Skip to main content

Risk Journalism—In Contexts of Trans-societal Interdependence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate Change

Abstract

The term ‘climate change’ refers to a variation in the earth’s temperature, and global climate policy aims to negotiate the urgent need to restrict the process of planetary warming. While climate change can be caused by natural processes such as solar radiation, mountain building or continental drifts, the term mostly refers to ‘anthropogenic climate change’, caused by human industrial activities which are drastically changing all types of natural environmental patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ader, C. R. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (2016). A theory of world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M., et al. (2009). The communicative construction of transnational political spaces. In M. Albert et al. (Eds.), Transnational political spaces (pp. 7–34). Frankfurt and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, S. (2004). News culture. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and environment. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2009). Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology Compass, 3(2), 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2010). Communicating chemical risks: Beyond the risk society. In Eriksson, J., Gilek, M. & Ruden, C. (Eds.), Regulating Chemical Risks: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on European and Global Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2015a). Reflections on environmental communication and the challenges of a new research agenda. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 379–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2015b). News organization(s) and the production of environmental news. In A. Hansen & J. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 176–182). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., & Wolling, J. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). The risk society: Towards a new modernity. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beder, S. (2002). Global spin: The corporate assault on environmentalism. Totnes, Devon: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beder, S. (2004). Moulding and manipulating the news. In R. White (Ed.), Controversies in environmental sociology (pp. 204–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berglez, P. (2008). What is global journalism? Journalism Studies, 9(6), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700802337727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglez, P. (2011). Inside, outside, and beyond media logic: Journalistic creativity in climate reporting. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710394903.

  • Berglez, P., Hoijer, B., & Olausson, U. (2009). Individualization and nationalisation of the climate issue: Two ideological horizons in Swedish news media. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 211–223). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, J. C., & Shanahan, J. (2004). Skepticism about media effects concerning the environment: Examining Lomborg’s hypotheses. Society & Natural Resources, 17(10), 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920490505266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonetta, L. (2007). Scientists enter the blogosphere. Cell, 129(3), 443–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonetta, L. (2009). Should you be tweeting? Cell, 139(3), 452–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, T., & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2009). Climate change and the media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2007a). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39(4), 470–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2007b). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2008a). Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climate Change, 86(1–2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2008b). The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses. Environmental Conservation, 35(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s037689290800461x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2008c). The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK tabloids. Political Geography, 27, 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.05.002.

  • Boykoff, M. T., Andrews, K., Daly, M., Gifford, L., Luedecke, G., McAllister, L., et al. (2016). United States Coverage of Climate Change or Global Warming, 2004–2016. Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, CO, USA. Retrieved from http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/icecaps/research/media_coverage/usa/index.html.

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, 14(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2008). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses (Human Development Report 2007/2008). Retrieved from the Human Development Report Office, United Nations Development Programme website: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/boykoff_maxwell_and_roberts_j._timmons.pdf.

  • Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0703_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes the media coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A. (2010a). Climate change as a ‘grand narrative’ (Interview by Filippo Bonaventura). Journal of Science Communication, 9(4), 1–4. Retrieved from http://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/Jcom0904(2010)C03.pdf.

  • Carvalho, A. (2010b). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13.

  • Chalaby, J. K. (2005). From internationalization to transnationalization. Global Media and Communication, 1(1), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2013). Foreign news on television: Where in the world is the Global Village? (1st ed.). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2000). TV news, lay voices and the visualization of environmental risks. In S. Allan, B. Adam, & C. Carter (Eds.), Environmental risks and the media (pp. 29–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2009). Series Editor’s Preface: Global crises and the media. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. viii–xii). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2013). Environmental conflict in a global, media age: Beyond dualisms. In L. Lester & B. Hutchins (Eds.), Environmental conflict and the media. Global crises and the media (pp. 13–28). Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. R. (2006). Environmental communication and the public sphere. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, B. (2003). Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia Journalism Review, 42, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Park, M.-J. (2000). De-westernising media studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, M. F., & Scheufele, D. A. (2010). Diversity of television exposure and its association with the cultivation of concern for environmental risks. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903509709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djerf-Pierre, M. (2012a). The crowding-out effect. Journalism Studies, 13(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.650924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djerf-Pierre, M. (2012b). When attention drives attention: Issue dynamics in environmental news reporting over five decades. European Journal of Communication, 291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112450820.

  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012a). Handbook of comparative communication research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012b). Organizing and managing comparative research projects across nations: Models and challenges of coordinated collaboration. In I. Volkmer (Ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 521–532). London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 364: Public awareness and acceptance of CO 2 capture and storage. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf.

  • Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1989). Environmental knowledge as an organizational weapon: The case of Greenpeace. Social Science Information, 28(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901889028001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Y. H., & Mansbach, R. M. (2004). Remapping global politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firdaus, A. (2017). Media globalization and digital journalism in Malaysia: A hierarchy of influences on network newswork in glocal spheres. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2009). Environment [Poll]. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/1615/environment.aspx.

  • Gavin, N. T. (2009). The web and climate change politics lessons from Britain? In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 129–142). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, N. T. (2010). Pressure group direct action on climate change: The role of the media and the web in Britain—A case study. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12(3), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00411.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, N. T., & Marshall, T. (2011). Mediated climate change in Britain: Scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1035–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbspan, R. (2005). Boiling point: How politicians, big oil and coal, journalists, and activists have fueled the climate crisis-and what we can do to avert disaster. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, T. A., Craig, R. T., & Alpert, J. M. (2016). Covering global warming in dubious times—Environmental reporters in the new media ecosystem. Journalism, 17(4), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, S. (2009, May 13). Obama’s key climate bill hit by $45 m PR campaign. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/may/12/us-climate-bill-oil-gas.

  • Gooch, G. D. (1996). Environmental concern and the Swedish press: A case study of the effects of newspaper reporting, personal experience and social interaction on the public’s perception of environmental risks. European Journal of Communication, 11(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323196011001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. E. (2013). Television and the earth: Not a love story. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. K., Boykoff, M. T., & Evered, K. T. (Eds.). (2008). Contentious geographies: Environmental knowledge, meaning, scale. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanitzsch, T. (2009). Comparing media systems reconsidered: Recent development and directions for future research. Journal of Global Mass Communication, 1(2), 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (1993). Greenpeace and press coverage of environmental issues. In A. Hansen (Ed.), The mass media and environmental issues (pp. 150–178). Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2000). Claimsmaking and framing in British newspaper coverage of the Brent Spar controversy. In S. Allan, B. Adam, & C. Carter (Eds.), Environmental risks and the media (pp. 55–72). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2010). Environment, media and communication. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. The International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (2015). News coverage of the environment: A longitudinal perspective. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 209–220). Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A., & Cox, J. R. (2015). The Routledge handbook of environment and communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, A. (2011). Network journalism: Journalistic practice in interactive spheres. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2007). Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbert, R. L., Kwak, N., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and pro-environmental behaviors: Integrating models of media consumption and effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. (2009). Balancing acts: PR, ‘impartiality’ and power in mass media coverage of climate change. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 92–110). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Williams, R. (2011). Consumers, crazies and killer whales: The environment on New Zealand television. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlor, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2009). If we seek, do we learn? Science Communication, 30(3), 380–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003a). Global civil society: An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003b). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, J., & Stavelin, E. (2014). Computational journalism in norwegian newsrooms. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 34–48. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512786.2013.813190.

  • Kempton, W. (1991). Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environmental Change, 1, 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. I., & Spector, M. (1973). Toward a sociology of social problems: Social conditions, value-judgments, and social problems. Social Problems, 20(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/799704.

  • Lachapelle, E., Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. (2012). Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States compared. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00563.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladle, R. J., Jepson, P., & Whittaker, R. J. (2005). Scientists and the media: The struggle for legitimacy in climate change and conservation science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 30(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801805x42036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. (2010). Media and environment: Conflict, politics and the news. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. (2011). Species of the month: Anti-whaling, mediated visibility, and the news. Environmental Communication, 5(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.542768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Williams, A., & Franklin, B. (2008). A compromised fourth estate? Journalism Studies, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701767974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, R. (1983). Media concentration on local political campaigns: A study on local newspapers and campaign organizations during the 1980 nuclear power referendum in Sweden. International Communication Gazette, 31(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928303100110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2003). On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M. (2008). Recent changes in solar output and the global mean surface temperature. III. Analysis of the contributions to the global mean air surface temperature rise. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 464, 1387–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Klein, M. (2007). Harnessing collective intelligence to address global climate change. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 449–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midtun, A., Coulter, P., Gadzekpo, A., & Wang, J. (2015). Comparing media framing of climate change in developed, rapid growth and developing countries. Energy & Environment, 26(8), 1271–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, S., Takeshita, T., Kawabata, M., Sekiya, N., Nakada, M., Otani, N., et al. (2002, July 21–26). Unsolved conflict among Europe, Japan and USA on the global warming issue: Analysis of the longitudinal threads in news frame. Paper presented at the 23rd IAMCR Conference, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. M., & Riechert, B. P. (2000). Interest group strategies and journalistic norms: News media framing of environmental issues. In S. Allan, B. Adam, & C. Carter (Eds.), Environmental risks and the media (pp. 45–54). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2006). Heat: How to stop the planet burning. London and New York: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neverla, I. (2008). The IPCC-reports 1990–2007 in the media. A case-study on the dialectics between journalism and natural sciences. International Communication Conference, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M., & Newman, T. (2015). Framing, the media and environmental communication. In H. Anders & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 325–338). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S., & Boykoff, M. (2011). The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. In L. Whitmarsh, S. J. O’Neill, & I. Lorenzoni (Eds.), Engaging the public with climate change: Communication and behaviour change (pp. 233–251). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Örnebring, H. (2012). Comparative journalism research—An overview. Sociology Compass, 6(10), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00493.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J. (2013). Climate change in the media: Reporting risk and uncertainty. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEW Research Center. (2011, April 14). Japan and global warming top the bloggers’ agenda: PEJ new media index, April 4–8, 2011. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2011/04/14/japan-and-global-warming-top-bloggers-agenda/.

  • PEW Research Center. (2012, March 1). Bloggers debate global warming and scientific ethics: PEJ new media index, February 20–24, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2012/03/01/bloggers-debate-global-warming-and-scientific-ethics/.

  • Pillay, K., & Maharaj, M. (2010). An overview of Web 2.0 social media as a tool for advocacy. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Scoring IT education goals in 2010’ of the Southern African Computer Lecturers’ Association, Pretoria, June 7–9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manoj_Maharaj/publication/266502528_An_Overview_of_Web_2.0_Social_Media_as_a_tool_for_advocacy/links/543bb95d0cf2d6698be31c45.pdf.

  • Pollack, H. N. (2005). Uncertain science… uncertain world. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen, T. (2010). Methodological inter-nationalism in comparative media research: Flow studies in international communication. In A. Roosvall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the nation: National topografies of global media landscapes (pp. 25–39). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantanen, T. (2013). A critique of the systems approaches in comparative media research: A Central and Eastern European perspective. Global Media and Communication, 9(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513504175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D. (2015). Globalization of mediated spaces: The case of transnational environmentalism in China. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2263–2281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D., & Shoemaker, P. J. (2016). A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J. P., Bradley, G. L., Glendon, A. I., Ellul, M. C., & Callaghan, R. (2012). Public risk perceptions, understandings and responses to climate change and natural disasters in Australia, 2010 and 2011. Retrieved from National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF) website: https://www.nccarf.edu.au/sites/default/files/attached_files_publications/Reser_2012_Public_risk_perceptions_Second_survey_report.pdf.

  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1970). Race in international politics: A dialogue in five parts. In Charles A. Micaud (Ed.), Monograph series in world affairs (Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 149–149). Denver: University of Denver. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764270014001103.

  • Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., & Naess, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 20(6), 778–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. C., Meier, R. F., & Griffin, R. J. (1979). Constructing a social problem. The press and the environment. Social Problems, 27(1), 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J. McComas, K., & Deline, M. B. (2015). Representations of the environment on television, and their effects. In A. Hansen & J. R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 242–247). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., & Lee, J. (2012). The stories TV tells: How fictional TV narratives shape normative perceptions and personal values. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerer, T., & Lim, S. (2015). The environmental state as a model for the world? An analysis of policy repertoires in 37 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 92–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society, 11(5), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taddicken, M., & Neverla, I. (2011). Klimawandel aus Sicht der Mediennutzer. Multifaktorielles Wirkungsmodell der Medienerfahrung zur komplexen Wissensdomäne Klimawandel. Medien Kommunikationswissenschaft, 59(4), 505–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P., & Zinn, J. (2006). Risk in social science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, A. T., Lollio-Fakhreddine, J., Berent, J., Donnelly, L., Herrin, W., Paquette, Z., et al. (2008). Star power: Celebrity advocacy and the evolution of the public sphere. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 362–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/3/006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, I. (2012). Deconstructing the “Methodological Paradox”: Comparative research between national centrality and networked spaces. In I. Volkmer (Ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 110–122). London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, I. (2014). The global public sphere: Public communication in the age of reflective interdependence. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142–147. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x.

  • Willnat, L., Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (2017). The American journalist in the digital age: How journalists and the public think about journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L. E. (2015). Analysing public perceptions, understanding and images of environmental change. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 339–353). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. (2009). Media use and global warming perceptions. Communication Research, 36(5), 698–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Volkmer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Volkmer, I., Sharif, K. (2018). Risk Journalism—In Contexts of Trans-societal Interdependence. In: Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate Change. The Palgrave Macmillan Series in International Political Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73308-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics