Abstract
In this chapter, we explore how quantum mechanics leads to some rather strange consequences for our notion of what is real and not real. What does quantum mechanics actually say about reality? Why does this theory make predictions that are so radically different from our everyday experience? We must answer these questions if quantum mechanics is to properly explain the world around us.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition.
- 2.
If you are not very familiar with formal logic, you can think of this as the logical equivalent of the distributive property of numbers: \(x(y+z) = xy + xz\), where multiplication plays the role of \(\mathsf {AND}\), and addition plays the role of \(\mathsf {OR}\).
- 3.
See Collapse Theories, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition.
References
A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Experimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982)
J.S. Bell, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987)
G. Birkhoff, J. von Neumann, The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37, 823 (1936); see also Quantum Logic and Probability Theory, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition
D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’ I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952); see also Bohmian Mechanics, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition
N. Bohr, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580 (1928)
A. Cabello et al., Simple Hardy-like proof of quantum contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 180404 (2013)
D. Dieks, P. Vermaas (eds.), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998); see also Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition
H. Everett, Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 1957; see also Everett’s Relative-State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics and Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition
S. Gerlich et al., Quantum interference of large organic molecules. Nat. Commun. 2, 263 (2011)
G.C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber, Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986)
L. Hardy, Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665 (1993)
N. Harrigan, R.W. Spekkens, Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010)
B. Hensen et al., Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682 (2015)
S. Kochen, E.P. Specker, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967)
N.D. Mermin, What’s wrong with this pillow? Phys. Today 42(4), 9 (1989)
N.D. Mermin, Physics: QBism puts the scientist back into science. Nature 507, 421 (2014)
R. Penrose, On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 28, 581 (1996)
A. Petersen, The philosophy of Niels Bohr. Bull. At. Sci. 19, 7 (1963)
M. Pusey, J. Barrett, T. Rudolph, On the reality of the quantum state. Nat. Phys. 8, 475 (2012)
C. Rovelli, Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1637 (1996); see also Relational Quantum Mechanics, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edition
M.A. Rowe et al., Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791 (2001)
E. Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935)
J.A. Wheeler, Information, physics, quantum: the search for links, in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, ed. by W.H. Zurek (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
10.1 Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Exercises
Exercises
-
1.
Going back to your answer to the first exercise of Chap. 1 (What is the purpose of physical theories?), does quantum mechanics fulfil the requirements implied by your answer there?
-
2.
The Pauli matrices \(\sigma _x\), \(\sigma _y\) and \(\sigma _z\) can be considered observables, since they have real eigenvalues \(+1\) and \(-1\). Consider two qubits in some quantum state, and the following array of possible observables:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{matrix} \sigma _x^{(1)} \sigma _x^{(2)} &{} \sigma _x^{(1)} \mathrm{{\mathbb {I}}}^{(2)} &{} \mathrm{{\mathbb {I}}}^{(1)} \sigma _x^{(2)} \\ \sigma _z^{(1)} \sigma _z^{(2)} &{} \mathrm{{\mathbb {I}}}^{(1)} \sigma _z^{(2)} &{} \sigma _z^{(1)} \mathrm{{\mathbb {I}}}^{(2)} \\ \sigma _y^{(1)} \sigma _y^{(2)} &{} \sigma _x^{(1)} \sigma _z^{(2)} &{} \sigma _z^{(1)} \sigma _x^{(2)} \end{matrix} \end{aligned}$$where the superscript indicates the qubit the matrix operates on.
-
(a)
Show that the three operators in every column and every row commute, and can therefore be measured simultaneously.
-
(b)
Show that each operator has eigenvalues \(\pm 1\).
-
(c)
Using the matrix form of the Pauli matrices, show that the operators in each row and column multiply to \(+{\mathbb {I}}\), except the first column, which multiplies to \(-{\mathbb {I}}\).
-
(d)
Assuming that each entry in the array has a pre-determined value of \(\pm 1\), try to populate the array such that the conditions in part (c) are satisfied. What do you conclude?
-
(a)
-
3.
Alice and Bob, positioned far away from each other, each receive an electron that is part of the entangled spin state
$$ |{\Psi ^-}\rangle = \frac{|{\uparrow \downarrow }\rangle -|{\downarrow \uparrow }\rangle }{\sqrt{2}} \, , $$where \(\uparrow \) and \(\downarrow \) define the positive and negative z-axis. Alice can freely choose to measure her electron spin in one of two directions: in the z-direction (denoted by \(\mathbf {a}\)) and in the direction an angle \(\theta _A\) away from the z-axis towards the x-axis (denoted by \(\mathbf {a}'\)). Similarly Bob can freely choose to measure his electron spin in the z-direction (denoted by \(\mathbf {b}\)) and in the direction an angle \(\theta _B\) away from the z-axis towards the x-axis (denoted by \(\mathbf {b}'\)).
-
(a)
Calculate the probabilities \(\mathrm {Pr({\textit{a}=\pm ,\textit{b}=\pm })}\) of finding the \(\pm \hbar /2\) eigenvalues in all possible measurement directions \(\mathbf {a}\), \(\mathbf {a}'\), \(\mathbf {b}\) and \(\mathbf {b}'\).
-
(b)
Define \(P(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b})\) as the expectation value over the \(\pm 1\) values of \(\mathbf {a}\cdot \mathbf {b}\):
$$\begin{aligned} P(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b}) = \,&\mathrm {Pr({\textit{a}=+,\textit{b}=+})} - \mathrm {Pr({\textit{a}=+,\textit{b}=-})} \\&- \mathrm {Pr({\textit{a}=-,\textit{b}=+})} + \mathrm {Pr({\textit{a}=-,\textit{b}=-})}\, . \end{aligned}$$What are the minimum and maximum values that \(P(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b})\) can take?
-
(c)
Without superluminal signalling between Alice and Bob, the expectation values obey the so-called CHSH inequality
$$\begin{aligned} |{P(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b})}| + |{P(\mathbf {a},\mathbf {b}')}| + |{P(\mathbf {a}',\mathbf {b})}| - |{P(\mathbf {a}',\mathbf {b}')}| \le 2\, , \end{aligned}$$which is a special case of a Bell inequality. Show that the probabilities you calculated in part (a) violate this expression when \(\theta _{\mathbf {a}} = 0\), \(\theta _{\mathbf {a}'} = \pi /2\), \(\theta _{\mathbf {b}} = \pi /4\), and \(\theta _{\mathbf {b}'} = 3\pi /4\). What do you conclude?
-
(a)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kok, P. (2018). The Nature of Reality. In: A First Introduction to Quantum Physics. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92207-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92207-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92206-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92207-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)