen Renaissance (Britannica et Americana, 5), Hamburg 1960 [pp. 49–142].
Kelso, R. “Sixteenth Century Definitions of the Gentleman in England”, JEGP 24 (1925), 370–382.
Kelso, R. The Doctrine of the English Gentleman in the Sixteenth Century. With a Bibliographical List of Treatises on the Gentleman and Related Subjects Published in Europe to 1625, Urbana, Ill., 1929; repr. Gloucester, Mass., 1964.
Kelso, R. Doctrine for the Lady of the Renaissance, Urbana, Ill., 1956.
Luck, G. Vir facetus: A Renaissance Ideal“, SP 55 (1958), 107–121.
Lytle, G.F./St. Orgel (eds.). Patronage in the Renaissance, Princeton, N.J., 1981.
Meissner, P. England im Zeitalter von Humanismus, Renaissance und Reformation, ed. H. Kauter, Heidelberg 1952.
Parry, G. The Golden Age Restor’d: The Culture of the Stuart Court, 1603–42, Manchester 1981.
Petelle, J.L. Speech and the English Gentleman in the Seventeenth Century, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1962.–DA 24 (1963), 1290–1291.
Pineas, R. “Polemical exemplum in Sixteenth-Century Religious Controversy” (Nr. C.273).
Rice, G.P. “The ‘Special Topic’, EILH, in Late Tudor and Early Stuart Public Discussion”, QJS 32 (1946), 21–25.
Rice, G.P. “The Classics and the Bible in English Public Address, 1550–1650”, CW 42 (1949), 134–139.
Schirmer, W.F. Antike, Renaissance und Puritanismus: Eine Studie zur englischen Literaturgeschichte des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts, München 1924.
Schoeck, R.J. “Rhetoric and Law in Sixteenth-Century England”, SP 50 (1953), 110–127.
Schoeck, R.J. “The Libraries of Common Lawyers in Renaissance England: Some Notes and a Provisional List”, Manuscripta 6 (1962), 155–167.
Schoeck, R.J. “Lawyers and Rhetoric in Sixteenth-Century England”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 274–291.
Sheavyn, Ph. The Literary Profession in the Elizabethan Age, Manchester 1909; rev. J.W. Saunders, Manchester 1967.
Short, R.W. The Patronage of Poetry under James I, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1936.
Smuts, M. “The Political Failure of Stuart Cultural Patronage”, in: Lytle/Orgel (eds.), Patronage in the Renaissance (Nr. C. 719 ), pp. 165–187.
Stafford, J. “The Social Status of Renaissance Literary Critics”, SE 25 (1945–1946), 72–97.
Thompson, P. “The Patronage of Letters Under Elizabeth and James I”, English 7 (1949), 278–282.
Vickers, B. “’The Power of Persuasion’: Images of the Orator, Elyot to Shakespeare”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 411–435.
Whigham, F.F. ’Fayned Showes and Forgerie’: Courtesy and Political Suasion in English Renaissance Literature, Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego 1976. - DAI 37 (1977), 4380A.
White, E.E. Puritan Rhetoric (Nr. C.145).
Wilson, J.F. Pulpit in Parliament (Nr. C.146).
Woesler, R. Die ständische Schichtung des Schriftstellertums in der englischen Renaissance (Diss. Berlin 1936), Düsseldorf 1936.
Wright, L.B. “Language Helps for the Elizabethan Tradesman”, JEGP 30 (1931), 335–347.
Wright, L.B. “Handbook Learning of the Renaissance Middle Class”, SP 28 (1931), 58–86.
Wright, L.B. “The Reading of Renaissance English Women”, SP 28 (1931), 671–688.
Wright, L.B. Middle-Class Culture in Elizabethan England, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1935; repr. Ithaca, N.Y., 1958.
Rhetorik/Poetik und Einzelne Autoren
Burke, R.R. The Figures of Language in the Sermons of Lancelot Andrewes, Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto 1971. - DAI 33 (1972), 719A.
Chambers, D.D.C. Lancelot Andrewes and the Topical Structure of Thought, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1969. - DA 30 (1969), 314A.
Johnson, M.A.C. Homiletic Theory and Practice (Nr. C. 759. 19 ).
Reidy, M.F. Bishop Lancelot Andrewes, Jacobean Court Preacher, Chicago 1955.
Webber, J. “Celebration of Word and World in Lancelot Andrewes’ Style”, JEGP 64 (1965), 255–269; repr. in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 336–352.
Dees, J.S. “Recent Studies in Ascham”, ELR 10 (1980), 300–310.
Fleischauer, J.F. A Plaine and Sensible Utterance: The Prose Style of Roger Ascham, Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 3501A - 3502A.
Greene, Th.M. “Roger Ascham: The Perfect End of Shooting”, ELH 36 (1969), 609–625.
Rice, J.E. Decorum in the Prose Style of Roger Ascham, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1974. - DAI 34 (1974), 7778A.
Ryan, L.V. Roger Ascham, Stanford 1963, London 1967.
Salamon, L.B. “The Imagery of Roger Ascham”, TSLL 15 /1 (1973), 5–23.
Strozier, R.M. “Theory and Structure in Roger Ascham’s The Schoolmaster, NM 74 (1973), 144–162.
Vos, A. “The Formation of Roger Ascham’s Prose Style”, SP 71 (1974), 344–370.
Vos, A. “Form and Function in Roger Ascham’s Prose”, PQ 55 (1976), 305–322.
Wilson, K.J. “Ascham’s Toxophilus and the Rules of Art”, RenQ 29 (1976), 30–51.
Ahrens, R. Die Essays von Francis Bacon: Literarische Form und moralistische Aussage (Anglistische Forschungen, 105), Heidelberg 1974.–EASG 1974, 72–73.
Berry, E.I. History and Rhetoric: Francis Bacon’s “History of Henry VII” and Its Relation to the Humanistic and ‘Politic’ Traditions, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1969.–DAI 31 (1970), 1749A–1750A.–Teilpublikation in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 281–308.
Bowman, Sr. M.A. The English Prose Style of Sir Francis Bacon, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1964.–DA 24 (1964), 4674–4675.
Burke, Ph.B. “Rhetorical Considerations of Bacon’s ‘Style’”, CCC 18 (1967.), 23–30.
Crane, R.S. “The Relation of Bacon’s Essays to His Program for the Advancement of Learning”, Schelling Anniversary Papers, New York 1923, pp. 87–105; repr. in: Vickers (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. B.197. 21 ), pp. 272–292.
Hannah, R. “Francis Bacon, the Political Orator. With a Short Study of His Rhetorical Theory and Practice”, in: Drummond (ed.), Studies in Rhetoric and Public Speaking (Nr. C. 105 ), pp. 91–132.
Jardine, L. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse (Nr. B. 197. 10 ).
Knights, L.C. “Bacon and the Seventeenth-Century Dissociation of Sensibility”, Scrutiny 11 (1943), 268–285; repr. in: Knights, Explorations, London 1964 (11946), pp. 101–119.
Mandeville, Sr. Sch. The Rhetorical Tradition of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.169).
Martin-Trigona, H.V. logical Proof and Imaginative Reason in Selected Speeches of Francis Bacon, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 694A.
McMahon, A.Ph. “Francis Bacon’s Essay Of Beauty, PMLA 60 (1945), 716–759.
Rossi, P. Francesco Bacone (Nr. B. 197. 16 ).
Vickers, B. Francis Bacon and Renaissance Prose, Cambridge 1968.
Vickers, B. (ed.). Essential Articles (Nr. B. 197. 21 ).
Wallace, K.R. “Discussion in Parliament and Francis Bacon”,QJS 43 (1957), 12–21; repr. in: Vickers (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. B.197. 21 ), pp. 195–210.
Wallace, K.R. “Chief Guides for the Study of Bacon’s Speeches”, SLitI 4 (1971), 173–188.
Warhaft, S. “The Anomaly of Bacon’s Allegorizing”, PMASAL 43 (1957), 327–333.
Landau, E. Wortspiele bei Beaumont und Fletcher, Diss. Wien 1960.
Taylor, A. “Proverbial Comparisons: in the Plays of Beaumont and Fletcher”, JAF 70 (1957), 25–36.
Allen, W.S. The Influence of Greek Rhetorical Structure on the English of the Authorized Version of the New Testament, Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University 1963. - DA 24 (1963), 2010.
Dodds, W.E. “The Rhetorical Style of the Collects in the Book of Common Prayer”, QJS 28 (1942), 407–414.
Robertz, W.G. Illustrations from the English Bible in Selected English Rhetorics, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1960. - DA 21 (1961), 3559.
Bischoff, D. Sir Thomas Browne (1605–1682) als Stilkünstler, Heidelberg 1943.
Corder, J.W. “Rhetoric and Meaning in Religio Laici, PMLA 82 (1967), 245–249; repr. in: Corbett (ed.), Rhetorical Analyses (Nr. C. 103 ), pp. 73–85.
Demaray, H.D. ’Disorderly Order’ in the Garden Literature of Browne, Marvell, and Milton, Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California 1968. - DAI 29 (1968), 256A - 257A.
Diyanni, R.J. The Prose Style of Sir Thomas Browne, Ph.D. diss., City University of New York 1976. - DAI 37 (1977), 5138A - 5139A.
Mandeville, Sr. Sch. The Rhetorical Tradition of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.169).
Miller, E. “The Browne Doublet: Religio Medici in the History of English Prose Style”, BRH 80 (1979), 213–221.
Moloney, M.F. “Metre and ‘Cursus’ in Sir Thomas Browne’s Prose”, JEGP 58 (1959), 60–67.
Morgan, E. “’Strong Lines’ and Strong Minds: Reflections on the Prose of Browne and Jonson”, CJ 4 (1951), 481–491.
Parker, E.L. “The Cursus in Sir Thomas Browne”, PMLA 53 (1938), 1037–1053.
Rao, J.S. “Sir Thomas Browne’s Prose Style: A Stylistic Analysis of Urne Buriall, in: G.V.L.N. Sarma (ed.), Essays and Studies ( FS Viswanatham ), Machìlipatnam 1977, pp. 54–60.
Stevens, C.D. ’Theater of the Self’: ‘Persona’ and the Rhetoric of Character in the Prose of Sir Thomas Browne, Ph.D. diss., Bowling Green State University 1978. - DAI 39 (1979), 4288A.
Tempest, N.R. “Rhythm in the Prose of Sir Thomas Browne”, RES 3 (1927), 308–318.
Warren, A. “The Style of Sir Thomas Browne”, KR 13 (1951), 674–687; repr. in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 413–423.
Whallon, W. “Hebraic Synonymy in Sir Thomas Browne”, ELH 28 (1961), 335–352.
Bryan, R.T. Robert Burton’s “Anatomy of Melancholy”: A Study of the Style, Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado 1967. - DA 29 (1968), 561A.
Höltgen, K.J. “Robert Burtons Anatomy of Melancholy: Struktur und Gattungsproblematik im Licht der ramistischen Logik”, Anglia 94 (1976), 388–403.
Hurt, E.L. The Prose Style of Robert Burton: The Fruits of Knowledge, Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon 1964. - DA 25 (1965), 5908.
Renaker, D. “Robert Burton and Ramist Method”, RenQ 24 (1971), 210–220.
Renaker, D. “Robert Burton’s Tricks of Memory”, PMLA 87 (1972), 391–396.
Thompson, R.G. The Wisdom of the Commonplace in Burton’s “Anatomy”: A Study of Its Rhetorical Intentions, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1971. - DAI 32 (1972), 6396A.
Jahn, J.D. “Chapman’s enargia and the Popular Perspective on Ovids Banquet of Sence, TSL 23 (1978), 15–30.
Sackton, A. “The Rhetoric of Literary Praise in the Poetry of Raleigh and Chapman”, TSLL 18 (1976), 409–421.
Schoell, F.L. “G. Chapman’s ‘Commonplace Book’” (Nr. C.178).
Schoell, F.L. “George Chapman et les Adages d’Erasmus”, BRLC 29 (1926), 43–61; auch in: f.L. Schoell, Études sur l’Humanisme Continental A la Fin de la Renaissance, Paris 1926, pp. 43–61.
Schonlau, Sr. M.G. A Study of the Language of Eloquence and the Principles of Decorum, Verisimilitude, and Imitation in the Plays of George Chapman, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1958.–DA 19 (1959), 2940–2941.
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language of the Tragedies of Shakespeare’s Chief Seventeenth-Century Contemporaries, George Chapman, Thomas Heywood, Ben Jonson, John Marston, John Webster, Cyril Tourneur, Thomas Middleton, Memphis 1977; repr. New York 1982.
Atwood, N.R. The Influence of Ancient, Medieval, and Early Renaissance Stylistic Theory and Practice Concerning Prose upon the Style of “The Hurt of Sedition” (1549) by Sir John Cheke, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1965. - DA 29 (1968), 252A.
Suerbaum, U. Die Lyrik der Korrespondenzen: Cowleys Bildkunst und die Tradition der englischen Renaissancedichtung, Bochum 1958.
McCanles, M. “The Rhetoric of the Sublime in Crashaw’s Poetry”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 189–211.
