Skip to main content

Marx on the Division of Labour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 735 Accesses

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

Abstract

The division of labour was a central concern throughout Marx’s writings from the earliest to the latest writings. It has also been the focus of opposition and abuse because of Marx’s supposedly unrealistic, and allegedly utopian, views. Subtleties in Marx’s texts have been ignored, thus allowing interpreters to think that Marx foresaw the abolition of all division of labour, rather than seeing him as making trenchant criticisms of capitalist forms of division of labour with plausible judgements about future cooperation. As in many cases, it is claimed that Marx can be seen as practical and plausible, with positive ideas for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Many of the ideas in this chapter were first presented in Robert Ware, “Marx, the Division of Labor, and Human Nature,” Social Theory and Practice VIII, No. 1 (Spring 1982), pp. 43–71.

  2. 2.

    Marx used both terms, “die moderne Industrie” and “die grosse Industrie,” virtually interchangeably, although the Collected Works (MECW) translates both as “modern industry.”

  3. 3.

    The English translation is misleading in saying in the same sentence that “the communist revolution … does away with labour.”

  4. 4.

    There is a misprint in this translation of this passage. Rather than “advantages” the text has “disadvantages,” but the German was “Vorteile,” and the French version, which was edited and improved by Marx personally, has “avantages.” It is translated correctly by Ben Fowkes in Marx, p. 458.

  5. 5.

    Marx wrote of “manufacture” as the period of industry characterized by manufacturing and before modern large-scale industry.

  6. 6.

    See Braverman (1974), Braverman et al. (1976), Gorz (1976), Edwards (1979), Sohn-Rethel (1978), Friedman (1977), and Zimbalist (1979). For some discussion of this literature, see the original paper (footnote 1) in Social Theory and Practice, pp. 54–57.

  7. 7.

    Recent work includes Sayers (2011) and Huws (2003, 2007, 2014). See also Jenkins (1996) on “full and free development”.

  8. 8.

    Michael Evans (1975, p. 159) says the “theme that a communist society will involve the abolition of the division of labour runs throughout Marx’s writings.” See David McLellan (1980, pp. 39 and 166 for the same idea). See also Shlomo Avineri (1971, p. 123). Donald Weiss says (1976, p. 112): “That Marx does speak in unqualified terms about the ‘abolition of the division of labor’ is beyond dispute.”

  9. 9.

    On this see Cohen (1988, 2001, pp. 131–133) and Weiss (1976). They think that this was the abolition of the division of labour that Marx promoted, but no matter how commendable it is and no matter how compatible with Marx’s goals it may be, it is not the abolition of division of labour in either the society or the workplace. This is the view that was criticized by Llorente 2006.

References

  • Note: References to the work of Frederick Engels and Karl Marx are from Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, Collected Works. 50 Volumes, 1975–2004. New York, NY: International Publishers. (Referred to in text as “MECW” with volume and page).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avineri, Shlomo. 1971. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry, et al. 1976. Technology, the Labor Process, and the Working Class. Monthly Review 28 (3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1973. For Reasons of State. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. What Kind of Creatures are We? New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A. 1988. The Dialectic of Labour in Marx. In History, Labour, and Freedom, ed. G.A. Cohen. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001 [1978]. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Expanded ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard. 1979. Contested Terrain. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Michael. 1975. Karl Marx. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Andrew L. 1977. Industry and Labour. London, UK: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, André. 1976. The Division of Labour. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, Ursula. 2003. The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2007. The Spark in the Engine: Creative Workers in a Global Economy. London, UK: Analytica Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J.L. 1996. Marx on Full and Free Development. Social Theory and Practice 22 (2): 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorente, Renzo. 2006. Analytical Marxism and the Division of Labor. Science and Society 70 (2): 232–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, David. 1980. The Thought of Karl Marx: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London, UK: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Richard W. 1981. Productive Forces and the Forces of Change. In The Philosophical Review, vol. 90, 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, Sean. 2011. Marx and Alienation: Essays on Hegelian Themes. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Donald W. 1976. Marx versus Smith on the Division of Labor. Monthly Review, pp. 104ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, Andrew, ed. 1979. Case Studies on the Labor Process. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ware, R.X. (2019). Marx on the Division of Labour. In: Marx on Emancipation and Socialist Goals. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97716-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics