Abstract
The current climate policy of Ireland was set according to a 2 °C temperature rise target. Pursuing a 1.5 °C temperature increase limit requires ratcheting of decarbonisation ambition. A large ensemble of scenarios are generated with decreasing carbon budgets, and the challenges of not exceeding these carbon budgets are compared with the current 2 °C climate policy scenario. The results indicate that a national carbon budget compatible with a 1.5 °C target would need to be almost three times smaller than the carbon budget resulting from the current national climate policy. This budget is technically feasible, but extremely challenging with the current technology assumptions. A carbon budget which would be midway between 1.5 and 2 °C appears much more plausible. Cost effective decarbonisation rates are non-linear in the near-medium term, contrary to the current policy, and more ambitious carbon budget targets can only be achieved through much stronger near-term mitigation efforts than suggested by the current nationally determined contribution. Marginal Abatement Costs (MAC) increase exponentially with increasing ambition. Delayed action causes a step change increase in MAC as well as reduces the level of feasible decarbonisation ambition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allen MR, Frame DJ, Huntingford C et al (2009) Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458:1163–1166. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08019
Bergin A, Conefrey T, Fitzgerald J, Kearney I (2013) Working Paper No. 460 July 2013 The HERMES-13 macroeconomic model of the Irish economy
Chiodi A, Deane P, Gargiulo M, Ó Gallachóir B (2015) The role of bioenergy in ireland’s low carbon future—is it sustainable? J Sustain Dev Energy, Water Environ Syst 3:196–216. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.2015.03.0016
Chiodi A, Gargiulo M, Deane JP et al (2013a) Modelling the impacts of challenging 2020 non-ETS GHG emissions reduction targets on Ireland’s energy system. Energy Policy 62:1438–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.129
Chiodi A, Gargiulo M, Rogan F et al (2013b) Modelling the impacts of challenging 2050 European climate mitigation targets on Ireland’s energy system. Energy Policy 53:169–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.045
Clarke LE, Jiang K, Akimoto K, et al (2014) Assessing transformation pathways. Clim Chang 2014 Mitig Clim Chang Contrib Work Gr III to Fifth Assess Rep Intergov Panel Clim Chang 413–510
Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B (2014) IPCC, 2014: summary for policymakers. Clim Chang
European Union (2015) Intended nationally determined contribution of the EU and its member states 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.301
Gambhir A, Drouet L, McCollum D et al (2017) Assessing the feasibility of global Long-Term mitigation scenarios. Energies 10:89. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010089
Glynn J, Chiodi A, Ó Gallachóir B (2017a) Energy security assessment methods: quantifying the security co-benefits of decarbonising the irish energy system. Energy Strateg Rev 15:72–88
Glynn J, Gargiulo M, Chiodi A, et al (2017b) Ratcheting national mitigation ambition using equitable carbon budgets to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Clim Policy
Loulou R, Remme U, Kanudia A, et al (2016) Documentation for the TIMES Model Part II. IEA Energy Technol Syst Anal Program 1–78
Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2008) Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032388
Matthews HD, Gillett NP, Stott PA, Zickfeld K (2009) The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459:829–832. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08047
Millar RJ, Fuglestvedt JS, Friedlingstein P et al (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nat Geosci 10:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO3031
Pye S, Li FGN, Price J, Fais B (2017) Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris agreement era. Nat Energy 2:17024. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.24
Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Friedlingstein P et al (2016) Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat Clim Chang 6:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868
SEAI (2016) Energy in Ireland 1990–2015. 86. http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_Publications/Energy_in_Ireland/Energy-in-Ireland-1990–2015
UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Report No. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1
Yue X (2016) Techniques for running large numbers of scenarios in TIMES. IEA-ETSAP Work Cork, Ireland
European Council (2009a) Brussels European Council 29/30 OCTOBER 2009-Presidency Conclusions. Council of the European Union.
European Council (2009b) 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. Official Journal of the European Union, 5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yue, X., Rogan, F., Glynn, J., Ó Gallachóir, B. (2018). From 2 °C to 1.5 °C: How Ambitious Can Ireland Be?. In: Giannakidis, G., Karlsson, K., Labriet, M., Gallachóir, B. (eds) Limiting Global Warming to Well Below 2 °C: Energy System Modelling and Policy Development. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74424-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74423-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74424-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)