Raspa, A.N. Crashaw and the Jesuit Poetic, Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto 1968. - DAI 29 (1969), 2225A - 2226A.
Schwenger, P. “Crashaw’s Perspectivist Metaphor”, CL 28 (1976), 65–74.
Wallerstein, R.C. Richard Crashaw: A Study in Style and Poetic Development, Madison, Wis., 1959.
Marcham, F.G. “Oliver Cromwell, Orator”, in: Bryant (ed.), The Rhetorical Idiom (Nr. C. 100 ), pp. 179–200.
Ferguson, A.B. “The Historical Thought of Samuel Daniel: A Study in Renaissance Ambivalence”, JHI 32 (1971), 185–202.
Johnson, M.M. The Well-Rimed Daniel (Nr. B. 280. 2 ).
Kau, J.L.Ch. “Samuel Daniel and the Renaissance ‘Impresa’-Makers: Sources for the English Collection of ‘Imprese’”, HLB 18 (1970), 183–204.
Kau, J.L.Ch. “Daniel’s Delia and the Imprese of Bishop Paolo Giovo: Some Iconological Influences”, JWCI 33 (1970), 325–328.
LaBranche, A. “Samuel Daniel: A Voice of Thoughtfulness”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 123–139.
Seronsy, C.C. “Well-Languaged Daniel: A Reconsideration”, MLR 52 (1957), 481–497.
Svensson, L.-H. Silent Art: Rhetorical and Thematic Patterns in Samuel Daniel’s “Delia, Lund 1980.
Blow, S.K. A Study of Rhetoric in Plays of Thomas Dekker (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Jacobean Drama Studies, 3), Salzburg 1972.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Beale, W.H. “On Rhetoric and Poetry: John Donne’s The Prohibition Revisited”, QJS 62 (1976), 376–386. - Replik: Th.O. Sloane, “On Prohibition and Repeal”, ibid., 387–388.
Bivens, W.P. Donne’s “Elegies” and “Letters to Severall Personages”: An Analysis of Rhetorical Method, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara 1970. - DAI 32 (1971), 2051A.
Boston, R. Stages in Growth of Donne’s Prose Art in the Sermons, Ph.D. diss., University of Washington 1969. - DAI 31 (1970), 727A.
Broich, U. “Form und Bedeutung der Paradoxie im Werk John Donnes”, GRM 48 (1967), 231–248.
Bryan, R.A. “John Donne’s Poems in Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Books”, ES 43 (1962), 170–174.
Bunton, N.D. A Rhetorical Analysis of Representative Sermons of John Donne, Ph.D. diss., State University of Iowa 1954. - DA 14 (1954), 1841A - 1842A.
Cameron, A.B. The Verse Epistles of John Donne: A Study of Rhetorical Conventions, Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey 1973. - DAI 34 (1973), 268A.
Carrithers, G.H. John Donne Preaching: Rhetorical Art at Lincoln’s Inn, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1960.
Chamberlin, J.S. Increase and Multiply: Arts-of -Discourse Procedure in the Preaching of Donne, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1976.
Colie, R.L. “The Rhetoric of Transcendence”, Eg 43 (1964), 145–170; repr. in: Roberts (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. C.759.43), pp. 199219 (503–506).
Cummings, A.J. The Rhetoric of John Donne’s “Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University 1971. - DAI 32 (1971), 3462A.
Empson, W. “Donne and the Rhetorical Tradition”, KR 11 (1949), 571–587; repr. in: Alpers (ed.), Elizabethan Poetry (Nr. C. 98 ), pp. 63–77.
Gindìn, J.J. Renaissance and Modern Theories of Irony: Their Application to Donne’s “Songs and Sonnets, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1954.–DA 14 (1954), 2066–2067.
Hester, M.Th. “’Zeal’ as Satire: The Decorum of Donne’s Satyres, Genre 10 (1977), 173–194.
Hickey, R.L. “Donne’s Art of Preaching”, TSL 1 (1956), 65–74.
Hickey, R.L. “Donne’s Art of Memory”, TSL 3 (1958), 29–36.
Hickey, R.L. “Donne’s Delivery”, TSL 9 (1964), 39–48.
Hill, D.A. The ‘Modus Praedicandi’ of John Donne: A Rhetorical Analysis of Selected Sermons of John Donne with Regard Specifically to the Theory of Preaching which He Put into Practice, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1962. - DA 23 (1963), 3026.
Johnson, M.A.C. Homiletic Theory and Practice in the Sermons of John Donne and Lancelot Andrewes, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 6555A.
Korte, A.M. “John Donne’s Satyres and a Matter of Rhetoric”, HAB 20 /3 (1969), 78–81.
Laan, Th.F. van. “John Donne’s Devotions and the Jesuit Spiritual Exercises”, SP 60 (1963), 191–202.
LaBranche, A. “’Blanda Elegeia’: The Background to Donne’s Elegies, MLR 61 (1966), 357–368.
Lederer, J. “John Donne and the Emblematic Practice”, RES 22 (1946), 182–200.
Lewalski, B.K. “Donne’s Poetry of Compliment: The Speaker’s Stance and the Topoi of Praise”, in: E. Miner (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Imagery: Essays on Uses of Figurative Language from Donne to Farquhar, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1971, pp. 45–67.
Lewalski, B.K. Donne’s “Anniversaries” and the Poetry of Praise: The Creation of a Symbolic Mode, Princeton, N.J., 1973; repr. 1979.
Lewalski, B.K. “Donne’s Epideictic Personae, SoQ 14 (1976), 195–202.
Lewis, J.Ch. The Rhetoric of Faith:. A Study of Donne’s Use of the Conceit in the Divine Poems, Ph.D. diss., University of Washington 1964.–DA 25 (1964), 2963–2964.
MacDonald, Sr. M.L. Poetic Speech in the Sermons of John Donne, Ph.D. diss., Catholic University of America 1969. - DAI 30 (1969), 2538A.
Mahony, P. “The Anniversaries: Donne’s Rhetorical Approach to Evil”, JEGP 68 (1969), 407–413.
Malpezzi, F.M. “Christian Poetics in Donne’s Upon the Translation of the Psalmes”, Renascence 32 (1980), 221–228.
McFarland, R.E. “Figures of Repetition in John Donne’s Poetry”, Style 11 (1977), 391–406.
McGrath, L. “John Donne’s Apology for Poetry”, SEL 20 (1980), 73–89.
Melton, W.F. The Rhetoric of Donne’s Verse, Baltimore 1906; repr. Norwood, Pa., 1978.
Miles, J. “The Language of the Donne Tradition”, KR 13 (1951), 37–49.
Mueller, J.M. Donne’s ‘Ars Praedicandi’: The Development of the Methods and Themes of His Preaching, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University 1965.
Mueller, W.R. John Donne: Preacher, Princeton, N.J., 1962.
Müller, W.G. “Anrede und Selbstgespräch in John Donnes Songs and Sonnets, GRM, N.F., 24 (1974), 305–323.
Müller, W.G. “Die Definition in John Donnes Liebesdichtung Anglia 94 (1976), 86–97.
Murphy, J. “The Young Donne and the Senecan Amble”, BRMMLA 23 (1969), 163–167.
Praz, M. Secentismo e Marinismo in Inghilterra: John Donne - Richard Crashaw, Florenz 1925.
Quinn, D. “Donne’s Christian Eloquence”, ELH 27 (1960), 276–297; repr. in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 353–374.
Rajan, T. “’Nothing Sooner Broke’: Donne’s Songs and Sonnets as Self-Consuming Artifact”, ELH 49 (1982), 805–828.
Roberts, J.R. (ed.). Essential Articles for the Study of John Donne’s Poetry, Hamden, Conn., 1975.
Rockett, W. “Donne’s Libertine Rhetoric”, ES 52 (1971), 507–518.
Sloane, M.C. “Emblem and Meditation: Some Parallels in John Donne’s Poetry”, SAtB 39 (1974), 74–79.
Sloane, Th.O. The Rhetoric in the Poetry of John Donne, Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University 1960. - DA 21 (1960), 1557.
Sloane, Th.O. “A Rhetorical Analysis of John Donne’s The Prohibition, QJS 48 (1962), 38–45
Sloane, Th.O. in: Schwartz/Rycenga (eds.), The Province of Rhetoric (Nr. C. 113 ), pp. 528–538
Corbett (ed.), Rhetorical Analyses of Literary Works (Nr. C.103), pp. 3–15.
Sloane, Th.O. “The Rhetoric in the Poetry of John Donne”, SEL 3 (1963), 31–44
Sloane, Th.O. in: Roberts (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. C.759. 43 ), pp. 189–198.
Sloane, Th.O. “The Persona as Rhetor: An Interpretation of Donne’s Satyre III, QJS 51 (1965), 14–27
Sloane, Th.O. in: Roberts (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. C.759. 43 ), pp. 424–438.
Sparrow, J. “John Donne and Contemporary Preachers: Their Preparation of Sermons for Delivery and for Publication”, E and S 16 (1931), 144–178.
Stein, A. “Donne’s Harshness and the Elizabethan Tradition”, SP 41 (1944), 390–409.
Stein, A. “Donne’s Obscurity and the Elizabethan Tradition”, ELH 13 (1946), 98–118.
Stein, A. John Donne’s Lyrics: The Eloquence of Action, Minneapolis 1962.
Sullivan, A. “Donne’s Sophistry and Certain Renaissance Books of Logic and Rhetoric”, SEL 22 (1982), 107–120.
Tourney, L.D. Rhetorical Invention in Donne’s “Obsequies” and “Exequies, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara 1972. - DAI 36 (1975), 2230A.
Traci, Ph.J.“The Supposed New Rhetoric of Donne’s Songs and Sonnets, Discourse 11 (1968), 98–107.
Umbach, H.H. “The Rhetoric of Donne’s Sermons”, PMLA 52 (1937), 354–358.
Umbach, H.H. “The Merit of Metaphysical Style in Donne’s Easter Sermons”, ELH 12 (1945), 108–129.
Vickers, B. “The Songs and Sonnets and the Rhetoric of Hyperbole”, in: A.J. Smith (ed.), John Donne: Essays in Celebration, London 1972, pp. 132–174.
Wasilifky, A.M. John Donne the Rhetor: A Study of the Tropes and Figures in the St. Paul’s Sermons, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1935.
Webber, J. “The Prose Styles of John Donne’s Devotions upon Emergent Occasions”, Anglia 79 (1961), 138–152.
Webber, J. Contrary Music: The Prose Style of John Donne, Madison, Wis., 1963.
Wiggins, E.L. “Logic in the Poetry of John Donne”, SP 42 (1945), 41–60.
Carter, K.D. Drayton and Decorum: A Stylistic Study of the Relation of Ornament to Subject in “Peirs Gaveston” (1593) and “Englands Heroicall Epistles” (1619), Ph.D. diss., University of Southern California 1971. - DAI 32 (1971), 957A.
LaBranche, A. “Drayton’s The Barons Warres and the Rhetoric of Historical Poetry”, JEGP 62 (1963), 82–95.
Fogle, F.R. A Critical Study of Drummond of Hawthornden, New York 1952.
MacDonald, R.H. The Library of Drummond of Hawthorn-den, Edinburgh 1971.
Wallerstein, R.C. “The Style of Drummond of Hawthornden in its Relation to his Translations”, PMLA 48 (1933), 1090–1107.
Armstrong, W.A. Damon and Pithias and Renaissance Theories of Tragedy“, ES 39 (1958), 200–207.
Jackson, J.L. “A Use of Special Rhetoric in an Elizabethan Play”, QJS 36 (1950), 540–541.
Smith, B. “Queen Elizabeth at the Cambridge Disputations”, QJS 15 (1929), 495–503.
Taylor, A. “Proverbial Comparisons, in the Plays […]” (Nr. C. 748. 2 ).
Waith, E.M. “John Fletcher and the Art of Declamation”, PMLA 66 (1951), 226–234.
Howe, J.R. John Ford’s Figurative Language: Its Dramatic Function in Six Plays, Ph.D. diss., New York University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 3974A - 3975A.
Rechtien, J.G. “John Foxe’s Comprehensive Collection of Commonplaces (Nr. C.176).
Baytop,A.A.R. Rhetoric for “Dulce” and “Utile”: William Gager’s Critical and Dramatic Practice, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts 1966. - DA 27 (1967), 3861A - 3862A.
Hedley, J. “Allegoria: Gascoigne’s Master Trope”, ELR 11 (1981), 148–164.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Rowe, G.E. “Interpretation, Sixteenth-Century Readers, and George Gascoigne’s The Adventures of Master F.J.”, ELH 48 (1981), 271–289.
Bergman, Ch.A. Paradoxical Vision: The Style and Stylistics of Fulke Greville, Lord Brooke, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1977. - DAI 38 (1978), 6138A.
Bergman, Ch.A. “’Alarums to Desire’: Fulke Greville’s Poetic and Sonnet LVI”, Style 15 (1981), 365–381.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Pailet, L.M. Schemes and Tropes (Nr. C. 802. 46 ).
Waswo, R. The Fatal Mirror: Themes and Techniques in the Poetry of Fulke Greville, Charlottesville, Va., 1972.
Limouze, H.S. “Joseph Hall and the Prose Style of John Milton”, MiltonS 15 (1981), 121–141.
Smith, P.A. “Bishop Hall, ‘Our English Seneca’”, PMLA 63 (1948), 1191–1204.
Benet, D. Secretary of Praise: The Poetic Vocation of George Herbert, Columbia, Mo., 1984.
Boykin, J.W. George Herbert’s “The Temple”: A Study of a Theory and an Art, Ph.D. diss., University of South Carolina 1971. - DAI 32 (1972), 5731A.
Fish, S.E. “Catachizing the Reader: Herbert’s Socratean Rhetoric”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 174–188.
Freer, C. Music for a King: George Herbert’s Style and the Metrical Psalms, Baltimore 1972.
Gallagher, M.P. “Rhetoric, Style, and George Herbert”, ELH 37 (1970), 495–516.
Greenwood, E.S. “George Herbert’s Sonnet Prayer: A Stylistic Study”, EIC 15 (1965), 27–43.
Hayes, A.M. “Counterpoint in Herbert”, SP 35 (1938), 43–60.
Hegnauer, S. Systrophé (Nr. C.262).
Hughes, R.E. “George Herbert’s Rhetorical World”, Criticism 3 (1961), 86–94.
Knepprath, H.E. “George Herbert: University Orator and Country Parson”, SSJ 32 (1966), 105–112.
Leimberg, I. “George Herbert: The Sinner. Der Tempel als Memoria-Gebäude”, Archiv 206 (1970), 241–250.
Lewalski, B.K. “Emblems and the Religious Lyric: George. Herbert and Protestant Emblematics”, HUSL 6 (1978), 32–56.
Manley, F. “Toward a Definition of Plain Style in the Poetry of George Herbert”, in: M. Mack/ G. deForest Lord (eds.), Poetic Traditions of the English Renaissance, New Haven/London 1982, pp. 203–217.
McGuire, Ph.C. “Herbert’s Jordan II and the Plain Style”, Mich Acad 1 (1969), 69–74.
Miller, E. ’Drudgerie Divine’: The Rhetoric of God and Man in George Herbert (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 84), Salzburg 1979.
Rickey, M.E. Utmost Art: Complexity in the Verse of George Herbert, Lexington 1966.
Schliebs, G. Die Funktion der Strophenformen in George Herberts “The Temple” im Rahmen des literarhistorischen sowie des musik-und dichtungstheoretischen Kontextes, Diss. Gießen 1970.–EASG 1972, 77–79.
Stein, A. George Herbert’s Lyrics, Baltimore 1968.
Taylor, M. The Soul in Paraphrase: George Herbert’s Poetics (De proprietatibus litterarum, Series practica, 92), Den Haag 1974.
Wickes, G. “George Herbert’s Views on Poetry”, RLV 4 (1955), 344–352.
Deming, R.H. Ceremony and Art: Robert Herrick’s Poetry (De proprietatibus litterarum, Series practica, 64), Den Haag/Paris 1974.
Farmer, N.K. “Robert Herrick’s Commonplace Book?” (Nr. C.165).
Godshalk, W.L. “Art and Nature: Herrick and History”, EIC 17 (1967), 121–124.
McGovern, R.J. A Trust to Good Verses: Robert Herrick’s Poetics of Self, Ph.D. diss., Case Western Reserve University 1968. - DAI 30 (1970), 3911A.
Rollin, R.B. Robert Herrick (TEAS, 34), New York 1966.
Rollin, R.B./ J.M. Patrick (eds.). ’Trust to Good Verses’: Herrick Tercentenary Essays, Pittsburgh 1978.
Spitzer, L. “Herrick’s Delight in Disorder, MLN 76 (1961), 209–214; repr. in: Spitzer, Essays on English and American Literature, Princeton, N.J., 1962, pp. 132–138.
McCain, J.W. “Oratory, Rhetoric and Logic in the Writings of John Heywood”, QJS 26 (1940), 44–47.
Withington, R. “Paronomasia in John Heywood’s Plays”, Smith Coll St Mod Lang 21 (1939), 221–239.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Rauchbauer, O. “Visual and Rhetorical Imagery in Th. Heywood’s A Woman Killed with Kindness, ES 57 (1976), 200–210.
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language (Nr. C. 752. 6 ).
Alexander, R.W. A Myth of Power: Metaphor and Rhetoric in “Leviathan, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1966. - DA 27 (1967), 4213A - 4214A.
Cook, E.J. “Thomas Hobbes and the ‘Far-Fetched’”, JWCI 44 (1981), 222–232.
Sacksteder, W. “Hobbes: Philosophical and Rhetorical Artifice”, P and R 17 (1984), 30–46.
Woodfield, R. “Thomas Hobbes and the Formation of Aesthetics in England”, BJA 20 (1980), 146–152.
Zappen, J.P. “Aristotelian and Ramist Rhetoric in Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan: Pathos versus Ethos and Logos”, Rhetorica 1 /1 (1983), 65–91.
Almasy, R.P. Richard Hooker and Elizabethan Polemics, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1975. -DAI 37 (1976), 3610A - 3611A.
.Boughner, D.C. “Notes on Hooker’s Prose”, RES 15 (1939), 194–200.
Darrow, D.M. Thomas Hooker and the Puritan Art of Preaching, Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 1535A.
Edelen, G. “Hooker’s Style”, in: W.S. Hill (ed.), Studies in Richard Hooker: Essays Preliminary to an Edition of His Works, Cleveland/London 1972, pp. 241–277.
Hill, W.S. “The Authority of Hooker’s Style”, SP 67 (1970), 328–338.
Stueber, Sr. M.S. “The Balanced Diction of Hooker’s Polity, PMLA 71 (1956), 808–826.
Yoder, S.A. The Prose Style of Richard Hooker’s “Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1938.
Yoder, S.A. “’Dispositio’ in Richard Hooker’s Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, QJS 27 (1941), 90–97.
Weiser, D.K. The Prose Style of John Jewel, 1522–1571, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1970. - DAI 31 (1970), 1777A - 1778A.
Allen, D.C. “Ben Jonson and the Hieroglyphics”, PQ 18 (1939), 290–300.
Barish, J.A. “Baroque Prose in the Theater: Ben Jonson”, PMLA 73 (1958), 184–195.
Barish, J.A. Ben Jonson and the Language of Prose Comedy, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
Beaurline, L.A. Jonson and Elizabethan Comedy: Essays on Dramatic Rhetoric, San Marino, Cal., 1978.
Bocan, Sr. A. Nature and Art Themes in the Middle Comedies of Ben Jonson, Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 4705A.
Brady, H.J. Ben Jonson’s ‘Works of Judgement’: A Study of Rhetorical Strategies in the “Epigrammes, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1980. - DAI 40 (1980), 4603A.
Brown, J.L. “Bodin et Ben Jonson”, RLC 20 (19401946), 66–81.
Clubb, R.L. The Relationship of Language to Character in Ben Jonson’s “Every Man Out of His Humour, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1958. - DAI 30 (1969), 274A.
Dale, L.F. Health Imagery and Rhetoric in the Major Comedies of Ben Jonson, Ph.D. diss., Texas Technological College 1969. - DAI 30 (1970), 3427A.
Drew-Bear, A. Rhetoric in Ben Jonson’s Middle Plays: A Study of Ethos, Character Portrayal, and Persuasion (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Jacobean Drama Studies, 24), Salzburg 1973.
Duncan, D. “Ben Jonson’s Lucianic Irony”, Ariel 1 /2 (1970), 42–53.
Hallahan, H.D. “Silence, Eloquence, and Chatter in Jonson’s Epicoene, HLQ 40 (1977), 117–127.
Harvey, E.S. Pageants of Virtue (Nr. C. 802. 30 ).
Hawkins, H. “The Idea of a Theater in Jonson’s The New Inn, RenD 9 (1966), 205–226.
Herendeen, W.H. “Like a Circle Bounded in Itself: Jonson, Camden, and the Strategies of Praise”. JMRS 11 (1981), 137–167.
Houck, J.K. Rhetorical Motifs in Ben Jonson’s Early Comedy, with Special Reference to “Epicoene, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 3672A - 3673A.
Howell, A.C. “A Note on Ben Jonson’s Literary Methods”, SP 28 (1931), 710–719.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Kay, W.D. Ben Jonson, Horace, and the Poetomachia: The Development of an Elizabethan Playwright’s Public Image, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 2713A.
Lemrow, J.H. Rhetoric, Structure, and Theme in Ben Jonson’s Poems and Early Comedies, Ph.D. diss., New York University 1980. - DAI 41 (1980), 2615A.
MacDonald, A.F. Rhetorical Strategy in Ben Jonson’s Comedy, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas, Austin 1972. - DAI 34 (1973), 731A.
Marotti, A.F. “The Self-Reflexive Art of Ben Jonson’s Sejanus, TSLL 12 (1970), 197–220.
Newton, R.C. Foundations of Ben Jonson’s Poetic Style: “Epigrammes” and “The Forrest, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1970. - DAI 32 (1971), 978A.
Peterson, R.S. Imitation and Praise in the Poems of Ben Jonson, New Haven, Conn./London 1981.
Petronella, E.V. “Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair: A Study in Baroque Style”, Discourse 13 (1970), 325–337.
Pfeffer, K. Das elisabethanische Sprichwort in seiner Verwendung bei Ben Jonson, Diss. Gießen 1933.
Potts, L.J. “Ben Jonson and the Seventeenth Century”, E and S, NS, 2 (1949), 7–24.
Rowse, G.E. “Ben Jonson’s Quarrel with Audience and its Renaissance Context”, SP 81 (1984), 438–460.
Sackton, A.H. Rhetoric as a Dramatic Language in Ben Jonson, New York 1948; repr. London 1968.
Sakowitz, A.H. Language as Drama: Uses of Rhetoric in Ben Jonson, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University 1941.–Harvard University Summaries of Theses (1941), 339–341.
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language (Nr. C. 752. 6 ).
Stein, A. “Plain Style, Plain Criticism, Plain Dealing, and Ben Jonson”, ELH 30 (1963), 306–316.
Clark, R.G. A Study of the Sermons of Henry King, Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado 1969. - DAI 30 (1969), 2477A.
Walzer, A.E. ’Invention Highest Wrought’: The Rhetorical Art of Henry King’s Poems, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1975. - DAI 37 (1976), 343A.
Ardolino, F. “’Sit We Down to See the Mystery’: Detection and Allegory in The Spanish Tragedy, Allegorica 5 (1980), 168–176.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Watt, St. “Emblematic Tradition and Audience Response to Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy, Slcon 6 (1980), 95–106.
Anderson, F.D. The King’s Preacher: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Sermons of Hugh Latimer Preached Between January, 1548, and Lent, 1550, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 3283A–3284A; SM 35 (1968), 264.
Anderson, F.D. “’Dispositio’ in the Preaching of Hugh Latimer”, SM 35 (1968), 451–461.
El-Gabalawy, S. “The Burden of Proof in Hugh Latimer’s Sermons”, Ren and R, NS, 1 (1977), 103–118.
Janton, P. L’éloquence et la rhétorique dans les sermons de Hugh Latimer, Paris 1968.
Schulze, B. Latimers Kanzelberedsamkeit in der Entwicklung der kirchlichen Prosa seit den Mystikern, Münster 1924.
Thomas, G.L. “Hugh Latimer: Preacher ‘Ad Populum’”, QJS 51 (1965), 28–34.
Clewett, R.M. “Rhetorical Strategy and Structure in Three of Sir David Lindsay’s Poems”, SEL 16 (1976), 3–14.
Barish, J.A. “The Prose Style of John Lyly”, ELH 23 (1956), 14–35.
Groll, M.W. “The Sources of the Euphuistic Rhetoric”, (Nr. C.190).
Henderson, J.R. “Euphues and His Erasmus”, ELR 12 (1982), 135–161.
Hornat, J. Anglicka renesanení próza: Eufuisticka beletrie od Pettieho “Palace Potéchy” do Greenova “Pandosta” [Renaissance Prose in England: Euphuistic Fiction from Pettie’s “Pallace of Pleasure” to Greene’s “Pandosto], Prag 1970.
Hunter, G.K. John Lyly: The Humanist as Courtier, London/Cambridge, Mass., 1962.
King, W.N. “John Lyly and Elizabethan Rhetoric”, SP 52 (1955), 149–161.
Landmann, F. Der Euphuismus (Nr. C.206).
McCabe, R. “Wit, Eloquence, and Wisdom in Euphues: An Anatomy of Wit, SP 81 (1984), 299–324.
O’Hara, J.E. The Rhetoric of Love in Lyly’s “Euphues and His England” and Sidney’s “Arcadia (1590) (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 76), Salzburg 1978.
Parks, G.B. “Before Euphues, J.Q. Adams Memorial Studies, Washington, D.C., 1948, pp. 475–493.
Ringler, W. “The Immediate Source of Euphuism” (Nr. C.217).
Sandbank, S. “Euphuistic Symmetry and the Image” (Nr. C.218).
Tilley, M.P. Elizabethan Proverb Lore in Lyly’s “Euphues” and in Pettie’s “Petite pallace” with Parallels from Shakespeare, New York/London 1926.
Toor, D.S. Euphuism in England Before John Lyly (Nr. C.229).
Whipple, T.K. “Isocrates and Euphuism”, MLR 11 (1916), 15–27, 129–135.
Brooke, C.F.T. “Marlowe’s Versification and Style”, SP 19 (1922), 186–205.
Davidson, A.E./C. Davidson. “The Function of Rhetoric, Marlowe’s Tamburlaine, and ‘Reciprocal Illumination’”, BSUF 22 (1981), 20–29.
Frey, L.H. “Antithetical Balance in the Opening and Close of Doctor Faustus, MLQ 24 (1963), 350–353.
Knoepfle, J.I. The Use of Renaissance Formulas for Praise in the Dramas of Christopher Marlowe, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 3148A.
Levin, H. Christopher Marlowe: The Overreacher, London 1954; repr. 1967.
Maclntyre, J.M. Marlowe’s Use of Rhetorical Figures, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1962.–DA 23 (1963), 2518–2519.
Mitchell, R.A. ’Woorking Woordes’: Classical Imagery and the Character of Marlowe’s “Tamburlaine, Ph.D. diss., University of Nevada, Reno 1982. - DAI 43 (1982), 1154A - 1155A.
Peet, D. “The Rhetoric of Tamburlaine, ELH 26 (1959), 137–155.
Pryor, M.A. Christopher Marlowe and the Arts of Persuasion, Ph.D. diss., University of Nebraska 1966. - DA 27 (1966), 460A - 461A.
Richmond, V.E.B. The Development of the Rhetorical Death Lament from the Late Middle Ages to Marlowe, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1959. - DA 20 (1960), 2807.
Rousseau, G.S. “Marlowe’s Dido and a Rhetoric of Love”, EM 19 (1968), 25–49.
Wyler, S. “Marlowe’s Technique of Communicating with His Audience, as Seen in His Tamburlaine, Part I”, ES 48 (1967), 306–316.
Anselment, R.A. “Rhetoric and the Dramatic Satire of Martin Marprelate”, SEL 10 (1970), 103–119.
Summersgìll, T.L. “The Influence of the Marprelate Controversy upon the Style of Thomas Nashe”, SP 48 (1951), 145–160.
Berland, E. “The Function of Irony in Marston’s Antonio and Mellida, SP 66 (1969), 739–755.
Buckridge, P. “Elements of an Anti-Rhetorical Poetic in the Satires of John Marston”, Parergon 19 (1977), 11–22.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
McGrath, L. “John Marston’s Mismanaged Irony: The Poetic Satires”, TSLL 18 (1976), 393–408.
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language (Nr. C. 752. 6 ).
Weiss, A. “Rhetoric and Satire: New Light on John Marston’s Pigmalion and the Satires”, JEGP 71 (1972), 22–35.
Cunningham, J.V. “Logic and Lyric”, MP 51 (1953), 33–41.
Hodge, R.I.V. Foreshortened Time: Andrew Marvell and the Seventeenth Century Revolutions, Cambridge/Totowa, N.J., 1978.
King, R.L. The Rhetoric of Andrew Marvell’s Prose, Ph.D. diss., Boston University Graduate School 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 2216A.
Low, A./P.J. Pival. “Rhetorical Pattern in Marvell’s To His Coy Mistress, JEGP 68 (1969), 414–421.
Moldenhauer, J.J. “The Voices of Seduction in To His Coy Mistress: A Rhetorical Analysis”, TSLL 10 (1968), 198–206.
Wright, Th.F. The Use of Rhetorical Devices in Selected Poems of Andrew Marvell, Ph.D. diss., Tulane University 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 1151A.
Bashian, K.R. Rhetoric as an Art of Self Defense (Nr. C. 794. 2 ).
Crabtree, J.H. “Philip Massinger’s Use of Rhetoric in The Roman Actor, FurmS 7 /3 (1960), 40–58.
Hoy, C. “Verbal Formulae in the Plays of Philip Massinger”, SP 56 (1959), 600–618.
Waith, E.M. “’Controversia’ in the English Drama” (Nr. C. 789. 2 ).
Christ, J.P. The Achievement of Form: A Rhetorical Study of Henry Medwall’s “Fulgens and Lucres, Ph.D. diss., Fordham University 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 5355A.
Waith, E.M. “’Controversia’ in the English Drama: Medwall and Messinger”, PMLA 68 (1953), 286–303.
Bueler, L.E. “The Rhetoric of Change in The Changeling, ELR 14 (1984), 95–113.
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language (Nr. C. 752. 6 ).
Adams, B.Sch. Milton and Metaphor: The “Artis Logicae” and the Imagery of the Shorter English Poems, Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh 1964. - DA 26 (1965), 1629.
Asals, H. “Rhetoric Agonistic in Samson Agonistes, MiltonQ 11 (1977), 1–4.
Auksi, P. “Milton’s ‘Sanctifi’d Bitternesse’: Polemical Technique in the Early Prose”, TSLL 19 (1977), 363–381.
Berek, P. Rhetoric and Style in “Paradise Lost, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University 1967.
Berek, P. “’Plain’ and ‘Ornate’ Styles and the Structure of Paradise Lost, PMLA 85 (1970), 237–246.
Blanchard, J.M. “The Tree and the Garden: Pastoral Poetics and Milton’s Rhetoric of Desire”, MLN 91 (1976), 1540–1568.
Bowers, A.R. John Milton as Controversialist: Rhetorical Influences on the Structure of the Three “Defences, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 2667A.
Broadbent, J.B. The Rhetoric of “Paradise Lost, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1955–1956.
Broadbent, J.B. “Milton’s Rhetoric”, MP 56 (1958–1959), 224–242.
Burnett, A. Milton’s Style: The Shorter Poems, “Paradise Regained”, and “Samson Agonistes, London/New York 1981.
Carson, M.J. The Moral Use of Rhetoric in “Paradise Regained, Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University 1976. - DAI 37 (1976), 982A.
Cavanaugh, Sr. M.H. John Milton’s Prolusions Considered in the Light of His Rhetorical and Dialectical Education at St. Paul’s Grammar School and Cambridge University, Ph.D. diss., Fordham University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 2668A - 2669A.
Clark, D.L. John Milton at St. Paul’s School (Nr. B. 352. 3 ).
Clark, J.A. “’Copious Matter of My Song’” (Nr. C. 802. 12 ).
Collins, D.S. Rhetoric and Logic in Milton’s English Poems, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina 1960. - DA 21 (1961), 1947.
Condee, R.W. Mansus and the Panegyric Tradition“, SRen 15 (1968), 174–192.
Cope, J.I. The Metaphoric Structure of “Paradise Lost, Baltimore 1962.
Dobler, J.M. An Anatomy of Metaphor: A Method for Analyzing Figurative Language and Its Application to the Figures in “Lycidas”, “Adonais”, and “Thyrsis, Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa 1983. -.DAI 44 (1984), 2137A.
Drawver, P.S. Milton’s Knowledge and Use of Aristotle, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1964.–DA 25 (1965), 4684–4685.
Durkin, Sr. M.B. “Iterative Figures and Images in Paradise Lost, XI-XII”, MiltonS 3 (1971), 139–158.
Egan, J. The Inward Teacher: Milton’s Rhetoric of Christian Liberty (SCN Editions and Studies, 2 ), University Park, Pa., 1980.
Emma, R.D./J.T. Shawcross (eds.). Language and Style in Milton: A Symposium in Honor of the Tercentenary of “Paradise Lost, New York 1967.
Ferry, A. Milton’s Epic Voice: The Narrator in “Paradise Lost, Cambridge, Mass., 1963; Chicago/London 21983.
Fletcher, H.F. The Intellectual Development of John Milton, 2 vol., Urbana, Ill., 1956–1961, vol: II, pp. 201–270.
Frissell, H.L. Milton’s “Art of Logic” and Ramist Logic in the Major Poems, Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University 1951.- DA 12 (1952), 794–795.
Gilman, W.E. Milton’s Rhetoric: Studies in His Defense of Liberty (University of Missouri Studies, 14/3), Columbia, Mo., 1939; repr. N.Y. 1970.
Gilman, W.E. “Milton’s Rhetoric on the Tyranny of Kings”, in: Howes (ed.), Historical Studies of Rhetoric and Rhetoricians (Nr. C.107), pp. 239–253 (406).
Gregerson, L. “The Limbs of Truth: Milton’s Use of Simile in Paradise Lost, MiltonS 14 (1980), 135–152.
Grose, Ch.W. The Rhetoric of Miltonic Simile, Ph.D. diss., Washington University 1966. - DA 27 (1966), 1785A - 1786A.
Grose, Ch.W. “Milton on Ramist Similitude”, in: E. Miner (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Imagery: Essays on the Uses of Figurative Language from Donne to Farquhar, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1971, pp. 103–116.
Hall, J.M. Milton’s Rhetoric in Prose and Poetry, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1967. - DA 27 (1967), 4220A.
Hoffman, R.L. “The Rhetorical Structure of Milton’s Second Defence of the People of England, SN 43 (1971), 227–245.
Holmer, J.O. “Milton’s Hobson Poems: Rhetorical Manifestation of Wit”, MiltonQ 11 (1977), 16–21.
Hunt, C. “Lycidas” and the Italian Critics. With a Preface by I. Samuel, New Haven, Conn./London1979.
Keith, A.L. “Personification in Milton’s Paradise Lost, EJ 17 (1928), 399–409.
König, E. Die Tropen Metonymie, Synekdoche und Antonomasie in Milton5 “Paradise Lost, Diss. Wien 1951.
Kranîdas, Th. The Fierce Equation: A Study of Milton’s Decorum (Studies in English Literature, 10), Den Haag 1965.
Kranîdas, Th. “’Decorum’ and the Style of Milton’s Anti-prelatical Tracts”, SP 62 (1965), 176–187; repr. in: Fish (ed.), Seventeenth-Century Prose (Nr. C. 106 ), pp. 475–488.
Kranîdas, Th. “Milton and the Rhetoric of Zeal”, TSLL 6 (1964–1965), 423–432.
Lerner, L.D. “The Miltonic Simile”, EIC 4 (1954), 297–308.
Lewalski, B.K. Milton’s Brief Epic: The Genre, Meaning, and Art of “Paradise Regained, Providence, R.I./London 1966.
Lewis, R.B. Milton’s Use of Logic and Rhetoric in “Paradise Lost” to Develop the Character of Satan, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1949.
Limouze, H.S. “Joseph Hall and the Prose Style of John Milton” (Nr. C. 770. 1 ).
Markus, H. Die Funktion der Parenthese in Miltons “Paradise Lost, Diss. Freiburg 1965.
Martindale, C.A. “Milton and the Homeric Simile”, CL 33 (1981), 224–238.
McCarron, W.E. “The ‘Persuasive Rhetoric’ of Paradise Regained, MiltonQ 10 (1976), 15–21.
Miller, G.E. “Stylistic Rhetoric and the Language of God in Paradise Lost, Book III”, Lang and S 8 (1975), 111–126.
Miller, G.E. “Dismissive Comparisons as a Descriptive Technique in Paradise Lost, NM 78 (1977), 57–61.
Miller, G.E. “Milton’s ‘Topothesias’: Some Rhetorical Aspects of Description in Paradise Lost, CahiersE 16 (1979), 47–58.
Mohl, R. John Milton and His Commonplace Book (Nr. B. 128. 2 ).
Moss,L. “The Rhetorical Style of Samson Agonistes, MP 62 (1965), 296–301.
Murrin, M. “The Language of Milton’s Heaven”, MP 74 (1977), 350–365.
Mustazza, L. ’Such Prompt Eloquence’: Language as Agency and Character in Milton’s Epics, Ph.D. diss., State University of New York, Stony Brook 1983. - DAI 44 (1983), 1802A.
Obourn, Th.D. The Rhetoric of Milton’s “Samson Agonistes” in the Context of English Literature from Spenser to Bunyan, Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester 1982. - DAI 43 (1982), 1981A.
Ogden, H.V.S. “The Principles of Variety and Contrast” (Nr. C.212).
Ong, W.J. “Logic and the Epic Muse: Reflections on Noetic Structures in Milton’s Milieu”, in: M. Lieb/J.T. Shawcross (eds.), Achievements of the Left Hand: Essays on the Prose of John Milton, Amherst, Mass., 1974, pp. 239–268.
Pearce, D.R. “The Style of Milton’s Epic”, YR 52 (1963), 427–444.
Ricks, Ch. Milton’s Grand Style, Oxford 1963.
Shullenberger, W.A. ’The Omnific Word’: Language in Milton, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts 1982. - DAI 43 (1983), 2684A - 2685A.
Sloane, Th.O. “Reading Milton Rhetorically”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 394–410.
Smith, G.W. Milton’s ‘Prompt Eloquence’: Debate and Rhetoric, Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia 1975. - DAI 36 (1975), 2225A.
Smith, G.W. “Iterative Rhetoric in Paradise Lost, MP 74 (1976), 1–19.
Speer, D.P. “Milton’s Defensio Prima: ‘Ethos’ and Vituperation in a Polemic Engagement”, QJS 56 (1970), 277–283.
Stavely, K. The Politics of Milton’s Prose Style (Yale Studies in English, 185), New Haven/ London 1975.
Steadman, J.M. “Milton’s Rhetoric: Satan and the ‘Unjust Discourse’”, MiltonS 1 (1969), 67–92.
Steadman, J.M. “Miracle and the Epic Marvellous in Paradise Lost, Archiv 198 (1961), 289–303.
Steadman, J.M. “Allegory and Verisimilitude in Paradise Lost: The Problem of the ‘Impossible Credible’”, PMLA 78 (1963), 36–39.
Steadman, J.M. “’Magnific Titles’: Satan’s Rhetoric and the Argument of Nobility”, MLR 61 (1966), 561–571.
Steadman, J.M. “Milton and, the ‘Argumentum Paris’: Biblical Exegesis and Rhetoric”, Archiv 202 (1966), 347–360.
Steadman, J.M. “Demetrius, Tasso, and Stylistic Variation in Paradise Lost, ES 47 (1966), 329–341.
Steadman, J.M. Epic and Tragic Structure in “Paradise Lost, Chicago/London 1976.
Stein, R.A. Paradise Regained“ in the Light of Classical and Christian Traditions of Criticism and Rhetoric, Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 2685A - 2686A.
Stein, R.A. “Eloquence as Power: Another Dimension of the Hercules Simile, Paradise Regained, IV, 562–568”, MiltonQ 4 (1970), 22–24.
Svendsen, K. “Epic Address and Reference and the Principle of Decorum in Paradise Lost, PQ 28 (1949), 185–206.
Tchakirides, J. Epic Prolepsis and Repetition as Structural Devices in Milton’s “Paradise Lost, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 881A.
Thompson, E.N.S. “Milton’s Prose Style”, PQ 14 (1935), 1–15.
Tillyard, E.M.W. The Miltonic Setting, London 1938, Kap. 1.
Tricorni, A.H. “Milton and the Jonsonian Plain Style”, MiltonS 13 (1979), 129–144.
Verney, P.J. Rhetoric and the Architectonics of Milton’s Verse, Ph.D. diss., Dalhousie University 1974.
Weaver, R. “Milton’s Heroic Prose”, in: Weaver (ed.), The Ethics of Rhetoric, Chicago 1953, pp. 143–163.
West, M. “’Not without Dust and Heat’: A Ciceronianism in Milton’s Areopagitica, RES, NS, 29 (1978), 181–185.
Whaler, J. “Compounding and Distribution of Similes in Paradise Lost, MP 28 (1931), 313–327.
Whaler, J. “Grammatical ‘Nexus’ of the Miltonic Simile”, JEGP 30 (1931), 327–334.
Whaler, J. “The Miltonic Simile”, PMLA 46 (1931), 1034–1074.
Whaler, J. “Animal Simile in Paradise Lost, PMLA 47 (1932), 534–553.
Whaler, J. Counterpoint and Symbol: An Inquiry into the Rhythm of Milton’s Epic Style, Kopenhagen 1956; repr. New York 1971; Darby, Pa., 1978.
Wittreich, J.A. “Milton’s Areopagitica: Its Isocratic and Ironic Contexts”, MiltonS 4 (1972), 101–115.
Wood, N.H. Satan as Orator: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Persuasion of Eve in “Paradise Lost, Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 1701A.
Wright, N. “Milton’s Use of Latin Formularies”, SP 40 (1943), 390–398.
Wurtele, D. “’Persuasive Rhetoric’: The Techniques of Milton’s Archetypal Sophist”, ESC 3 (1977), 18–33.
Bowman, Sr. Th. The Relationship of ‘Pathos’ and Style in “A Dyalogue of Comforte Agaynste Tribulacyon”: A Rhetorical Study, Ph.D. diss., Catholic University of America 1972. - DAI 33 (1972), 3632A.
Cavanaugh, J.R. The Use of Proverbs and ‘Sententiae’ for Rhetorical Amplification in the Writings of Saint Thomas More, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1969. - DAI 31 (1970), 2336A - 2337A.
Fulham, Sr. M.V. Some Aspects of the Style of St. Thomas More in His English Letters, Ph.D. diss., Catholic University 1962.
Kinney, A.F. Rhetoric and Poetic in Thomas More’s “Utopia (Humana Civilitas, 5 ), Malibu, Cal., 1979.
McCutcheon, E. My Dear Peter: The “Ars Poetica” and Hermeneutics for More’s “Utopia, Angers 1983.
Mermel, J. The Eloquent and the Powerful: A Study of Tudor Debate on Court Service, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1976. - DAI 37 (1976), 989A.
Nelson, W. “Thomas More, Grammarian and Orator”, PMLA 58 (1943), 337–352.
Pineas, R. “Thomas More’s Use of the Dialogue Form as a Weapon of Religious Controversy”, SRen 7 (1960), 193–206.
Schoeck, R.J. “Levels of Word-Play and Figurative Signification in More’s Utopia, N and Q, NS, 1 (1954), 512–513.
Sodeman, N.R. More’s Use of Amplification in Two Dialogues, Ph.D. diss., Georgia State University - School of Arts and Sciences 1976. - DAI 37 (1977), 5148A - 5149A.
Sodeman, N.R. “Rhetoric in More’s English Dialogues”, Moreana 59–60 (1978), 13–18.
Sullivan, Sr. M.R. A Study of the Cursus in the Works of St. Thomas More, Ph.D. diss., The Catholic University of America, Washington D.C. 1943.
Anderson, G.M. The Use of Language and Rhetoric in Thomas Nashe’s “The Unfortunate Traveller, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1961. - DA 28 (1967), 209A - 210A.
Browne, Th.A. Thomas Nashe and the Traditions of Plain-Speaking, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1961. - DA 22 (1961), 1622.
Costa, P.W. ’Mixt and Mangeled’: Linguistic/ Stylistic Variety and the Case of Thomas Nashe’s Latin, Ph.D. diss., City University of New York 1980. - DAI 41 (1980), 1579A.
Crewe, J.V. Unredeemed Rhetoric: Thomas Nashe and the Scandal of Authorship, Baltimore/London 1982.
Gibbons, Sr. M. “Polemic, the Rhetorical Tradition, and The Unfortunate Traveller, JEGP 63 (1964), 408–421.
Johnson, W.J. Stylistic Development in the Prose of Thomas Nashe, Ph.D. diss., University of Texas 1967. - DA 27 (1967), 4254A - 4255A.
Kaula, D. “The Low Style in Nashe’s The Unfortunate Traveler, SEL 6 (1966), 43–57.
Liedstrand, F. Metapher und Vergleich in “The Unfortunate Traveller” von Thomas Nashe und bei seinen Vorbildern François Rabelais und Pietro Aretino, Diss. Münster 1930.
Lyons, N. “Thomas Nashe, the Antic Stylist”, MichQR 10 (1971), 113–118.
Pailet, L.M. Schemes and Tropes (Nr. C. 802. 46 ).
Seifter, B.W. The Rhetoric of Thomas Nashe, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1979. - DAI 42 (1981), 2690A.
Summersgill, T.L. “The Influence of the Marprelate Controversy upon the Style of Thomas Nashe” (Nr. C. 785. 2 ).
Ball, B.W. Rhetoric in the Plays of George Peele, Ph.D. diss., University of Kentucky 1966. - DAI 30 (1969), 2011A - 2012A.
Bashian, K.R. Rhetoric as an Art of Self Defense: An Analysis of Trial Scenes in the Works of Peele, Shakespeare, Webster, and Massinger, Ph.D. diss., New York University 1979. - DAI 40 (1979), 1476A - 1477A.
Montrose, L.A. “Gifts and Reasons: The Contexts of Peele’s Araygnement of Paris, ELH 47 (1980), 433–461.
Berquist, G.F. The Parliamentary Speaking of John Pym: 1621–1643, Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University 1957.–SM 25 (1958), 99–100.
Crowell, L. “The Speaking of John Pym, English Parliamentarian”, SM 33 (1966), 77–101.
Crowell, L. “Three Plain Speakers in Stuart England” (Nr. C.703).
Bowers, R.H. “Raleigh’s Last Speech: The ‘Elms’ Document”, RES, NS, 2 (1951), 209–216.
Sackton, A. “The Rhetoric of Literary. Praise in the Poetry of Raleigh and Chapman” (Nr. C. 752. 2 ).
Weaver, J.J.W. Rhetoric and Tragedy in Thomas Sackville’s Contributions to “The Mirror for Magistrates, Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University 1968. - DA 29 (1969), 3162A.
Alexander, N. “Hamlet and the Art of Memory”, N and Q, NS, 15 (1968), 137–139.
Alexander, N. Poison, Play, and Duel: A Study in “Hamlet”, London/Lincoln, Nebr., 1971.
Andresen, M. “’Ripeness Is All’: Sententiae and Commonplaces in King Lear, in: R.L. Colie/ F.T. Flahiff (eds.), Some Facets of ”King Lear“: Essays in Prismatic Criticism, London 1974, pp. 145–168.
Azzalino, W. “Stilkundliche Betrachtung der Reden des Brutus und des Antonius in Shakespeares Julius Caesar (III.2)”, NMs 11 (1940), 249–271.
Badawi, M.M. “Euphemism and Circumlocution in Macbeth, Cairo St Engl 7 (1960), 25–46.
Baldwin, Th.W. William Shakespeare’s Petty School, Urbana, Iii., 1943.
Baldwin, Th.W. William Shakspere’s ‘Small Latine and Lesse Greeke’ (Nr. C.670).
Baldwin, Th.W. On the Literary Genetics of Shakespeare’s Poems and Sonnets, Urbana, Ill., 1950.
Baldwin, Th.W. “Shakspere’s Aphthonian Man”, MLN 65 (1950), 111–112.
Baldwin, Th.W. On the Literary Genetics of Shakespeare’s Plays 1592–1594, Urbana, Ill., 1959.
Barroll, J.L. “Enobarbus’ Description of Cleopatra”, TSE 37 (1958), 61–78.
Bashian, K.R. Rhetoric as an Art of Self Defense (Nr. C. 794. 2 ).
Baxter, J. Shakespeare’s Poetic Styles: Verse into Drama, London/Boston/Henley 1980.
Birrell, T.A. “The Shakespearian Mixture: Recent Approaches to Shakespeare’s Handling of the Comic and Tragic Kinds”, Museum 63 (1958), 97–111.
Blunt, A. “An Echo of the ‘Paragone’ in Shakespeare”, JWCI 2 (1938–1939), 260–262.
Böhm, R. Wesen und Funktion der Sterberede im Elisabethanischen Drama (Britannica et Americana, 13), Hamburg 1964.
Booth, S. “Syntax as Rhetoric in Richard II, Mosaic 10 /3 (1977), 87–103.
Bowers, A.R. “Iconography and Rhetoric in Shakespeare’s Lucrece, SStud 14 (1981), 1–21.
Bradbrook, M.C. “Fifty Years of the Criticism of Shakespeare’s Style: A Retrospect”, ShS 7 (1954), 1–11.
Brown, J.R. “On the Acting of Shakespeare’s Plays” (Nr. C.328).
Brown, J.R. Shakespeare’s Plays in Performance (Nr. C.329).
Bunselmeyer, J.E. The Tragic Effects of Rhetoric: Shakespeare’s Use of Rhetorical Schemes in the Tragedies, Ph.D. diss., Fordham University 1973. - DAI 34 (1974), 5093A.
Burke, K. “Shakespearean Persuasion”, AR 24 (1964), 19–36.
Carnes, V. “Mind, Imagination and Art in Shakespeare’s The Tempest, NDQ 35 (1967), 93–103.
Chang, J.S.M.J. “The Language of Paradox in Romeo and Juliet, SStud 3 (1967), 22–42.
Charney, M. “Shakespeare’s Style in Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra, ELH 26 (1959), 355–367.
Charney, M. Style in “Hamlet, Princeton, N.J., 1969.
Clayton, Th. “The Quibbling Polonii and the Pious Bonds: The Rhetoric of Hamlet, I, iii”, SStud 2 (1966), 59–94.
Craig, H. “Shakespeare and Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique: An Inquiry into the Criteria for Determining Sources”, SP 28 (1931), 618–630.
Crusius, T.W. Rhetoric and Ritual in three Shakespearean Tragedies, Ph.D. diss., University Southern California 1978. - DAI 39 (1978), 2950A.
Curtin, M.E.D. Mistaking the Word and Simple Syllogisms: Form and Function in Shakespeare’s Wordplay, Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia 1978. - DAI 39 (1979), 4955A.
Danson, L.N. “Metonymy and Coriolanus, PQ 52 (1973), 30–42.
Denney, C.D.B. The Dynamics of Shakespeare’s Rhetoric: A Study of Judicial Debate in Four Plays, Ph.D. digs., Stanford University 1973. - DAI 33 (1973), 6867A - 6868A.
Dent, R.W. “Imagination in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, SQ 15 (1964), 115–129.
Dietz, H. Mittel und Methoden der politischen Massenbeeinflussung bei Shakespeare, Diss. Tübingen 1926.
