Skip to main content

Identification and Tracking of Process Inconsistencies in Manufacturing Enterprises

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover 8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017) (EPPM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1180 Accesses

Abstract

Identification and elimination of process inconsistencies is a crucial aspect of improving the competitiveness and performance of an enterprise. Analysis and understanding of inconsistencies determines the success or failure of improvement initiatives undertaken by enterprises. A process inconsistency may be considered a negative effect of internal factors on an organization’s capability. Moreover, it could be perceived as an effect of a misfit between organizational characteristics and contingencies. The main purpose of the paper is to identify the sources of process inconsistencies and examine attempts at their elimination in manufacturing enterprises. To this purpose, the paper proposes an adaptation of the classification tree analysis. This approach makes it possible to identify omitted areas of process improvement in leading manufacturing enterprises from North-Eastern Poland. The results of the analysis indicate that the attempts to eliminate problems in the examined enterprises are not fully-effective. The majority of the inconsistencies reported by employees and customers were not lastingly eliminated. The dominant source of inconsistencies was related to process and organizational aspects. The paper is intended to cast light on some of the key barriers to the implementation of the process approach through tracking inconsistencies in manufacturing enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhargav D (2017) Business process management—a construction case study. Constr Innov 17(1):50–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2015-0055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. CRC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper DR, Schindler PS (2014) Business research methods, 12th edn. The McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davenport TH (2010) Process management for knowledge work. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1 international handbooks on information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donaldson L (2006) The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In: Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Eriksen B, Snow CC (eds) Organization design the evolving state-of-the-art, Springer, US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34173-02

  6. Emery CR (2009) A cause-effect-cause model for sustaining cross-functional integration. Bus Proc Manage J 15(1):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150910931488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulledge TR, Sommer RA (1999) Process coupling in business process engineering. Knowl Process Manage 6(3):158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser B, Strauss A (1999) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glavan LM, Vukšić VB, Vlahović N (2015) Decision tree learning for detecting turning points in business process orientation: a case of Croatian companies. Croatian Oper Res Rev 6(1):207–224. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2015.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammer M (2010) What is Business Process Management? In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1 international handbooks on information systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ho SKM (1993) Problem solving in manufacturing. Manage Decis 31(7)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Izenman AJ (2008) Modern multivariate statistical techniques. Regression, classification and manifold learning. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78189-1

  13. Jeston J, Nelis J (2008) Business process management: practical guidelines to successful implementations, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jørgensen F, Boer H, Gertsen F (2003) Jump-starting continuous improvement through self-assessment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 2(10):1260–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung M, Lee Y, Lee H (2015) Classifying and prioritizing the success and failure factors of technology commercialization of public R&D in South Korea: using classification tree analysis. J Technol Transf 40(5):877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9376-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jurczuk A (2016) Reactive approach for cause analysis of business processes inconsistency. Organ Rev (Przegląd Organizacji) 3:42–48 (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jurczuk A (2016) Towards process maturity—triggers of change. In: Proceedings of 9th international scientific conference business and management. 20 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karagiannis D (2013) Business process management: a holistic management approach. In: Mayr HC, Kop Ch, Liddle S, Ginige A (eds) Information systems: methods, models and applications, lecture notes in business information processing 137:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kohlbacher M, Reijers HA (2013) The effects of process-oriented organizational design on firm performance. Bus Process Manage J 19(2):245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowy A (2011) Nine paradoxes of problem solving. Strategy Leadersh 39(3):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthews RL, Tan KH, Marzec PE (2015) Organisational ambidexterity within process improvement: an exploratory study of four project-oriented firms. J Manuf Technol Manage 26(4):458–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2013-018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormack K, Willems J, van den Bergh J, Deschoolmeester D, Willaert P, Indihar Štemberger M, Škrinjar R, Trkman P, Ladeira MB, Valadares de Oliveira MP, Bosilj Vuksic V, Vlahovic N (2009) A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Bus Proc Manage J 15(5):792–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook SM, Russo A (2001) Making inconsistency respectable in software development. J Syst Softw 58(2):171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00036-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Phogat S, Gupta AK (2017) Identification of problems in maintenance operations and comparison with manufacturing operations: a review. J Qual Maintenance Eng 23(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-06-2016-0027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders Jones JL, Linderman K (2014) Process management, innovation and efficiency performance: the moderating effect of competitive intensity. Bus Proc Manage J 20(2):335–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2013-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Škrinjar R, Trkman P (2013) Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int J Inf Manage 33(1):48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sommerville I, Sawyer P, Viller S (1999) Managing process inconsistency using view points. IEEE Trans Software Eng 25(6):784–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Talib F, Rahman Z (2015) Identification and prioritization of barriers to total quality management implementation in service industry. TQM J 27(5):591–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Trkman P (2010) The critical success factors of business process management. Int J Inf Manage 30(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. vom Brocke J, Zelt S, Schmiedel T (2016) On the role of context in business process management. Int J Inf Manage 36(3):486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walker ED, Cox JF (2006) Addressing ill-structured problems using Goldratt’s thinking processes: a white collar example. Manag Decis 44(1):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was conducted within S/WZ/1/2017 project and was financed from Ministry of Science and Higher Education funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkadiusz Jurczuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jurczuk, A. (2018). Identification and Tracking of Process Inconsistencies in Manufacturing Enterprises. In: Şahin, S. (eds) 8th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management (EPPM 2017). EPPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74123-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74122-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74123-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics