Abstract
Is victory at the polls or successful passage of a law the only way to evaluate a campaign? This chapter considers other ways that a political strategy may be viewed be successful, such as building candidate name recognition, facilitating the election of other candidates on a ticket, gaining credibility, and developing relationships. This chapter builds evaluation skills for advocacy and electoral campaigns through selecting appropriate metrics and methods to evaluate political social work efforts. Evaluation plans should be developed alongside your other strategic planning efforts, with benchmarks in pace before your efforts start. This helps to ensure that your evaluation efforts can inform and increase the effectiveness of your work while also ensuring that you collect the relevant data to assess the outcomes of your effort. We emphasize the ways in which evaluation can be used throughout a campaign, through both formative and summative evaluation, to assess progress and refine your strategy for success. Finally, the need for attention to monitoring implementation after a political success is discussed.
References
Alice Paul Institute. (n.d.). The Equal Rights Amendment: Unfinished business for the Constitution. Retrieved from http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/index.htm.
Alliance for Justice. (2004). Investing in change: A funder’s guide to supporting advocacy. Washington, DC: Alliance for Justice.
Ash, A. (2013). A cognitive mask? Camouflaging dilemmas in street-level policy implementation to safeguard older people from abuse. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 99–115.
Belton, K. B. (2001). Assessing your advocacy efforts. Association Management, 53(2), 49–52.
Centers for Disease Control. (n.d.). Brief 1: Overview of policy evaluation. Step by step—evaluating violence and injury prevention policies.
Coffman, J., & Reed, E. (2009). Unique methods in advocacy evaluation. In Harvard Family Research Project. Innovation Network (Ed.).
Devlin-Foltz, D., Fagen, M., Reed, E., Medina, R., & Neiger, B. (2012). Advocacy evaluation: Challenges and emerging trends. Health Promotion Practice, 13(5), 581–586.
Dodson, E. A., Geary, N. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). State legislators sources and use of information: Bridging the gap between research and policy. Health Education Researc, 30(6), 840–888.
Guthrie, K., Louie, J., David, T., & Foster, C. C. (2005). The challenge of assessing policy and advocacy activities: Strategies for a prospective evaluation approach. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment.
Landers, J. (2016, April 25). When Shirley Chisholm ran for president, few would say: “I’m with her”. Smithsonian.com .
Lane, S. R., Ostrander, J. A., & Rhodes Smith, T. (2017). “Politics is social work with power”: Training social workers for elected office. Social Work Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1366975.
Levy-Pollans, J. (2013). What if there are more than two candidates in my race? Retrieved from https://www.wellstone.org/blog/2014/03/what-if-theres-more-2-candidates-my-race.
McNutt, J. G. (2011). Is social work advocacy worth the cost? Issues and barriers to an economic analysis of social work political practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(4), 397–403.
Meyers, M., Glaser, B., & MacDonald, K. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1–22.
Mickelson, J. S. (2013). Political process. In C. Franklin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
National Conference of State Legislators. (2017). Health innovations state law database: Tracking state laws for health care transformations, 2015–2017. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/health-innovations-database-2015.aspx
Ostrander, J., Lane, S. R., McClendon, J., Hayes, C., & Rhodes Smith, T. (2017). Collective power to create political change: Increasing the political efficacy and engagement of social workers.. Journal of Policy Practice.(16), 261–275
S.B. 1343. (2007). An act concerning compassionate care for victims of sexual assault. Retrieved from https://www.cga.ct.gov/asp/cgabillstatus/cgabillstatus.asp?selBillType=Bill&bill_num=1343&which_year=2007.
Tabak, R. G., Eyler, A. A., Dodson, E. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: A study to enhance advocacy. Public Health, 129(6), 698–704.
Teles, S., & Schmitt, M. (2011). The elusive craft of evaluating advocacy. Stanford Social Innovation Review.
Viscidi, L. (2017, June 23). Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris agreement challenges Latin America. The New York Times.
Whelan, J. (2008). Advocacy evaluation: Review and opportunities. Change Agency.
White House. (2017). Executive order minimizing the economic burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act pending repeal. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/2/executive-order-minimizing-economic-burden-patient-protection-and.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lane, S.R., Pritzker, S. (2018). Evaluating Political Social Work Efforts. In: Political Social Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68588-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68588-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68587-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68588-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)