Dollarhide, L.E. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” and Renaissance Rhetoric, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1954.
Donoghue, D. “Shakespeare’s Rhetoric”, StIr 47 (1958), 431–440.
Doran, M. “’High Events as These’: The Language of Hyperbole in Antony and Cleopatra, QQ 72 (1965), 26–51.
Doran, M. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language, Madison, Wis., 1976.
Draper, J.W. “Patterns of Style in Romeo and Juliet, SN 21 (1948–1949), 195–210.
Draper, J.W. “Stylistic Contrast in Shakespeare’s Plays”, WVUPP 13 (1961), 11–24.
Draper, J.W. “Prolepsis in Shakespeare’s Tragedies”, RLM 17 (1964), 165–177.
Dunbabin, R.L. “A Rhetorical Figure in Shakespeare”, MLN 41 (1926), 469–470.
Dunn, R.P. ’A Crooked Figure’: The Functions of the Tropes and Similes in Shakespeare’s History Plays, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 4766A.
Durham, L.J. The Uses of Disorder: Comic and Erotic Rhetoric in Shakespearean Tragedy, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1970. - DAI 31 (1970), 2340A.
Duthie, G.I. “Antithesis in Macbeth, ShS 19 (1966), 25–33.
Elam, K. Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedies, Cambridge 1984.
Ellis, H.A. Shakespeare’s Punning in “Love’s Labour’s Lost, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina 1963.–DA 24 (1964), 3329–3330.
Evans, R.O. The Osier Cage: Rhetorical Devices in “Romeo and Juliet, Lexington, Ky., 1966.
Ewbank, I.-S. Hamlet and the Power of Words“, ShS 30 (1977), 85–102.
Fairchild, A.H.R. “Shakespeare and the Arts of Design (Architecture, Sculpture, and Painting)”, UMS 12 /1 (1937), 1–198.
Farnham, W. The Shakespearean Grotesque: Its Genesis and Transformations, Oxford 1971.
Forrest, K.K. Speech and Power: A Renaissance Theme in “King Lear, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1976. - DAI 37 (1976), 2195A - 2196A.
Fraser, R.A. Shakespeare’s Poetics in Relation to “King Lear, London 1962.
Fregly, M.S. Studies in Shakespeare’s Use of Logic and Rhetoric, Ph.D. dìss., Gainesville University, Fla., 1967.
Fregly, M.S. From Allegory to Realistic Illusion in Renaissance Drama (Nr. C.457).
Friedman, D.M. “John of Gaunt and the Rhetoric of Frustration”, ELH 43 (1976), 279–299.
Frye, R.M. “Rhetoric and Poetry in Julius Caesar, QJS 37 (1951), 41–48.
Gent, L. Venus and Adonis: The Triumph of Rhetoric“, MLR 69 (1974), 721–729.
Goldsmith, U.K. “’Words out of a Hat!? Alliteration and Assonance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets”, JEGP 49 (1950), 33–48.
Gourlay, P.S. “Guilty Creatures Sitting at a Play: A Note on Hamlet, Act II, Scene 2”, RenQ 24 (1971), 221–225.
Green, R.M. The Treasure Chest of the Mind (Nr. C.306).
Greene, G. “’Excellent Dumb Discourse’: Silence and Grace in Shakespeare’s Tempest, SN 50 (1978), 193–205.
Grund, G.R. “Rhetoric as Metaphor: Some Notes on Dramatic Method”, EA 33 (1980), 282–295.
Gulbenkian, D.Ch. Speech Style in Shakespeare, Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University 1971. - DAI 32 (1971), 2687A.
Gurr, A.J. Elizabethan Acting and Shakespeare’s Company (Nr. C.333).
Gurr, A.J. The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642 (Nr. C.336).
Guyol, H.S. “A Temperance of Language: Goneril’s Grammar and Rhetoric”, EJ 55 (1966), 316–319.
Halio, J.L. Rhetorical Ambiguity as a Stylistic Device in Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1956. - DAI 30 (1969), 1135A.
Hammerle, K. “’The Poet’s Eye’ (MND 5.1.12): Zur Auffassung Shakespeares vom Wesen des Dichters”, IBK 1 (1953), 101–107.
Hapgood, R. “’Speak Hands for Me’: Gesture as Language in Julius Caesar, DramS 5 (1966), 162–170.
Harding, F.J.W. “Fantasy, Imagination and Shakespeare”, BJA 4 (1964), 305–320.
Hardy, B. Dramatic Quicklyisms: Malapropric Wordplay Technique in Shakespeare’s “Henriad, 2 vol. (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 85), Salzburg 1979.
Harris, P.G. Shakespeare’s Use of Rhetoric to Achieve Comic Effects in the Romantic Comedies, Ph.D. diss., Texas Tech. University 1983. - DAI 44 (1983), 759A.
Hartman, G. Die Gesten bei Shakespeare als Ausdruck von Gemütsbewegungen: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Schauspieltechnik im Elisabethanischen Zeitalter, Diss. Leipzig 1923.
Hasler, J. “Enumeration in Love’s Labour’s Lost, ES 50 (1969), 176–185.
Hawkes, T. “The Word Against the Word: The Role of Language in Richard II, Lang and S 2 (1969), 296–322.
Hays, M. “Reason’s Rhetoric: King Lear and the Social Uses of Irony”, Boundary 7 /2 (1979), 97–116.
Hockey, D.C. “A World of Rhetoric in Richard II, SS 15 (1964), 179–191.
Hunter, G.K. “Isocrates’ Precepts and Polonius’ Character”, SQ 8 (197), 501–506.
Ichikawa, S. “A Few Notes on the Rhetoric of Shakespeare”, SELit 15 (1935), 317–324.
Jones, W.J. “Shakespeare the Rhetorician”, EFLL 26 (1980), 241–271; Part II: 27 (1980), 43–70.
Joseph, Sr. M. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language (Columbia University Studies in English and Comparative Literature, 165), New York 1947; repr. 1966.
Joseph, Sr. M. Rhetoric in Shakespeare’s Time: Literary Theory of Renaissance Europe, New York 1962.
Kavros, H.E. Shakespeare and the Anti-Rhetorical Tradition, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1981. - DAI 42 (1982), 3165A.
Kennedy, M.B. The Oration in Shakespeare, Chapel Hill/London 1942.
Kerl, E. Das Hendiadyoin bei Shakespeare, Diss. Marburg 1922.
Klein, J.L. “’What Is’t to Leave Betimes?’ Proverbs and Logic in Hamlet, ShS 32 (1979), 163–176.
Kohl, N. Das Wortspiel in der Shakespeareschen Komödie: Studien zur Interdependenz von verbalem und aktìonalem Spiel in den frühen Komödien und den späten Stücken, Diss. Frankfurt 1966.
Kurka, E. “Zur Darstellung von Redner und Rede in Shakespeares Dramen”, ShJ 104 (1968), 175–191.
LaBrìola, J.Ch. Dramatic Uses of Rhetorical Description in “Julius Caesar”, “Othello”, and “Coriolanus”, with Reference to Other Shakespearean Tragedies, Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame 1972. - DAI 33 (1973), 3589A - 3590A.
Laird, D. “The Generation of Style in Romeo and Juliet, JEGP 63 (1964), 204–213.
Lavista, D.J. An Investigation into the Influence of Ramistic Rhetoric on the Rhetorical Expression of Shakespeare’s Comic Heroines, Ph.D. diss., Syracuse University 1973. - DAI 34 (1974), 7374A.
Lawrence, N.G. “A Study of Taffeta Phrases and Honest Kershey Noes”, in: Lawrence/Reynolds (eds.), Sweet Smoke of Rhetoric (Nr. C. 109 ), pp. 93–107.
Lee, S.-I. Shakespeare as a Literary Critic, Ph.D. diss., Texas Tech. University 1980. - DAI 42 (1981), 1161A - 1162A.
Leider, E.W. “Plainness of Style in King Lear, SQ 21 (1970), 45–53.
Leimberg, I. Shakespeares “Romeo und Julia”: Von der Sonettdichtung zur Liebestragödie (Beihefte zu Poetica, 4), München 1968.–EASG 1968, 38–42.
Leimberg, I. “Shakespeares Komödien und Sidneys ‘Goldene Welt’”, ShJW (1969), 174–197.
Leimberg, I. “’The truest poetry is the most feigning’–Dichtung und Wahrheit in As You Like It, in: H. Mainusch/D. Rolle (eds.), Studien zur englischen Philologie ( FS Mertner ), Frankfurt/Bern/Ciréncester 1979, pp. 51–81.
Lengeler, R. Tragische Wirklichkeit als groteske Verfremdung bei Shakespeare (Anglistische Studien, 2), Köln/Graz 1964.
Lengeler, R. Das Theater der leidenschaftlichen Phantasie: Shakespeares “Sommernachtstraum” als Spiegel seiner Dichtungstheorie (Kieler Beiträge zur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 11), Neumünster 1975.–EASG 1975, 81–84.
Levin, H. The Question of “Hamlet, Oxford 1959; repr. New York 1964.
Levin, H. “Form and Formality in Romeo and Juliet, SQ 11 (1960), 3–11.
Livingston, M.L. “The Natural Art of The Winter’s Tale, MLQ 30 (1969), 340–355.
Loeben, M.-B. v. Shakespeares sprachliche Ironie und die Entwicklung seiner Dramatik, Diss. München 1965.
MacIsaac, W.J. Set Speeches in Shakespeare: A Dramatic and Rhetorical Analysis of “Richard II, Ph.D. diss., Harvard University 1964.
Mackin, J.H. Orations and Speeches of Persuasion in Shakespeare’s Tragedies: A Summary, Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago 1962.
Maher, M.Z. A Rhetorical Analysis of Shakespeare’s “Troilus and Cressida, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1973. - DAI 34 (1973), 2060A.
Mahood, M.M. Shakespeare’s Wordplay, London 1957; repr. New York 1968.
Martin, L.C. “Shakespeare, Lucretius, and the Commonplaces”, RES 21 (1945), 174–182.
McAlindon, T. Shakespeare and Decorum, London 1973.
McCullen, J.T. “Iago’s Use of Proverbs for Persuasion”, SEL 4 (1964), 247–262.
McDonald, Ch.O. “’Decorum’, ‘Ethos’, and ’Pathos’ in the Heroes of Elizabethan Tragedy” (Nr. C.404).
McElroy, D. “Rhetorical Patterns in Hamlet, III.i.56–60”, N and Q, NS, 8 (1961), 136–138.
McElveen, I.B. Shakespeare and Renaissance Concepts of the Imagination, Ph.D. diss., University of South Carolina 1973. - DAI 35 (1974), 409A - 410A.
McKay, M.R. Shakespeare’s Use of the Apostrophe, Popular Rhetorical Device of the Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado 1969. - DAI 30 (1970), 4459A - 4460A.
Mehl, D. “Schaubild und Sprachfigur in Shakespeares Dramen”, ShJW (1970), 7–29; engl. Obers.: “Visual and Rhetorical Imagery in Shakespeare’s Plays”, E and S, NS, 25 (1972), 83–100.
Milward, P. “The Homiletic Tradition in Shakespeare’s Plays–with Special Reference to Hamlet, ShStud (Tokyo) 5 (1967), 72–87.
Mizener, A. “The Structure of Figurative Language in Shakespeare’s Sonnets”, SoR 5 (1940), 730–747; repr. in: G. Willen/V.B. Reed (eds.), A Casebook on Shakespeare’s Sonnets, New York 1964, pp. 219–235.
Moore, H.G. The Dramatic and Rhetorical Functions of Proverbial Materials in Representative Plays of Shakespeare, Ph.D. diss., Texas Tech. University 1955.
Morgues, O. “Deux triomphes de l’hyperbole”, in: M.E. Durry/R. Ellrodt/M.-T. Jones-Davies (eds.), De Shakespeare à T.S. Eliot: Mélanges offerts à Henri Fluchère (Etudes Anglaises, 63), Paris 1976, pp. 73–79.
Müller, W.G. “A Hidden Oration in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Sprachkunst 6 (1975), 104–114.
Müller, W.G. Die politische Rede bei Shakespeare, Tübingen 1979.
Müller, W.G. “The Villain as Rhetorician in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Anglia 102 (1984), 37–59.
Muir, K. “Shakespeare and Rhetoric”, ShJ 90 (1954), 49–68
Müller, W.G. “Shakespeare Among the Commonplaces”, RES, NS, 10 (1959), 283–289.
Nowottny, W.M.T. “Some Aspects of the Style of King Lear, ShS 13 (1960), 49–57.
Nowottny, W.M.T. “Shakespeare and the Orator”, in: Hommage A Shakespeare: Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg (Mai-Juin 1965), pp. 25–46.
Nowottny, W.M.T. “Some Features of Shakespeare’s Poetic Language Considered in the Light of Quintilian and Thomas Wilson”, HUSL 4 (1976), 125–137.
Nuttall, A.D. Two Concepts of Allegory: A Study of Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” and the Logic of Allegorical Expression, London 1967.
Orkin, M.R. An Examination of Shakespeare’s Use of Proverb Idiom in Four Plays: “Henry IV, Part I”, “As You Like It”, “Julius Caesar”, “Macbeth, Ph.D. thesis, University of London 1980.
Oyama, T. “Love and Its Rhetoric in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Anglica 6 (1967), 1–19.
Oyama, T. “Form and Rhetoric in Shakespearean Comedy”, ShStud (Tokyo) 11 (1972–1973), 1–27.
Palmer, D.J. “Art and Nature in Twelfth Night, CritQ 9 (1967), 201–212.
Palmer, D.J. “Art and Nature in As You Like It, PQ 49 (1970), 30–40.
Pasicki, A. “Some Rhetorical Figures in Much Ado About Nothing, KN 15 (1968), 147154.
Payne, M. “Political Myth and Rhetoric in Julius Caesar, BuR 19 (1971), 85–106.
Perle, M. Die Hyperbel und ihre Verwendung bei Shakespeare, Diss. Breslau 1933.
Peterson, D.L. “A Probable Source for Shakespeare’s Sonnet CXXIX”, SQ 5 (1954), 381–384.
Pettet, E.C. “Shakespeare’s Conception of Poetry”, E and S, NS, 3 (1950), 29–46.
Plett, H.F. “Hamlets Rede an die Schauspieler: Zur actio als Theorie des fiktionalen Handelns bei Shakespeare”, ShJW (1981), 133–153.
Plett, H.F. “’Action is eloquence’: Zur rhetorischen Aktionstypik in Shakespeares Othello, GRM 63 (1982), 1–21.
Porter, J.L. The Rhetoric of Humanism: Three Studies in the Character of Eloquence, Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon 1983. - DAI 44 (1984), 2133A.
Price, H.T. “Shakespeare as a Critic”, PQ 20 (1941), 390–399.
Purdon, N. The Words of Mercury: Shakespeare and English Mythography of the Renaissance (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 39), Salzburg 1974.
Radbill, A. ’All that’s Spoke Is Marred’: Shakespeare and the Distrust of Language, Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut 1981. - DAI 42 (1981), 1650A.
Rappoport, R./H. Boyd. “Shakespeare as a Critic of Language”, ESA 11 (1968), 135–150.
Reichert, J.F. “Sonnet XX and Erasmus’ Epistle to Perswade a Yong Gentleman to Mariage, SQ 16 (1965), 238–240.
Ringler, W.R. “Hamlet’s Defense of the Players”, in: R. Hosley (ed.), Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama ( FS Craig ), London 1963, pp. 201–211.
Roberts, D.R. Shakespeare and the Rhetoric of Stylistic Ornamentation, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1936.
Robinson, J.E. “The Ritual and Rhetoric of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, PMLA 83 (1968), 380–391.
Robinson, R.F. Shakespeare’s Orators: A Study of Shakespeare’s Use of Oratory in Eleven Representative Plays, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1966. - DA 27 (1967), 2508A.
Rushton, W.L. Shakespeare and “The Arte of English Poesie, Liverpool 1909; repr. New York 1973.
Salinger, St.J. Public Speaking and Play in Shakespeare, Ph.D. diss., Indiana University 1981. - DAI 42 (1982), 4011A.
Schäfer, J. Shakespeares Stil: Germanisches und romanisches Vokabular, Frankfurt 1973.
Schirmer, W.F. “Shakespeare und die Rhetorik”, ShJ 71 (1935), 11–31; repr. in: Schirmer, Kleine Schriften, Tübingen 1950, pp. 83–108.
Schlauch, M. “Roman ‘Controversiae’ and the Court Scene in Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice, KN 7 (1960), 35–56.
Schmidgall, G. Shakespeare and the Courtly Aesthetic, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1981.
Schmidt-Hidding, W. “Shakespeares Stilkritik in den Sonetten”, in: Shakespeare-Studien ( FS Mutschmann ), Marburg 1951, pp. 119–126.
Sehrt, E.Th. “Zur Umstimmungsszene bei Shakespeare: Hamlet, III,4”, ShJW (1966), 63–102.
Seltzer, D. “Elizabethan Acting in Othello, SQ 10 (1959), 201–210.
Simmons, J.L. “Shakespearean Rhetoric and Realism”, GaR 24 (1970), 453–471.
Smith, Ch.G. Shakespeare’s Proverb Lore: His Use of the “Sententiae” of Leonard Culman and Publilius Syrus, Cambridge, Mass., 1963.
Stockholder, K. “Power and Pleasure in Troilus and Cressida or Rhetoric and Structure of the Anti-Tragic”, CE 30 (1968–1969), 539–554.
Taft, R.J. A Rhetorical Perspective of “Romeo and Juliet, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1975. - DAI 37 (1976), 342A.
Thaler, A. “Shakespeare on Style, Imagination, and Poetry”, PMLA 53 (1938), 1019–1036.
Thaler, A. Shakespeare and Sir Philip Sidney: The Influence of “The Defense of Poesy, Cambridge, Mass., 1947; repr. New York 1967.
Trousdale, M. Shakespeare and the Rhetoricians, London 1982.
Turner, R.Y. Shakespeare’s Apprenticeship, Chicago/London 1974.
Vickers, B. The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose, London 1968.
Vickers, B. “Shakespeare’s Use of Rhetoric”, in: K. Muir/S. Schoenbaum (eds.), A New Companion to Shakespeare Studies, Cambridge 1971, pp. 83–98 (266–267).
Waddington, R.B. “Shakespeare’s Sonnet 15 and the Art of Memory”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 96–122.
Wade, J.E. Mediaeval Rhetoric in Shakespeare, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1942. - DA 5 (1942), 72.
Waldo, T.R.B. Musical Terms as Rhetoric: A Study of the Complexity of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Style (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Jacobean Drama Studies, 45), Salzburg 1975.
Webb, H.J. “’Rude am I in My Speech’”, ES 39 (1958), 67–72.
Weber, E. Das Oxymoron bei Shakespeare (Diss. Hamburg 1963), Frankfurt 1963.
Weimann, R. “Rede-Konventionen des Vice von Mankind bis Hamlet: Zur Herkunft, Dramaturgie und Struktur von ‘madness’ und ’impertinency’’, ZAA 15 (1967), 117–151.
Weinstock, H. Die Funktion elisabethanischer Sprichwörter und Pseudosprichwörter bei Shakespeare (Annales Universitatis Saraviensis: Philosophische Fakultät, 6), Heidelberg 1966.
Wickert, M. “Antikes Gedankengut in Shakespeares Julius Cäsar: 1. Brutus und die Rhetorik”, ShJ 82–83 (1948), 11–24.
Wilan, R.A. The Relation of Logic and Rhetoric to Meaning in Shakespeare’s “Troilus and Cressida, Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland 1970. - DAI 31 (1970), 2359A.
Willcock, G.D. Shakespeare as Critic of Language (Shakespeare Association Pamphlet, 18), London 1934.
Willcock, G.D. “Shakespeare and Rhetoric”, E and S 29 (1944), 50–61.
Wolfley, L.Ch. Rhetoric and Ethics in Shakespeare’s “The Rape of Lucrece”: A Study in the Morality of Style, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1972.
Wright, G.T. “Hendiadys and Hamlet, PMLA 96 (1981), 168–193.
Yuasa, N. “Rhetoric in the Sonnets of Sidney, Spenser and Shakespeare” (Nr. C. 799. 40 ).
Zandvoort, R.W. “Brutus’s Forum Speech in Julius Caesar, RES 16 (1940), 62–66.
Zimmermann, H. Die Personifikation im Drama Shakespeares (Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft West, NF, 12), Heidelberg 1975.–EASG 1975, 79–81.
Baroway, I. “Tremellius, Sidney, and Biblical Verse” (Nr. C.530).
Berrey, C.K. The Inward Turn of. C.aracter: From Rhetorical to Psychological Characterization in Sidney’s “Old” and “New Arcadia, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1980. - DAI 42 (1981), 1642A - 1643A.
Browne, R.M. “Rhetorical Analysis and Poetic Structure”, in: R.M. Gorrell (ed.), Rhetoric: Theories for Application, Champaign, Ill., 1967, pp. 90–98.
Cerny, L. ’Beautie and the use thereof’: Eine Interpretation von Sir Philip Sidneys “Arcadia (Anglistische Studien, 6), Köln/Wien 1984.
Challis, L. “The Use of Oratory in Sidney’s Arcadia, SP 62 (1965), 561–576.
Connell, D. Sir Philip Sidney: The Maker’s Mind, Oxford 1977.
Cooper, Sh.R. The Sonnets of “Astrophel and Stella”: A Stylistic Study, Den Haag 1968, Kap. 6.
Duhamel, P.A. Sir Philip Sidney and the Traditions of Rhetoric, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1945.–University of Wisconsin Abstracts of Dissertations 9 (1949), 483–484.
Duhamel, P.A. “Sidney’s Arcadia and Elizabethan Rhetoric”, SP 45 (1948), 134–150.
Freer, C. “The Style of Sidney’s Psalms”, Lang and S 2 (1969), 63–78.
Goulston, W. “The ‘Figuring Forth’ of Astrophil: Sidney’s Use of Language”, SoRA 11 (1978), 228–246.
Green, R.M. The Treasure Chest of the Mind (Nr. C.306).
Greenblatt, St.J. “Sidney’s Arcadia and the Mixed Mode”, SP 70 (1973), 269–278.
Grundy, P.N. The Nature and Function of Poetics in the Poems of Sir Philip Sidney, Ph.D. diss., Northern Illinois University 1978. - DAI 39 (1979), 4957A.
Hager, A. ’Sweet Smoke of Rhetoric’: The Eiron and his Irony in the “Defence of Poesie” and Book I of the “1590 Arcadia, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley 1978. - DAI 39 (1979), 4957A - 4958A.
Harkness, St. “The Prose Style of Sir Philip Sidney”, WisSL 2 (1918), 57–76.
Heninger, S.K. “Sidney and Boethian Music”, SEL 23 (1983), 37–46.
Howe, A.R. Astrophel and Stella: ‘Why and How’“, SP 61 (1964), 150–169.
Kalstone, D. Sidney’s Poetry: Contexts and Interpretations, Cambridge, Mass., 1965; repr. New York 1970.
Kelleher, H.G. Sidney’s Argumentative Prose and the New “Arcadia”: Classical Rhetorical Structures, Ph.D. diss., University of Denver 1977. - DAI 38 (1977), 2809A - 2810A.
Lanham, R.A. Astrophil and Stella: Pure and Impure Persuasion“, ELR 2 (1972), 100–115.
Mahl, M.R. “Sir Philip Sidney’s Scribe: The New Arcadia and The Apology for Poetry, ELN 10 (1973), 90–91.
Miller, P.M. The Rhetoric of Sidney’s “Arcadia, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1939. - DA 12 (1952), 190.
Montgomery, R.L. Symmetry and Sense: The Poetry of Sir Philip Sidney, Austin, Tex., 1961.
Montrose, L.A. “Celebration and Insinuation: Sir Philip Sidney and the Motives of Elizabethan Courtship”, RenD, NS, 8 (1977), 3–35.
Myrick, K.O. Sir Philip Sidney as a Literary Craftsman, Cambridge, Mass., 1935; repr. Lincoln, Nebr., 1965.
O’Hara, J.E. The Rhetoric of Love in Lyly’s “Euphues and His England” and Sidney’s “Arcadia (1590) (Nr. C. 783. 9 ).
Parker, R.W. “Terentian Structure and Sidney’s Original Arcadia, ELR 2 (1972), 61–78.
Rigik, E.M. ’No Eloquence Like It’: Stylistic Rhetoric in the Poetry of Sir Philip Sidney, Ph.D. diss., University of Delaware 1981. - DAI 41 (1981), 4723A - 4724A.
Rogers, D.O. “Nature and Art in Sidney’s Astrophel and Stella, SCB 31 (1971), 211–214.
Rudenstine, N. Sidney’s Poetic Development, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.
Scribner, Br.S. Figures of Word-Repetition in the First Book of Sir Philip Sidney’s “Arcadia, Washington, D.C.’, 1948.
Smart, M.J.M. Sir Philip Sidney as Ironist: An Examination of Some Rhetorical Structures in the “Old Arcadia, Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto 1976. - DAI 39 (1978), 2265A.
Stanford, Ch.L. Sir Philip Sidney: Contrasting Views on the Value and Morality of Rhetoric and Poetry, Ph.D. diss., University of Missouri, Columbia 1978. - DAI 39 (1979), 6150A.
Stroup, Th.B. “The ‘Speaking Picture’ Realized: Sidney’s 45th Sonnet”, PQ 29 (1950), 440–442.
Thaler, A. Shakespeare and Sir Philip Sidney (Nr. C. 798. 167 ).
Washington, M.A. Sir Philip Sidney: An Annotated Bibliography of Modern Criticism, Columbia, Mo., 1972.
Weiner, A.D. Sir Philip Sidney and the Poetics of Protestantism, Minneapolis 1978.
Whitney, L. “Concerning Nature in The Countesse of Pembrokes Arcadia, SP 24 (1927), 207–222.
Yuasa, N. “Rhetoric in the Sonnets of Sidney, Spenser and Shakespeare: A Morphology of Metaphor, Antanaclasis and Oxymoron”, SELit, English Number (1977), 33–52.
Fish, St.E. “Aspects of Rhetorical Analysis: Skelton’s Philip Sparrow, SN 34 (1962), 216–238.
Lievsay, J.L. “’Silver-Tongued Smith’, Paragon of Elizabethan Preachers”, HLQ 11 (1947–1948), 13–36.
Aguzzi, D.L. Allegory in the Heroic Poetry of the Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1959.–DA 20 (1960), 3736–3737.
Alpers, P.J. “Narrative and Rhetoric in the Faerie Queene, SEL 2 (1962), 27–46.
Alpers, P.J. The Poetry of “The Faerie Queene, Princeton, N.J., 1967.
Baskervill, Ch.R. “The Early Fame of The Shepheards Calender, PMLA 28 (1913), 291–313.
Bender, J.B. Spenser and Literary Pictorialism, Princeton, N.J., 1972.
Berg, K.T. van den. “’The Counterfeit in Personation’: Spenser’s Prosopopoia or Mother Hubberds Tale, in: L.L. Martz/A. Williams (eds.), The Author in his Work: Essays in a Problem in Criticism, New Haven 1978, pp. 85–102.
Beutner, Sr. M.L. Spenser and the Emblem Writers, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1941. -DA 4 (1943), 115–116.
Brereton, P.A. Book IV of Spenser’s “Faerie Queene”: A Ramistic Analysis of Friendship, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles 1975. - DAI 36 (1975), 2837A.
Cain, Th.H. “The Strategy of Praise in Spenser’s Aprill, SEL 8 (1968), 45–58.
Cain, Th.H. Praise in “The Faerie Queene, Lincoln, Nebr./London 1978.
Cincotta, M.A. “Reinventing Authority in The Faerie Queene SP 80 (1983), 25–52.
Clark, J.A. ’Copious Matter of My Sony’: Thematic and Rhetorical Paradoxes of Abundance in Spenser and Milton, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1982. - DAI 43 (1983), 3917A.
Dixon, M.F.N. “Fairy Tale, Fortune, and Boethian Wonder: Rhetorical Structure in Book VI of The Faerie Queene, UTQ 44 (1974–1975), 141–165.
Dixon, M.F.N. “Rhetorical Patterns and Methods of Advocacy in Spenser’s Shepheardes Calender, ELR 7 (1977), 131–154.
Donnelly, M. “’Dialectical Poetics’ and the Alleged Influence of Ramism on Spenser: A Reply”, in: D.A. Richardson (ed.), Spenser at Kalamazoo, 1978: Proceedings from a Special Session at the 13th Conference on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo, Cleveland 1978, pp. 20–28.
Dundas, J. “The Rhetorical Basis of Spenser’s Imagery”, SEL 8 (1968), 59–75.
Fish, St.E. “Nature as Concept and Character in the Mutabilitie Cantos, CLAJ 6 (1963), 210–215.
Fletcher, J.B. “The Painter of the Poets”, SP 14 (1917), 153–166.
Freake, D.H. Speech in “The Faerie Queene”: ‘Faire Feeling Words’, Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto 1976. - DAI 39 (1978), 2287A - 2288A.
Friedmann, A.E. The Description of Landscape in Spenser’s “Faerie Queene”: A Study of Rhetorical Tradition, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1965.–DA 26 (1966), 6039–6040.
Galyon, L.R. The Faerie Queene“, Book III: The Rhetoric of the Web, Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa 1974. - DAI 35 (1974), 2266A - 2267A.
Gohn, E.S. “A Note on Spenser’s Use of Trope”, MLN 64 (1949), 53–55.
Greenlaw,E.A. Studies in Spenser’s Historical Allegory, Baltimore 1932, New York 21967.
Guth, H.P. “Allegorical Implications of Artifice in Spenser’s Faerie Queene, PMLA 76 (1961), 474–479.
Hageman, E.H. Spenser and the Rhetoricians: A Study of Rhetorical Forms and Figures in “The Faerie Queene, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1971. - DAI 32 (1972), 6929A.
Hageman, E.H. “In Praise of Poet’s Wit: Spenser and the Sister Arts”, in: D.A. Richardson (ed.), Spenser: Classical, Medieval, Renaissance, and Modern: Proceedings from a Special Session at the 1.2th Conference on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo, Cleveland 1977, pp. 199–213.
Hamilton, A.C. The Structure of Allegory in “The Faerie Queene, Oxford 1961.
Hankins, J.E. Source and Meaning in Spenser’s Allegory: A Study of “The Faerie Queene, Oxford 1971.
Hardison, O.B. Amoretti and the ‘Dolce Stil Novo’“, ELR 2 (1972), 208–216.
Harvey, E.S. Pageants of Virtue: Common Strategies of Moral Persuasion in Edmund Spenser’s “Faerie Queene” and Ben Jonson’s Masques, Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota 1975. - DAI 36 (1976), 5316A.
Heninger, S.K. “The Implications of Form for The Shepheardes Calender, SRen 9 (1962), 309–321.
Hill, R.F. “Spenser’s Allegorical ‘Houses’”, MLR 65 (1970), 721–733.
Jessee, J.W. Spenser and the Emblem Books, Ph.D. diss., University of Kentucky 1955.
Keller, U. “Der allegorische Ort und die Funktion der Allegorie in Spensers Faerie Queene, GRM 54 (1973), 285–302.
Kennedy, W.J. “Rhetoric, Allegory, and Dramatic Modality in Spenser’s Fradubìo Episode”, ELR 3 (1973), 351–368.
Koller, K. “Art, Rhetoric, and Holy Dying in the Faerie Queene with Special Reference to the Despair Canto”, SP 61 (1964), 128–139.
MacLure, M. “Nature and Art in The Faerie Queene, ELH 28 (1961), 1–20.
MacLure, M. “Spenser’s Allegories”, UTQ 32 (1962), 83–92 [review article].
Marshall, G.A. The Tempering of Allegory: Spenser’s Humanistic Adaptations of Fourfold Method in “The Faerie Queene”, Book II, Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame 1982. - DAI 43 (1982), 1981A.
McElderry, B.R. Archaism and Innovation in Spenser’s Poetic Diction, Ph.D. diss., Iowa University 1925.
Meyer, S. “The Figures of Rhetoric in Spenser’s Colin Clout, PMLA 79 (1964), 206–218.
Meyer, S. An Interpretation of Edmund Spenser’s “Colin Clout, Cork 1969.
Morgan, K.S. Formal Style in “The Faerie Queene, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1966. - DA 27 (1967), 3846A.
Murrin, M. “The Rhetoric of Fairyland”, in: Sloan/ Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 73–95.
Neuse, R.T. Diction in “The Faerie Queene”: Some of Its Principles and Patterns, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1959.
Pailet, L.M. Schemes and Tropes as Organizational Devices in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century English Literature: Edmund Spenser, Fulke Greville and Thomas Nashe, Ph.D. diss., Arizona State University 1983. - DAI 44 (1983), 1802A.
Parker, M.P. The Allegory of “The Faerie Queene, Oxford 1960.
Pope, E.F. “Renaissance Criticism and the Diction of The Faerie Queene (Nr. 8.359.16).
Rix, H.D. “Spenser’s Rhetoric and the ‘Doleful Lay’”, MLN 53 (1938), 261–265.
Rix, H.D. Rhetoric in Spenser’s Poetry (Pennsylvania State College Studies, 7), Pennsylvania State College 1940; repr. Philadelphia, Pa., 1978.
Rosenzweig, S. “Ascham’s Scholemaster and Spenser’s February Eclogue (Nr. B. 196. 4 ).
Sheridan, E.P. Modes of Allegory in “The Faerie Queene”, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1949.
Sirluck, E. “A Note on the Rhetoric of Spenser’s ‘Despair’”, MP 47 (1949), 8–11.
Smith, Ch.G. Spenser’s Proverb Lore: With Special Reference to His Use of the “Sententiae” of Leonard Culman and Publilius Syrus, Cambridge, Mass., 1970.
Spiegler, M. Spenser’s Pictorial Rhetoric: ‘Imagines Agentes’ in “The Faerie Queene”, Book I, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles 1970. - DAI 31 (1971), 3566A.
Steele, 0.L. The Rhetorical Functions of the Narrator in “The Faerie Queene”, Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia 1965. - DA 26 (1966), 6054.
Walker, J.M. Metaphors of Art in Spenser’s “Faerie Queene, Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania 1974. - DAI 35 (1975), 5369A - 5370A.
Walker, J.M. “The Art of Memory and the Maleger Episode: Spenser’s Faerie Queene II.xi”, in: D.A. Richardson (ed.), Spenser at Kalamazoo, 1978: Proceedings from a Special Session at the 13th Conference on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo, Cleveland 1978, pp. 35–53.
Wells, R.H. Spenser’s “Faerie Queene” and the Cult of Elizabeth, London/Canberra/Totowa, N.J., 1983.
Williams, K. “Vision and Rhetoric: The Poet’s Voice in The Faerie Queene, ELH 36 (1969), 131–144.
Yuasa, N. “Rhetoric in the Sonnets of Sidney, Spenser and Shakespeare” (Nr. C. 799. 40 ).
Foley, S.M. The Honorable Style of Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey: A Critical Reading of Surrey’s Poetry, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1979. - DAI 40 (1979), 2693A - 2694A.
Jentoft, C.W. Rhetoric and Structure in the Poetry of Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University 1969. - DAI 30 (1970),.441SA–4416A.
Jentoft, C.W “Surrey’s Four ‘Orations’ and the Influence of Rhetoric on Dramatic Effect”, PLL 9 (1973), 250–262.
Jentoft, C.W “Surrey’s Five Elegies: Rhetoric, Structure, and the Poetry of Praise”, PMLA 91 (1976), 23–32.
Antoine, M.S. The Rhetoric of Jeremy Taylor’s Prose: Ornament of the Sunday Sermons, Washington 1945.
Glicksman, H. “The Figurative Quality in Jeremy Taylor’s Holy Dying, SR 30 (1922), 488–494.
Hickey, B.B. Style and Structure in the Sermons of Jeremy Taylor, Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame 1983. - DAI 43 (1983), 3325A.
King, J.R. “Certain Aspects of Jeremy Taylor’s Prose Style”, ES 37 (1956), 197–210.
Salome, Sr.A. The Rhetoric of Jeremy Taylor’s Prose, Washington 1946.
Marks, C.L. “Thomas Traherne’s Commonplace Book” (Nr. C.170).
Emerson, E.H. “John Udall and the Puritan Sermon”, QJS 44 (1958), 282–284.
Kreuzer, J.R. “Some Earlier Examples of the Rhetorical Device in Ralph Roister Doister (III.iv.33 ff.)”, RES 14 (1938), 321–323.
Reed, A.W. “Nicholas Udall and Thomas Wilson”, RES 1 (1925), 275–283.
Calhoun, Th.O. The Poetics, Unity and Continuity of Henry Vaughan’s “Silex Scintillans, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 5010A.
Steuert, D.H. “The English Prose Style of Thomas Watson, Bishop of Lincoln, 1557”, MLR 41 (1946), 225–236.
Bashian, K.R. Rhetoric as an Art of Self Defense (Nr. C. 794. 2 ).
Franklin, H.B. “The Trial Scene of Webster’s The White Devil Examined in Terms of Renaissance Rhetoric”, SEL 1 /2 (1961), 35–51.
Gentry, Th.B. The Dramatic Functions of Rhetorical Devices in the Plays of John Webster, Ph.D. diss., University of Kentucky 1962. - DAI 30 (1969), 1980A - 1981A.
Hunter, G.K. A Comparison of the Use of the ‘Sententia’ (Nr. C.166).
Stagg, L.C. Index to the Figurative Language (Nr. C. 752. 6 ).
Brilliant, A.N. “The Style of Wyatt’s The Quyete of Mynde, E and S, NS, 24 (1971), 1–21.
Daalder, J. “Rhetoric and Revision in Wyatt’s Poems”, AUMLA 31 (1969), 63–75.
Friedman, D.M. “Wyatt and the Ambiguities of Fancy”, JLGP 67 (1968), 32–48.
Griffin, A.B. The Language of Sir Thomas Wyatt, Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania 1965. - DA 26 (1965), 3316A - 3317A.
Hannen, Th.A. “The Humanism of Sir Thomas Wyatt”, in: Sloan/Waddington (eds.), The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry (Nr. C. 114 ), pp. 37–57.
Odabashian, B.D. The Rhetoric of Wyatt’s Love Lyrics: The Tension between Logic and Love, Ph.D. diss., University of Columbia 1981. - DAI 43 (1982), 1556A.
Twombly, R.G. Thomas Wyatt and the Rhetoric of Address, Ph.D. diss., Yale University 1965. - DA 26 (1965), 2227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plett, H.F. (1985). Sekundärliteratur zur Geschichte der Rhetorik und Poetik. In: Englische Rhetorik und Poetik 1479 – 1660. Forschungsberichte des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88195-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88195-3_5
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-03201-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-88195-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive